Agbor, Avitus A. (2013) Instigation to Crimes Against Humanity: The Flawed Jurisprudence of the Trial and Appeal Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Ahmetasević, Nidzara (2010) “Hague Recognizes Propaganda’s Role in Srebrenica Genocide.” Balkan Insight, 7 July 2010. www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/hague-recognises-propaganda-s-role-in-srebrenica-genocide/ Accessed 11 June 2016.Google Scholar

Akhavan, Payam (2001) “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” American Journal of International Law, 95(1): 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aksenova, Marina (2016) Complicity in International Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry and Kessler, Kimberly (1997) “Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 87: 1138–93.Google Scholar

American Law Institute (2010) Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical & Emotional Harm. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 2010–2012.Google Scholar

Anders, Gerhard (2011) “Testifying About ‘Uncivilized Events’: Problematic Representations of Africa in the Trial Against Charles Taylor.” Leiden Journal of International Law. 24(4): 937–59. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156511000446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth S. and Pildes, Richard H. (2000) “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” Pennsylvania Law Review. 148: 1503–75.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth S. and Pildes, Richard H. (2001/1941) The Basic Works of Aristotle. Trans. McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (2004) Rhetoric. Trans. Roberts, W. Rhys. Dover: New York.Google Scholar

Ashworth, Andrew (2009) Principles of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ashworth, Andrew and Zedner, Lucia (2014) Preventative Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. 1st Edn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Belavusau, Uladzislau (2014) “Experts in Hate Speech Cases. Towards a Higher Standard of Proof in Strasbourg?” In Werner, Wouter and Gruszczyński, Łukasz (eds.), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 254–71.Google Scholar

Benesch, Susan (2004) “Inciting Genocide, Pleading Free Speech.” World Policy Journal, V21(2): 62–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benesch, Susan (2008) “Vile Crime or Inalienable Right: Defining Incitement to Genocide.” Virginia Journal of International Law, 48(3): 486–528.Google Scholar

Benesch, Susan (2012) “The Ghost of Causation in International Speech Crime Cases.” In Dojčinović, P. (ed.), Propaganda, War Crimes and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Abingdon, NY: Routledge, pp. 254–68.Google Scholar

Berger, Linda L. (2013) “Metaphor and Analogy: The Sun and Moon of Legal Persuasion.” Journal of Law and Policy, 22(1): 147–95.Google Scholar

Berger, Sebastian and Elsner, Wolfram (2007) “European Contributions to Evolutionary Institutional Economics: The Cases of Cumulative Circular Causation (CCC) and Open System Approach (OSA). Some Methodological and Policy Implications.” Journal of Economic Issues, 41 (2): 529–37.Google Scholar

Bernays, Edward (1928/2005) Propaganda. New York: Ig Publishing.Google Scholar

Black, Henry Campbell (2009) Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th Edn. Garner, Bryan A. (ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar

Boas, Gideon (2007) The Milosevic Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bosmajian, Haig A. (1992) Metaphor and Reason in Judicial Opinions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brass, Marcel and Haggard, Patrick (2007) “To Do or Not to Do: The Neural Signature of Self-Control.” Journal of Neuroscience. 27(34): 9141–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browning, Christopher (1998) Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Collins. First published 1992.Google Scholar

Burger, J. M. (2009) “Replicating Milgram: Would People Still Obey Today?” American Psychologist. 64: 1–11.Google Scholar

Cahill, Michael T. (2012) “Defining Inchoate Crimes: An Incomplete Attempt.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. 9: 751–9.Google Scholar

Camp, Elizabeth (2006) “Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor.” Philosophy Compass. 1/2: 154–70.Google Scholar

Campbell, Duncan (1998) “Justice at Last, 45 Years Too Late.” The Guardian. 31 July 1998.Google Scholar

Caplan, Gerald (2007) “Rwanda: Walking the Road to Genocide.” In Thompson, Allan (ed.), The Media and the Rwanda Genocide. London: Pluto Press, pp. 20–37.Google Scholar

Cardozo, Benjamin (1931) Law and Literature and Other Essays and Addresses. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Susan (2000) The Media Wars. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Carver, Richard (2000) “Broadcasting and Political Transition: Rwanda and Beyond.” In Fardon, R. and Furniss, G. (eds.), African Broadcast Cultures: Radio in Transition. Oxford: James Currey, pp. 188–97.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio (2008) International Criminal Law. 2nd Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio and Gaeta, Paola (2013) Cassese’s International Criminal Law. Revised by Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Baig, L., Fan, M., Gosnell, C. and Whiting, A.. 3rd Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavell, Stanley (1979) The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley (2005) “Passionate and Performative Utterances.” In Gordon, R. B. (ed.), Contending with Stanley Cavell. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 178–98.Google Scholar

Chiesa, Luis (2008) “Duress, Demanding Heroism and Proportionality: The Erdemovic Case and Beyond.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, (41): 741–73.Google Scholar

Chrétien, J. P., Dupaquier, J. F., Kabanda, M. and Ngarambe, J. (1995) Rwanda: Les Medias du Genocide. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kamari (2009) Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kamari (2010) “Rethinking Africa Through Its Exclusions: The Politics of Naming Criminal Responsibility.” Anthropological Quarterly 83(3): 625–52.Google Scholar

Clermont, Kevin and Sherwin, Emily (2002) “A Comparative View of Standards of Proof.” American Journal of Comparative Law. 50(2): 243–76.Google Scholar

Cohen, Felix (1935) “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach.” Columbia Law Review. 35(6): 809–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Barry E. (1974) “Four Components of the Rotter Internal-External Scale: Belief in a Difficult World, a Just World, a Predictable World, and a Politically Responsive World.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3): 381–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036015.Google Scholar

Combs, Nancy A. (2010) Fact-Finding Without Facts. The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Constable, Marianne (2014) Our Word Is Our Bond: How Legal Speech Acts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Corcoran, Hannah, Lader, Deborah and Smith, Kevin (2015) Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2014/15, Statistical Bulletin 05/15, London: UK Home Office.Google Scholar

Cryer, Robert, Friman, Håkan, Robinson, Darryl and Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (2014) An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. 3rd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dale, A. C. (2001) “Countering Hate Messages That Lead to Violence: The United Nations’ Chapter VII Authority to Use Radio Jamming to Halt Incendiary Broadcasts.” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 11: 109–451.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald (2001) “What Metaphors Mean.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd Edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 245–64.Google Scholar

Davidson, H. Ron (2004) “The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s Decision in The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana et al.: The Past, Present, and Future of International Incitement Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law, 17(3): 505–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Thomas (2009) “How the Rome Statute Weakens the International Prohibition on Incitement to Genocide.” Harvard Human Rights Journal. (22): 245–70.Google Scholar

Davis, G. Scott (1996) Religion and Justice in the War over Bosnia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

De le Brosse, Renaud (2003) Political Propaganda and a Plan to Create a “State for All Serbs”: Consequences of Using the Media for Ultra-Nationalist Ends. Report Compiled at the request of the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). 4 February 2003. Case Slobodan Milošević, Case No. IT-02–54.Google Scholar

De Quervain, D. J. F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A. and Fehr, E. (2004) “The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment.” Science. 27 August 2004; 305(5688): 1254–8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100735CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeCoux, Elizabeth L. (2007) “The Admission of Unreliable Expert Testimony Offered by the Prosecution: What’s Wrong with Daubert and How to Make It Right.” Utah Law Review. pp 131–166.Google Scholar

Del Ponte, Carla (2008) Madam Prosecutor: Confrontations with Humanity’s Worst Criminals and the Culture of Impunity: A Memoir. With Sudetic, Chuck. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar

Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte and Kelly, Tobias (2007) Paths to International Justice: Social and Legal Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Des Forges, Alison (1999) “Propaganda and Practice.” Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda. New York: Human Rights Watch. March 1999.Google Scholar

Dharmapala, Dhammika and McAdams, Richard H. (2005) “Words That Kill? An Economic Model of the Influence of Speech on Behavior (with Particular Reference to Hate Speech).” Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1): 93–136.Google Scholar

Dion, Karen, Berscheid, Ellen and Walster, Elaine (1972) “What Is Beautiful Is Good.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3): 285–290.Google Scholar

Dodd, Thomas J. Defense of Streicher, University of Connecticut: Archives & Special Collections at the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center, http://archives.lib.uconn.edu/islandora/object/20002%3A1953#page/1/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Dodd, Thomas J. Individual Responsibility of the Defendant Julius Streicher, University of Connecticut: Archives & Special Collections at the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center, http://archives.lib.uconn.edu/islandora/object/20002%3A1942#page/1/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Dodd, Thomas J. Office of US Chief of Counsel Memorandum for Mr. Dodd, Harriet Zetterberg Margolies, 29 May 1946, at http://archives.lib.uconn.edu/islandora/object/20002%3A1953#page/1/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Dodd, Thomas J. Prosecution oral Presentation against Fritzsche, University of Connecticut: Archives & Special Collections at the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center, http://archives.lib.uconn.edu/islandora/object/20002:1536#page/1/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Dojčinović, Predrag (ed.) (2012) Propaganda, War Crimes and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Abingdon, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dojčinović, Predrag (2014) “The Chameleon of Mens Rea and the Shifting Guises of Genocidal Intent in International Criminal Proceedings,” Visiting Gladstein Professor Lecture in Human Rights, University of Connecticut, 3 April 2014.Google Scholar

Donia, Robert J. (2015) Radovan Karadžić: Architect of the Bosnian Genocide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Douglas, Lawrence (1995) “Film as Witness: Screening ‘Nazi Concentration Camps’ Before the Nuremberg Tribunal.” The Yale Law Journal, 105(2): 449–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Lawrence (2001) The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dower, John (1986) War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Dressler, Joshua (2009) Understanding Criminal Law. 5th Edn. Newark: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar

Dressler, Joshua and Garvey, Stephen P. (2012) Cases and Materials in Criminal Law. 6th Edn. St. Paul, MN: West Academic.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark (2007) “The Expressive Value of Prosecuting and Punishing Terrorists: Hamdan, the Geneva Conventions, and International Criminal Law.” George Washington Law Review, 75(5–6): 1165–99.Google Scholar

Eastwood, Margaret (2012) “Hitler’s Notorious Jew-Baiter: The Prosecution of Julius Streicher.” In Dojčinović, Predrag (ed.), Propaganda, War Crimes and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Abingdon, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Enoch, David, Spectre, Levi and Fisher, Talia (2012) “Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 40(3): 197–224.Google Scholar

Eltringham, Nigel (2004) Accounting for Horror: Post-Genocide Debates in Rwanda. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Eltringham, Nigel (2006) “‘Invaders Who Have Stolen the Country’: The Hamitic Hypothesis, Race and the Rwandan Genocide.” Social Identities, 12(4): 425–46.Google Scholar

Eltringham, Nigel (2012) “Spectators to the Spectacle of Law: The Formation of a ‘Validating Public’ at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 773: 425–45.Google Scholar

Eltringham, Nigel (2013) “‘Illuminating the Broader Context’: Anthropological and Historical Knowledge at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(2): 338–55.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1990) “Multiple Processes by Which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The MODE Model as an Integrative Framework.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23: 75–110.Google Scholar

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2002) “Altruistic Punishment in Humans.” Nature, 415(6868): 137–40.Google Scholar

Feingold, A. (1992) “Good-Looking People Are Not What We Think.” Psychological Bulletin, 111: 304–41.Google Scholar

Feldman, Robin (2009) The Role of Science in Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fišer, Nenad (2012) “The Indictable Propaganda: A Bottom Up Perspective.” In Dojčinović, Predrag (ed.) Propaganda, War Crimes and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Abingdon, NY: Routledge, pp. 33–70.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley (1994) There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech and It’s a Good Thing, Too. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M. (1967) “Attitude and the Prediction of Behaviour.” In Fishbein, M. (ed.), Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M and Ajzen, I. (1974). “Attitudes Towards Objects as Predictors of Single and Multiple Behavioural Criteria.” Psychological Review, 81(1): 29–74.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. and Dupree, C. (2014). “Gaining Trust as Well as Respect in Communicating to Motivated Audiences About Science Topics.” PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(4): 13593–7.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. and Durante, F. (2014) “Never Trust a Politician? Collective Distrust, Relational Accountability, and Voter Response.” In van Prooijen, J.-W. and van Lange, P. (eds.), Power, Politics & Paranoia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P. and Xu, J. (2002) “A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6): 878–902.Google Scholar

Friedland, Steven I., Bergman, Paul and Taslitz, Andrew E. (2012) Evidence Law and Practice. 5th Edn. New Providence: LexisNexis.Google Scholar

Garland, Brent (ed.) (2004) Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind and the Scales of Justice. New York: Dana Press.Google Scholar

Gatowski, S. I., Dobbin, S. A., Richardson, J. T., Ginsburg, G. P., Merlino, M. L. and Dahir, V. (2001) “Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges and Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World.” Law and Human Behavior, 25(5): 433–58.Google Scholar

Gaudreault-DesBiens, J. (2000) “From Sisyphus’s Dilemma to Sisyphus’s Duty? A Meditation on the Regulation of Hate Propaganda in Relation to Hate Crimes and Genocide.” McGill Law Journal, 46: 121–38.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, Michael S. and Steven, Megan S. (2004) “Free Will in the Twenty-First Century: A Discussion of Neuroscience and the Law.” In Garland, Brent (ed.), Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind and the Scales of Justice. Dana Press: New York.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford (1983) “Common Sense as a Cultural System.” Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gerken, Heather (2017) “Federalism 3.0.” New York University Law School: 2017 Thomas M. Jorde Symposium, 1 March 2017.Google Scholar

Gey, Steven (2010) “The Brandenburg Paradigm and Other First Amendments.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 12: 971–1052.Google Scholar

German Criminal Code (Übersetzung des Strafgesetzbuches) (2015), Trans. Bohlander, Michael. Saarbrücken: Juris GmbH. www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.htmlGoogle Scholar

Goff, Phillip Atiba et al. (2008) “Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2): 292–306.Google Scholar

Goodale, Mark (2017) Anthropology and Law: A Critical Introduction. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, Russell (ed.) (2005) Contending with Stanley Cavell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Gregory S. (2005) “A War of Media, Words, Newspapers, and Radio Stations: The ICTR Media Trial Verdict and a New Chapter in the International Law of Hate Speech.” Virginia Journal International Law, 45(139): 1–60.Google Scholar

Gordon, Gregory S. (2008) “From Incitement to Indictment? Prosecuting Iran’s President for Advocating Israel’s Destruction and Piecing Together Incitement Law’s Emerging Analytical Framework.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 98(3): 853–920.Google Scholar

Gordon, Gregory S. (2010) “Music and Genocide: Harmonizing Coherence, Freedom and Nonviolence in Incitement Law.” Santa Clara Law Review, 50: 607–46.Google Scholar

Gordon, Gregory S. (2012) “Formulating a New Atrocity Speech Offense: Incitement to Commit War Crimes.” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 43(2): 281–316.Google Scholar

Gray, Kurt and Wegner, Daniel M. (2012) “The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil.” In Mikulincer, Mario and Shaver, Phillip R. (eds.), Morality Takes Two: Dyadic Morality and Mind Perception. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association pp. 109–27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13091–006Google Scholar

Green, Leon (1927) Rationale of Proximate Cause. Kansas City: Vernon Law Book Company.Google Scholar

Green, Michael Steven (2005) “Legal Realism as Theory of Law.” William & Mary Law Review, (46): 1915–2000. http://ssrn.com/abstract=761007Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent (1989) Speech, Crime, and the Uses of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1986) Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Groscup, Jennifer L. et. al. (2002) “The Effects of Daubert on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in State and Federal Criminal Cases.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(4): 339–72.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, Martin and Sorli, Richard (2012) The Philosophy of J. L. Austin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haidt, J., McCauley, C. and Rozin, P. (1994) “Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Disgust: A Scale Sampling Seven Domains of Disgust Elicitors.” Personality and Individual Differences, 16: 701–13.Google Scholar

Haiman, Franklyn S. (1992) “Speech Acts” and the First Amendment. Carbondale, IL; Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Hare, Ivan and Weinstein, James (eds.) (2010) Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, Lasana T. and Fiske, Susan T. (2006) “Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups.” Journal of Psychological Science, 17(10): 847–53.Google Scholar

Harris, Lasana T. and Fiske, Susan T. (2011) “Dehumanized Perception: A Psychological Means to Facilitate Atrocities, Torture and Genocide?” Journal of Psychology, 219(3): 175–81.Google ScholarPubMed

Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, Tony (1985) Causation in the Law. 2nd Edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Harvard Law Review (2012) “Evidence – Eyewitness Identifications – New Jersey Supreme Court Uses Psychological Research to Update Admissibility Standards for Out-of-Court Identifications. – State v. Henderson, 27 A.3d 872 (N.J. 2011).” 125(6): 1514–21.Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (2006) “Dehumanization: An Integrative Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3): 252–64.Google Scholar

Haslam, N., Bain, P., Douge, L., Lee, M. and Bastian, B. (2005) “More Human than You: Attributing Humanness to Self and Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6): 937–50.Google Scholar

Healy, Thomas (2009) “Brandenburg in a Time of Terror.” Notre Dame Law Review, 84(2): 655–731.Google Scholar

Hola, Barbora (2012) International Sentencing: A Game of Russian Roulette or Consistent Practice? Amsterdam: VU Universiteit/Uitgeverij BOXPress.Google Scholar

Hola, Barbora, Smeulers, A. and Bijleveld, C. (2011) “International Sentencing Facts and Figures: Sentencing Practice at the ICTY.” and ICTR, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9(2): 411–39.Google Scholar

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2002) The Responsibility to Protect: The Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar

Independent International Commission on Kosovo (2000) Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Adopted by the Assembly of States Parties. First session. New York, 3–10 September 2002. Official Records ICC-ASP/1/3. Legal citation: ICC-ASP/1/3, at 10, and Corr. 1 (2002), UN Doc. PCNICC/2000/1/Add.1 (2000).Google Scholar

International Criminal Court (2011) Elements of Crimes. The Hague: International Criminal Court. Legal Citation: ICC-PIDS-LT-03–002/11_EngGoogle Scholar

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (2015) Rules of Procedure and Evidence. IT/32/Rev.50. 8 July 2015. Hague: ICTY.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (1996) Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind. Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its forty-eighth session, 6 May–26 July 1996, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-first session, Supplement No. 10, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1996. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.532, corr. 1, corr. 3 (1996).Google Scholar

Irwin, Rachel (2012) “Prosecutors Seek 28–Year Jail Term for Šešelj.” Institute for War and Peace Reporting. http://iwpr.net/report-news/prosecutors-seek-28-year-jail-term-seselj. Accessed 9 March 2017.Google Scholar

Jacoby, Susan (1983). Wild Justice: The Evolution of Revenge. HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar

Jackson, Miles (2015) Complicity in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Janis, Mark W., Kay, Richard S. and Bradley, Anthony W. (2008) European Human Rights Law. 3rd Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila (1995) Science at the Bar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Pamela J. and Kroll-Smith, Steve (eds.) (1996) Witnessing for Sociology: Sociologists in Court. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Jordan, Constance (ed.) (2013) Reason and Imagination: The Selected Correspondence of Learned Hand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jost, J. T. and Thompson, E. P. (2000) “Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality as Independent Predictors of Self-Esteem, Ethnocentrism, and Social Policy Attitudes Among African Americans and European Americans.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3): 209–232. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1403Google Scholar

Jowett, Garth S. and O’Donnell, Victoria (2006) Propaganda and Persuasion. 4th Edn. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Jowett, Garth S. and O’Donnell, Victoria (2012) Propaganda and Persuasion. 5th Edn. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Kahan, Dan M., Hoffman, David A. and Braman, Donald (2009) “Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe? Scott v. Harris and the Perils of Cognitive Illiberalism.” Harvard Law Review, 122(3): 838–903.Google Scholar

Kahan, Dan M., Hoffman, David, Evans, Danieli, Devins, Neal, Lucci, Eugene and Cheng, Katherine (2016) “‘Ideology’ or ‘Situation Sense’? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 64: 349–439.Google Scholar

Kaid, Linda Lee (2004) Handbook of Political Communication Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Stathis (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kao, Justine T., Bergen, Leon and Goodman, Noah D. (2014) “Formalizing the Pragmatics of Metaphor Understanding.” Unpublished paper. http://cocolab.stanford.edu/papers/KaoEtAl2014.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kearney, M. G. (2007) The Prohibition of Propaganda for War in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kearney, Joseph D. and Merrill, Thomas W. (2000) “The Influence of Amicus Briefs on the Supreme Court.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 148(3): 743–855.Google Scholar

Kelly, Tobias (2011) This Side of Silence: Human Rights, Torture, and the Recognition of Cruelty. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Kelman, Herbert G. (1973) “Violence Without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers.” Journal of Social Issues, 29(4): 25–61.Google Scholar

Kelsall, Tim (2009) Culture Under Cross-Examination: International Justice and the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kiper, Jordan (2015) “War Propaganda, War Crimes and Post-Conflict Justice in Serbia: An Ethnographic Account.” The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(2): 1–20.Google Scholar

Klinkner, Melanie (2008) “Proving Genocide? Forensic Expertise and the ICTY.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 6(3): 447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klug, Heinz and Merry, Sally (eds.) (2016) The New Legal Realism: Studying Law Globally. Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krauss, Robert M. and Chiu, Chi-Yue (1997) In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. and Lindsey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41–88.Google Scholar

Kruger, J. and Gilovich, T. (2004) “Actions, Intentions, and Self-Assessment: The Road to Self-Enhancement Is Paved with Good Intentions.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3): 328–39.Google Scholar

Kuper, Leo (1985) The Prevention of Genocide. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

La Mort, Justin (2009) “The Soundtrack to Genocide in the Bikindi Trial to Protect Free Speech and Uphold the Promise of Never Again.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law, 4(1): 43–60.Google Scholar

La Tour, Bruno (2010) The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil D’État. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola (2004) A Life of HLA Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (2009) “The Neural Theory of Metaphor.” 2 January 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1437794Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lamoine, George, ed. (1992) Charges to the Grand Jury 1689–1803. Camden Fourth Series. Vol. 43. London: Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar

Langer, Máximo (2005) “The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law.” American Journal of Comparative Law, 53(4): 835–909.Google Scholar

Langton, Rae (1993) “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4): 293–330.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold (1927) Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Lewis, David (1973) “Causation.” Journal of Philosophy, 70(17): 556–67.Google Scholar

Li, Darryl (2004) “Echoes of Violence: Considerations on Radio and Genocide in Rwanda.” Journal of Genocide Research. 6(1): 9–28.Google Scholar

Libet, Benjamin W. (1999) “Do We Have Free Will?” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (8–9): 47–57.Google Scholar

Lillie, Christine M., Knapp, Brock, Harris, Lasana T. and Wilson, Richard Ashby (2015) “This Is the Hour of Revenge: The Psychology of Propaganda and Mass Atrocities.” 18 March 2015. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2580521 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580521Google Scholar

Loxley, James (2007) Performativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1965) “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4): 245–64.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catherine A. (1993) Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catherine A. (2009) Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza, & Ngeze. Case No. ICTR 99–52-T. American Journal of International Law, 98(2): 325–30.Google Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner (1982/1861) Ancient Law. London: John Murray. Original reprinted by The Legal Classics Library, Birmingham, Alabama.Google Scholar

Maravilla, Christopher Scott (2008) “Hate Speech as a War Crime: Public and Direct Incitement to Genocide in International Law.” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 17(1): 113–44.Google Scholar

Mayson, Sandra G. (2016) “Dangerous Defendants.” University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 16–30. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2826600Google Scholar

McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R. and Tabak, B. A. (2010) “Evolved Mechanisms for Revenge and Forgiveness.” In Shaver, P. R. and Mikulincer, M. (eds.), Understanding and Reducing Aggression, Violence, and Their Consequences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 221–39.Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S. and Lasswell, Harold D. (1967) “Jurisprudence in Policy-Oriented Perspective.” Yale University Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 2582 (New Haven, CT: Yale). http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2582Google Scholar

McKinley, Maggie (2016) “Lobbying and the Petition Clause.” Stanford Law Review. 68(5): 1131–1205.Google Scholar

Meijers, Tim and Glashuis, Marlies (2013) “Expression of Justice or Political Trial? Discursive Battles in the Karadžić Case.” Human Rights Quarterly 35(3): 720–52.Google Scholar

Melzer, Nils (2009) Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under Humanitarian Law. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar

Mendel, Toby (2006) Study on International Standards Relating to Incitement to Genocide or Racial Hatred. United Nations: UN Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide.Google Scholar

Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.) (2015) The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mertz, Elizabeth (ed.) (2008) The Role of Social Science in Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Mertz, Elizabeth, Macaulay, Stewart and Mitchell, Thomas W. (eds.) (2016) The New Legal Realism: Translating Law-and-Society for Today’s Legal Practice. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Metzl, J. F. (1997) “Rwandan Genocide and the International Law of Radio Jamming.” American Journal of International Law, 91(4): 628–51.Google Scholar

Miles, Thomas J. and Sunstein, Cass R. (2007) “The New Legal Realism.” University of Chicago Law Review, 75: 831–51.Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley (1974) Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart (1989/1859) On Liberty and Other Writings. Edited by Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mironko, Charles (2007) “The Effect of RTLM’s Rhetoric of Ethnic Hatred in Rural Rwanda.” In Thompson, Allan (ed.), The Media and the Rwanda Genocide. London: Pluto Press, pp. 125–35.Google Scholar

Misser, Francois and Jaumain, Yves (1994) “Death by Radio,” Index on Censorship, 23:72.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Neil J. (2004) Agents of Atrocity: Leaders, Followers and the Violation of Human Rights in Civil War. New York, NY: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Moenssens, Andre A., Bacigal, Ronald J., Ashdown, Gerald G. and Hench, Virginia E. (2003) Criminal Law. 7th Edn. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Monahan, John and Skeem, Jennifer L. (2016) “Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12: 489–513. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092945Google Scholar

Monahan, John and Laurens Walker, W. (2010) Social Science in Law: Cases and Materials, 7th Edn. New York: Thomson Reuters/Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Moore, Michael S. (2009) Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moran, Rachel (2010) “What Counts as Knowledge? A Reflection on Race, Social Science, and the Law.” Law and Society Review, 44(3/4): 515–51.Google Scholar

Morse, Stephen J. (2004) “Inevitable Mens Rea.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, (27): 51–64.Google Scholar

Morse, Stephen J. (2008) “Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, (9): 1–36.Google Scholar

Morse, Stephen J. and Roskies, Adina L. (2013) A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel (2013) “Judith Shklar Versus the International Criminal Court.” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism and Development, 4(3): 473–500.Google Scholar

Mundis, Daryl (2001) “From ‘Common Law’ Towards ‘Civil Law’: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence.” Leiden Journal of International Law, 14: 367–82.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar (1944) An American Dilemma, Volume 2: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. Vol. 2. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar (1957) Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar (1978) “Institutional Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues, 12(4): 771–83.Google Scholar

Nahmias, Eddy (2015) “Why We Have Free Will.” Scientific American. January, pp. 77–9.Google Scholar

National Research Council (2002) The Age of Expert Testimony: Science in the Courtroom, Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Daniel J. (2002) “Guilt as a Mechanism of Persuasion.” In Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M. (eds.), The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 329–44.Google Scholar

Oberschall, Anthony (2006) “Vojislav Šešelj’s Nationalist Propaganda: Contents, Techniques, Aims and Impacts, 1990–1994.” Expert report for the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Case No. IT-03–67, MFI P5.Google Scholar

Oberschall, Anthony (2012) “Propaganda, Hate Speech and Mass Killings.” In Dojčinović, Predrag (ed.), Propaganda, War Crimes and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 171–200.Google Scholar

Ohlin, Jens David (2009) “Incitement and Conspiracy to Commit Genocide.” In Gaeta, Paola (ed.), The UN Genocide Convention – A Commentary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Olatunji, B. O., Williams, N. L., Tolin, D. F., Sawchuck, C. N., Abramowitz, J. S. and Lohr, J. M. et al. (2007) “The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement.” Psychological Assessment, 19: 281–97.Google Scholar

Orentlicher, Diane (2005) “Criminalizing Hate Speech in the Crucible of Trial: Prosecutor v. Nahimana.” New England Journal of International and Comparative Law, 12(17): 1–34.Google Scholar

Osiel, Mark (2009) Making Sense of Mass Atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paul, L. A. and Hall, Ned (2013) Causation: A User’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perloff, Richard M. (2010) The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E. and Wegener, D. T. (1998) “Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications For Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 227–40.Google Scholar

Pildes, Richard H. (2014) “Institutional Formalism and Realism in Constitutional and Public Law.” 2013 Supreme Court Review, 1; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14–09. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2411141Google Scholar

Pirie, Fernanda (2013) The Anthropology of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Plato, (1993) Republic. Trans. Waterfield, Robin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Power, Samantha (2002) A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Prewitt, Kenneth, Schwandt, Thomas A. and Straf, Miron L. (eds.) (2012) Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/13460Google Scholar

Pricewaterhouse Coopers, LLP (2011) “Daubert Challenges to Financial Experts: A Yearly Study of Trends and Outcomes.” www.pwc.com/en_US/us/forensic-services/publications/assets/daubert-study-2011.pdfGoogle Scholar

Prosser, William and Page Keeton, W. (1984) Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. 5th Edn. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar

Rhodes, N. and Wood, W. (1992) “Self-Esteem and Intelligence Affect Influenceability: The Mediating Role of Message Reception.” Psychological Bulletin, 111: 156–71.Google Scholar

Rikhof, Joseph (2005) “Hate Speech and International Criminal Law: The Mugesera Decision by the Supreme Court of Canada.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3(5): 1121–33.Google Scholar

Risinger, D. Michael (2000) “Navigating Expert Reliability: Are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock?” Albany Law Review, 64(1): 99–149.Google Scholar

Robinson, John Paul, Shaver, Phillip R. and Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (eds.) (1991) Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Volume 1 (Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H. and Cahill, Michael T. (2012) “Causation: The Requirements for Holding an Actor Accountable for a Result.” In Cahill, Michael T., Robinson, Paul H. and Baughman, Shima Baradaran (eds.), Criminal Law: Cases and Controversies. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michael (2001) “Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis.” Public Law Research Paper No. 41. Cardozo Law School: Yeshiva University, New York.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Sophia (2011) Common Sense: A Political History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rossini, Andrea Oskari (2016) “Šešelj Verdict: The Dissenting Judge.” Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, 8 April 2016. www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/Serbia/Seselj-verdict-the-dissenting-judge-169740. Accessed 9 March 2017.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1965) On the Philosophy of Science. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Ruzindana, Mathias (2012) “The Challenges of Understanding Kinyarwanda Key Terms Used to Instigate the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda.” In Dojčinović, Predrag (ed.), Propaganda, War Crimes and International Law: From Speakers’ Corner to War Crimes. Abingdon, NY: Routledge, pp. 145–70.Google Scholar

Ruzindana, Mathias, Rwigamba, Balinda and Nkusi, Laurent (1998) The Kinyarwanda Language: Its Use and Impact in the Various Media During the Period 1990–1994: A Sociolinguistic Study. March. Prosecution Exhibit P110A in ICTR-99–52-T (Nahimana, et al.).Google Scholar

Rwandan Patriotic Front, www.rpfinkotanyi.org/en/index.php. Accessed 21 November 2014.Google Scholar

Saks, Michael J. and Faigman, David L. (2005) “Expert Evidence After Daubert”. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1: 105–130.Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence and Umphrey, Martha Merrill (2007) How Law Knows. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A. (1999) “International Decision: Mugesera v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. American Journal of International Law. 93(2): 529–33. DOI: 10.2307/2998009.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A. (2000) “Hate Speech in Rwanda: The Road to Genocide.” McGill Law Journal, 46: 141–71.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A. (2007) An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 3rd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schabas, William A. (2009) Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes. 2nd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffer, David and Dinh, Anthony (2010) “The Pre-Trial Chamber’s Significant Decision on Joint Criminal Enterprise for Individual Responsibility.” 3 June 2010. www.cambodiatribunal.org/sites/default/files/resources/ctm_scheffer_dinh_jce_commentary_3_june_2010.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2017.Google Scholar

Seaman, Julie (2008) “Triangulating Testimonial Hearsay: The Constitutional Boundaries of Expert Opinion Testimony.” Georgetown Law Journal, 96: 827–84.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1983) Intentionality: An Essay on the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1994) “Metaphor.” In Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1995) Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language and Political Power. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1998) Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (2001) Rationality in Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith (1986) Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger (1993) Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger (2003) “Response to the March 1998 Report and Testimony of Dr. Mathias Ruzindana.” 20 January 2003. Report with Author.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger (2005) Creating Language Games: How Law Enforcement Uses (and Misuses) Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sluiter, Göran (2007) “Compromising the Authority of International Criminal Justice–How Vojislav Šešelj Runs His Trial.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(2): 529–36.Google Scholar

Smith, S. M. and Shaffer, D. R. (1995) “Speed of Speech and Persuasion: Evidence for Multiple Effects.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 21: 1051–60.Google Scholar

Sopory, Pradeep and Dillard, James P. (2002) “Figurative Language and Persuasion.” In Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M. (eds.), The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, pp. 407–426.Google Scholar

Sproule, J. M. (1994) Channels of Propaganda. Bloomington, IN: Edinfo.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane (1988) “Law, Causation and Common Sense.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1): 111–31.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane (2001) “Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences.” Vanderbilt Law Review, 54(3): 941–1009.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Jane (2008) “Choosing What We Mean by ‘Causation’ in the Law.” Missouri Law Review. 73(2): 433–80.Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan (1978) “Illness as Metaphor.” New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan (1989) “Aids and Its Metaphors.” New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan (1991) Illness as Metaphor. AIDS and Its Metaphors. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Stewart, James G. (2012a) “Overdetermined Atrocities.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(5): 1189–1218.Google Scholar

Stewart, James G. (2012b) “The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes.” Leiden Journal of International Law, 25(1): 165–219.Google Scholar

Stewart, James G. (2014) “Complicity.” In Dubber, Markus and Hörnle, Tatjana (eds.), Oxford Criminal Law Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Straus, Scott (2006) The Order of Genocide: Race, Power, and War in Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Straus, Scott (2007) “What Is the Relationship Between Hate Radio and Violence? Rethinking Rwanda’s ‘Radio Machete.’” Politics & Society, 35(4): 609–37.Google Scholar

Sumner, L.W. (2011) “Criminalizing Expression: Hate Speech and Obscenity.” In Deigh, John and Dolinko, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass (1995) “The Expressive Function of the Law.” Pennsylvania Law Review, 144: 2021–53.Google Scholar

Surdukowski, Jay (2005) “Is Poetry a War Crime-Reckoning for Radovan Karadzic the Poet-Warrior.” Michigan Journal of International Law, 26(2): 673–99.Google Scholar

Swigart, Leigh (2015) “African Languages in International Criminal Justice: the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and Beyond.” In Chernor Jalloh, Charles and Marong, Alhagi B. M. (eds.), Promoting Accountability Under International Law for Gross Human Rights Violations in Africa: Essays in Honor of Prosecutor Hassan Bubacar Jallow. The Hague: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 578–611.Google Scholar

Tabeau, Ewa and Bijak, Jakub (2005) “War-Related Deaths in the 1992–1995 Armed Conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Critique of Previous Estimates and Recent Results.” European Journal of Population, 21: 187–215.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2008) “Understanding Legal Realism,” St. John’s Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08–0133. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1127178Google Scholar

Taylor, Christopher (1999) Sacrifice as Terror: the Rwandan Genocide of 1994. Oxford: Berg Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Telford (1992) The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Wibke K. (2005) “The Relationship Between Hate Propaganda and Incitement to Genocide: A New Trend in International Law Towards Criminalization of Hate Propaganda?” Leiden Journal of International Law, 18(2): 257–82.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Wibke K. (2006) “Incitement in International Law.” International Review of the Red Cross, 88: 823–52.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Wibke K. (2015) Incitement in International Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Wibke and Schabas, William A. (2013) “Incitement to Genocide.” In Behrens, Paul and Henham, Ralph (eds.), Elements of Genocide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Turner, J. W. Cecil (1958) Kenny’s Outlines of Criminal Law. 17th Edn. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar

Twining, William L. (1943) Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

United Nations. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. 9 December 1948, 78 U.N.T.S. 227 (entered into force 12 January 1951).Google Scholar

United Nations. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Eighth Session, 6 May–26 July 1996. Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-first session, Supplement No. 10. Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 1996. Vol. II(2). UN Document A/51/10.Google Scholar

United Nations. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Adopted by the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries in the Establishment of the International Criminal Court on 17 July 1998. UN Doc. A/CONF. 183/9; 37 ILM 1002 (1998); 2187 UNTS 90.Google Scholar

United Nations Human Rights Council. Prevention of Genocide. A/HRC/RES/28/34, adopted 59th meeting, 27 March 2015.Google Scholar

United Nations International Law Commission, Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 48th Session., 17 July 1996, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.532; UN GAOR 51st Session., Supp. No. 10, art. 2.3(f), reprinted in [1996] 2 Y.B. Int’l L. Comm’n 17.Google Scholar

United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI) (2011) Manual on International Criminal Defence ADC-ICTY Developed Practices. Turin: UNICRI.Google Scholar

United Nations Secretary General (2009) Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-third session. UN Document A/63/677.Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council. Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. 1993. S.C. Res. 827, UN SCOR, 3217th mtg., Adopted 25 May 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/827 (1993).Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council. Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. 1994. S.C. Res. 955, UN SCOR, 3453d mtg., Annex, art. 6, UN Doc. S/RES/955 (1994).Google Scholar

Van Schaack, Beth and Slye, Ronald (2010) International Criminal Law and Its Enforcement: Cases and Materials. 2nd Edn. New York: Thomson Reuters/Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Van Schaack, Beth and Slye, Ronald (2014) International Criminal Law and its Enforcement: Cases and Materials. 3rd Edn. St. Paul: West Academic.Google Scholar

Van Sliedregt, Elies (2012) Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vinen, Richard (2003) “Servant Problems”, Historically Speaking (2): 2–5. www.bu.edu/historic/hs/november03.html#vinen. Accessed 9 March 2017.Google Scholar

Wald, Patricia (2001) “To ‘Establish Incredible Events by Credible Evidence’ The Use of Affidavit Testimony in Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal Proceedings.” Harvard International Law Journal, 42(2): 535–53.Google Scholar

Wald, Patricia (2004) “ICTY Judicial Proceedings-An Appraisal from Within.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2(2): 466–73.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy (2012) The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Warburton, Nigel (2009) Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wegner, Daniel M. (2002) The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Werle, Gerhard (2007) “Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute,” International Criminal Justice, 5(4): 953–75. DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqm059.Google Scholar

White House (2013) “The Obama Administration’s Comprehensive Efforts to Prevent Mass Atrocities Over the Past Year.” 1 May 2013. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/fact_sheet_-_administration_efforts_to_prevent_mass_atrocities5.pdfGoogle Scholar

Wigfield, Allan and Eccles, Jacquelynne S. (2000) “Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 68–81. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.Google Scholar

Williams, Glanville (1989) “Finis for Novus Actus?” The Cambridge Law Journal, 48(3): 391–416.Google Scholar

Wilson, Richard Ashby (2011) Writing History in International Criminal Trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Richard Ashby (2015) “Inciting Genocide with Words.” Michigan Journal of International Law, 36(2): 100–46.Google Scholar

Winter, Steven L. (1989) “Transcendental Nonsense, Metaphoric Reasoning, and the Cognitive Stakes for Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 137(4): 1105–1237.Google Scholar

Workman, Lance and Reader, Will (2014) Evolutionary Psychology. 3rd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Richard W. (1985) “Causation in Tort Law.” California Law Review, 73(6): 1737–1828.Google Scholar

Wright, Richard W. (1988) “Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics, and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts.” Iowa Law Review, 73: 1001–77.Google Scholar

Wright, Richard W. (2011) “Proving Causation: Probability Versus Belief.” In Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation. Ch. 10, Oxford: Hart Publishing. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1918474Google Scholar

Yanagizawa-Drott, David (2014) “Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4): 1947–94. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qju020Google Scholar

Yeager, Daniel (2006) J. L. Austin and the Law. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar

Zahar, Alexander (2005) “The ICTR’s ‘Media” Judgment and the Reinvention of ‘Direct’ and Public Incitement to Commit Genocide.” Criminal Law Forum. 16(1): 33–48.Google Scholar

Zahar, Alexander (2008) “Legal Aid, Self-Representation and the Crisis at The Hague Tribunal.” Criminal Law Forum, 19(2): 241–63.Google Scholar