Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:43:57.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Regulatory Networks

Power, Legitimacy, and Compliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Abraham L. Newman  and
David Zaring
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Cross-border collaboration among domestic regulatory agencies has become a defining feature of contemporary global governance. Substate actors meet with their peers from other jurisdictions to exchange information, coordinate enforcement, and even to harmonize the regulatory rules applied at home (Keohane and Nye 1977; Raustiala 2002; Slaughter 2004). Both the international relations (IR) and international law (IL) literatures have taken note of this form of transgovernmental cooperation, and a term in both literatures has been minted and widely adopted. “Regulatory networks” appear in myriad areas where globalization has affected a regulatory project shared across borders by agencies, industries, and interest groups. In many instances, economic interdependence forges interactions among jurisdictions with distinct domestic rules. The resulting governance frictions produce the impetus for regulatory interactions among domestic authorities delegated with responsibilities for market oversight. There are regulatory networks in antitrust (Whytock 2005; Damro 2006), aviation (Bermann 1993), data privacy (Bignami 2005; Newman 2008a), human rights (Cardenas 2003), national security (Krahmann 2003; Lipson 2005), and telecommunications (Bermann 1995) regulation, just to name a few.

In the world of financial regulation alone, which has been a particularly welcoming one for such networks, American regulators have joined the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Participants Group of major export credit agencies, the Financial Action Task Force (which deals with money laundering), the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) the semi-private International Accounting Standards Board, and the mostly private World Federation of Exchanges. In addition, the new Financial Stability Board (FSB) is meant to serve as a network of networks, coordinating the harmonization of financial regulation done by other financial regulatory networks and staffed, like them, by domestic agency officials (Singer 2004; Zaring 2005; Baker 2009; Posner 2009; Helleiner 2010; Bach and Newman 2010a; Brummer 2012).

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 244 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan (2000). “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan (2009). “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State,” in Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 44–88.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie (2009). “The Politics of International Regime Complexity,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, David (2010). “Varieties of Cooperation: Regulating Transnational Markets for Information Goods,” International Studies Review, Vol. 36, pp. 561–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, David, and Newman, Abraham (2010a). “Transgovernmental Networks and Domestic Policy Convergence: Evidence from Insider Trading Regulation,” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 505–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, David, and Newman, Abraham (2010b). “Governing Lipitor and Lipstick: Capacity, Sequencing, and Power in International Pharmaceutical and Cosmetics Regulation,” Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 665–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andrew (2009). “Deliberative Equality and the Transgovernmental Politics of the Global Financial Architecture,” Global Governance, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael S., and Duvall, Raymond (2005). Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Barr, Michael S., and Miller, Geoffrey P. (2006). “Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermann, George A. (1993). “Regulatory Cooperation with Counterpart Agencies Abroad: The FAA's Aircraft Certification Experience,” Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 669–781.Google Scholar
Bermann, George A. (1995). “Regulatory Cooperation between the European Commission and U.S. Administrative Agencies,” Administrative Law Journal of the American University, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 933–83.Google Scholar
Bignami, Francesca E. (1999). “The Democratic Deficit in European Community Rulemaking: A Call for Notice and Comment in Comitology,” Harvard Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 451–515.Google Scholar
Bignami, Francesca E. (2005). “Transgovernmental Networks vs. Democracy: The Case of the European Information Privacy Network,” Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 807–68.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. (1998). “Organizing Babylon: On Different Conceptions Of Policy Networks,” Public Administration, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummer, Chris (2010). “Post-American Securities Regulation,” California Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 327–83.Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris (2011). “How International Financial Law Works (and How It Doesn't)” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 257–327.Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris (2012). Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Buthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter (2011). The New Global Rulers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. (1995). “Transnational Relations and the Development of European Economic and Monetary Union,” in Risse-Kappan, Thomas (ed.), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Nonstate Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 37–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia (2003). “Transgovernmental Activism: Canada's Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions,” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 775–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, R. C. (2011). “Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms,” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerny, Philip G. (2010). Rethinking World Politics: A Theory of Transnational Neopluralism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damro, Chad (2006). “Transatlantic Competition Policy: Domestic and International Sources of EU-US Cooperation,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damtoft, Russell W., and Flanagan, Ronan (2009). “The Development of International Networks in Antitrust,” International Lawyer, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 137, pp. 137–50.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. (2007). All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Dunoff, , , Jeffrey L. (2004). “Public Participation in the Trade Regime: Of Litigation, Frustration, Agitation and Legitimation,” Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 961–70.Google Scholar
Eberlein, Burkard, and Newman, Abraham (2008). “Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union,” Governance, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry (2006). “Governing Information Flows: States, Private Actors, and e-Commerce,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 9, pp. 353–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. (1988). “Legitimacy in the International System,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 705–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovanoli, Mario (2009). “The Reform of the International Financial Architecture after the Global Crisis,” N.Y.U. Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 81–123.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter (1992). “Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander (2009). “Network Analysis for International Relations,” International Organization Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 559–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru (2007). “Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law to Matter Where Needed Most,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 407–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. (2001). “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 111, No. 8, pp. 1935– 2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenreich, Martin, and Zeitlin, Jonathan (2009). Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric (1996). States and the Reemergence of Global Finance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric (2010). “What Role for the New Financial Stability Board? The Politics of International Standards after the Crisis,” Global Policy, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 282–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration (Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Raymond F. (1976). “The International Role of ‘Domestic’ Bureaucracy,” International Organization, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 405–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John, Davies, William, and Sykes, Alan O., Jr. (2008). Legal Problems of International Economic Relations, 4th ed. (St. Paul, MN: West).Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. (1956). Transnational Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Jurgen (1997). “Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving: European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 609–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczmarek, Sarah, and Newman, Abraham (2011). “The Long Arm of the Law: Extraterritoriality and the National Implementation of Foreign Bribery Legislation,” International Organization, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 745–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles, and Lake, David (2009). “Economic Integration and Global Governance: Why So Little Supranationalism?,” in Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 242–76.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy (2009). “Harmonization and Its Discontents: A Case Study of TRIPS Implementation in India's Pharmaceutical Sector,” California Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1571–1649.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Nye, Joseph (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, and Krisch, Nico (2006). “Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara (2013). “Institutionalism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Krahmann, Elke (2003). Multilevel Networks in European Foreign Policy (Hampshire, UK: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Lake, David, and Wong, Wendy (2009). “The Politics of Networks: Interests, Power, and Human Rights Norms,” in Kahler, Miles (ed.), Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 127–50.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, David (2005). “The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 598, pp. 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew, and Scott, Joanne (2009). “The Hidden World of WTO Governance,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, Michael (2005). “Transgovernmental Networks and Nonproliferation,” International Journal, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 179–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. (2003). “Regulatory Globalization as a Response to Regulatory Competition,” Emory Law Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 1353–79.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, 1st ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mitrany, David (1966). A Working Peace System (London: Quadrangle).Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham (2008a). “Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Transgovernmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive,” International Organization, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 103–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Abraham (2008b). Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham (2010). “International Organization Control under Conditions of Dual Delegation: A transgovernmental Politics Approach,” in Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. (eds.), Who Governs the Globe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher K. (1993). “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Eric (2010). “Challenge of International Cooperation and Institutional Design in Financial Supervision: Beyond Transgovernmental Networks,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 243–84.Google Scholar
Perry, James, and Nolke, Andreas (2006). “The Political Economy of International Accounting Standards,” Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 559–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John (1995). “Policy Networks and European Union Policy-Making,” West European Politics, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Elliott (2009). “Making Rules for Global Finance: Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation at the Turn of the Millennium,” International Organization, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 665–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A. (2005). “International Law and the Disaggregated State,” Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 797–842.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter (1990). “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, pp. 295–336.Google Scholar
Putnam, Tonya L. (2009). “Courts without Borders: Domestic Sources of U.S. Extraterritoriality in the Regulatory Sphere,” International Organization, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 459–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2002). “The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law,” Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2004). “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2013). “Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 293–320.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Martin (2010). “Employment Policy: Between Efficacy and Experimentation,” in Wallace, Helen, Pollack, Mark A., and Young, Alasdair R. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 279–304.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappan, Thomas (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Nonstate Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Dorf, Michael C. (1998). “A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism,” Columbia Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 267–473.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne (2007). Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Hal S. (1995). “The Competitive Implications of the Basle Capital Accord,” Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 885–95.Google Scholar
Singer, David (2004). “Capital Rules: The Domestic Politics of International Regulatory Harmonization,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 531–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, David (2007). Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the International Financial System (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2001). “Agencies on the Loose? Holding Government Networks Accountable” in Bermann, George A., Herdegen, Matthias, and Lindseth, Peter L. (eds.), Transatlantic Regulatory Co-operation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 521–46.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2004). A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Steiner, Henry J., and Vagts, Detlev (1976). Transnational Legal Problems (Mineola, NY: Foundation Press).Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. (2005). “The Global Regulatory Challenge to U.S. Administrative Law,” N.Y.U. Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 695–762.Google Scholar
Underhill, Geoffrey R. D. (1995). “Keeping Governments out of Politics: Transnational Securities Markets, Regulatory Cooperation, and Political Legitimacy,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, Pierre (2009). “Transnational Regulatory Networks and Their Limits,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 113–72.Google Scholar
Vreeland, James (2008). “Political Institutions and Human Rights: Why Dictatorships Enter into the United Nations Convention against Torture,” International Organization Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991). “The Transformation of Europe,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 100, No. 8, pp. 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whytock, Christopher A. (2005). “A Rational Design Theory of Transgovernementalism: The Case of the E.U.-U.S. Merger Review Cooperation,” Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver (1981). “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87. No. 1, pp. 548–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaring, David (1998). “International Law by Other Means: The Twilight Existence of International Financial Regulatory Organizations,” Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 281–330.Google Scholar
Zaring, David (2005). “Informal Procedure, Hard and Soft, in International Administration,” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 379–784.Google Scholar
Zaring, David (2008). “Rulemaking and Adjudication in International Law,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 563–611.Google Scholar
Zito, Anthony (2001). “Epistemic Communities, Collective Entrepreneurship and European Integration,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 583–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×