Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2021
  • Online publication date: May 2021

3 - Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian

Summary

This chapter provides a description of the basic interpersonal clause system in Khorchin Mongolian – i.e., MOOD. The categories in the traditional description of Khorchin Mongolian clause grammar are mostly defined notionally and are not grammatically motivated. In contrast, the description in this chapter motivates the clause classes in the MOOD system in terms of their structural configurations based on unmonitored conversational data. The functions of Predicator, Positioner, Interrogator and Inquirer are used to distinguish the general types of [indicative] and [imperative] and the more delicate systems they make available. The MOOD systems are then characterised in relation to their functions in exchanges in terms of the structural configurations that realise options in NEGOTIATION in discourse semantics. The description in this chapter makes significant contributions to (i) the unified description of Khorchin Mongolian clause types and structures, and (ii) the characterisation of grammatical patterns in terms of discourse semantics.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Bayancogtu, (2002). [Horcin aman ayalgun u sudulul, A Study of Khorchin Dialect]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University Press.
Berry, M. (1981a). Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-Layered Approach to Exchange Structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 120–45.
Berry, M. (1981b). Systemic Linguistics and Discourse analysis: A Multi-Layered Approach to Exchange Structure. Mimeo (a longer version of Berry, 1981a).
Berry, M. (1981c). Polarity, Ellipticity and Propositional Development, Their Relevance to the Well-Formedness of an Exchange (A Discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s Classes of Move). The Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10(1), 3663.
Berry, M. (1981d). Towards Layers of Exchange Structure for Directive Exchanges. Network, 2, 2331.
Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Caganhada, (1995). 蒙古语科尔沁土语研究 [Menggu yu keerqin tuyu yanjiu, A Study of Khorchin Mongolian Dialect]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Cenggeltei, (1999). [Odo ʉye in monggol helen u jʉi (nemen zasagsan heblel, A Grammar of Modern Mongolian (A Revised Edition)]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People Publishing House.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Some Notes on ‘Deep’ Grammar. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1),5767.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic-Functional Interpretation of the Nature and Ontogenesis of Dialogue. In Fawcett, R., Halliday, M.A.K., Lamb, S. and Makkai, A., eds., The Semiotics of Culture and Language. Vol. 1 of Language as Social Semiotic. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 335.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed., London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Methods – Techniques – Problems. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J., eds., Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 5986.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London/New York: Continuum.
Hao, J. (2020). Analysing Scientific Discourse from a Systemic Functional Perspective: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology. London: Routledge.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Martin, J. R. (2018). Introduction – Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspectives. Functions of Language, 25(1), 219.
Martin, J. R. & Cruz, P. (2018). Interpersonal Grammar of Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 5496.
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse, 2nd ed., London/New York: Continuum.
Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., Wang, Pin & Zhu, Y. (in press). Systemic Functional Grammar: Another Step into the Theory – Grammatical Description. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2018). The Notion of Multilingual Meaning Potential: A Systemic Exploration. In Sellami-Baklouti, A. and Fontaine, L., eds., Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 90120.
Mwinlaaru, I.N., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Akerejola, E. S. (2018). A System-Based Typology of mood in Niger-Congo Languages. In Agwuele, A. and Bodomo, A., eds., The Routledge Handbook of African Linguistics. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 93117.
Na-Gancigsurung, , Gardi, , Wa-Secin, & Cinggeltu, , eds., (2005). [Helen u šinzilel un nere tomiya, Terms in Linguistics]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Education Press.
Nasunbayar, , Haserdeni, , Tʉrgen, , Cogtu, , Tawadagba, , Naranbatu, & Secen, . (1982). [Orcin cag un monggul hele, Modern Mongolian]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Education Press.
Quiroz, B. (2013). The Interpersonal and Experiential Grammar of Chilean Spanish: Towards a Principled Systemic-Functional Description Based on Axial Argumentation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating Interpersonal Meanings: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63.
Rose, D. (2018). Sister, Shall I Tell You? Enacting Social Relations in a Kinship Community. Functions of Language, 25(1), 97134.
Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U., Patpong, P., & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of mood: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional View. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective. London: Equinox Publishing, pp. 859920.
Tiemei, (2015). [Monggol helen u horcin aman ayalgun u abiyan u dagun uhagan u zadalulta, Acoustic Phonetics of Khorchin Mongolian]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Inner Mongolia University.
Tserenpil, D. & Kullman, R. (2008). Mongolian Grammar, 4th revised ed., Ulaanbaater: Admon.
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
Ventola, E. (1988). The Logical Relations in Exchanges. In Benson, J. D. and Greaves, W. S., eds., Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 5172.
Wang, Penglin. (1983). 关于蒙古语族“格附加成分”的问 [Guanyu menggu yuzu “ge fujia chengfen” de wenti, On case marking in Mongolic languages]. Minority Languages of China 1, 4164. Weblink: https://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/34292030/guan_yu_meng_gu_yu_zu__ge_fu_jia_cheng_fen__de_wen.htm.
Wang, Pin. (2020). Axial Argumentation and Cryptogrammar in Interpersonal Grammar: A Case Study of Classical Tibetan mood. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York/London: Routledge, 73101.
Zhang, D. (2020a). Axial Argumentation below the Clause: The Verbal Group in Khorchin Mongolian. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 3572.
Zhang, D. (2020b). Negotiating Interpersonal Meaning in Khorchin Mongolian: Discourse and Grammar. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. https://hdl.handle.net/2123/22835