Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T10:46:00.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Conclusion

from IV - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2017

Lorena Sosa
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Human Rights
Get access

Summary

The greatest thing in this world is not so much where we stand as in what direction we are moving.

J. W. von Goethe

Exploring Intersectionality

The incorporation of intersectionality within the human rights framework on Violence against Women (VAW) implies the recognition of the diversity of women and their different experiences of violence, challenging essentialist views of gender. In addition to the strong symbolic meaning that such recognition would carry, there are many expectations regarding its theoretical and practical potential to include all women and ensure the full enjoyment of their human rights. This book wishes to contribute to the debates in the ongoing process of incorporation of intersectionality within the international human rights framework on VAW. It entails a double analysis. On one hand, it has theoretically explored the human rights framework on VAW from the perspective of intersectionality, revealing to what extent intersectionality is explicitly and/or implicitly incorporated in norms and what are the consequences for States. On the other hand, it empirically applied an intersectional approach in two case studies, revealing gaps in legislation and policies.

Intersectionality is discussed in relation to VAW from a theoretical perspective. It is presented in Chapter 2 as an explicit interdisciplinary approach to the study of race, gender, class and other social categories of distinction which can be used for the interpretation of human rights, particularly in relation to violence against women. The overarching notion promoted by intersectionality is that individuals (and groups) are affected by multiple forms of subordination based on multiple grounds of distinction, rather than by discrimination based on one single ground at a time. Three core theoretical propositions of intersectionality were identified. Firstly, intersectionality predicates the socio-structural nature of inequality. The unequal positioning of individuals and groups relates to categories used to distinguish and differentiate among them. The second proposition of intersectionality, closely related to the first, is that the construction of the social categories goes beyond the level of the (personal) identity to that of the structural. Finally, intersectionality suggests that multiple categories of distinction do not simply add to each other to create a multiplied effect, but that a new and different situation of subordination is created.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Lorena Sosa
  • Book: Intersectionality in the Human Rights Legal Framework on Violence against Women
  • Online publication: 25 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771525.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Lorena Sosa
  • Book: Intersectionality in the Human Rights Legal Framework on Violence against Women
  • Online publication: 25 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771525.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Lorena Sosa
  • Book: Intersectionality in the Human Rights Legal Framework on Violence against Women
  • Online publication: 25 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771525.009
Available formats
×