Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 1994
  • Online publication date: May 2010

Appendix A - Chisholm's definition of organic unity

Summary

I wish to consider briefly Chisholm's attempt to define an organic unity. One merit of his approach is that it does not make use of the notion of a “sum” of values. In Brentano and Intrinsic Value, he offers the following definitions:

(D1) P is a part of Q = Df Q is necessarily such that (a) if it obtains then P obtains, and (b) whoever conceives Q conceives P.

(D2) Some of the goodness of G is defeated by W = Df. B is a good part of W and better than W; and if Whas a bad part that is worse than W, then that bad part is part of G.

(D3) Some of the badness of B is defeated by W-Df B is a bad part of W and worse than W; and if W has a good part that is better than W, then that good part is a part of B.

Given the definition of a part in (D1), every state of affairs is a part of itself. Thus, in (D2) and (D3) we should take the definition of “part” to refer to “proper parts.”,P is a proper part of Q if and only if P is a part of Q and Q is not a part of P.

The defeat of goodness can be illustrated by pleasure in the bad. Consider the state of affairs, Smith's being pleased that Jones is suffering.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Intrinsic Value
  • Online ISBN: 9780511663802
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663802
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×