Book contents
- Issues and Concepts in Historical Ecology
- Issues and Concepts in Historical Ecology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- 1 Is There a Future for the Past?
- Part I Challenges: Time and Memory
- 2 Historical Ecology and the Longue Durée
- 3 Human and Societal Dimensions of Past Climate Change
- 4 Rural Communities and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
- 5 Baselines and the Shifting Baseline Syndrome – Exploring Frames of Reference in Nature Conservation
- Part II Approaches: Concepts and Methods
- Part III Moving Forward
- Index
- References
4 - Rural Communities and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
from Part I - Challenges: Time and Memory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Issues and Concepts in Historical Ecology
- Issues and Concepts in Historical Ecology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- 1 Is There a Future for the Past?
- Part I Challenges: Time and Memory
- 2 Historical Ecology and the Longue Durée
- 3 Human and Societal Dimensions of Past Climate Change
- 4 Rural Communities and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
- 5 Baselines and the Shifting Baseline Syndrome – Exploring Frames of Reference in Nature Conservation
- Part II Approaches: Concepts and Methods
- Part III Moving Forward
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Issues and Concepts in Historical EcologyThe Past and Future of Landscapes and Regions, pp. 84 - 111Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27 (4), 629–49.Google Scholar
Babai, D. & Molnár, Z. (2014). Small-scale traditional management of highly species-rich grasslands in the Carpathians. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 182, 123–30.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10 (5), 1251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In Berkes, F. & Folke, C., eds. Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Biró, E., Babai, D., Bódis, J., & Molnár, Z. (2014). Lack of knowledge or loss of knowledge? Traditional ecological knowledge of population dynamics of threatened plant species in East-Central Europe. Journal for Nature Conservation, 22, 318–25.Google Scholar
Dahlström, A., Iuga, , , A., & Lennartsson, T. (2013). Managing biodiversity rich hay meadows in the EU: a comparison of Swedish and Romanian grasslands. Environmental Conservation, 40 (2), 194–205.Google Scholar
Dunn, E. C. (2003). Trojan pig: paradoxes of food safety regulation. Environment and Planning, 35 (8), 1493–1511.Google Scholar
Einarsson, P. (2015). Traditionell kunskap i modernt lantbruk. CBM:s skriftserie 91. Uppsala: Centrum för Biologisk Mångfald.Google Scholar
Eriksson, O., Bolmgren, K., Westin, A., & Lennartsson, T. (2015). Historic hay cutting dates from Sweden 1873–1951 and their implications for conservation management of species-rich meadows. Biological Conservation, 184, 100–7.Google Scholar
Gaignebet, C. (1990). La folle journée de Figaro: entre poils et jardinets. In Mesnil, M., ed. Les Plantes et les Saisons. Calendriers et Représentations. Collection Ethnologies d’Europe. Bruxelles: Institut de Sociologie.Google Scholar
Gherman, T. (2002). Meteorologia populară. Observări, credințe și obiceiuri. Bucarest: Paideia.Google Scholar
Glassie, H. (1995). Tradition. The Journal of American Folklore, 108 (430), 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Reyes-Garcia, V., Olsson, P., & Montes, C. (2012). Traditional ecological knowledge and community resilience to environmental extremes: a case study in Doñana, SW Spain. Global Environmental Change, 22, 640–50.Google Scholar
Grigg, D. B. (1974). The Agricultural Systems of the World: An Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, E., Dahlström, A., Emanuelsson, , Wissman, M., , J., & Lennartsson, T. (2011). Combining historical and ecological knowledge to optimise biodiversity conservation in semi-natural grasslands. In Pujol, J. L., ed. The Importance of Biological Interactions in the Study of Biodiversity. InTech.Google Scholar
Handler, R. & Linnekin, J. (1984). Tradition, genuine or spurious. The Journal of American Folklore, 97 (358), 273–90.Google Scholar
Helldin, J. O. & Lennartsson, T. (2007). Agricultural landscapes in East Europe as reference areas for Swedish land management. In Surd, V. & Zotic, V., eds. Rural Space and Local Development. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitara Clujeana, pp. 367–70.Google Scholar
Huband, S. & McCracken, D. (2011). Understanding high nature value agriculture in the Romanian Carpathians: a case study. In Knowles, B., ed. Mountain Hay Meadows: Hotspots of Biodiversity and Traditional Culture. London: Society of Biology.Google Scholar
Iancu, B. & Stroe, M. (2016). In search of eligibility: Common Agricultural Policy and the reconfiguration of hay-meadows management in the Romanian highlands. MARTOR: The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review, 21, 129–44.Google Scholar
Iuga, A. (2016). Intangible hay heritage in Șurdești. MARTOR: The Museum of the Romanian Peasant Anthropology Review, 21, 67–84.Google Scholar
Kideckel, D. (2001). Labor and Society in the Jiu Valley and Fagaras Regions of Romania. Washington, DC: National Council for Eurasian and East European Research.Google Scholar
Kideckel, D. (2006). Colectivism și singurătate în satele românești: Țara Oltului în perioada comunistăși în primii ani după Revoluție. Iași: Polirom.Google Scholar
Kligman, G. & Verdery, K. 2011. Peasants under Siege: The Collectivization of Romanian Agriculture, 1949–1962. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larsson, J. (2009). Fäbodväsendet 1550–1920: ett centralt element i Nordsveriges jordbrukssystem. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lennartsson, T. & Helldin, J.-O. (2007). Agricultural landscapes in Eastern Europe as reference areas for Swedish land management. In Hasund, K. P. & Helldin, J.-O., eds. Valuable Agricultural Landscapes – the Importance of Romania and Scandinavia for Europe, KSLA 2007: 5. Stockholm: Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien.Google Scholar
Magnusson, L. & Ottosson, L. eds. (2009). The Evolution of Path Dependence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Manoliu, V. (1999). Mic dicționar de astrologie și meteorology țărănească. Bucarest: Mentor.Google Scholar
Mesnil, M. (1997). Etnologul între șarpe și balaur; Mesnil, M. and Popova, A. Eseuri de mitologie balcanică. Bucharest: Paideia.Google Scholar
Mihăilescu, V. (2000). La maisnie diffuse, du communisme au capitalisme: Questions et hypothèses, Balkanologie, 4:2. www.balkanologie.revues.org/334Google Scholar
Mihăilescu, V., Nicolau, , Gheorghiu, V., , M., & Dirnovan, G. (1993). Snagov – trei proiecții asupra sistematizării. Sociologie Românească, 4 (1), 18–32.Google Scholar
Myrdal, J. (1999). Jordbruket under feodalismen. 1000–1700. Stockholm: Natur och kultur/ Lts förlag.Google Scholar
Myrdal, J. (2012). Boskapsskötseln under medeltiden. En källpluralistisk studie. Stockholm: Nordiska Museets förlag.Google Scholar
Myrdal, J. & Morell, M., eds. (2011). The Agrarian History of Sweden. From 4000 BC to AD 2000. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, E. (1999). Changing identities, changing landscapes: human-land relations in transition in the Aspre, Roussillon. Cultural Geographies, 6 (1), 29.Google Scholar
Österling, P.-A. (2010). Dialekt och folkminnesarkivens material – etnologi på Institutet för språk och folkminnen (SOFI) exemplet ULMA. In Tunón, H. and Dahlström, A., eds., Nycklar till kunskap. Om människans bruk av naturen. Uppsala: Centrum för Biologisk Mångfald and Stockholm: Kungl. skogs- och lantbruksakademien, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
Oteros-Rozas, E., Ontillera-Sánchez, R., Sanosa, P., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Reyes-García, V., & González, J. A. (2013). Traditional ecological knowledge among transhumant pastoralists in Mediterranean Spain. Ecology and Society, 18 (3), 33.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Mallén, I. & Corbera, E. (2013). Community-based conservation and traditional ecological knowledge: Implications for social-ecological resilience. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05867-180412Google Scholar
Stahl, H. H. (1946). Sociologia satului devălmaș românesc. Organizarea economică și juridică a trupurilor de moșie. Bucarest: Fundația Regele Mihai I.Google Scholar
Stroe, M. (2015). Rigid norms, flexible subjects: socio-ecological resilience in contested hay landscapes. In Troc, G. & Iancu, B., eds., Modes of Appropriation and Social Resistance, Bucharest: Tritonic, pp. 103–20.Google Scholar
Szelenyi, I., ed. (1998). Privatizing the Land. Rural Political Economy in Post-Communist and Socialist Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Torsello, D. (2003). Trust, Property and Social Change in a Southern Slovakian Village. Munster: Lit. Verlag.Google Scholar
Tunón, H. (2015). Studiet av bruket av naturen. Ur etnobiologins historia. In Tunón, H., ed., Etnobotanik. Planter i skikog brug, i historien og i folkemedicinen. Vagn J. Brøndegaards biografi, bibliografi og artikler på dansk i udvalg. Vol. 1. Stockholm: Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien and Uppsala: Centrum för Biologisk Mångfald, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
Tunón, H., Kvarnström, M., Axelsson Linkowski, W., & Westin, A. (2014). Hur bör Sverige genomföra artiklarna 8j and 10c i syfte att uppnå Aichi-mål 18 i FN:s Konvention om biologisk mångfald?. Uppsala: Centrum för Biologisk Mångfald.Google Scholar
Verdery, K. (2003). The Vanishing Hectare: Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. London: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Wästfelt, A., Saltzman, K., Gräslund Berg, E., & Dahlberg, A. (2012). Landscape care paradoxes: Swedish landscape care arrangements in a European context. Geoforum, 43, 1171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westin, A., Isacson, M., & Lennartsson, T. (2017). Land and labour as resources of an integrated peasant economy in a Swedish mining district during the 1860s great famine. In Panjek, A. Larsson, J. and Mocarelli. L, eds., Integrated Peasant Economy in a Comparative Perspective – Alps, Scandinavia and Beyond, Koper: University of Primorska Press, pp. 309–32.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by