Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:13:00.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biblical criticism criticised: with reference to the Markan report of Jesus's examination before the Sanhedrin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Get access

Summary

In the introduction to the third edition of his Neutestamentliche Methodenlehre Heinrich Zimmermann writes that he has not mentioned religio-historical study among the methods of scholarly New Testament interpretation, because he does not know ‘which New Testament pericopae could be chosen as examples, from the point of view of the history of religions’, to demonstrate its use and applicability. His book is accordingly for the most part a full and highly instructive presentation of literary-historical methods, particularly form-criticism and redaction-criticism. The traditions which are shaped in transmission and combined in redaction have nevertheless an historical background. In form- and redaction-criticism this is virtually excluded from examination. These methods are concerned primarily with the moulding of the traditions by congregational Sitz im Leben and editorial outlook. Enquiry is directed at the process of literary formation rather than the historical background from which the process begins. Heinz Schürmann justly observes that enquiry into the Sitz im Leben of the congregations which proclaimed the Gospel is too limited in scope for him to say that his acceptance of the Gospel is vindicated by it. If, for instance, the Gospel statements on Jesus are to be interpreted only in the light of Easter and Whitsuntide, and cannot be ‘traced back to the historical Jesus and into the company of the disciples before Easter’, the Christian message would lose ‘the factum historiam’ which is its basis, and could accordingly ‘no longer be distinguished from Gnosis’.

Kurt Lüthi, in his review of Adolf Holl's Jesus in schlechter Gesellschaft, sums up by saying that New Testament study has foregone ‘any direct apprehension of Jesus’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×