Constitutional steps towards judicial independence

Shimon Shetreet; Sophie Turenne

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139005111.003

2 - Constitutional steps towards judicial independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Shimon Shetreet and

Sophie Turenne

Show author details

Shimon Shetreet: Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sophie Turenne: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

2.1 The history of judicial independence has been well documented by Robert Stevens. With the purpose of setting the constitutional background to this work, we sketch, over the centuries, the position of the judiciary in relation to the executive and Parliament, before considering the further step towards judicial independence under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (CRA) and the consequences of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA). A sense of the existing strains allows us to understand better the concern that the Lord Chancellor’s duty to preserve the independence of the judiciary should be put on statutory footing in the CRA.

History

2.2 Our brief historical account focuses upon the emergence of the foundations of the modern judiciary in the events of the seventeenth century. In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, judges were an integral part of the royal administration and, at the direction of the Crown, performed many administrative duties. To Tudor and early Stuart men the distinction between judicial and administrative duties would have been rather obscure. Holdsworth’s observation that the Chancery was ‘a branch of the civil service as well as a judicial court’ applied in varying degrees to many institutions that we now refer to as ‘courts of law’. As long as the King and Parliament did not come into conflict and did not look to the courts of law for support in the struggle for power, the independence of the judges was not an important issue. Thus, under the Tudors, the issue of judicial independence did not give rise to difficulties. During this period the judges undoubtedly were not independent: they were under strict royal control and the Crown enjoyed their cooperation. Since judges were not sought by the sovereign of the day to be instruments in political struggles, this harmonious cooperation met with popular approval. Similarly, because judges were outside the sphere of politics, very few were removed for political reasons during this period, even though they held office at the King’s (or Queen’s) pleasure.

Type: Chapter
Information: Judges on Trial
The Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary
, pp. 21 - 46

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139005111.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stevens, R., The Independence of the Judiciary. The View from the Lord Chancellor’s Office (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Jones, W.J., Politics and the Bench (London: Allen & Unwin, 1971), pp. 18–19, 21–2, 51–2Google Scholar

Havighurst, A.F., ‘The Judiciary and Politics in the Reign of Charles II’ (1950) 66 LQR 62, 65–6

Holdsworth, W., History of English Law, vol. I, 2nd edn (1937), p. 273, vol. IV, p. 75.

Jones, W.J., Politics and the Bench (London: Allen & Unwin, 1971), 18.Google Scholar

Gardiner, S.R., A Student’s History of England, vol. I, pp. 1–2 (London: Longman, Greens and Co, 1890)Google Scholar

Harding, A., Social History of English Law (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965), pp. 252–3.Google Scholar

Foss, E., The Judges of England (London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1857), vol. V, pp. 343–4, 370–3Google Scholar

Bowen, C.D., The Lion and the Throne: The Life and Times of Sir Edward Coke 1552–1634 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1957)Google Scholar

McIlwain, C.H., ‘The Tenure of English Judges’ (1913) 7 Am Pol Sci Rev 217, 222

Havighurst, A.F., ‘James II and the Twelve Men in Scarlet’ (1953) 69 LQR 522.

Campbell, J., Lives of the Chief Justices (London: John Murray, 1849), vol. I, pp. 288 and 292.Google Scholar

Haynes, E., Selection and Tenure of Judges (Littleton, Co: Rothman & Co., 1944), p. 77.Google Scholar

Broom, H., Constitutional Law Viewed in Relation to the Common Law and Exemplified by Cases (London: W. Maxwell, 1866), pp. 147–8Google Scholar

Brooke, LJ, ‘Judicial Independence – Its History in England and Wales’, in Cunningham, H. (ed.), Fragile Bastion. Judicial Independence in the Nineties and Beyond (Sidney: Judicial Commission of New South Wales, 1997), pp. 94–5.Google Scholar

Taswell-Langmead, T.P., English Constitutional History, l0th edn by Plucknett, T.F.L. (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1946), pp. 392n, 430–1Google Scholar

Wade, E.C.S., ‘Consultation of the Judiciary by the Executive’ (1930) 46 LQR 169, 181–2

Medley, D.J., A Student’s Manual of English Constitutional History (Oxford: Blackwell, 1894), p. 488.Google Scholar

Hearn, W.E., The Government of England: its Structure and its Development, 2nd edn (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1886), p. 79.Google Scholar

Anson, T.R.S., The Law and Custom of the Constitution, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1907), vol. I, p. 30.Google Scholar

Bacon, F., ‘Essays: Of Judicature’, in Spedding, J., Ellis, R.. and Heath, D. (eds.), Works of Francis Bacon (New York: Hurd and Houghton, 1861 reprint), vol. VI, pp. 506 and 510.Google Scholar

Keir, D.L., ‘The Case of Ship Money’ (1936) 52 LQR 546

Hatsell, J., Precedents of Proceedings in the House of Commons, with Observations (London: Printed for L. Hansard and Sons, 1818), vol. IV, pp. 139 et seq.Google Scholar

Campbell, , Lives, vol. I, 509–510 (1849)

Kenyon, J. P., The Stuart Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 445.Google Scholar

Havighurst, A.F., ‘The Judiciary and Politics in the Reign of Charles II’ (1950) 66 LQR 62, 65.

Birkenhead, , Points of View (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1922), vol. II, pp. 159–61Google Scholar

Cecil, H., Tipping the Scales (London: Hutchinson, 1964), p. 26Google Scholar

Thomson, M.A., A Constitutional History of England. 1642–1801 (London: Methuen, 1938), p. 282.Google Scholar

Hallam, H., The Constitutional History of England from the Accession of Henry VII to the Death of George II, 5th edn (London: John Murray, 1846), vol. II, p. 357.Google Scholar

Mathew, T., For Lawyers and Others (London: Hodge, 1938), pp. 71–87Google Scholar

Keeton, G., ‘The Judiciary and the Constitutional Struggle 1660–88’ (1962) 7 J Pub Teach Law 56

Heuston, R.F.V., Lives of the Lord Chancellors (1885–1940) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), p. 39.Google Scholar

Brougham, , Present State of the Law: the Speech of Henry Brougham, Esq, MP, in the House of Commons on Thursday February 7 1828 (London: Henry Colburn, 1828), p. 20Google Scholar

May, Erskine, The Constitutional History of England, edited and continued by Holland, F. (London: Longman, Greens, 1912), pp. 75–6.Google Scholar

Todd, A., On Parliamentary Government in England: its Origin, Development and Practical Operation (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1867–69), vol. II, p. 157.Google Scholar

Foord, A., Her Majesty’s Opposition 1714–1830 (Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Hatsell, , Precedents, 3rd edn (1796), vol. II, 26–9

Le Sueur, A., ‘The Conception of the UK’s New Supreme Court’, in Le Sueur, A. (ed.), Building the UK’s New Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 4Google Scholar

Steyn, , ‘The Case for a Supreme Court’ (2002) LQR 382.

Le Sueur, A., ‘From Appellate Committee to Supreme Court: A Narrative’, in Blom-Cooper, L., Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords 1876–2009 (Oxford University Press, 2009), chapter 5Google Scholar

Bingham, T., ‘The Human Rights Act’ (2010) European Human Rights Law Review 568, 570Google Scholar

Bamforth, N., ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998’ [1998] PL 572

O’Cinneide, C., Human Rights and the UK Constitution (London: British Academy Policy Centre, 2012).Google Scholar

Feldman, D., ‘Human Rights, Terrorism and Risk: the Roles of Politicians and Judges’ [2006] PL 364, 375

Allan, T.R.S, ‘Human Rights Act in Constitutional Perspective’ (2006) 59 CLP 27, p. 36.

Bradley, A., ‘The Sovereignty of Parliament – Form or Substance ?’, in Jowell, J. and Olivier, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 7th edn (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 34 and 37.Google Scholar

Hale, , ‘The Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’, Legal Wales (12 October 2012).

Himsworth, C., ‘Case Comment’ [2012] PL 205, 213.

Book contents

2 - Constitutional steps towards judicial independence

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive