Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 146
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fischhoff, Baruch and Bar-Hillel, Maya 1984. Diagnosticity and the base-rate effect. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 402.

    Dewhurst, W.G. 1984. Evaluation of our Patients; Our Pupils; and Ourselves. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 29, Issue. 8, p. 635.

    Dawson, Neal V. and Arkes, Hal R. 1987. Systematic errors in medical decision making:. Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 183.

    Medin, Douglas L. Wattenmaker, William D. and Michalski, Ryszard S. 1987. Constraints and Preferences in Inductive Learning: An Experimental Study of Human and Machine Performance. Cognitive Science, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 299.

    Shrader-Frechette, Kristin 1988. PRODUCER RISK, CONSUMER RISK, AND ASSESSING TECHNOLOGICAL IMPACTS. Review of Policy Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 155.

    Nahinsky, Irwin D. 1990. Anomalies in the Judgment of Statistical Association: Fallacies Based on Unidirectional Independence, Shifting Dependence, and Conjunction. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 70, Issue. 2, p. 643.

    Elstein, Arthur S. Shulman, Lee S. and Sprafka, Sarah A. 1990. Medical Problem Solving. Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    Dawson, Neal V. and Cebul, Randall D. 1990. Advances in Quantitative Techniques for Making Medical Decisions. Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 37.

    Christensen, Caryn Elstein, Arthur S. Bernstein, Lionel M. and Balla, John I. 1991. Formal decision supports in medical practice and education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 62.

    Bar-Hillel, Maya 1991. Commentary on Wolford, Taylor, and Beck: The conjunction fallacy?. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 412.

    Heller, Rachael F. Saltzstein, Herbert D. and Caspe, William B. 1992. Heuristics in Medical and Non-Medical Decision-Making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 211.

    Hamm, Robert M. 1993. Explanations for Common Responses to the Blue/Green Cab Probabilistic Inference Word Problem. Psychological Reports, Vol. 72, Issue. 1, p. 219.

    Timmermans, Daniëlle 1994. The Roles of Experience and Domain of Expertise in Using Numerical and Verbal Probability Terms in Medical Decisions. Medical Decision Making, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 146.

    Wolfe, Christopher R. 1995. Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems: A fuzzy-trace theory account. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 85.

    Falk, Ruma and Greenbaum, Charles W. 1995. Significance Tests Die Hard. Theory & Psychology, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 75.

    Hammond, Kenneth R. 1996. How Convergence of Research Paradigms Can Improve Research on Diagnostic Judgment. Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 281.

    Naik, K S Ness, L M Bowker, A M B and Robinson, P J A 1996. Is computed tomography of the body overused? An audit of 2068 attendances in a large acute hospital. The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 69, Issue. 818, p. 126.

    Lai-Huat Lim and Benbasat, I. 1996. IT support for reducing group judgment biases. p. 98.

    Lim, Lai-Huat and Benbasat, Izak 1996. A Framework for Addressing Group Judgment Biases with Group Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 7.

    Gigerenzer, Gerd 1996. The Psychology of Good Judgment. Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 273.

  • Print publication year: 1982
  • Online publication date: May 2013

18 - Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities


To a great extent, the quality and cost of health care are determined by the decisions made by physicians whose ultimate objective is to design and administer a treatment program to improve a patient's condition. Most of the decisions involve many factors, great uncertainty, and difficult value questions.

This chapter examines one aspect of how these decisions are made, studying the use of probabilistic reasoning to analyze a particular problem: whether to perform a biopsy on a woman who has a breast mass that might be malignant. Specifically, we shall study how physicians process information about the results of a mammogram, an X-ray test used to diagnose breast cancer. The evidence presented shows that physicians do not manage uncertainty very well, that many physicians make major errors in probabilistic reasoning, and that these errors threaten the quality of medical care.

The problem

A breast biopsy is not a trivial procedure. The most common type (around 80%) is the excisional biopsy, in which the suspicious mass is removed surgically for microscopic examination and histological diagnosis by a pathologist. Usually the patient is admitted to a hospital and given a full set of preoperative diagnostic tests. The biopsy is almost always done under general anesthesia (with a probability of approximately 2 out of 10,000 of an anesthetic death).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Judgment under Uncertainty
  • Online ISBN: 9780511809477
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *