Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:25:58.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Challenge of Public Justification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Ronald C. Den Otter
Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I go into more detail what public justification is, why it is important, and how reasonable people could offer reasons that they sincerely believe other reasonable people would accept. I then explain what makes hard constitutional cases hard by drawing on accounts of the nature of reasonable disagreement found in contemporary political theory literature. In doing so, I hope to show that this kind of disagreement, as intractable as it may be at times, need not lead to skepticism about the possibility of the rational resolution of constitutional controversies. Although most of us these days doubt the ability of formalist or deductive methods to provide correct answers, at least in hard cases, it does not follow that any constitutional argument is as good as any other constitutional argument. One can appreciate why reasonable judges might reach different results in such cases and not conclude that the process of giving reasons is futile. The kinds of reasons that a judicial opinion incorporates will determine whether that opinion is legitimate. There is a world of difference between an opinion that meets or comes close to meeting the standard of public justification that I defend in this book and an opinion that clearly falls short of that. I then conclude with some thoughts on the weaknesses of skeptical challenges to the objectivity of legal reasoning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dworkin, Ronald, “Liberalism,” in A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 181–204Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F., Value and Justification: The Foundations of Liberal Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism (Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,” in Liberal Rights: Collected Papers: 1981–91 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 36–7Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, Equality and Partiality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 3Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, “Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy,” 16 Philosophy and Public Affairs (1987), 215–40Google Scholar
Wall, Steven and Klosko, George, “Introduction,” in Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory, ed. Wall, Steven and Klosko, George (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 8Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1992), 24Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, “The Economic Basis of Deliberative Democracy,” 6 Social Philosophy and Policy (1989), 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehg, William, “Discourse and the Moral Point of View: Deriving a Dialogical Principle of Universalization,” 34 Inquiry (1990), 44–5Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, Robert Nozick: Property, Justice, and the Minimal State (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991), 36Google Scholar
Wall, Steven, Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 110–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 50Google Scholar
Estlund, David, “The Democracy/Contractualism Analogy,” 31 Philosophy and Public Affairs (2003), 397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, “Why Dialogue?86 Journal of Philosophy (1989), 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F., “Liberal Neutrality: A Compelling and Radical Principle,” in Perfection and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory, ed. Wall, Steven and Klosko, George (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 144Google Scholar
O'Brien, David M., “Preface,” in Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench, 2nd ed., ed. O'Brien, David M. (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2004), viiGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot Be Avoided in Politics and What Should Be Done about It (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 1996), 35Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul, In Defense of Anarchism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” in Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 110Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Collected Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 394Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 1998), 202Google Scholar
Bohman, James, “The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy,” 6 Journal of Political Philosophy (1998), 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, Harm to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), 4Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A., Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A., Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, “Why Dialogue?86 Journal of Philosophy (1989), 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, “Moral Conflict and Political Legitimacy,” 16 Philosophy and Public Affairs (1987), 215–40Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles, “Political Liberalism,” 18 Political Theory (1990), 339–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, James S., The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald, Justificatory Liberalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 11Google Scholar
Kozinski, Alex, “What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making,” in Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench, 2nd ed., ed. O'Brien, David M. (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2004), 77Google Scholar
Bedau, Hugo Adam, “A Reply to Van Den Haag,” in The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 457–69Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., God Save This Honorable Court: How the Choice of Supreme Court Justices Shapes Our History (New York: Random House, 1985), 148Google Scholar
Levi, Edward H., An Introduction to Legal Reasoning (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949), 1Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, The Many Faces of Realism (LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing, 1987), 73Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin, “The Dissenting Opinion,” Journal of Supreme Court History (1994), 33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, William J., “In Defense of Dissents,” 50 Hastings Law Journal (1999), 674Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., Republic.com (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), xGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey, “Justice Delayed: The Case against California's Gay Marriage Decision,” New Republic, June 11, 2008, 9Google Scholar
Lister, Andrew, “How to Defend (Same-Sex) Marriage,” review, 00 Polity (2005), 1Google Scholar
O'Brien, David M., “Judicial Review and American Politics: Historical and Political Perspectives,” in Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench, 2nd ed., ed. O'Brien, David M. (Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2004), 2–3Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D., The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 232Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M., What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision (New York: New York University Press, 2001), 37Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J., Brown v. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Movement (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), xGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N., The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., How Judges Think (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), 175Google Scholar
Graber, Mark, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 39Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur, “Introduction: Anti-Archimedeanism,” in Ronald Dworkin, ed. Ripstein, Arthur (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Lenhardt, Christian and Nicholsen, Sherry Weber (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990), 63Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, “Foucault on Freedom and Truth,” 12 Political Theory (1984), 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John, Enlightenment's Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age (London: Routledge, 1995), 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, 2nd ed., trans. Sheridan, Alan (New York: Vintage Books, 1979)Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 2nd ed. (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, “Skepticism about Practical Reason in Literature and in the Law,” 107 Harvard Law Review (1994), 716–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Deliberation, Disagreement, and Voting,” in Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights, ed. Koh, Harold Hongju and Slye, Ronald C. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999), 222Google Scholar
Kelly, Erin and McPherson, Lionel, “On Tolerating the Unreasonable,” 9 Journal of Political Philosophy (2001), 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, Fred, Free Public Reason: Making It Up As We Go (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 7Google Scholar
Bohman, James, “Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism,” 23 Political Theory (1995), 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), xGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara, “The Practice of Moral Judgment,” in The Practice of Moral Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 73–93Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), 475–8Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 54–8Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F., Contemporary Theories of Liberalism: Public Reason as a Post-Enlightenment Project (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003), 12Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, Justice as Impartiality (Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora, “The Public Use of Reason,” in Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 28–50Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Michael J. et al., Constitutional Theory: Arguments and Perspectives, 2nd ed. (Newark, NJ: LexisNexis Publishing, 2000), 1Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×