Book contents
- Justification and Excuse in International Law
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 130
- Justification and Excuse in International Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Select Table of Treaties and Other Documents
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Justification and Excuse in International Law
- Part II Classifying the Defences in the Articles on State Responsibility
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Books in the Series
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2018
Book contents
- Justification and Excuse in International Law
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 130
- Justification and Excuse in International Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Select Table of Treaties and Other Documents
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Justification and Excuse in International Law
- Part II Classifying the Defences in the Articles on State Responsibility
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Books in the Series
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Justification and Excuse in International LawConcept and Theory of General Defences, pp. 481 - 523Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abass, A. ‘Consent Precluding State Responsibility: A Critical Analysis’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agius, M. ‘The Invocation of Necessity in International Law’ (2009) 56 Netherlands International Law Review 95.Google Scholar
Ago, R. ‘Le délit international’ (1939) 68 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 415.Google Scholar
Ago, R. ‘La colpa nell’illecito internazionale’ in Scritti sulla responsabilità internazionale degli Stati (first published 1939, Napoli: Jovene, 1979) vol. 1, 273.Google Scholar
Akande, D. and Liefländer, T. ‘Clarifying Necessity, Imminence, and Proportionality in the Law of Self-Defence’ (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law 563.Google Scholar
Akehurst, M. ‘International Liability for Injurious Consequences Arising Out of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law’ (1985) 16 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3.Google Scholar
Alaimo, M. L. ‘La natura del consenso nell’illecito internazionale’ (1982) Rivista di diritto internazionale 257.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. ‘A Unified Excuse of Preemptive Self-Protection’ (1999) 74 Notre Dame Law Review 1475.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. ‘Lesser Evils: A Closer Look at the Paradigmatic Justification’ (2005) 24 Law & Philosophy 611.Google Scholar
Alexandrov, S. A. Self-Defense Against the Use of Force in International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).Google Scholar
Alland, D. ‘International Responsibility and Sanctions: Self-Defence and Countermeasures in the ILC Codification of Rules Governing International Responsibility’ in Simma, B. and Spinedi, M. (eds), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana, 1987), 152.Google Scholar
Alland, D. ‘Countermeasures of General Interest’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alland, D. ‘The Definition of Countermeasures’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1127.Google Scholar
Alldridge, P. ‘Rules for Courts and Rules for Citizens’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Jiménez, A. ‘New Approaches to the State of Necessity in Customary International Law: Insights from WTO Law and Foreign Investment Law’ (2008) 19 American Review of International Arbitration 463.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Jiménez, A. ‘Foreign Investment Protection and Regulatory Failures as States’ Contribution to the State of Necessity under Customary International Law – A New Approach’ (2010) 27 Journal of International Arbitration 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, K. ‘Toward a Universal System of Crime: Comments on George Fletcher’s Grammar of Criminal Law’ (2006–7) 28 Cardozo Law Review 2647.Google Scholar
Ambos, K. ‘May a State Torture Suspects to Save the Life of Innocents’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice 261.Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, C. Evidence in International Litigation (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005).Google Scholar
Amzazi, M. ‘Morocco’ in International Encyclopaedia of Laws (Criminal Law: Suppl. 11) (The Hague: Kluwer, 1997).Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, C. Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice (The Hague: TMC Asser, 2001).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D. Teoria generale della responsabilità dello stato nel diritto internazionale (Florence: Lumachi, 1902).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D. ‘La responsabilité internationale des Etats à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’ (1906) 13 Revue générale de droit international public 5, 285.Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D. ‘Corso di diritto internazionale’ in Opere di Dionisio Anzilotti (reprint of 3rd edn originally published in 1927, Padova: CEDAM, 1955).Google Scholar
Appolis, G. ‘Le règlement de l’affaire du Rainbow Warrior’ (1987) 91 Revue générale de droit international public 9.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G. ‘Counter-Measures and Amicable Dispute Settlement Means in the Implementation of State Responsibility: A Crucial Issue before the International Law Commission’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 20.Google Scholar
Arias, H. ‘The Non-Liability of States for Damages Suffered by Foreigners in the Course of a Riot, an Insurrection or a Civil War’ (1913) 7 American Journal of International Law 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnolds, E. and Garland, N. F. ‘The Defence of Necessity in Criminal Law: The Right to Choose a Lesser Evil’ (1974) 65 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 289.Google Scholar
Arroyo Lara, E. ‘Reflexiones en torno a la legítima defensa como causa excluyente la ilicitud (VIII Informe a la CDI)’ (1982–3) 1 Anales de la Universidad de La Laguna 75.Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. ‘Self-Defence and the Right to Life’ (1975) 34 Cambridge Law Journal 282.Google Scholar
Auerbach, C. ‘On Professor Hart’s Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’ (1956–7) 9 Journal of Legal Education 39.Google Scholar
Aust, H. P. Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Aust, H. P. ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness and Shared Responsibility’ in Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalos, I. (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 169.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. ‘A Plea for Excuses’ (1956–7) 57 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1.Google Scholar
Bachmaier Winter, L. and del Moral García, A. ‘Spain’ in International Encyclopaedia of Laws (Criminal Law: Suppl. 46) (The Hague: Kluwer, 2012).Google Scholar
Balladore-Pallieri, G. Diritto internazionale pubblico, 7th edn (Milano: Giuffrè, 1956).Google Scholar
Bannelier, K. and Christakis, T. ‘Volenti non fit injuria? Les effets du consentement à l’intervention militaire’ (2004) 50 Annuaire Français de droit international 102.Google Scholar
Barbier, S. ‘Assurances and Guarantees of Non-Repetition’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 551.Google Scholar
Barboux, H. M. Jurisprudence du Conseil des prises pendant la guerre de 1870–1871 (Paris: Sotheran, Baer & cie, 1872).Google Scholar
Barboza, J. ‘Necessity (Revisited) in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J. (ed.), Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984), 27.Google Scholar
Barboza, J. ‘Contramedidas en la reciente codificación de la responsabilidad de los Estados: fronteras con la legítima defensa y el estado de necesidad’ (2003) 12 Anuario Argentino de derecho internacional 15.Google Scholar
Baron, M. ‘Justifications and Excuses’ (2005) 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 387.Google Scholar
Baron, M. ‘Is Justification (Somehow) Prior to Excuse? A Reply to Douglas Husak’ (2005) 24 Law & Philosophy 595.Google Scholar
Barros, J. The Corfu Incident of 1923: Mussolini and the League of Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Barsotti, R. ‘Armed Reprisals’ in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 79.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. ‘The Relationship Between the WTO Agriculture Agreement and the SCM Agreement: An Analysis of Hierarchy Rules in the WTO Legal System’ (2016) 50 Journal of World Trade 7.Google Scholar
Basdevant, J. ‘L’action coercitive anglo-germano-italienne contre le Venezuela (1902–1903)’ (1904) 11 Revue générale de droit international public 373.Google Scholar
Basdevant, J. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1936) 58 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 471.Google Scholar
Baxter, R. R. ‘International Law in “Her Infinite Variety”’ (1980) 29 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 549.Google Scholar
Bederman, D. J. ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 817.Google Scholar
Beknazar, T. B. ‘Russian Indemnity Arbitration’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (www.mpepil.com, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009–).Google Scholar
Ben Mansour, A. ‘Consent’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 439.Google Scholar
Bennouna, M. ‘Le règlement des differends peut-il limiter le ‘droit’ de se faire justice a soi-même?’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 61.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (first published in 1823, Burns, J. H and Hart, H. L. A, eds, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Benvenuti, P. ‘Lo stato di necessità alla prova dei fatti’ in Spinedi, M. et al. (eds), La codificazione della responsabilità internazionale degli Stati alla prova dei fatti (Milano: Giuffrè, 2006), 107.Google Scholar
Berlia, G. ‘La guerre civile et la responsabilité internationale de l’Etat’ (1937) 11 Revue générale de droit international public 51.Google Scholar
Berman, M. N. ‘Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality’ (2003) 53 Duke Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Berman, M. N. ‘Lesser Evils and Justification: A Less Close Look’ (2005) 24 Law & Philosophy 681.Google Scholar
Bernsmann, K. ‘Private Self-Defence and Necessity in German Penal Law and in the Penal Law Proposal – Some Remarks’ (1996) 30 Israel Law Review 171.Google Scholar
Bettiol, G. and Pettoello-Mantovani, L. Diritto penale parte generale, 12th edn (Padova: CEDAM, 1988).Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens, 1953).Google Scholar
Binder, C. ‘Changed Circumstances in International Investment Law: Interfaces Between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis’ in Binder, C. et al. (eds), International Investment Law in the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 608.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, A. ‘Emergency Exceptions: State of Necessity and Force Majeure’ in Muchlinski, P. and Ortino, F. (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 459.Google Scholar
Blanning, T. The Nineteenth Century: Europe 1798–1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Bluntschli, J. C. Le droit international codifié, 2nd edn (Lardy trans, Paris: Guillaumin, 1874).Google Scholar
Bluntschli, J. C. Le droit international codifié, 3rd edn (Lardy trans, Paris: Guillaumin, 1881).Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. and Crook, J. R. ‘Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles: Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 773.Google Scholar
Boed, R. ‘State of Necessity as a Justification for Internationally Wrongful Conduct’ (2000) 3 Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Bohlander, M. The German Criminal Code: A Modern English Translation (Oxford: Hart, 2008).Google Scholar
Bohlen, . ‘Incomplete Privilege to Inflict Intentional Invasions of Interests of Property and Personality’ (1926) 39 Harvard Law Review 307.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, L. ‘Other Non-derogable Obligations’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1205.Google Scholar
Bonfils, H. Manuel de droit international public, 4th edn (Fauchille, ed., Paris: Rousseau, 1905).Google Scholar
Bonfils, H. Manuel de droit international public, 7th edn (Fauchille, ed., Paris: Rousseau, 1914).Google Scholar
Borchard, E. M. ‘Harvard Draft on the Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) 23 American Journal of International Law Special Supplement 131.Google Scholar
Borchard, E. M. The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York: Banks Law, 1915).Google Scholar
Borchard, E. M. ‘Responsibility of States at the Hague Codification Conference’ (1930) 24 American Journal of International Law 517.Google Scholar
Borel, E. ‘L’Acte Général de Genève’ (1929) 27 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 497.Google Scholar
Borelli, S. and Olleson, S. ‘Obligations Relating to Human Rights and Humanitarian Law’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1177.Google Scholar
Borsi, U. ‘Ragione di guerra e stato di necessità nel diritto internazionale’ (1916) 5 Rivista di diritto internazionale 157.Google Scholar
Bourquin, M. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1931) 35 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Bowett, D. Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Bowett, D. ‘The Impact of Security Council Decisions on Dispute Settlement Procedures’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 89.Google Scholar
Brierly, J. L. ‘The General Act of Geneva, 1928’ (1930) 11 British Yearbook of International Law 119.Google Scholar
Brierly, J. L. ‘Vital Interests and the Law’ (1944) 21 British Yearbook of International Law 51.Google Scholar
Brockelbank, W. ‘The Vilna Dispute’ (1926) 20 American Journal of International Law 583.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S. ‘Fur Seals and the Bering Sea Arbitration’ (1895) 26 Journal of the American Geographical Society of New York 326.Google Scholar
Brown, V. ‘Rights, Liberties and Duties: Reformulating Hohfeld’s Scheme of Legal Relations?’ (2005) 58 Current Legal Problems 343.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I. International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Brownlie, I. Principles of Public International Law, 7th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Brusa, E. ‘Responsabilité des Etats à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers en cas d’émeute ou de guerre civile’ (1898) 17 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international 96.Google Scholar
Bry, G. Précis elémentaire de droit international public, 4th edn (Paris: Larose, 1901).Google Scholar
Bücheler, G. Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Burlamaqui, J. J. The Principles of Natural and Politic Law (1747, Nugent trans., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006).Google Scholar
Byrd, S. ‘Wrongdoing and Attribution: Implications Beyond the Justification-Excuse Distinction’ (1986–7) 33 Wayne Law Review 1289.Google Scholar
Cahier, P. ‘Changements et continuité du droit international’ (1985) 195 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Calvo, C. Le droit international théorique et pratique, 3rd edn (Paris: Pedone-Lauriel, 1880) vols 1– 3.Google Scholar
Calvo, C. Dictionnaire de droit international public et privé (Paris: Rousseau, 1885) vols 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Calvo, C. Le droit international théorique et pratique, 4th edn (Paris: Pedone-Lauriel, 1888) vol. 3.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. ‘International Law and Primitive Law’ (1988) 8 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 169.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. ‘Offence and Defence’ in Dennis, I. H. (ed.), Criminal Law and Justice (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1987).Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, E. ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 889.Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, E. (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Capotorti, F. ‘L’extinction et la suspension des traités’ (1971) 134 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 417.Google Scholar
Capotorti, F. ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1994) 248 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Carnazza-Amari, G. Trattato sul diritto internazionale pubblico di pace, 2nd edn (Milano: Maisner, 1875).Google Scholar
Carnazza-Amari, G. Traité de droit international public en temps de paix (Montanari-Revest trans., Paris: Larose, 1880) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Caron, D. ‘The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship Between Form and Authority’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 857.Google Scholar
Cassese, A. ‘On the Use of Criminal Law Notions in Determining State Responsibility for Genocide’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 875.Google Scholar
Cavaglieri, A. I diritti fondamentali degli Stati nella Societá Internazionale (Padova: Librai-Editori, 1906).Google Scholar
Cavaglieri, A. Lo stato di necessità nel diritto internazionale (Roma: Athenaeum, 1917).Google Scholar
Cavaglieri, A. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1929) 26 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 311.Google Scholar
Cavarretta, G. Lo stato di necessità nel diritto internazionale: parte generale (Palermo: Reber, 1910).Google Scholar
Čepelka, Č. ‘Les conséquences juridiques du délit en droit international contemporain’ in Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Iuridica, Monographia (Prague: Universita Karlova, 1965) vol. 3.Google Scholar
Charpentier, J. ‘L’affaire du Rainbow Warrior’ (1985) 31 Annuaire Français de droit international 210.Google Scholar
Charpentier, J. ‘L’affaire du Rainbow Warrior: le règlement interétatique’ (1986) 32 Annuaire Français de droit international 873.Google Scholar
Charpentier, J. ‘L’affaire du Rainbow Warrior: la sentence arbitrale du 30 avril 1990 (Nouvelle Zélande c. France)’ (1990) 36 Annuaire Français de droit international 395.Google Scholar
Charpentier, J. L’affaire Rainbow Warrior et la responsabilité internationale des États (Saarbrücken: Europa-Institut, 1991).Google Scholar
Chatterjee, C. ‘The Rainbow Warrior Arbitration Between New Zealand and France’ (1992) 9 Journal of International Arbitration 17.Google Scholar
Chavarot, M.-C. ‘La pratique des lettres de marque d’après les arrêts du parlement (XIIIe–début XVe siècle)’ (1991) 149 Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes 51.Google Scholar
Chin, G. J. ‘Unjustified: The Practical Irrelevance of the Justification/Excuse Distinction’ (2009) 43 Michigan Journal of Law Reform 79.Google Scholar
Chircop, A. ‘Ships in Distress, Environmental Threats to Coastal States, and Places of Refuge: New Directions for an Ancien Regime?’ (2002) 33 Ocean Development & International Law 207.Google Scholar
Chircop, A. ‘The Customary Law of Refuge for Ships in Distress’ in Chircop, A. and Linden, O. (eds), Places of Refuge for Ships: Emerging Environmental Concerns of a Maritime Custom (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2006), 163.Google Scholar
Chircop, A. et al. ‘Characterising the Problem of Places of Refuge for Ships’ in Chircop, A. and Linden, O. (eds), Places of Refuge for Ships: Emerging Environmental Concerns of a Maritime Custom (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2006), 1.Google Scholar
Christakis, T. ‘Les “circonstances excluant l’illicéité”: une illusion optique?’ in Corten, O. et al. (eds), Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit: Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2007), 223.Google Scholar
Christakis, T. ‘“Nécessité n’a pas de Loi”? Rapport général sur la nécessité en droit international’ in Christakis, T. (ed.), La nécessité en droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2007), 9.Google Scholar
Christakis, T. ‘Quel remède à l’éclatement de la jurisprudence CIRDI sur les investissement en Argentine? La décision du comité ad hoc dans l’affaire CMS c. Argentine’ (2007) 111 Revue générale de droit international public 879.Google Scholar
Christakis, T. and Bannelier, K. ‘La légitime défense en tant que “circonstance excluant l’illicéité”’ in Kherad, R. (ed.), Légitimes défenses (Paris: LGDJ, 2007), 233.Google Scholar
Christakis, T. and Bannelier, K. ‘La légitime défense a-t-elle sa place dans un code sur la responsabilité internationale?’ in Constantinides, A. and Zaikos, N. (eds), The Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Kalliopi K Koufa (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 519.Google Scholar
Christie, G. ‘The Unwarranted Conclusions Drawn from Vincent v Lake Erie Transportation Co Concerning the Defence of Necessity’ (2005) 5 Issues in Legal Scholarship, article no 7.Google Scholar
Civoli, C. ‘In torno alla legittima difesa e allo stato di necessità. Studio storico’ (1893) 37 Rivista Penale 21.Google Scholar
Clark, R. ‘State Terrorism: Some Lessons from the Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior’ (1988) 20 Rutgers Law Journal 393.Google Scholar
Cohan, J. A. ‘Two Men and a Plank: The Argument from a State of Nature’ (2007–8) 29 Whittier Law Review 333.Google Scholar
Cohen, F. S. ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Columbia Law Review 809.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Hart, H. ‘Theory and Definition in Jurisprudence’ (1955) 29 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplemental Volume) 213.Google Scholar
Colvin, E. ‘Exculpatory Defences in Criminal Law’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 381.Google Scholar
Combacau, J. and Alland, D. ‘“Primary” and “Secondary” Rules in the Law of State Responsibility: Categorizing International Obligations’ (1985) 16 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 81.Google Scholar
Condorelli, L. ‘Le règlement des différends en matière de responsabilité internationale des Etats: quelques remarques candides sur le débat à la CDI’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 106.Google Scholar
Condorelli, L. and Kress, C. ‘The Rules of Attribution: General Considerations’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 221.Google Scholar
Conforti, B. ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1988) 212 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Corrado, M. ‘Notes on the Structure of a Theory of Excuses’ (1991–2) 82 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 465.Google Scholar
Corten, O. ‘The Controversies Over the Customary Prohibition on the Use of Force: A Methodological Debate’ (2005) 5 European Journal of International Law 803.Google Scholar
Corten, O. ‘Breach and Evolution of the International Customary Law on the Use of Force’ in Cannizzaro, E. and Palchetti, P. (eds), Customary International Law on the Use of Force: A Methodological Approach (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 119.Google Scholar
Corten, O. ‘Article 52 (1969)’ in Corten, O. and Klein, P. (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) vol. 2, 1201.Google Scholar
Cortés Martín, J. M. ‘El estado de necesidad en materia económica y financiera’ (2009) 25 Anuario Español de derecho internacional 119.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘International Law and Foreign Sovereigns: Distinguishing Immune Transactions’ (1983) 54 British Yearbook of International Law 75.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Counter-Measures as Interim Measures’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 66.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Revising the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 435.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement: An Inaugural Lecture’ (2010) 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Overview of Part Three of the Articles on State Responsibility’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 931.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, J. State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Sovereignty as a Legal Value’ in Crawford, J. and Koskenniemi, M. (eds), Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law’ (2013) 365 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ‘The International Court of Justice and the Law of State Responsibility’ in Tams, C. and Sloane, J. (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 75.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. et al. ‘Towards an International Law of Responsibility: Early Doctrine’ in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Kohen, M. (eds), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010), 377.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. and Olleson, S. ‘The Exception of Non-Performance: Links Between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility’ (2001) 21 Australian Yearbook of Internatioanl Law 55.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. and Olleson, S. ‘The Character and Forms of International Responsibility’ in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 443.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cristani, F. ‘The Sempra Annulment Decision of 29 June 2010 and Subsequent Developments in Investment Arbitration Dealing with the Necessity Defence’ (2011) 15 International Community Law Review 237.Google Scholar
Czapliński, , , W. and Danilenko, G. M. ‘Conflict of Norms in International Law’ (1990) 21 Netherlands International Law Review 3.Google Scholar
D’Amato, A. ‘The Coerciveness of International Law’ (2009) 52 German Yearbook of International Law 437.Google Scholar
d’Argent, P. ‘Du commerce à l’emploi de la force: l’affaire des plates-formes pétrolières (arrêt sur le fond)’ (2003) 49 Annuaire Français de droit international 266.Google Scholar
Daillier, P. ‘The Development of the Law of Responsibility through the Case Law’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 37.Google Scholar
Daman, M. ‘Cross-Border Hot Pursuit in the EU’ (2008) 16 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice 171.Google Scholar
Damrosch, L. F. ‘Retaliation or Arbitration – or Both? The 1978 United States-France Aviation Dispute’ (1980) 74 American Journal of International Law 785.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, M. ‘Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Law’ (1985) 97 Harvard Law Review 625.Google Scholar
Darcy, S. ‘The Evolution of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals’ (2003) 175 Military Law Review 184.Google Scholar
Darcy, S. ‘Retaliation and Reprisal’ in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 879.Google Scholar
David, E. ‘Primary and Secondary Rules’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 27.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. ‘The Rainbow Warrior Arbitration Concerning the Treatment of the French Agents Mafart and Prieur’ (1991) 40 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 446.Google Scholar
Davies, P. ‘Defences and Third Parties: Justifying Participation’ in Dyson, A., Goudkamp, J. et al. (eds), Defences in Tort (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 107.Google Scholar
Davis, G. B. The Elements of International Law, 4th edn (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1916).Google Scholar
Davis, N. ‘Rights, Permission, and Compensation’ (1985) 14 Philosophy & Public Affairs 374.Google Scholar
Dawidowicz, M. ‘Third-Party Countermeasures: Observations on a Controversial Concept’ in Chinkin, C. M. and Baetens, F. (eds), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 340.Google Scholar
de Garden, G. C. Traité complet de diplomatie (Paris: Treuttel et Wurtz, 1833) vol. 1.Google Scholar
de Guttry, A. Le rappresaglie non comportanti la coercizione militare nel diritto internazionale (Milano: Giuffrè, 1985).Google Scholar
de Hoogh, A. ‘Jus Cogens and the Use of Armed Force’ in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 1161.Google Scholar
de Hoogh, A. ‘Restrictivist Reasoning on the Ratione Personae Dimension of Armed Attacks in the Post 9/11 World’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 19.Google Scholar
de la Brière, Y. ‘Evolution de la doctrine et de la pratique en matière de représailles’ (1928) 22 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 237.Google Scholar
de Lapradelle, A. and Politis, N. Recueil des arbitrages internationaux (Paris: Pedone, 1905) vols 1 and 2.Google Scholar
de Louter, J. Le droit international public positif (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1920) vols 1 and 2.Google Scholar
de Martens, C. Nouvelles causes célèbres du droit des gens (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1843) vol. 2.Google Scholar
de Oliveira Mazzuoli, V. Curso de direito international public, 6th edn (São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2012).Google Scholar
de Robertis, F. La responsabilità contrattuale nel Diritto Romano dalle origini a tutta l’età postclassica (Bari: Caducci, 1996).Google Scholar
de Visscher, C. Belgium’s Case: A Juridical Enquiry (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1916).Google Scholar
de Visscher, C. ‘Les lois de la guerre et la théorie de la nécessité’ (1917) 24 Revue générale de droit international public 74.Google Scholar
de Visscher, C. ‘La responsabilité internationale des Etats’ in Bibliotheca Visseriana (Brill, 1924) vol. 2.Google Scholar
de Visscher, C. Theory and Reality in Public International Law, 3rd edn (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Deeks, A. ‘“Unwilling or Unable”: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’ (2012) 52 Virginia Journal of International Law 483.Google Scholar
Del Mar, K. ‘The Effects of Framing International Legal Norms as Rules or Exceptions: State Immunity from Civil Jurisdiction’ (2013) 15 International Community Law Review 143.Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, A. and Casanova, E. Le rappresaglie nei comuni medievali e specialmente in Firenze (Bologna: Zanichelli, 1894).Google Scholar
Dempsey, M. M. and Herring, J. ‘Why Sexual Penetration Requires Justification’ (2007) 27 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 467.Google Scholar
Díaz Barrado, C. M. El consentimiento, causa de exclusión de la ilicitud del uso de la fuerza en Derecho Internacional (Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, 1989).Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. D. ‘The Analogy Between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations’ (1917) 26 Yale Law Journal 564.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y. ‘International Law as a Primitive Legal System’ (1986–7) 19 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 1.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y. War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Distefano, G. ‘Fait continu, fait composé et fait complexe dans le droit de la responsabilité’ (2006) 52 Annuaire Français de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Distefano, G. ‘Article 51 (1969)’ in Corten, O. and Klein, P. (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) vol. 2, 1179.Google Scholar
Dominicé, C. ‘Observations sur les droits de l’Etat victime d’un fait internationalement illicite’ in Dominicé, C. et al. (eds), L’ordre juridique international entre tradition et innovation (Paris: PUF, 1997), 261.Google Scholar
Dominicé, C. ‘The International Responsibility of States for Breach of Multilateral Obligations’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 353.Google Scholar
Dominicé, C. ‘Attribution of Conduct to Multiple States and the Implication of a State in the Conduct of Another State’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 281.Google Scholar
Donner, P. ‘Offering Refuge Is Better Than Refusing’ (2008) 7 Journal of Maritime Affairs 281.Google Scholar
Dörr, O. and Randelzhofer, A. ‘Article 2(4)’ in Simma, B. et al. (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) vol. 1, 200.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L. ‘The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government’ (1985) 56 British Yearbook of International Law 189.Google Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘New Thoughts about the Concept of Justification on the Criminal Law: A Critique of Fletcher’s Thinking and Rethinking’ (1984–5) 32 University of California in Los Angeles Law Review 61.Google Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature’ (1986–7) 33 Wayne Law Review 1155.Google Scholar
Duarte d’Almeida, L. ‘Defining “Defences”’ in Dyson, A. et al. (eds), Defences in Tort (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 35.Google Scholar
Duarte d’Almeida, L. Allowing for Exceptions: A Theory of Defences and Defeasibility in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ducrocq, L. Représailles en temps de paix: Blocus pacifique suivi d’une étude sur les affaires de Chine (1900–1901) (Paris, 1901).Google Scholar
Dugard, J. ‘Jurisdiction over Persons on Board an Aircraft Landing in Distress’ (1981) 30 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 902.Google Scholar
Dupuis, C. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1930) 32 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M. ‘Le fait générateur de la responsabilité des Etats’ (1984) 188 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 8.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M. ‘The International Law of State Responsibility: Revolution or Evolution’ (1989–90) 11 Michigan Journal of International Law 105.Google Scholar
Elagab, O. Y. The Legality of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Eser, A. ‘Justification and Excuse’ (1976) 24 American Journal of Comparative Law 621.Google Scholar
Eser, A. ‘Justification and Excuse: A Key Issue in the Concept of Crime’ in Eser, A. (ed.), Justification and Excuse: Comparative Perspectives (Freiburg, 1987), 18.Google Scholar
Falkof, G. ‘“State of Necessity” Defence Accepted in LG&E v Argentina ICSID Tribunal’ (2006) 3(5) Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar
Farhang, C. ‘Mapping the Approaches to the Question of Exemption from International Responsibility’ (2013) 60 Netherlands International Law Review 93.Google Scholar
Farhang, C. ‘The Notion of Consent in Part One of the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (2014) 27 Leiden Journal of International Law 55.Google Scholar
Farhang, C. ‘Self-Defence as a Circumstance Precluding the Wrongfulness of the Use of Force’ (2015) 11 Utrecht Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Faria, M. P. B. R. ‘Portugal’ in International Encyclopaedia of Laws (Criminal Law: Suppl. 48) (The Hague: Kluwer, 2013).Google Scholar
Fauchille, P. Du blocus maritime: étude de droit international et de droit comparé (Paris: Rousseau, 1882).Google Scholar
Fauchille, P. Traité de droit international public (Paix), 8th edn (Paris: Rousseau, 1922) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Fauchille, P. Traité de droit international public (Paix), 8th edn (Paris: Rousseau, 1926) vol. 3.Google Scholar
Favre, A. ‘Fault as an Element of the Illicit Act’ (1964) 52 Georgetown Law Journal 566.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. ‘Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life (Tanner Lecture)’ (1978) 7 Philosophy & Public Affairs 93.Google Scholar
Ferrer Beltrán, J. and Ratti, G. B. ‘Defeasibility and Legality: A Survey’ in Ferrer Beltrán, J. and Ratti, G. B. (eds), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 11.Google Scholar
Ferzan, K. K. ‘Clarifying Consent: Peter Westen’s The Logic of Consent’ (2006) 25 Law & Philosophy 193.Google Scholar
Ferzan, K. K. ‘Justification and Excuse’ in Deigh, J. and Dolinko, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 239.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, C. O. ‘When the Rule Swallows the Exception’ in Meyer, L. (ed.), Rules and Reasoning: Essays in Honour of Frederick Schauer (London: Hart, 1999), 147.Google Scholar
Fiore, P. Nouveau droit international public, 2nd edn (Antoine trans., Paris: Pedone-Lauriel, 1885) vols 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Fiore, P. Trattato di diritto internazionale, 3rd edn (Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1887) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Fiore, P. Il diritto internazionale codificato (Roma: Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1890).Google Scholar
Firth, S. ‘The Nuclear Issue in the Pacific Islands’ (1986) 21 Journal of Pacific History 202.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G. ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 92 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M. ‘Necessity in International Environmental Law’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 159.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M. and Olufemi, E. Contemporary Issues in the Law of Treaties (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005).Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 537.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Proportionality and the Psychotic Aggressor: A Vignette in Comparative Criminal Theory’ (1973) 8 Israel Law Review 367.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘The Individualization of Excusing Conditions’ (1973–4) 47 Southern California Law Review 1269.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr. Robinson’ (1975–6) 23 University of California in Los Angeles Law Review 293.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape’ (1978–9) 26 University of California in Los Angeles Law Review 1355.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Perspectives on Rights: The Right to Life’ (1978–9) 13 Georgia Law Review 1371.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. and Ohlin, J. Defending Humanity: When Is Force Justified and Why (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Focarelli, C. International Law as a Social Construct (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Foley, V. and Nolan, C. ‘The Erika Judgment – Environmental Liability and Places of Refuge: A Sea Change in Civil and Criminal Responsibility That the Maritime Community Must Heed’ (2008) 33 Tulane Maritime Law Journal 41.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, F. and Bjorge, E. ‘Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995 (The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia v Greece) Judgment of 5 December 2011’ (2012) 61 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 775.Google Scholar
Forlati, S. Diritto dei trattati e responsabilità internazionale (Milano: Giuffrè, 2005).Google Scholar
Forlati, S. ‘Reactions to Non Performance of Treaties in International Law’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 759.Google Scholar
Forteau, M. ‘Reparation in the Event of a Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 887.Google Scholar
Foster, C. Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Foster, D. ‘Necessity Knows No Law! LG&E v Argentina’ (2006) 9 International Arbitration Law Review 149.Google Scholar
Fouret, J. ‘“CMS c/LG&E” ou l’état de nécessité en question’ (2007) 2 Revue de l’arbitrage 249.Google Scholar
Fox, G. H. ‘Intervention by Invitation’ in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook on the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 816.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 715.Google Scholar
François, J. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1936) 66 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Frey, R. ‘Act-Utilitarianism’ in LaFollette, H. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 165.Google Scholar
Frowein, J. A. ‘Kosovo and Lotus’ in Fastenrath, U. et al. (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 923.Google Scholar
Fry, J. D. ‘Coercion, Causation, and the Fictional Elements of Indirect Responsibility’ (2007) 40 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 611.Google Scholar
Gaja, G. ‘Jus Cogens Beyond the Vienna Convention’ (1981) 172 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 271.Google Scholar
Gaja, G. ‘Primary and Secondary Rules in the International Law of State Responsibility’ (2014) 97 Rivista di diritto internazionale 981.Google Scholar
Gaja, G. ‘Interpreting Articles Adopted by the International Law Commission’ (2014) 85 British Yearbook of International Law.Google Scholar
Galiani, F. De’ doveri de’ princìpi neutrali verso i principi guerreggianti, e di questi verso i neutrali (1782).Google Scholar
Gardam, J. G. Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Gardner, J. ‘The Gist of Excuses’ in Gardner, D. (ed.), Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 121.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. ‘In Defence of Defences’ in Gardner, J. (ed.), Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 77.Google Scholar
Garner, J. W. ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries Suffered by Foreigners Within Their Territories on Account of Mob Violence, Riots and Insurrections’ (1927) 21 American Society of International Law Proceedings 49.Google Scholar
Gattini, A. ‘La notion de la faute à la lumière du projet de convention de la Commission du droit international sur la responsabilité internationale’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 253.Google Scholar
Gattini, A. ‘Smoking/No Smoking: Some Remarks on the Current Place of Fault in the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 397.Google Scholar
Gazzini, T. The Changing Rules on the Use of Force in International Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gazzini, T. ‘Foreign Investment and Measures Adopted on Grounds of Necessity: Toward a Common Understanding’ (2010) 7(1) Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar
Gerkens, J.-F. ‘Vis maior and vis cui resisti non potest’ in van den Bergh, R. and van Niekerk, G. (eds), Ex iusta traditum: Essays in Honour of Eric H Pool (Pretoria: University of South Africa, 2005), 109.Google Scholar
Ghanayim, K. ‘Excused Necessity in Western Legal Philosophy’ (2006) 19 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 31.Google Scholar
Gidel, G. ‘Droits et devoirs des nations, théorie classique des droits fondamentaux des États’ (1925) 10 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 537.Google Scholar
Giraud, E. ‘La théorie de la légitime défense’ (1934) 49 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 688.Google Scholar
Goebel, J. ‘The International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence, Insurrections and Civil War’ (1914) 8 American Journal of International Law 802.Google Scholar
Gomaa, M. M. Suspension or Termination of Treaties on Grounds of Breach (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).Google Scholar
Gordley, J. ‘Damages under the Necessity Doctrine’ (2005) 5 Issues in Legal Scholarship, article no 2.Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A. ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 31.Google Scholar
Grabczynska, A. and Ferzan, K. K. ‘Justifying Killing in Self-Defence’ (2007) 99 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 235.Google Scholar
Graefrath, B. ‘Complicity in the Law of International Responsibility’ (1996) 29 Revue Belge de droit international 370.Google Scholar
Grando, M. Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Grapin, P. Valeur internationale des Principes généraux du droit (Paris: Domat-Montchrestien, 1934).Google Scholar
Gray, C. International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Gray, C. International Law and the Use of Force, 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Green, J. A. ‘The Oil Platforms Case: An Error in Judgment?’ (2004) 9 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 357.Google Scholar
Green, J. A. ‘Docking the Caroline: Understanding the Relevance of the Formula in Contemporary Customary International Law Concerning Self-Defense’ (2006) 14 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 429.Google Scholar
Green, J. A. ‘Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force’ (2011) 32 Michigan Journal of International Law 215.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, K. ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’ (1984) 84 Columbia Law Review 1897.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, K. ‘Distinguishing between Justification and Excuse’ (1986) 49 Law & Contemporary Problems 89.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C. ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’ (1987) 36 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 283.Google Scholar
Grewe, W. G. The Epochs of International Law (Byers, Michael ed., Berlin: de Gruyter, 2000).Google Scholar
Gross, L. ‘States as Organs of International Law and the Problem of Autointerpretation’ in Essays on International Law and Organization (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1998) vol. 1, 167.Google Scholar
Gross, O. and Ni Aolain, F. ‘Emergency, War and International Law’ (2001) 70 Nordic Journal of International Law 29.Google Scholar
Gross, O. and Ni Aolain, F. Law in Times of Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Grotius, H. De jure belli ac pacis (1625, Tuck ed., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005).Google Scholar
Grzebyk, P. Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Guani, A. ‘Les mesures de coercition entre membres du Pacte de la Société des Nations envisagées spécialement au point de vue Américain’ (1924) 31 Revue générale de droit international public 285.Google Scholar
Guarini, G. B. Le rappresaglie in tempo di pace: storia e dottrina (Roma: Società Cartiere Centrali, 1910).Google Scholar
Guggenheim, P. Traité de droit international public (Genève: Georg & Cie, 1954) vol. 2.Google Scholar
Guillaume, G. ‘L’affaire du Rainbow Warrior et son règlement’ in Guillaume, G. (ed.), Les grandes crises internationales et le droit (Paris: Seuil, 1994), 219.Google Scholar
Gur-Aye, M. ‘Should a Criminal Code Distinguish between Justification and Excuse?’ (1992) 5 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 215.Google Scholar
Gur-Aye, M. ‘Justifying the Distinction between Justifications and Power (Justification vs Power)’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law & Philosophy 293.Google Scholar
Hackworth, G. H. ‘Responsibility of States for Damage Caused in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Aliens’ (1930) 24 American Journal of International Law 500.Google Scholar
Hall, J. ‘Comment on Justification and Excuse’ (1976) 24 American Journal of Comparative Law 638.Google Scholar
Hallborg, R. ‘Comparing Harms: The Lesser Evil Defense and the Trolley Problem’ (1997) 3 Legal Theory 291.Google Scholar
Halleck, H. Elements of International Law and Laws of War (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1866).Google Scholar
Hameed, A. ‘Legislation and Law on the International Plane’ (2015), University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No 35/2015, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2614614.Google Scholar
Hannikainen, L. Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens) in International Law (Helsinki: Lakimesliiton Kustannus, 1988).Google Scholar
Hart, H. ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’ in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (reprint, first published in 1953, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), 1.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Legal Responsibility and Excuses’, in Hart, H. L. A. (ed.), Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 29.Google Scholar
Hassemer, W. ‘Justification and Excuse in Criminal Law: Theses and Comments’ (1986) Brigham Young University Law Review 573.Google Scholar
Hautefeuille, L. B. Des droits et des devoirs des nations neutres en temps de guerre maritime, 2nd edn (Paris: Guillaumin, 1858) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Hautefeuille, L. B. Histoire des origines, des progres et des variations du droit maritime international (Paris: Guillaumin, 1858).Google Scholar
Hazan, E. T. L’état de nécessité en droit pénal interétatique et international (Paris: Pedone, 1949).Google Scholar
Heathcote, S. ‘State of Necessity and International Law’, unpublished thesis, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
Heathcote, S. ‘Est-ce que l’état de nécessité est un principe de droit international coutumier?’ (2007) 1 Revue Belge de droit international 53.Google Scholar
Heffter, A. W. Le droit international de l’Europe, 2nd edn (Bergson trans., Paris: Cotillon, 1866).Google Scholar
Heffter, A. W. Le droit international de l’Europe, 3rd edn (Bergson trans., Paris: Cotillon, 1873).Google Scholar
Herring, J. Criminal Law: Texts, Cases, and Materials, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Higgins, A. P. The Law of Nations and the War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1914).Google Scholar
Higgins, R. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994).Google Scholar
Hill, D. J. ‘The Janina-Corfu Affair’ (1924) 18 American Journal of International Law 98.Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, A. ‘Self-Help in Time of Peace’ (1932) 26 American Journal of International Law 315.Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, A. Force in Peace. Force Short of War in International Relations (1933, reprinted in London: Kennikat Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Hoffheimer, M. H. ‘Codifying Necessity: Legislative Resistance to Enacting Choice-of-Evils Defenses to Criminal Liability’ (2007) 82 Tulane Law Review 191.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal 16.Google Scholar
Holtzoff, A. ‘Some Phases of the Law of Blockade’ (1916) 10 American Journal of International Law 53.Google Scholar
Hoppe, J. and Wright, W. ‘Force Majeure Clauses in Leases’ (2007) 21 Probate & Property 8.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. ‘Justification and Excuse in the Program of the Criminal Law’ (1986) 49 Law & Contemporary Problems 109.Google Scholar
Hruschka, J. ‘On the History of Justification and Excuse in Cases of Necessity’ in Byrd, S. and Hruschka, J. (eds), Kant and Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), 323.Google Scholar
Hudson, M. O. ‘How the League of Nations Met the Corfu Crisis’ (1923) 6 World Peace Foundation Pamphlet Series 176.Google Scholar
Hull, I. V. A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hurd, H. M. ‘Justification and Excuse, Wrongdoing and Culpability’ (1998–9) 74 Notre Dame Law Review 1551.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. M. ‘Blaming the Victim: A Response to the Proposal that Criminal Law Recognize a General Defense of Contributory Responsibility’ (2005) 8 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 503.Google Scholar
Hurst, C. B. ‘The Effect of War on Treaties’ (1921) 2 British Yearbook of International Law 37.Google Scholar
Husak, D. N. ‘Justifications and the Criminal Liability of Accessories’ (1989–90) 80 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 491.Google Scholar
Husak, D. N. ‘The Serial View of Criminal Law Defences’ (1992) 3 Criminal Law Forum 369.Google Scholar
Husak, D. N. ‘On the Supposed Priority of Justification to Excuse’ (2005) 24 Law & Philosophy 557.Google Scholar
Husak, D. N. ‘Beyond the Justification/Excuse Dichotomy’ in Cruft, R. et al. (eds), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 141.Google Scholar
Jagota, S. P. ‘State Responsibility: Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness’ (1985) 16 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 249.Google Scholar
Jeffries, J. C. and Stephan, P. B. ‘Defenses, Presumption, and Burden of Proof in the Criminal Law’ (1979) 88 Yale Law Journal 1325.Google Scholar
Jenks, W. ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 401.Google Scholar
Jennings, R. Y. ‘The Caroline and McLeod Cases’ (1938) 32 American Journal of International Law 82.Google Scholar
Jescheck, H.-H. ‘Evolución del concepto jurídico de la culpabilidad en Alemania y Austria’ (2003) 5(1) Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología.Google Scholar
Jiménez de Aréchaga, E. ‘International Responsibility’ in Sørensen, M. (ed.), Manual of Public International Law (London: MacMillan, 1968), 541.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I. ‘The Plea of “Necessity” in International Legal Discourse: Humanitarian Intervention and Counter-terrorism’ (2005) 43 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 337.Google Scholar
Jones, G. H. and Schlechtriem, P. ‘Breach of Contract (Deficiencies in a Party’s Performance)’ in Von Mehren, A. T. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976) vol. 7 (Contracts in General).Google Scholar
Jouannet, E. The Liberal-Welfarist Law of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Kadish, S. ‘Respect for Life and Regard for Rights in the Criminal Law’ (1976) 64 California Law Review 871.Google Scholar
Kaeckenbeck, G. ‘Divergences between British and Other Views on International Law’ (1919) 4 Transactions of the Grotian Society 213.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J. ‘Oil’s Well That Ends Well? Critical Comments on the Merits Judgment in the Oil Platforms Case’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 695.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J. ‘Gaps, the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion and the Structure of International Legal Argument between Theory and Practice’ (2010) 80 British Yearbook of International Law 333.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J. Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J. ‘The Resilience of the Restrictive Rules on Self-Defence’ in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 627.Google Scholar
Kamto, M. ‘La volonté de l’Etat en droit international’ (2004) 310 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Kamto, M. ‘The Time Factor in the Application of Countermeasures’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1169.Google Scholar
Kasachkoff, T. ‘Killing in Self-Defense: An Unquestionable or Problematic Defense?’ (1998) 17 Law & Philosophy 509.Google Scholar
Kasenetz, E. D. ‘Desperate Times Call for Desperate Measures’ (2010) 41 George Washington Law Review 709.Google Scholar
Kaufman, W. ‘Is There a “Right” to Self‐Defense?’ (2004) 23 Criminal Justice Ethics 20.Google Scholar
Kazazi, M. Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International Tribunals (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. ‘Théorie générale du droit international public. Problèmes choisis’ (1932) 42 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 117.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. General Theory of Law and State (Wedberg trans., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. ‘Sanctions in International Law under the Charter of the United Nations’ (1945–6) 31 Iowa Law Review 499.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. ‘Collective Security and Collective Self-Defence under the Charter of the United Nations’ (1948) 42 American Journal of International Law 783.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. ‘Théorie du droit international public’ (1953) 84 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. Law and Peace in International Relations – The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 1940–1941 (Buffalo, NY: William S Hein & Co, 1997).Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law (B. Litschewski Paulson and S. L. Paulson trans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Kentin, E. ‘Economic Crisis and Investment Arbitration: The Argentine Cases’ in Kahn, P. and Wälde, T. (eds), New Aspects of International Investment Law (The Hague: Nijhoff, 2007), 629.Google Scholar
Kerbrat, Y. ‘Interaction between the Forms of Reparation’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 574.Google Scholar
Kirgis, F. L. ‘Some Lingering Questions about Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1989) 22 Cornell International Law Journal 549.Google Scholar
Kiss, A. Répertoire de la pratique française en matière de droit international public (Paris: CNRS, 1962).Google Scholar
Kleen, R. Lois et usages de la neutralité d’après le droit international conventionnel et coutumier des états civilisés (Paris: Marescq Ainé, 1898) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Klepper, H. ‘Torts of Necessity: A Moral Theory of Compensation’ (1990) 9 Law & Philosophy 223.Google Scholar
Klüber, J.-L. Droit des gens moderne de l’Europe, 2nd edn (Ott ed., Paris: Pedone-Lauriel, 1874).Google Scholar
Knoops, G.-J. A. Defenses in Contemporary International Criminal Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar
Koh, K. and Tan, Y. ‘Singapore’ in International Encyclopaedia of Laws (Criminal Law: Suppl. 5) (The Hague: Kluwer, 1995).Google Scholar
Kohen, M. ‘The Notion of “State Survival” in International Law’ in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Sands, P. (eds), Nuclear Weapons and the International Court of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 293.Google Scholar
Kolb, R. ‘La légitime défense des Etats au XIXème siècle et pendant l’époque de la Société de Nations’ in Kherad, R. (ed.), Légitimes défenses (Paris: LGDJ, 2007), 67.Google Scholar
Kolb, R. ‘Conflits entre normes de jus cogens’ in Corten, O. et al. (eds), Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit: Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Brussels: Bruylant, 2007), 481.Google Scholar
Kolb, R. Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens: A General Inventory (Oxford: Hart, 2015).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order?’ (2002) 72 British Yearbook of International Law 337.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (reissued with new epilogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kramer, M. Objectivity and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Kunz, J. ‘The Law of Nations, Static and Dynamic’ (1933) 27 American Journal of International Law 630.Google Scholar
Kunz, J. ‘The Theory of International Law’ (1938) 32 American Society of International Law Proceedings 23.Google Scholar
Kunz, J. ‘Adjudging the Exceptional at International Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis’ (2008) 59 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 325.Google Scholar
La Guerre de 1914: recueil de documents intéressant le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 1916) vols 1–2. https://archive.org/details/laguerrede1914re01pariGoogle Scholar
Lamberti-Zanardi, P. La legittima difesa nel diritto internazionale (Milano: Giuffrè, 1972).Google Scholar
Lang, G. ‘Why Not Forfeiture?’ in Frowe, H. and Lang, G. (eds), How We Fight: Ethics in War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 38.Google Scholar
Lanovoy, V. ‘Complicity in an Internationally Wrongful Act’ in Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalos, I. (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 134.Google Scholar
Laun, R. ‘Le régime international des ports’ (1926) 15 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Laurent, P. H. ‘State Responsibility: A Possible Historic Precedent to the Calvo Clause’ (1966) 15 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 395.Google Scholar
Laurent, P. H. ‘Anglo-American Diplomacy and the Belgian Indemnities Controversy 1836–42’ (1967) 10 Historical Journal 197.Google Scholar
Laursen, A. ‘The Use of Force and (the State of) Necessity’ (2004) 37 Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 485.Google Scholar
Laursen, A. ‘The Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Oil Platforms Case’ (2004) 73 Nordic Journal of International Law 135.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. ‘The So-Called Anglo-American and Continental Schools of Thought in International Law’ (1931) 12 British Yearbook of International Law 31.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J. Handbook of Public International Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Deighton, Beel & Co, 1885).Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J. The Principles of International Law, 4th edn (Boston: DC Heath & Co, 1910).Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J. The Principles of International Law, 6th edn (Boston: DC Heath & Co, 1915).Google Scholar
Leben, C. ‘Les contre-mesures inter-étatiques et les réactions à l’illicite dans la société internationale’ (1982) 28 Annuaire Français de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Leben, C. ‘L’etat de nécessité dans le droit international de l’investissement’ (2005) 349 Cahiers de l’arbitrage 19.Google Scholar
Leben, C. ‘Obligations Relating to the Use of Force and Arising from Peremptory Norms of International Law’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1197.Google Scholar
Lebergott, S. ‘Through the Blockade: The Profitability and Extent of Cotton Smuggling, 1861–1865’ (1981) 41 Journal of Economic History 867.Google Scholar
Lefeber, R. ‘Case Analysis: The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project and the Law of State Responsibility’ (1998) 11 Leiden Journal of International Law 609.Google Scholar
LeFur, L. Des représailles en temps de guerre. Représailles et réparation (Paris: Sirey, 1919).Google Scholar
LeFur, L. ‘La théorie du droit naturel depuis le XVII siècle et la doctrine moderne’ (1927) 18 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 259.Google Scholar
Lenckner, T. ‘The Principle of Interest Balancing as a General Basis of Justification’ (1986) Brigham Young University Law Review 645.Google Scholar
Lepard, B. D. Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Lesaffer, R. ‘Too Much History: From War as Sanction to the Sanctioning of War’ in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 35.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U. ‘The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think about the Consequences?’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 853.Google Scholar
Lissitzyn, O. J. ‘The Treatment of Aerial Intruders in Recent Practice and International Law’ (1953) 47 American Journal of International Law 559.Google Scholar
Londoño Lázaro, M. C. Las garantías de no repetición en la jurisprudencia Interamericana. Derecho Internacional y cambios estructurales del Estado (México DF: Tirant lo Blanch, 2014).Google Scholar
Lowe, V. ‘Precluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for Excuses?’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 405.Google Scholar
Lowell, A. L. ‘The Council of the League of Nations and Corfu’ (1923) 6 World Peace Foundation Pamphlet Series 169.Google Scholar
Lozano Contreras, F. La noción de debida diligencia en derecho internacional público (Barcelona: Atelier, 2007).Google Scholar
Lozano Contreras, F. ‘El estado de necesidad y las cláusulas de emergencia contempladas en los APPRI: los casos argentinos ante el CIADI’ (2013) 65 Revista Española de derecho internacional 101.Google Scholar
Lubell, N. Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Maccoby, S. ‘Reprisals as a Measure of Redress Short of War’ (1924–6) 2 Cambridge Law Journal 64.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Macdonell, J. ‘The Declaration of London’ (1910) 11 Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 68.Google Scholar
Macri, G. Teorica del diritto internazionale (Messina: Fratelli d’Angelo, 1883) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Macri, G. Teorica del diritto internazionale (Messina: Fratelli d’Angelo, 1884) vol. 2.Google Scholar
Malanczuk, P. ‘Countermeasures and Self-Defence as Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1983) 43 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 705.Google Scholar
Malanczuk, P. ‘Countermeasures and Self-Defence as Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ in Spinedi, M. and Simma, B. (eds), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana, 1987), 197.Google Scholar
Mancini, M. Stato di guerra e conflitto armato nel diritto internazionale (Torino: Giappichelli, 2009).Google Scholar
Mancini, M. ‘The Effects of a State of War or Armed Conflict’ in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 988.Google Scholar
Manning, W. R. Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States–Canadian Relations (Washington: Carnegie Endowment, 1943) vol. 3.Google Scholar
Marinucci, G. and Dolcini, E. Manuale di diritto penale, 2nd edn (Milano: Giuffrè, 2006).Google Scholar
Marks, S. ‘Treaties, State Responsibility and Remedies’ (1990) 49 Cambridge Law Journal 387.Google Scholar
Martin, A. ‘Investment Disputes after Argentina’s Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-Precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law’ (2012) 29 Journal of International Arbitration 49.Google Scholar
Martinez, A. ‘Is Invoking State Defences in Investment Arbitration a Waste of Time and Money?’ (2008) 15 Croatian Arbitration Yearbook 89.Google Scholar
Martinez, A. ‘Invoking State Defenses in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in Waibel, M. et al. (eds), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Hague: Kluwer, 2010), 315.Google Scholar
McAuley, F. ‘Theory of Justification and Excuse: Some Italian Lessons’ (1987) 35 American Journal of Comparative Law 359.Google Scholar
McDougall, C. The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McGregor, L. ‘Torture and State Immunity: Deflecting Impunity, Distorting Sovereignty’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 903.Google Scholar
McNair, A. D. ‘The Legal Meaning of War, and the Relation of War to Reprisals’ (1926) 11 Transactions of the Grotian Society 29.Google Scholar
Merkouris, P. Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
Merle, R. and Vitu, A. Traité de droit criminel: Droit pénal général, 6th edn (Paris: Cujas, 1988).Google Scholar
Messineo, F. ‘Maps of Ephemeral Empires: The ICJ and the Macedonian Name Dispute’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International & Comparative Law 169.Google Scholar
Messineo, F. ‘Multiple Attribution of Conduct’ in Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalos, I. (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 60.Google Scholar
Migliorino, L. ‘Sur la déclaration d’illicéité comme forme de satisfaction: à propos de la sentence arbitrale du 30 avril 1990 dans l’affaire du Rainbow Warrior’ (1992) 96 Revue générale de droit international public 61.Google Scholar
Milanović, M. ‘The Lost Origins of Lex Specialis: Rethinking the Relationship between Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law’ in Ohlin, J. (ed.), Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflict and Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Milgrim, M. R. ‘An Overlooked Problem in Turkish–Russian Relations: The 1878 War Indemnity’ (1978) 9 International Journal of Middle East Studies 519.Google Scholar
Milhizer, E. R. ‘Justification and Excuse: What They Were, What They Are and What They Ought to Be’ (2004) 78 St John’s Law Review 725.Google Scholar
Mills, A. ‘Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law’ (2013) 84 British Yearbook of International Law 187.Google Scholar
Moir, L. ‘Action against Host States of Terrorist Groups’ in Weller, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 720.Google Scholar
Montague, P. ‘Rights and Duties of Compensation’ (1984) 13 Philosophy & Public Affairs 79.Google Scholar
Montague, P. ‘Davis and Westen on Rights and Compensation’ (1985) 14 Philosophy & Public Affairs 390.Google Scholar
Montague, P. ‘War and Self-Defence: A Critique and a Proposal’ (2010) 23 Diametros 69.Google Scholar
Montini, M. ‘La necessità ambientale e le sue diverse funzioni nel diritto internazionale contemporaneo’ in Spinedi, M. et al. (eds), La codificazione della responsabilità internazionale degli Stati alla prova dei fatti (Milano: Giuffrè, 2006), 153.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J. ‘Théorie des sanctions internationales’ (1935) 16 Revue de droit international et législation comparée (3rd series) 474.Google Scholar
Moriaud, P. De la justification du délit par l’état de nécessité (Geneva: Burkhart, 1889).Google Scholar
Moursi Badr, G. ‘The Exculpatory Effect of Self-Defence in State Responsibility’ (1980) 10 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 1.Google Scholar
Mousourakis, G. ‘Distinguishing between Justifications and Excuses in the Criminal Law’ (1998) 9 Stellenbosch Law Review 165.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. D. ‘Article 80 of the Rules (Counter-claims)’ in Zimmerman, A. et al. (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 1000.Google Scholar
Murray, C. F. ‘Any Port in a Storm? The Right of Entry for Reasons of Force Majeure or Distress in the Wake of the Erika and the Castor’ (2002) 63 Ohio State Law Journal 1465.Google Scholar
Neff, S. C. The Rights and Duties of Neutrals (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Newcombe, A. and Paradell, L. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2009).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. ‘Concurrence between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International Law’ (2003) 52 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 615.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. ‘International Adjudication of Global Public Goods: The Intersection of Substance and Procedure’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 769.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. and Jacobs, D. ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Concept Paper’ (2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 359.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A. and Plakokefalos, I. (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Noyes, J. E. ‘Places of Refuge for Ships’ (2008) 37 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 135.Google Scholar
Noyes, J. E. ‘Ships in Distress’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (www.mpepil.com, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009–).Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E. The Power and Purpose of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. ‘Free Will’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R. ‘Universal Jurisdiction: Clarifying the Basic Concept’ (2004) 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice 735.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R. ‘Proportionality’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1158.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R. ‘Jurisdictional Immunities’ in Tams, C. and Sloan, J. (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 107.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R. ‘Theory and the Doctrinal International Lawyer’ (2015) 4 University College London Journal of Law & Jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Oberdiek, J. ‘Lost in Moral Space: On the Infringing/Violating Distinction and Its Place in the Theory of Rights’ (2004) 23 Law & Philosophy 325.Google Scholar
Oberdiek, J. ‘What’s Wrong with Infringements (Insofar as Infringements Are Not Wrong): A Reply’ (2008) 27 Law & Philosophy 293.Google Scholar
Okowa, P. N. ‘Defences in the Jurisprudence of International Tribunals’ in Goodwin-Gill, G. S. and Talmon, S. (eds), The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), 389.Google Scholar
Omichinski, N. M. ‘Applying the Theories of Justifiable Homicide to Conflicts in the Doctrine of Self-Defense’ (1986–7) 33 Wayne Law Review 1447.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A. Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Orrego-Vicuña, F. ‘Softening Necessity’ in Arsanjani, M. (ed.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honour of W Michael Reisman (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 741.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbino Gimeno, Í. ‘De moscas y agresores muertos’ (2008) 3 Revista para el Análisis del Derecho 2.Google Scholar
Ortolan, T. Règles internationales et diplomatie de la mer (Paris: Dumaine, 1845) vols 1– 3.Google Scholar
Ortolan, T. Règles internationales et diplomatie de la mer, 4th edn (Paris: Plon, 1864) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Paddeu, F. ‘A Genealogy of Force Majeure in International Law’ (2011) 82 British Yearbook of International Law 381.Google Scholar
Paddeu, F. ‘Self-Defence as a Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness: Understanding Article 21 of the Articles on State Responsibility’ (2014) 85 British Yearbook of International Law.Google Scholar
Paddeu, F. ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (www.mpepil.com, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015–).Google Scholar
Paddeu, F. ‘Use of Force Against Non-State Actors and the Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness of Self-Defence’ (2017) 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 93.Google Scholar
Padelletti, M. L. Pluralità di stati nel fatto illecito internazionale (Milan: Giuffrè, 1990).Google Scholar
Palmer, G. ‘Settlement of International Disputes: The Rainbow Warrior Affair’ (1989) 15 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 585.Google Scholar
Palmisano, G. ‘Sulla decisione arbitrale relativa alla seconda fase del caso Rainbow Warrior’ (1990) 73 Rivista di diritto internazionale 874.Google Scholar
Palmisano, G. ‘Colpa dell’organo e colpa dello Stato nella responsabilità internazionale: Spunti critici di teoria e di prassi’ (1992) 19–20 Comunicazioni e Studi 623.Google Scholar
Palmisano, G. ‘Fault’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (www.mpepil.com, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007–).Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M. ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’ (2008) 79 British Yearbook of International Law 264.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 617.Google Scholar
Parlett, K. The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Parlett, K. ‘The Application of the Rules on Countermeasures in Investment Claims’ in Chinkin, C. M. and Baetens, F. (eds), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 389.Google Scholar
Passero, L. Dionisio Anzilotti e la dottrina internazionalistica tra Otto e Novecento (Milano: Giuffrè, 2010).Google Scholar
Paulsson, J. Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. ‘Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Bears the Burden?’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Pavoni, R. ‘Human Rights and the Immunities of Foreign States and International Organizations’ in de Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. (eds), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 71.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘The Normative Dilemma – Will and Consent in International Law’ (1992) 12 Australian Yearbook of International Law 22.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘Remarques sur une Révolution Inachevée: le Projet d’Articles de la Commission du Droit International sur la Responsabilité des Etats’ (1996) 42 Annuaire Français de droit international 7.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘La codification du droit de la responsabilité internationale: tatonnements et affrontements’ in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Gowlland-Debbas, V. (eds), The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality. Liber Amicorum Georges Abi-Saab (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001), 285.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘Les Articles de la CDI sur la Responsabilité de l’Etat pour fait internationalement illicite. Suite – et fin?’ (2002) 48 Annuaire Français de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘Les rapports de Roberto Ago à la CDI sur la responsabilité des Etats’ (2002) 4 Forum du droit international 222.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘The Definition of Responsibility in International Law’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 3.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. ‘The ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 75.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. ‘The Anglo-German Intervention in Venezuela’ (1903) 177 North American Review 86.Google Scholar
Perassi, . ‘Necessità e stato di necessità nella teoria dommatica della produzione giuridica’ (1917) Rivista di diritto pubblico 271.Google Scholar
Perels, M. ‘Droit de blocus en temps de paix’ (1887–8) 9 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international 275.Google Scholar
Pergola, U. ‘Fondamento giustificativo dello stato di necessità’ (1909) 70 Rivista Penale 405.Google Scholar
Phillimore, R. Commentaries upon International Law (Philadelphia: Johnson, 1854) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Phillimore, R. Commentaries upon International Law (Philadelphia: Johnson, 1855) vol. 2.Google Scholar
Phillimore, R. Commentaries upon International Law (Philadelphia: Johnson, 1857) vol. 3.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. Wheaton’s Elements of International Law, 5th edn (London: Stevens, 1916).Google Scholar
Pillitu, A. P. Lo stato di necessità nel diritto internazionale (Perugia: Università di Perugia, 1981).Google Scholar
Pink, T. ‘The Will’ in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.rep.routledge.com/article/N086, London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Pinto, R. ‘L’affaire du Rainbow Warrior: à propos de la sentence du 30 avril 1990, Nouvelle-Zélande c/France’ (1990) 117 Journal du droit international 841.Google Scholar
Pisillo Mazzeschi, R. ‘Termination and Suspension of Treaties for Breach in the ILC Works on State Responsibility’ in Spinedi, M. and Simma, B. (eds), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana, 1987), 57.Google Scholar
Pisillo Mazzeschi, R. Due diligence e responsabilità internazionale degli Stati (Milano: Giuffrè, 1989).Google Scholar
Pisillo Mazzeschi, R. ‘Responsabilité de l’état pour violation des obligations positives relatives aux droits de l’homme’ (2008) 333 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 175.Google Scholar
Podestá-Costa, L. ‘La responsabilidad del Estado por daños irrogados a la persona o a los bienes de extranjeros en luchas civiles’ (1939) 34 Revista de derecho internacional (La Habana) 5.Google Scholar
Politis, N. ‘Les répresailles entre Etats membres de la Société des Nations’ (1924) 31 Revue générale de droit international public 5.Google Scholar
Politis, N. ‘Le régime des représailles en temps de paix. Rapport et projets de résolution et de règlement’ (1934) 38 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Politoff, S. et al. ‘Chile’ in International Encyclopaedia of Laws (Criminal Law: Suppl. 24) (The Hague: Kluwer, 2003).Google Scholar
Pradier-Fodéré, P. Traité de droit international: Européen et Américain (Paris: Pedone, 1885) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Pradier-Fodéré, P. Traité de droit international: Européen et Américain (Paris: Pedone, 1894) vol. 6.Google Scholar
Proukaki, E. K. The Problem of Enforcement in International Law (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. De jure naturae et gentium (1688, Oldfather trans, Oxford: Clarendon, 1934).Google Scholar
Pugh, M. ‘Legal Aspects of the Rainbow Warrior Affair’ (1987) 36 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 655.Google Scholar
Quadri, R. ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1964) 113 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 237.Google Scholar
Quigley, J. ‘Complicity in International Law: A New Direction in the Law of State Responsibility’ (1986) 57 British Yearbook of International Law 77.Google Scholar
Quigley, J. ‘The Common Law’s Theory of Criminal Liability: A Challenge from Across the Atlantic’ (1989–1990) 11 Whittier Law Review 479.Google Scholar
Radbruch, G. ‘Jurisprudence in the Criminal Law’ (1936) 18 Journal of Comparative Legislation & International Law 218.Google Scholar
Randelzhofer, A. ‘Article 51’ in Simma, B. (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) vol. 1, 788.Google Scholar
Rapisardi-Mirabelli, A. I limiti d’obbligatorietà delle norme giuridiche internazionali (Catania: Giannotta, 1922).Google Scholar
Ratti, G. B. ‘Normative Inconsistency and Logical Theories: A First Critique of Defeasibilism’ in Araszkiewicz, M. and Šavelka, J. (eds), Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), 123.Google Scholar
Raz, J. The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of a Legal System (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Reeves, J. S. ‘The Neutralization of Belgium and the Doctrine of Kriegsraison’ (1915) 13 Michigan Law Review 179.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. ‘Necessity in International Investment Arbitration – An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent ICSID Cases?’ (2006) 3(5) Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. ‘Necessity in International Investment Arbitration – An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent ICSID Cases?’ (2007) 8 Journal of World Investment and Trade 191.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. ‘Necessity in Investment Arbitration’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 137.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. and Binder, C., ‘Debts and State of Necessity’ in Boholavsky, J. P. and Cernic, J. L. (eds), Making Sovereign Financing and Human Rights Work (Oxford: Hart, 2014), 115.Google Scholar
Reinold, T. ‘State Weakness, Irregular Warfare, and the Right of Self-Defense Post-9/11’ (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 244.Google Scholar
Reisman, M. ‘The Supervisory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: International Arbitration and International Adjudication’ (1996) 258 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Renault, L. First Violations of International Law by Germany: Luxembourg and Belgium (Frank Carr trans, London: Longmans, 1917).Google Scholar
Reuter, P. ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1961) 103 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 425.Google Scholar
Riddell, A. and Plant, B. Evidence before the International Court of Justice (London: BIICL, 2009).Google Scholar
Rigaux, F. ‘International Responsibility and the Principle of Causality’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 81.Google Scholar
Rinaudo, . ‘Rappresaglia (storia del diritto)’ in Azara, A. and Eula, E. (eds), Novissimo Digesto Italiano (Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, 1986).Google Scholar
Ripert, G. ‘Les règles de droit civil applicables aux rapports internationaux’ (1933) 44 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 569.Google Scholar
Ripinsky, S. ‘State of Necessity: Effect on Compensation’ (2007) 4(6) Transnational Dispute Management.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 American Journal of International Law 180.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability’ (1975–6) 23 University of California in Los Angeles Law Review 266.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Criminal Law Defences: A Systematic Analysis’ (1982) 82 Columbia Law Review 199.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Rules of Conduct and Principles of Adjudication’ (1990) 57 University of Chicago Law Review 729.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Competing Theories of Justification: Deeds versus Reasons’ in Simester, A. and Smith, A. (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 45.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘The Bomb Thief and the Theory of Justification Defences’ (1997) 8 Criminal Law Forum 387.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Objective Versus Subjective Justification: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory’ in Robinson, P. H. et al. (eds), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 343.Google Scholar
Rodick, B. C. The Doctrine of Necessity in International Law (New York: Columbia University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J. The Independence of Spanish South-America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Rolin, A. ‘Consultation’ in de la Pradelle, A. (ed.), Causes célèbres du droit des gens: les Suisses et les dommages de guerre (Paris: Editions Internationales, 1931), 261.Google Scholar
Ronzitti, N. ‘Use of Force, Jus Cogens and State Consent’ in Cassese, A. (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 147.Google Scholar
Root, E. ‘The Real Significance of the Declaration of London’ (1912) 6 American Journal of International Law 583.Google Scholar
Root, E. ‘The “Great War” and International Law’ (1921) 83 Advocate of Peace through Justice 225.Google Scholar
Rosenne, S. Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law (1925–1928) (New York: Oceana, 1972).Google Scholar
Rosenstock, R. ‘The ILC and State Responsibility’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 792.Google Scholar
Rostow, E. V. ‘Until What? Enforcement Action or Collective Self-Defense?’ (1991) 85 American Journal of International Law 506.Google Scholar
Roumy, F. ‘L’origine et la diffusion de l’adage canonique Necessitas non habet legem (VIIIe–XIIIe s.)’ in Mueller, W. and Sommar, M. (eds), Medieval Church Law and the Origins of the Western Legal Tradition: A Tribute to Kenneth Pennington (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 2006), 457.Google Scholar
Rousseau, C. Principes généraux du droit international public (Paris: Pedone, 1944) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Rousseau, C. ‘Chronique des faits internationaux’ (1978) Revue générale de droit international public 1125.Google Scholar
Ruys, T. ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Ruys, T. ‘The Meaning of “Force” and the Boundaries of the Jus ad Bellum: Are “Minimal” Uses of Force Excluded from UN Charter Article 2(4)?’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 159.Google Scholar
Ruys, T. and Verhoeven, S. ‘Attacks by Private Actors and the Right of Self-Defence’ (2005) 10 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 289.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C. ‘State Responsibility, Necessity and Human Rights’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 79.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. ‘Les circonstances excluant l’illicéité’ in Zemanek, K. and Salmon, J. (eds), La responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 1987), 89.Google Scholar
Salter, J. ‘Grotius and Pufendorf on the Right of Necessity’ (2005) 26 History of Political Thought 285.Google Scholar
Salvioli, G. ‘Les règles générales de la paix’ (1933) 46 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Samra, H. ‘Five Years Later: The CMS Award Placed in the Context of the Argentine Financial Crisis and the ICSID Arbitration Boom’ (2007) 38 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 667.Google Scholar
Sánchez de Bustamante y Sirvén, A. Droit international public (Paris: Sirey, 1936) vol. 3.Google Scholar
Sánchez de Bustamante y Sirvén, A. Droit international public (Paris: Sirey, 1937) vol. 4.Google Scholar
Sander, G. ‘Brazilian Loans Case and Serbian Loans Case’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (www.mpepil.com, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008–).Google Scholar
Sawyer, S. ‘Rainbow Warrior: Nuclear War in the Pacific’ (1986) 8 Third World Quarterly 1325.Google Scholar
Scalese, G. La rilevanza delle scusanti nella teoria dell’illecito internazionale (Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2008).Google Scholar
Schachter, O. ‘Dispute Settlement and Countermeasures in the International Law Commission’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 471.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Scheuner, U. ‘L’influence du droit interne sur la formation du droit international’ (1939) 68 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 95.Google Scholar
Schill, S. ‘International Investment Law and the Host State’s Power to Handle Economic Crises’ (2007) 24 Journal of International Arbitration 265.Google Scholar
Schreiber, H.-L. ‘Problems of Justification and Excuse in the Setting of Accessorial Conduct’ (1986) Brigham Young University Law Review 611.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G. ‘The Inductive Approach to International Law’ (1947) 60 Harvard Law Review 539.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G. ‘The Fundamental Principles of International Law’ (1955) 87 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 191.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G. and Brown, E. Manual of International Law, 6th edn (Milton: Professional Books, 1976).Google Scholar
Schwebel, S. ‘The Thirty-Second Session of the International Law Commission’ (1980) 74 American Journal of International Law 961.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B. The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1909) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B. ‘The Declaration of London of February 26, 1909’ (1914) 8 American Journal of International Law 274.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L.-A. ‘The Relationship between Reprisals and Denunciation or Suspension of a Treaty’ (1993) 4 European Journal of International Law 341.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L.-A. ‘La codification des contre-mesures par la Commission du droit international’ (2005) 38 Revue Belge de droit international 447.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L.-A. ‘Countermeasures in Response to Grave Violations of Obligations Owed to the International Community’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1137.Google Scholar
Sierra, H. M. and Cantaro, A. S. Lecciones de derecho penal (Bahía Blanca: Universidad Nacional del Sur, 2005).Google Scholar
Silingardi, S. Gli effetti giuridici della guerra sui rapporti economici e commerciali (Torino: Giappichelli, 2012).Google Scholar
Simester, A. P. ‘Necessity, Torture and the Rule of Law’ in Ramraj, V. V. (ed.), Emergencies and the Limits of Legality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 289.Google Scholar
Simma, B. ‘Reflections on Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Its Background in General International Law’ (1970) 20 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 5.Google Scholar
Simma, B. ‘Counter-Measures and Dispute Settlement: A Plea for a Different Balance’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 102.Google Scholar
Simma, B. and Spinedi, M. (eds), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana, 1987).Google Scholar
Simma, B. and Tams, C. ‘Article 60 (1969)’ in Corten, O. and Klein, P. (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 1351.Google Scholar
Simma, B. and Tams, C. ‘Reacting against Treaty Breaches’ in Hollis, D. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 576.Google Scholar
Simons, K. ‘Exploring the Intricacies of the Lesser Evils Defense’ (2005) 24 Law & Philosophy 645.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. ‘Consequentialism’ in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2012), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/consequentialism/.Google Scholar
Sloane, R. D. ‘On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 447.Google Scholar
Small, D. H. ‘The Oil Platforms Case: Jurisdiction through the – Closed – Eye of the Needle’ (2004) 3 Law & Practice of International Courts & Tribunals 113.Google Scholar
Smit Duijzentkunst, B., The Concept of Rights in International Law (PhD thesis, Cambridge University, 2015).Google Scholar
Song, N. ‘Between Scylla and Charybdis: Can a Plea of Necessity Offer Safe Passage to States in Responding to an Economic Crisis without Incurring Liability to Foreign Investors?’ (2008) 19 American Review of International Arbitration 235.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1960) 101 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 1.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. ‘Civil Liability for Crimes’ in Dyson, M. (ed.), Unravelling Tort and Crime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 304.Google Scholar
Sperduti, G. ‘Introduzione allo studio delle funzioni della necessitá nel diritto internazionale’ (1943) 22 Rivista di diritto internazionale 19.Google Scholar
Spiermann, O. ‘Humanitarian Intervention as a Necessity and the Threat or Use of Jus Cogens’ (2002) 71 Nordic Journal of International Law 523.Google Scholar
Spinedi, M. ‘Problemi di diritto internazionale sollevati dal naufragio della Torrey Canyon’ (1967) Rivista di diritto internazionale 655.Google Scholar
Stapelbroek, K. ‘The Progress of Humankind in Galiani’s Dei doveri dei principi neutrali: Natural Law, Neapolitan Trade and Catherine the Great’ (2011) 10 Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies 161.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, U. ‘Self-Defense as Claim Right, Liberty, and Act-Specific Agent-Relative Prerogative’ (2016) 35 Law & Philosophy 193.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. F. History of the Criminal Law of England (London: MacMillan, 1883) vols 1– 3.Google Scholar
Stone, J. ‘Burden of Proof and the Judicial Process’ (1944) 60 Law Quarterly Review 262.Google Scholar
Stone, J. Legal System and Lawyers’ Reasoning (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Stowell, E. C. The Diplomacy of the War of 1914 (Boston: Cambridge University Press, 1915).Google Scholar
Stowell, E. C. and Munro, H. F. International Cases, Arbitrations and Incidents Illustrative of International Law as Practiced by Independent States (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1916) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. ‘Free Will’ in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Strupp, K. ‘L’incident de Janina entre la Grèce et l’Italie’ (1924) 31 Revue générale de droit international public 255.Google Scholar
Strupp, K. Eléments du droit international public universel, Européen et Américain, 2nd edn (Paris: Editions Internationales, 1930) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Strupp, K. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1934) 47 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 259.Google Scholar
Subramanian, S. ‘Too Similar or Too Different: State of Necessity as a Defence under Customary International Law and the Bilateral Investment Treaty and Their Relationship’ (2012) 9 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 68.Google Scholar
Sucharitkul, S. ‘State Responsibility and International Liability under International Law’ (1995–6) 18 Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Journal 821.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S. D. ‘The “Necessity” Defense and the Failure of Tort Theory: The Case against Strict Liability for Damages Caused while Exercising Self-Help in an Emergency’ (2005) 5 Issues in Legal Scholarship, Article 1.Google Scholar
Sussmann, F. B. ‘The Defence of Private Necessity and the Problem of Compensation’ (1967) 2 Ottawa Law Review 184.Google Scholar
Swanson, S. ‘The Medieval Foundations of John Locke’s Theory of Natural Rights: Rights of Subsistence and the Principle of Extreme Necessity’ (1997) 18 History of Political Thought 399.Google Scholar
Szurek, S. La force majeure en droit international (doctoral thesis, Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas, 1996) vols 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Szurek, S. ‘The Notion of Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 427.Google Scholar
Szurek, S. ‘Force Majeure’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 475.Google Scholar
Szurek, S. ‘Distress’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 481.Google Scholar
Taft, W. H. ‘Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 295.Google Scholar
Talmon, S. ‘Jus Cogens after Germany v Italy: Substantive and Procedural Rules Distinguished’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 979.Google Scholar
Talmon, S. ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 417.Google Scholar
Tams, C. ‘All’s Well That Ends Well? Comments on the ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility’ (2002) 62 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 759.Google Scholar
Tams, C. ‘Unity and Diversity in the Law of State Responsibility’ in Zimmerman, A. and Hofmann, R. (eds), Unity and Diversity in International Law (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2005), 435.Google Scholar
Tams, C. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tams, C. Waiver, Acquiescence and Extinctive Prescription’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1035.Google Scholar
Tams, C. ‘Treaty Breaches and Responses’ in Tams, C. et al. (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014), 476.Google Scholar
Tenekides, G. ‘Les effets de la contrainte sur les traités à la lumière de la Convention de Vienne du 23 mai 1969’ (1974) 20 Annuaire Français de droit international 79.Google Scholar
Thakur, R. ‘A Dispute of Many Colours: France, New Zealand and the “Rainbow Warrior” Affair’ (1986) 42 The World Today 209.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H. ‘Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice: The Genocide Convention and Oil Platforms Decisions’ (1999) 12 Leiden Journal of International Law 197.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H. The Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Thouvenin, J. M. ‘Self-Defence’ in Crawford, J. et al. (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 455.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. ‘Are Counter-Measures Subject to Prior Recourse to Dispute Settlement Procedures?’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 77.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. ‘International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century’ (1999) 281 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. ‘Article 36’ in Zimmerman, A. et al. (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 633.Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N. ‘Necessity and the Use of Force: A Special Regime’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 11.Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N. ‘Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: The Interaction between Self-Defence as a Primary Rule and Self-Defence as a Secondary Rule’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law.Google Scholar
Twiss, T. ‘The Doctrine of Continuous Voyages, as Applied to Contraband of War and Blockade’ (1877–8) 3 Law Magazine & Review 1.Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A. and Lekkas, S.-I. ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda versus Flexibility in the Suspension and Termination of Treaties’ in Tams, C. J. et al. (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (London: Edward Elgar, 2014), 312.Google Scholar
Uniacke, S. Permissible Killing: The Self-Defence Justification of Homicide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Uniacke, S. ‘In Defense of Permissible Killing: A Response to Two Critics’ (2000) 19 Law & Philosophy 627.Google Scholar
Unterhalter, D. ‘Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2009) 42 Cornell International Law Journal 209.Google Scholar
Upton, F. The Law of Nations Affecting Commerce during War (New York: Voorhies, 1863).Google Scholar
Valenti, M. ‘Lo stato di necessità nei procedimenti arbitrali ICSID contro l’Argentina’ (2008) 91 Rivista di diritto internazionale 114.Google Scholar
van Hamel, J. ‘Les principes du droit d’extradition et leur application dans l’affaire Savarkar’ (1911) 13 Revue de droit international et de législation comparée 370.Google Scholar
van Schaack, B. ‘The Crime of Political Genocide: Repairing the Genocide Convention’s Blind Spot’ (1997) 106 Yale Law Journal 2259.Google Scholar
van Steenberghe, R. La légitime défense en droit international public (Bruxelles: Larcier, 2012).Google Scholar
van Steenberghe, R. ‘State Practice and the Evolution of the Law of Self-Defence: Clarifying the Methodological Debate’ (2015) 2 Journal of the Use of Force in International Law 81.Google Scholar
van Steenberghe, R. ‘The Law of Self-Defence and the New Argumentative Landscape on the Expansionists’ Side’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 43.Google Scholar
Vattel, E. Droit des gens ou principes de la loi naturelle (Fenwick trans., Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution, 1916).Google Scholar
Velásquez, F. ‘La culpabilidad y el principio de culpabilidad’ (1993) 50 Revista de derecho y ciencias políticas 283.Google Scholar
Venezia, J.-C. ‘La notion de répresailles en droit international public’ (1960) 64 Revue générale de droit international public 465.Google Scholar
Venturini, G. ‘La portée et les effets juridiques des attitudes et des actes unilatéraux des Etats’ (1964) 112 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 363.Google Scholar
Venturini, G. Necessità e proporzionalità nell’uso della forza militare in diritto internazionale (Milano: Giuffrè, 1988).Google Scholar
Verdross, A. ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1929) 30 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 271.Google Scholar
Verdross, A. ‘Les principes généraux du droit dans la jurisprudence internationale’ (1935) 52 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 191.Google Scholar
Vereshchetin, V. S. ‘Some Observations on the New Proposal on Dispute Settlement’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 54.Google Scholar
Vidmar, J. ‘Rethinking Jus Cogens after Germany v Italy: Back to Article 53?’ (2013) 60 Netherlands International Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Viganò, F. Stato di necessità e conflitti di doveri: Contributo alla teoria delle cause di giustificazione e delle scusanti (Milano: Giuffrè, 2000).Google Scholar
Villalpando, S. L’émergence de la communauté internationale dans la responsabilité des Etats (Paris: PUF, 2005).Google Scholar
Villalpando, S. ‘On the International Court of Justice and the Determination of Rules of Law’ (2013) 26 Leiden Journal of International Law 243.Google Scholar
Viñuales, J. E. ‘State of Necessity and Peremptory Norms in International Investment Law’ (2008) 14 Law & Business Review of the Americas 79.Google Scholar
Viñuales, J. E. Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
von Bernstorff, J. The Public International Law Theory of Hans Kelsen – Believing in Universal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
von Liszt, F. Das Völkerrecht: systematisch Dargestellt (Berlin: Verlag von O Häring, 1898).Google Scholar
von Liszt, F. Le droit international: Exposé systématique (translation of 1913 9th edn, Paris: Pedone, 1927).Google Scholar
Vranes, E. ‘The Definition of “Norm Conflict” in International Law and Legal Theory’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 395.Google Scholar
Waibel, M. ‘Two Worlds of Necessity in ICSID Arbitration: CMS and LG&E’ (2007) 20 Leiden Journal of International Law 637.Google Scholar
Waibel, M. Sovereign Defaults before International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Waldock, H. ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’ (1952) 81 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 451.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. ‘“Transcendental Nonsense” and System in the Law’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 16.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, S. ‘Justifying the Right to Self-Defense: A Theory of Forced Consequences’ (2005) 91 Virginia Law Review 999.Google Scholar
Washburn, A. H. ‘The Legality of the Pacific Blockade – I’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 55.Google Scholar
Washburn, A. H. ‘The Legality of the Pacific Blockade – II’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 227.Google Scholar
Washburn, A. H. ‘The Legality of the Pacific Blockade – III’ (1922) 21 Columbia Law Review 442.Google Scholar
Webb, P. ‘Human Rights and the Immunities of State Officials’ in de Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. (eds), Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 114.Google Scholar
Weidenbaum, P. ‘Necessity in International Law’ (1938) 14 Transactions of the Grotian Society 105.Google Scholar
Weil, P. ‘Le droit international en quête de son identité: cours général de droit international public’ (1992) 237 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 11.Google Scholar
Weil, P. and Richemond-Barak, D. ‘The Oil Platforms Case before the International Court of Justice: A Non-Case of International Responsibility’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 329.Google Scholar
Westen, P. K. ‘Comment on Montague’s “Rights and Duties of Compensation”’ (1985) 14 Philosophy & Public Affairs 385.Google Scholar
Westlake, J. Chapters on the Principles of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1894).Google Scholar
Westlake, J. International Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910) vol. 1.Google Scholar
Westlake, J. International Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913) vol. 2.Google Scholar
Wexler, J. ‘The Rainbow Warrior Affair: State and Agent Responsibility for Authorized Violations of International Law’ (1987) 5 Boston University International Law Journal 389.Google Scholar
Wharton, F. A Digest of the International Law of the United States, 2nd edn (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1887) vol. 2.Google Scholar
Wheaton, H. Elements of International Law (Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard, 1836).Google Scholar
Wheaton, H. Elements of International Law, 8th edn (updated by Dana, R. H., Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1866).Google Scholar
Whitehead, L. ‘No Port in a Storm: A Review of Recent History and Legal Concepts Resulting in the Extinction of Ports of Refuge’ (2009) 58 Naval Law Review 65.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. Q. The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard, 2012).Google Scholar
Wiesse, C. Le droit international appliqué aux guerres civiles (de Blonay trans., Lausanne: Benda, 1898).Google Scholar
Wiesse, C. Reglas de derecho internacional aplicables a las guerras civiles, 2nd edn (Lima: Torres-Aguirre, 1905).Google Scholar
Wigley, S. ‘Disappearing Without a Moral Trace? Rights and Compensation during Times of Emergency’ (2009) 28 Law & Philosophy 617.Google Scholar
Williams, J. F. ‘Le droit international et les obligations financières internationales qui naissent d’un contrat’ (1923) 1 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 289.Google Scholar
Winfield, P. H. ‘The History of Intervention in International Law’ (1922–3) 3 British Yearbook of International Law 130.Google Scholar
Winfield, P. H. ‘Grounds of Intervention in International Law’ (1924) 5 British Yearbook of International Law 149.Google Scholar
Wittich, S. ‘The International Law Commission’s Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts Adopted on Second Reading’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 891.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. Jus gentium methodo scientifica pertractatum (1764, Drake trans., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar
Wolff, K. ‘Les principes généraux du droit applicables dans les rapports internationaux’ (1931) 36 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 479.Google Scholar
Woolsey, T. D. Introduction to the Study of International Law (Boston: James Munroe, 1860).Google Scholar
Woolsey, T. D. Introduction to the Study of International Law, 5th edn (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1886).Google Scholar
Wright, Q. ‘Opinion of Jurists on the Janina-Courfou Affair’ (1924) 18 American Journal of International Law 536.Google Scholar
Wright, Q. ‘When Does War Exist?’ (1932) 26 American Journal of International Law 362.Google Scholar
Wright, Q. ‘Review: The Corfu Incident of 1923: Mussolini and the League of Nations by James Barros’ (1966) 60 American Journal of International Law 870.Google Scholar
Yamada, C. ‘Revisiting the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), 117.Google Scholar
Yamada, T. ‘State of Necessity in International Law: A Study of International Judicial Cases’ (2005) 34 Kobe Gakuin Law Journal 107.Google Scholar
Yang, X. State Immunity in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Zegveld, L. Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Zemanek, K. ‘The Unilateral Enforcement of International Obligations’ (1987) 47 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 32.Google Scholar
Zemanek, K. ‘The Legal Foundations of the International System’ (1997) 266 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international 9.Google Scholar
Zoller, E. Peacetime Unilateral Remedies: An Analysis of Countermeasures (Dobbs Ferry: Transnational Publishers, 1984).Google Scholar
Zollmann, J. ‘L’affaire Naulilaa entre le Portugal et l’Allemagne, 1914–1933. Réflexions sur l’histoire politique d’une sentence arbitrale internationale’ (2013) 15 J Hist IL 201.Google Scholar
Zolo, D. ‘Hans Kelsen: International Peace through International Law’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 306.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, L. The Rape of Belgium: The Untold Story of World War I (New York: New York University Press, 2004).Google Scholar