Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Kant on Beauty and Biology
  • Cited by 111
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2009
Print publication year:
2007
Online ISBN:
9780511487323
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487323
Subjects:
History of Philosophy, Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, Philosophy
Series:
Modern European Philosophy
Information

Book description

Kant's Critique of Judgment has often been interpreted by scholars as comprising separate treatments of three uneasily connected topics: beauty, biology, and empirical knowledge. Rachel Zuckert's book interprets the Critique as a unified argument concerning all three domains. She argues that on Kant's view, human beings demonstrate a distinctive cognitive ability in appreciating beauty and understanding organic life: an ability to anticipate a whole that we do not completely understand according to preconceived categories. This ability is necessary, moreover, for human beings to gain knowledge of nature in its empirical character as it is, not as we might assume it to be. Her wide-ranging and original study will be valuable for readers in all areas of Kant's philosophy.

Awards

Winner of the American Society of Aesthetics Monograph Prize 2008

Reviews

Review of the hardback:'… impressive in its intellectual scope, its clearly-written quality, its well-informed, considerable citation of the secondary literature in Kant scholarship and its manner of arguing for a variety of nuanced positions that arise within the text's many subthemes. It is a contribution that stands solidly on the shoulders of the presently leading Kant scholarship and that integrates itself well into it.'

Source: British Journal for the History of Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Bibliography of works cited
Bibliography of works cited
Primary sources
KantImmanuel, . Kants gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–).
Translations consulted
KantImmanuel, . Anthropology from a Practical Point of View [Anth], tr. Mary Gregor. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974.
KantImmanuel, . Blomberg Logic, Jäsche Logic [JL], Vienna Logic, in Logic Lectures, tr. J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
KantImmanuel, Critique of Judgment, tr. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.
KantImmanuel, Critique of the Power of Judgment [CJ], tr. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
KantImmanuel, Critique of Practical Reason [CPrR], tr. L. W. Beck. New York: Macmillan/Library of Liberal Arts, 1989.
KantImmanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KantImmanuel, Critique of Pure Reason [CPR], tr. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
KantImmanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. N. K. Smith. New York: St. Martin's, 1989.
KantImmanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals [GW], tr. L. W. Beck. New Jersey: Prentice Hall/Library of Liberal Arts, 1997.
KantImmanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KantImmanuel, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science [MFNS], tr. James Ellington. New York: Library of Liberal Arts, 1970.
KantImmanuel, Metaphysics of Morals [MM], in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KantImmanuel, Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99, tr. Arnulf Zweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
KantImmanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics [Prol], tr. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Secondary sources
Adams, Robert. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Allison, Henry. “Kant's Antinomy of Teleological Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 25–42.
Allison, HenryKant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Allison, HenryKant's Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Allison, HenryKant's Transcendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
Allison, Henry“Pleasure and Harmony in Kant's Theory of Taste: A Critique of the Causal Reading,” in Parret, Herman, ed., Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1999, 466–83.
Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant's Deduction of Taste,” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982), 295–302.
Ameriks, KarlInterpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Aquila, Richard. “A New Look at Kant's Aesthetic Judgements,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 87–114.
Aquila, Richard“Unity of Organism, Unity of Thought, and the Unity of the Critique of Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 139–55.
Barker, Stephen. “Beauty and Induction in Kant's Third Critique,” in Meerbote, Ralf and Hudson, Hud, eds., Kant's Aesthetics, vol. i. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1991, 49–61.
Baum, Manfred. “Subjektivität, Allgemeingültigkeit and Apriorität des Geschmacksurteils bei Kant,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 39 (1991), 272–83.
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Reflections on Poetry, tr. Karl Aschenbreener and William B. Holther. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.
Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebTheoretische Ästhetik, tr. and ed. Rudolph Schweizer, Hans. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.
Bäumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18 Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.
Beck, Lewis White. Commentary on Kant's “Critique of Practical Reason”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
Bell, David. “The Art of Judgment,” Mind 96 (1987), 221–44.
Bencivenga, Ermanno. “Economy of Expression and Aesthetic Pleasure,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (1987), 615–30.
Bennett, Jonathan. Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Bennett, JonathanKant's Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Brandt, Reinhardt. “The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1989, 177–90.
Budd, Malcolm. “Kant on Aesthetic Appreciation,” Parts i, ii, iii, British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1998), 1–18, 117–26, 211–50.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Butts, Robert. “Teleology and Scientific Method,” Nous 24 (1990), 1–16.
Caranti, Luigi. “Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste,” Kant-Studien 96 (2005), 364–74.
Carrier, Martin. “Kant's Theory of Matter and His Views on Chemistry,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 205–30.
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Cohen, Ted. “Three Problems in Kant's Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002), 1–12.
Cohen, Ted“Why Beauty Is a Symbol of Morality,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 221–36.
Coleman, Francis X. J.The Harmony of Reason: A Study in Kant's Aesthetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1974.
Crawford, Donald. Kant's Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.
Crowther, Paul. “The Claims of Perfection: A Revisionary Defense of Kant's Theory of Dependent Beauty,” International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1986), 61–74.
Crowther, Paul. “The Significance of Kant's Pure Aesthetic Judgement,” British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996).
Cummins, Robert. “Functional Analysis,” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975), 741–65.
Düsing, Klaus. Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Kant-Studien Ergängzungshefte 96. Bonn: H. Bouvier u. Co. Verlag, 1968.
Elliott, R. K. “The Unity of Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgement,” British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1968), 244–59.
Falk, Barrie. “Having What We Want,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1991), 171–86.
Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Floyd, Juliet. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity,” in Parret, Herman, ed., Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998), 192–218.
Fricke, Cristel. “Explaining the Inexplicable: The Hypothesis of the Faculty of Reflective Judgment in Kant's Third Critique,” Nous 24 (1990), 45–62.
Fricke, CristelKants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteil. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.
Friedman, Michael. “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 161–99.
Friedman, MichaelKant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Friedman, Michael“Regulative and Constitutive,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1992), 73–102.
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2003.
Gibbons, Sarah. Kant's Theory of Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reath, Andrews, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine, eds., Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 329–60.
Ginsborg, Hannah“Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure,” Inquiry 46 (2003), 164–81.
Ginsborg, Hannah“Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 231–58.
Ginsborg, Hannah“Lawfulness Without Law,” Philosophical Topics 12 (1997), 37–81.
Ginsborg, Hannah“Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Nous 24 (1990), 63–78.
Ginsborg, HannahThe Role of Taste in Kant's Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland, 1990.
Ginsborg, Hannah“Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004), 33–65.
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976.
Gracyzk, Theodore. “Kant's Shifting Debt to British Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1986), 204–17.
Grenberg, Jeanine. “Feeling, Desire, and Interest in Kant's Theory of Action,” Kant-Studien 92 (2001), 153–79.
Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Guevara, Daniel. Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation. Boulder: Westview, 2000.
Guyer, Paul. “From Nature to Morality: Kant's New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 314–42.
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Guyer, Paul. “Kant's Conception of Empirical Law,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 38–55.
Guyer, Paul. “Kant's Principles of Reflecting Judgment,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003, 1–61.
Guyer, Paul. “Natural Ends and the Ends of Nature,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 157–65.
Guyer, Paul. “Organisms and the Unity of Science,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 259–81.
Guyer, Paul. “Pleasure and Society in Kant's Theory of Taste,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 21–54.
Guyer, Paul. “Purpose in Nature: What Is Living, and What Is Dead in Kant's Teleology?,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 343–72.
Guyer, Paul. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity,” Nous 24 (1990), 17–43.
Hegel, G. W. F.Faith and Knowledge, tr. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris. Albany: Suny Press, 1977.
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, tr. Richard Taft. Fifth edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.
Henrich, Dieter. The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy, ed. Richard Velkley, tr. Jeffrey Edwards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Hogarth, William. The Analysis of Beauty, ed. Paulson, Ronald. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
Horstmann, R. -P. “Why Must There Be a Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Judgment?,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1989, 157–76.
Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977.
Hume, David“Of the Standard of Taste,” in Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1987, 226–49.
Hume, DavidTreatise of Human Nature, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Isenberg, Arnold. “Critical Communication,” in Isenberg, Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism, ed. Callaghan, William, Cauman, Leigh, and Hempel, Carl. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 156–71.
Janaway, Christopher. “Kant's Aesthetics and the ‘Empty Cognitive Stock’,” Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1997), 459–76.
Kitcher, Philip. “Projecting the Order of Nature,” in Kitcher, Patricia, ed., Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998, 219–38.
Kolb, Daniel. “Kant, Teleology, and Evolution,” Synthese 91 (1992), 9–28.
Kraft, Michael. “Kant's Theory of Teleology,” International Philosophical Quarterly 22 (1982), 41–9.
Kulenkampff, Jens. Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1978.
Leibniz, G. W.Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Essays, tr. Daniel Garber and Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.
Lessing, G.Hamburgische Dramaturgie, tr. Helen Zimmern. New York: Dover, 1962.
Lessing, G.Laocoön, tr. E. A. McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.
Locke, John. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge, tr. Charles T. Wolf. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Lorand, Dorit Barchana. “The Kantian Beautiful or the Utterly Useless Prolegomena to Any Future Aesthetics,” Kant-Studien 93 (2002), 309–23.
Lorand, Ruth. “Free and Dependent Beauty,” British Journal of Aesthetics 29:1 (1989), 32–40.
Löw, Reinhard. Philosophie des Lebendigen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.
Mackie, J. L. “Causes and Conditions,” in Sosa, Ernest and Tooley, Michael, eds., Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 33–55.
Makkreel, Rudolph. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Makkreel, Rudolph“Regulative and Reflective Uses of Purposiveness in Kant,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 49–63.
Malaband, Philip. “Understanding Kant's Distinction between Free and Dependent Beauty,” Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002), 66–81.
Marc-Wogau, Konrad. Vier Studien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Uppsala: Lundequistka Bokhandeln, 1938.
Margolis, Joseph. “The Ontological Peculiarity of Works of Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1977), 45–50.
McCloskey, Mary. Kant's Aesthetic. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
McFarland, J. D.Kant's Concept of Teleology. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 1970.
McGhee, Michael. “A Fat Worm of Error?,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (1991), 222–9.
McLaughlin, Peter. Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Lewistown, NY: Mellen, 1990.
McTaggart, J. McT. E. “Time,” in Gale, Richard, ed., The Philosophy of Time. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1967, 86–79.
Meerbote, Ralf. “Reflections on Beauty,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 55–86.
Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings, tr. and ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Mill, J. S. Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979.
Morisson, Iain. “Pleasure in Kant,” Journal of Philosophical Research, forthcoming.
Nagel, Ernest. “Teleology Revisited,” in Teleology Revisited and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979, 275–316.
Pillow, Kirk. “Jupiter's Eagle and the Despot's Hand Mill: Two Views on Metaphor in Kant,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (2001), 193–209.
Pillow, KirkSublime Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2000.
Pippin, Robert. Kant's Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.
Pippin, Robert“Leaving Nature Behind; or Two Cheers for Subjectivism,” in Smith, Nick, ed., Reading McDowell: Essays on Mind and World. New York and London: Routledge, 2002, 58–75.
Pippin, Robert“The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic, and Reflective Judgement,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996), 549–69.
Prauss, Gerold. Erscheinung bei Kant. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971.
Reath, Andrews. “Hedonism, Heteronomy, and the Principle of Happiness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1989), 42–72.
Rind, Miles. “Kant's Beautiful Roses, a Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’,” British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2003), 65–74.
Rogerson, Kenneth. Kant's Aesthetic: The Roles of Form and Expression. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986.
Rush, Fred. “The Harmony of the Faculties,” Kant-Studien 92 (2001), 38–61.
Rutherford, Donald. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Ryle, Gilbert. “Pleasure,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplemental vol. 28 (1954), 135–46.
Santayana, George. The Sense of Beauty. New York: Dover, 1955.
Savile, Anthony. Kantian Aesthetics Pursued. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993.
Schaper, Eva. Studies in Kant's Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.
Schrader, George. “The Status of Feeling in Kant's Philosophy,” in Pierre Laberge, François Duchesneau, and Bryan, E. Morrisey, eds., Actes du Congrès d'Ottawa sur Kant dans les traditions anglo-américaines et continentales/Proceedings of the Ottawa Congress on Kant in the Anglo-American and Continental Traditions, tenu du 10 au 14 octobre 1974. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1976, 143–64.
Schrader, George“The Status of Teleological Judgment in the Critical Philosophy,” Kant-Studien 45 (1953), 204–35.
Searle, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Shell, Susan. The Embodiment of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Sloan, Philip. “Preforming the Categories: Eighteenth Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of the A Priori,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002), 229–53.
Smit, Houston. “The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1999), 203–23.
Stecker, Robert. “Free Beauty, Dependent Beauty, and Art,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 21 (1987), 89–99.
Strawson, P. F.The Bounds of Sense. London: Routledge, 1966.
Taylor, Charles. The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul, 1964.
Tüschling, B. “The System of Transcendental Idealism: Questions Raised and Left Open in the Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 109–27.
Walton, Kendall. “Categories of Art,” Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 334–67.
Warren, Daniel. “Kant's Dynamics,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 93–116.
Watkins, Eric. “Kant's Justification of the Laws of Mechanics,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 136–59.
Watkins, Eric, ed. Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997), 387–400.
Wiggins, David. “Response to Richard Wollheim,” Ratio 20 (1978), 52–68.
Winckelmann, J. J.The History of Ancient Art Among the Greeks, tr. G. Henry Lodge. London: John Chapman, 1850.
Wohlfart, Günther. “Transzendentale Ästhetik und kritischer Ästhetik,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36 (1982), 64–76.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “An Engagement with Kant's Theory of Beauty,” in Meerbote, Ralf and Hudson, Hud, eds., Kant's Aesthetics. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1991, 105–27.
Wright, Larry. “Functions,” Philosophical Review 82 (1973), 139–68.
Wubnig, J. “The Epigenesis of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien 60 (1968–9), 147–52.
Zammito, John. The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Zanetti, Véronique. “Die Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien 84 (1993), 341–55.
Zangwill, Nick. “Kant on Pleasure in the Agreeable,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1995), 167–76.
Zumbach, Clark. The Transcendent Science: Kant's Conception of Biological Methodology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1984.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.