Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-g5k2d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T04:51:23.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2017

Paul Formosa
Paul Formosa
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection , pp. 206 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry E. Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. “Ethics, Evil and Anthropology in Kant: Remarks on Allen Wood's Kant's Ethical Thought.” Ethics 111, no. 3 (2001): 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant's Transcendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. “On the Very Idea of a Propensity to Evil.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002): 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. “Reflections on the Banality of (Radical) Evil.” In Rethinking Evil, edited by Lara, Maria Pia, 86–100. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Altman, Matthew C. Kant and Applied Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Interpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. “Emotions in Kant's Later Moral Philosophy: Honour and the Phenomenology of Moral Value.” In Kant's Ethics of Virtue, edited by Betzler, Monika, 123–146. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon. Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. New York: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon, and Muchnik, Pablo, eds. Kant's Anatomy of Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. Means, Ends, & Persons. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano. “Kant's Idea of Human Dignity: Between Tradition and Originality.” Kant-Studien 106, no. 1 (2015): 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano. “The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason.” In Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, 197–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnoli, Carla. “Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed.” Ratio Juris 27, no. 3 (2014): 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Marcia. Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia. “Love and Respect in the Doctrine of Virtue.” In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, edited by Timmons, Mark, 391–408. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia, and Fahmy, Melissa Seymour. “Beneficence and Other Duties of Love in The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant's Ethics, edited by Hill, Thomas E. Jr., 211–228. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret. Kant's Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayefsky, Rachel. “Dignity, Honour, and Human Rights: Kant's Perspective.” Political Theory 41, no. 6 (2013): 809–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Behuniak, Susan M. “Death with ‘Dignity’: The Wedge That Divides the Disability Rights Movement from the Right to Die Movement.” Politics and the Life Sciences 30, no. 1 (2011): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betzler, Monika, ed. Kant's Ethics of Virtue. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyleveld, Deryck, and Brownsword, Roger. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Biss, Mavis. “Kantian Moral Striving.” Kantian Review 20, no. 1 (2015): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen. “Kant on Human Dignity.” Kant-Studien 106, no. 1 (2015): 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, Maria. “Physiology and the Controlling of Affects in Kant's Philosophy.” Kantian Review 13, no. 2 (2008): 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. “Losing One's Self.” In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Atkins, Kim, 193–211. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Caswell, Matthew. “Kant's Conception of the Highest Good, the Gesinnung, and the Theory of Radical Evil.” Kant-Studien 97 (2006): 184–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Ruth F. “The Market for Bodily Parts: Kant and Duties to Oneself.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 6, no. 2 (1989): 129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholbi, Michael. “A Direct Kantian Duty to Animals.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 52, no. 3 (2014): 338–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholbi, Michael. “Kant and the Irrationality of Suicide.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 17, no. 2 (2000): 159–76.Google Scholar
Cholbi, Michael. “A Kantian Defense of Prudential Suicide.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2010): 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix, ed. Kant on Emotion and Value. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “Reason, Humanity, and the Moral Law.” In The Sources of Normativity, edited by O'Neill, Onora, 167–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummiskey, David. Kantian Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cureton, Adam. “A Contractualist Reading of Kant's Proof of the Formula of Humanity.” Kantian Review 18, no. 3 (2013): 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Erin. Dignity Rights: Courts, Constitutions, and the Worth of the Human Person. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Allan, and Railton, Peter. “Toward Fin De Siècle Ethics: Some Trends.” The Philosophical Review 101, no. 1 (1992): 115–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88, no. 1 (1977): 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Richard. “The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself.” In Kant's Ethics, edited by Hill, Thomas E.., 83–101. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Dean, Richard. “Glasgow's Conception of Kantian Humanity.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46, no. 2 (2008): 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Richard. The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Abortion and Kant's Formula of Universal Law.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37, no. 4 (2007): 547–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Animality and Agency: A Kantian Approach to Abortion.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76, no. 1 (2008): 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Freedom, Primacy, and Perfect Duties to Oneself.” In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara, 170–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Humanity, Obligation, and the Good Will: An Argument against Dean's Interpretation of Humanity.” Kantian Review 15, no. 1 (2011): 118–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Kant's Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy.” Kantian Review 4 (2000): 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Kant's Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 17, no. 4 (2000): 405–423.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Kant's Conception of Virtue.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by Guyer, Paul, 505–537. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1997): 321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Kant on the Wrongness of ‘Unnatural’ Sex.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16, no. 2 (1999): 225–248.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara. “A Kantian Conception of Human Flourishing.” In Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, edited by Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian, 164–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Love of Honor as a Kantian Virtue.” In Kant on Emotion and Value, edited by Cohen, Alix, 191–209. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara. Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant's Moral Theory. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. The Theory of Morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düwell, Marcus, Braarvig, Jens, Brownsword, Roger, and Mieth, Dietmar, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Elisabeth. Kant's Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. “The Inner Freedom of Virtue.” In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, edited by Timmons, Mark, 289–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, and Narveson, Jan. “The Nature and Value of Rights.” Journal of Value Inquiry 4, no. 4 (1970): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Susan. “From Occupied Bodies to Pregnant Persons: How Kantians Should Treat Pregnancy and Abortion.” In Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, edited by Kneller, Jane and Axinn, Sidney, 265–282. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Gareth. “Charity and Humanity in the Philosophy of Language.” Praxis 1, no. 2 (2008): 17–29.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, William J. “The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korsgaard's Constructivism, Realism, and the Nature of Normativity.” Ethics 115 (2005): 651–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “‘All Politics Must Bend Its Knee before Right’: Kant on the Relation of Morals to Politics.” Social Theory and Practice 34, no. 2 (2008): 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “The Ends of Politics: Kant on Sovereignty, Civil Disobedience, and Cosmopolitanism.” In Politics and Teleology in Kant, edited by Formosa, Paul, Goldman, Avery and Patrone, Tatiana, 37–58. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “From Discipline to Autonomy: Kant's Theory of Moral Development.” In Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary, edited by Roth, Klas and Surprenant, Chris, 163–176. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “Kant's Conception of Personal Autonomy.” Journal of Social Philosophy 44, no. 3 (2013): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “Kant on the Highest Moral-Physical Good: The Social Aspect of Kant's Moral Philosophy.” Kantian Review 15, no. 1 (2010): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “Kant on the Radical Evil of Human Nature.” The Philosophical Forum 38, no. 3 (2007): 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “A Life without Affects and Passions: Kant on the Duty of Apathy.” Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy 13 (2011): 96–111.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “The Role of Vulnerability in Kantian Ethics.” In Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy and Dodds, Susan, 88–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul, and Mackenzie, Catriona. “Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no. 5 (2014): 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy 68, no. 1 (1971): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. “The Burdens of Public Justification.” Philosophy, Politics and Economics 6 (2007): 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. Rawls. New York: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. “The Moral Importance of Politeness in Kant's Anthropology.” Kantian Review 9, no. 1 (2005): 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, Richard. “Rounding up the Usual Suspects: Varieties of Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61, no. 242 (2011): 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, Richard. “The Universal Law Formulas.” In Kant's Ethics, edited by Hill, Thomas E. Jr., 52–82. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Gensler, Harry J. “A Kantian Argument against Abortion.” Philosophical Studies 49 (1986): 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, Alan. “Rights and Virtues.” Review of Metaphysics 38, no. 4 (1985): 739–762.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Nathaniel. “The Principle of Charity.” Dialogue 43, no. 4 (2004): 671–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. “Vulnerable Research Subjects.” APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine 4, no. 1 (2004): 3–9.Google Scholar
Graff, Rieke Van Der, and Van Delden, Johannes J. M.. “Clarifying Appeals to Dignity in Medical Ethics from an Historical Perspective.” Bioethics 23, no. 3 (2009): 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia S. “A Case of Mixed Feelings: Ambivalence and the Logic of Emotion.” In Explaining Emotions, edited by Rorty, A. O., 223–250. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary. The Laws of Freedom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. “All You Need Is Love?” In Kant on Emotion and Value, edited by Cohen, Alix, 210–223. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. Kant and the Ethics of Humility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. “What Is the Enemy of Virtue?.” In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Denis, Lara, 152–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Gressis, Rob. “Recent Work on Kantian Maxims I: Established Approaches.” Philosophy Compass 5, no. 3 (2010): 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressis, Rob. “Recent Work on Kantian Maxims II.” Philosophy Compass 5, no. 3 (2010): 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. “Kant's Argument for Radical Evil.” European Journal of Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002): 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant. New York: Routledge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “The Value of Reason and the Value of Freedom.” Ethics 109 (1998): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights.” Metaphilosophy 41, no. 4 (2010): 464–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Translated by Cronin, Ciaran. Edited by Cronin, Ciaran and De Greiff, Pablo. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. “A Kantian Approach to Abortion.” Social Theory and Practice 15, no. 1 (1989): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth. “Creation Ethics: The Moral Status of Early Fetuses and the Ethics of Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 28, no. 4 (1999): 310–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, Barbara. Moral Literacy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. Dignity and Practical Reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Donagan's Kant.” Ethics 104 (1993): 22–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Humanity as an End in Itself.” Ethics 91, no. 1 (1980): 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “In Defense of Human Dignity: Comments on Kant and Rosen.” In Understanding Human Dignity, Proceedings of the British Academy, edited by McCrudden, Christopher, 315–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. ed. Kant's Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.” Ethics 99, no. 4 (1989): 752–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Making Exceptions without Abandoning the Principle: Or How a Kantian Might Think About Terrorism.” In Dignity and Practical Reason, 196–225. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Moral Construction as a Task: Sources and Limits.” Social Philosophy & Policy 25, no. 1 (2008): 214–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Respect for Humanity.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 1994.Google Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. “Servility and Self-Respect.” The Monist 57, no. 1 (1973): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HillJr., Thomas E. Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by Joel Anderson. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Polity Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert N. Self-Improvement: An Essay in Kantian Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, Lawrence, and Wuerth, Julian, eds. Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jotterand, Fabrice. “Human Dignity and Transhumanism.” The American Journal of Bioethics 10, no. 7 (2010): 45–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kain, Patrick. “Kant's Defense of Human Moral Status.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47, no. 1 (2009): 59–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Realism and Anti-Realism in Kant's Second Critique.” Philosophy Compass 1, no. 5 (2006): 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Self-Legislation in Kant's Moral Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (2004): 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by Louden, Robert B.. Edited by Louden, Robert B.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “The Conflict of the Faculties.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J. and Anchor, Robert. In Religion and Rational Theology, edited by Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George, 233–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Critique of Practical Reason.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. In Practical Philosophy, edited by Gregor, Mary J., 133–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan, 1982.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. In Practical Philosophy, edited by Gregor, Mary J., 37–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Heath, Peter. Edited by Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Lectures on Pedagogy.” Translated by Louden, Robert B.. In Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 434–485. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “The Metaphysics of Morals.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. In Practical Philosophy, edited by Gregor, Mary J., 353–604. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Philanthropy.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. In Practical Philosophy, edited by Gregor, Mary J., 611–615. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. In Practical Philosophy, edited by Gregor, Mary J., 273–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Philosophers’ Medicine of the Body.” Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. In Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 182–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” Translated by Di Giovanni, George. In Religion and Rational Theology, edited by Wood, Allen and Di Giovanni, George, 39–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens or Essay on the Constitution and the Mechanical Origin of the Whole Universe According to Newtonian Principles.” Translated by Reinhardt, Olaf. In Natural Science, edited by Watkins, Eric, 182–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kateb, George. Human Dignity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kennett, Jeanette, and Fine, Cordelia. “Internalism and the Evidence from Psychopathy and Acquired Sociopathy.” In Moral Psychology Volume 3, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, 173–190. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. “Death, Dignity, and Respect.” Social Theory and Practice 35, no. 4 (2009): 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. “Deriving the Supreme Moral Principle from Common Moral Ideas.” In Kant's Ethics, edited by Hill, Thomas E. Jr., 121–137. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. How to Treat Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. “Kantian Condemnation of Commerce in Organs.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19, no. 2 (2009): 147–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerstein, Samuel. “Kantian Dignity: A Critique.” In Cambridge Handbook on Human Dignity, edited by Düwell, Marcus, Braarvig, Jens, Brownsword, Roger and Mieth, Dietmar, 222–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. “Treating Oneself Merely as a Means.” In Kant's Ethics of Virtue, edited by Betzler, Monika, 201–218. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel. “Treating Others Merely as Means.” Utilitas 21, no. 2 (2009): 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killmister, Suzy. “Dignity: Not Such a Useless Concept.” Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (2010): 160–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kipnis, Kenneth. “Vulnerability in Research Subjects: A Bioethical Taxonomy.” In Ethical & Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, 174–184. Bethesda: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2001.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. “Human Dependency and Rawlsian Equality.” In Feminists Rethink the Self, edited by Meyers, Diana, 219–266. Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant's Second Thoughts on Race.” The Philosophical Quarterly 57, no. 229 (2007): 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1999): 59–80.Google Scholar
Kolnai, Aurel. “Dignity.” Philosophy 51, no. 197 (1976): 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppelman, Elysa R. “Dementia and Dignity: Towards a New Method of Surrogate Decision Making.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27, no. 1 (2002): 65–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korsgaard, Christine M. The Constitution of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals.” In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, edited by Peterson, Grethe B.. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy.” The Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (2003): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. Self-Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. The Sources of Normativity. Edited by Onora O'Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottow, Michael H. “The Vulnerable and the Susceptible.” Bioethics 17, no. 5–6 (2003): 460–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langton, Rae. “Objective and Unconditioned Value.” Philosophical Review 116, no. 2 (2007): 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, Mianna. “Feinberg, Mills, and the Child's Right to an Open Future.” Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 4 (2006): 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. Kant's Human Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. “Kant's Virtue Ethics.” Philosophy 61, no. 238 (1986): 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David. Legal Ethics and Human Dignity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan, eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Macklin, Ruth. “Dignity Is a Useless Concept: It Means No More Than Respect for Persons or Their Autonomy.” British Medical Journal 327, no. 7249 (2003): 1419–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manninen, Bertha Alvarex. “Are Human Embryos Kantian Persons?: Kantian Considerations in Favor of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3, no. 4 (2008): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manninen, Bertha Alvarex. “A Kantian Defense of Abortion Rights with Respect for Intrauterine Life.” Diametros 39 (2014): 70–92.Google Scholar
McCarty, Richard. “Maxims in Kant's Practical Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44, no. 1 (2006): 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher, ed. Understanding Human Dignity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
McMullin, Irene. “Kant on Radical Evil and the Origin of Moral Responsibility.” Kantian Review 18, no. 1 (2013): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. “Kant on Enlightened Moral Pedagogy.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49, no. 3 (2011): 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Michael. “Dignity, Rights, and Self-Control.” Ethics 99, no. 3 (1989): 520–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalson, Gordon. Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milo, Ronald. “Contractarian Constructivism.” The Journal of Philosophy 92, no. 4 (1995): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate A. “Can Kant Have an Account of Moral Education?”. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43, no. 4 (2009): 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate A. Community and Progress in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas. Kant's Conception of Moral Character. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas. “Kant on Moral Education, or ‘Enlightenment’ and the Liberal Arts.” The Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 1 (2003): 43–73.Google Scholar
Neuhäuser, Christian, and Stoecker, Ralf. “Human Dignity as Universal Nobility.” In Cambridge Handbook on Human Dignity, edited by Düwell, Marcus, Braarvig, Jens, Brownsword, Roger and Mieth, Dietmar, 298–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, Michael. “The Stem Cell Slide: Be Alert to the Beginnings of Evil.” In The Stem Cell Controversy: Debating the Issues, edited by Ruse, Michael and Pynes, Christopher A.. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
O'Hagan, Emer. “Animals, Agency, and Obligation in Kantian Ethics.” Social Theory and Practice 35, no. 4 (2009): 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. “Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason.” In News Essays on the History of Autonomy, edited by Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry, 181–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. “Between Consenting Adults.” In Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, 105–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. “Constructivism in Rawls and Kant.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 347–367. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. “Constructivism vs. Contractualism.” Ratio XVI, no. 4 (2003): 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. “The Public Use of Reason.” In Judgment, Imagination, and Politics, edited by Beiner, Ronald and Nedelsky, Jennifer, 65–90. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. “Universal Laws and Ends-in-Themselves.” In Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, 126–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Oduncu, F.S. “Stem Cell Research in Germany: Ethics of Healing Vs. Human Dignity.” Med Health Care Philos 6, no. 1 (2003): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallikkathayil, Japa. “Deriving Morality from Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity.” Ethics 121, no. 1 (2010): 116–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadaki, Lina. “Abortion and Kant's Formula of Humanity.” Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (2012): 145–166.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, Edmund D., Schulman, Adam, and Merrill, Thomas W., eds. Human Dignity and Bioethics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. “Two Construals of Scanlon's Contractualism.” The Journal of Philosophy 97, no. 3 (2000): 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. “The Stupidity of Dignity.” The New Republic (May 28, 2008).Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. “Is Kant's Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’?”. In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, edited by Timmons, Mark, 133–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 9 (1980): 515–572.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Themes in Kant's Moral Philosophy.” In Kant's Transcendental Deductions, edited by Förster, Eckart, 81–113. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. Agency & Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. “Agency and Universal Law.” In Agency & Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory, 196–230. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. “Formal Approaches to Kant's Formula of Humanity.” In Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretive Essays, edited by Timmons, Mark and Baiasu, Sorin, 201–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald H. “The Value of Rational Nature.” Ethics 112 (2002): 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. London: Routledge, 1983.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its Meaning and History. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostbøll, Christian F. “Kantian Autonomy and Political Liberalism.” Social Theory and Practice 37, no. 3 (2011): 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Klas, and Surprenant, Chris W., eds. Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. New York: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagoff, M. “Extracorporeal Embryos and Three Conceptions of the Human.” Am J Bioeth 5, no. 6 (2005): 52–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. “Introduction: The Many Moral Realisms.” In Essays on Moral Realism, edited by Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, 1–26. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. “The Appeal and Limits of Constructivism.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by Lenman, James and Shemmer, Yonatan, 226–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar. “What Is a Child?” Ethics 109, no. 4 (1999): 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Doris. “Dignity: One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Still Counting.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2010): 118–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, Doris. “Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (2008): 230–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, Doris, and Gefenas, Eugenijus. “Vulnerability: Too Vague and Too Broad?”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (2009): 113–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searle, John R. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity.” In Kant's ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens, 102–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. Kant on Human Dignity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. “Kant on Human Dignity Reconsidered.” Kant-Studien 106, no. 1 (2015): 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. ed. Kant on Moral Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. “Respect Towards Elderly Demented Patients.” Diametros 39 (2014): 109–124.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan M. “Kant's Concept of Human Dignity as a Resource for Bioethics.” In Human Dignity and Bioethics, edited by Pellegrino, Edmund D., Schulman, Adam and Merill, Thomas W., 333–350. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. “Reasons and Feelings in Kantian Morality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, no. 2 (1995): 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. “Speciesism and Moral Status.” Metaphilosophy 40, no. 3–4 (2009): 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. Ethics and the A Priori. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Kelly D. “Kant's Taxonomy of the Emotions.” Kantian Review 6 (2002): 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. “The Autonomy of Morality and the Morality of Autonomy.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2009): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. Understanding Moral Obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Stoecker, Ralf. “Three Crucial Turns on the Road to an Adequate Understanding of Human Dignity.” In Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization, edited by Kaufmann, Paulus, Kuch, Hannes, Neuhäuser, Christian and Webster, Elaine, 7–20. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohr, Karen. “Kantian Beneficence and the Problem of Obligatory Aid.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2011): 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surprenant, Chris. Kant and the Cultivation of Virtue. New York: Routledge, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David. “The Authority of Humanity.” Ethics 113 (2003): 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, no. 1 (1971): 47–66.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens, ed. Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens, Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens, “Kant on Conscience, ‘Indirect’ Duty, and Moral Error.” International Philosophical Quarterly 46, no. 3 (2006): 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, Mark. “The Limits of Moral Constructivism.” Ratio XVI, no. 4 (2003): 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, Helga. “A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity: The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality.” In Out of the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy, edited by Crasnow, Sharon and Superson, Anita, 33–57 Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. David. “A Right to Self-Termination.” Ethics 109 (1999): 606–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velleman, J. David. Self to Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Vergés-Gifra, Joan. “Why Rawls Should Have Resisted the Hermeneutic Temptation.” Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 4 (2006): 584–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Dignity, Rank, and Rights. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. 2009.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Fitzpatrick, William. “O'Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002): 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus, and Kleingeld, Pauline. “Why the Moral Law Is Not Self-Legislated: A Novel Reading of Kantian Autonomy.” Paper presented at the 12th International Kant Congress, 2015.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard. “Liberty, Equality, and Independence: Core Concepts in Kant's Political Philosophy.” In A Companion to Kant, edited by Bird, Graham, 364–382. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Eric. “Kant on Autonomy and the Value of Persons.” Kantian Review 18, no. 2 (2013): 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Eric. “Kantian Autonomy and the Moral Self.” The Review of Metaphysics 62 (2008): 355–381.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, edited by Schoeman, Ferdinand, 46–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. “Exploitation.” Social Philosophy and Policy 12, no. 2 (1995): 136–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. “Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 72 (1998): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Formosa, Macquarie University, Sydney
  • Book: Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection
  • Online publication: 02 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987308.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Formosa, Macquarie University, Sydney
  • Book: Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection
  • Online publication: 02 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987308.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Paul Formosa, Macquarie University, Sydney
  • Book: Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection
  • Online publication: 02 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987308.007
Available formats
×