Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Preface to the Sixteenth Edition
- Preface to The Seventeenth Edition
- Preface to the Eighteenth Edition
- Contents
- Index of cases
- Index to the principal statutes
- List of principal books cited
- BOOK I GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
- CHAPTER I CRIME AND CRIMINAL LAW
- CHAPTER II PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
- CHAPTER III VARIATIONS IN LIABILITY
- CHAPTER IV PRELIMINARY CRIMES
- CHAPTER V THE POSSIBLE PARTIES TO A CRIME
- CHAPTER VI THE CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES
- BOOK II DEFINITIONS OF PARTICULAR CRIMES
- BOOK III MODES OF JUDICIAL PROOF
- BOOK IV CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- Appendix I The meaning of ‘credit’
- Appendix II II Rules as to admission of evidence which reveals to the jury facts discreditable to the person accused
- Appendix III III Forms of indictment
- Index
CHAPTER II - PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
from BOOK I - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
- Frontmatter
- Preface to the Sixteenth Edition
- Preface to The Seventeenth Edition
- Preface to the Eighteenth Edition
- Contents
- Index of cases
- Index to the principal statutes
- List of principal books cited
- BOOK I GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
- CHAPTER I CRIME AND CRIMINAL LAW
- CHAPTER II PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
- CHAPTER III VARIATIONS IN LIABILITY
- CHAPTER IV PRELIMINARY CRIMES
- CHAPTER V THE POSSIBLE PARTIES TO A CRIME
- CHAPTER VI THE CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES
- BOOK II DEFINITIONS OF PARTICULAR CRIMES
- BOOK III MODES OF JUDICIAL PROOF
- BOOK IV CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- Appendix I The meaning of ‘credit’
- Appendix II II Rules as to admission of evidence which reveals to the jury facts discreditable to the person accused
- Appendix III III Forms of indictment
- Index
Summary
Section I. AT COMMON LAW
HISTORICAL: NOT EMBODIED IN A CODE
Our system of criminal law is not, as is the case in some countries, contained in a single code promulgated by a legislative body. It is, on the contrary, a conglomerate mass of rules based upon the ancient common law of England as modified and extended by the authoritative decisions of the judges in the long passage of history, and vastly enlarged by the addition of statutory enactments made by parliament from time to time, to meet the needs of the moment. For a proper understanding of our criminal system it is therefore necessary to begin with a study of the common law, for as Blackstone wrote: ‘ Statutes also are either declaratory of the common law, or remedial of some defects therein.’
THE PERIOD OF STRICT LIABILITY
There is evidence that throughout Europe in the remote past acts which caused serious harm were supposed to bring about the infliction upon the people of some calamitous punishment by the gods. In such circumstances severe sufferings were inflicted upon the offender in order to placate the outraged deity. But combined with this notion, and eventually outliving it, was the idea that the person whose active conduct appeared as the visible cause of the harm should be held responsible for it; indeed, this responsibility was attached to animals and even to inanimate objects, under the crude conception of causation formed by primitive and superstitious minds, which attributed some kind of spiritual personality to lifeless objects with which man himself had brought about a human death. The English law as to ‘deodands’ was a relic of this prehistoric notion; the deodand was any inanimate instrument by which the killing had been effected. In the Anglo-Saxon era it was called brana, the slayer, and it was handed over to the family of the man killed in order that they might take vengeance upon it. The old couplet ran
Whatever moved to do the deed
Is deodand and forfeited,
but forfeiture was not confined to things that had moved: so once where a small boy fell into a pan full of milk and was drowned, the pan was forfeited.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kenny's Outlines of Criminal Law , pp. 7 - 51Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
- 1
- Cited by