Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:16:10.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER 17 - Lacewings, biological control, and conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

P. K. McEwen
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
T. R. New
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
A. E. Whittington
Affiliation:
National Museums of Scotland
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Release of non-specific predatory insects into a new area implies responsibilities associated with a ‘duty of care’ for the receiving environment and, from the conservationist's viewpoint, is not always an exercise to be undertaken lightly, despite the seeming urgency of biological control measures against pest arthropods. The twin contexts that are relevant to introductions of lacewings are (1) release of species which are exotic to the areas where they are released (that is, as classical biological control agents, species not present previously in the region of introduction, for which the above precautions may be particularly important) and (2) native species whose populations are enhanced by releases from commercial stocks, or by use of attractants to concentrate field populations in more limited areas. Both approaches are usually part of IPM programmes undertaken with the overall aim of seeking more cost-efficient pest control with the economic and environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use.

Incorporation of predators into such strategies is increasingly undertaken with the aims of short-term gain and longer-term environmental safety. Nevertheless, it is pertinent here to recapitulate some of the responsibilities and concerns that such operations raise, and to emphasise the need to monitor introductions effectively to help improve further the application technologies and quality of the results obtained.

Many such releases are indeed undertaken with due regard to ‘acceptable risk’, but clear definition of those risks is itself a complex matter. Increasingly, such risks are being dealt with by a combination of regulations, protocols, and guidelines involving some degree of consensus of scientific and regulatory participants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×