Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:01:27.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Verbal Complex Formation and Overt Subjects in Infinitivals in Spanish

from Part I - The Computational Component

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Ángel J. Gallego
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Roger Martin
Affiliation:
Yokohama National University, Japan
Get access

Summary

Spanish generally has subject preceding main verbs. However, under some discourse motivated examples with control verbs ,the subject might appear post infinitival and precede the complements of that that infinitive. One plausible explanation for this structure is to assume that this is an instance of backward control (Polinsky and Potsdam 2002) and that this post infinitival subject is the Spell out of the subject before its moved to the main clause. However, I will propose an remnant movement alternative. This subject ends up in this position post infinitival position because massive remnant movement of verbal projections to the left has taken place. These remnant movements mask the fact that the subject is the lead to the order in which the main subject appears between infinitive and complements of the infinitive. This alternative has important advantages of drawing parallelism between these Spanish constructions and the formation of verbal complexes in the Germanic Languages (Hinterhölzl 2005, Hungarian and Dutch (Koopman & Szabolsci 2000) and causatives in French (Homer, Ishizuka & Sportiche 2009). One important advantage of this proposal is that it accounts for the following generalization: those languages that allow VSO order are also the ones that permit a wider distribution of subjects in apparent backward control contexts. We conclude that this wider distribution is a consequence of the fact that Spanish and languages with the VSO order have a higher Spec position for the landing site of its subjects.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E.. 2001. The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., Iordachioia, G., and Marchis, M.. 2010. No objections to backward control. In Hornstein, N. and Polinsky, M. (eds.), Movement Theory of Control. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 89118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement Aspects of Verb Syntax. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25.4: 657689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, J. and Jonas, D.. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195236.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. 2004. Towards a cartography of subject positions. In Rizzi, L. (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. New York: Oxford University Press, 115165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. and Shlonsky, U.. 2004. Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 519557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, J. 1997. On the behavior of adverbs in sentence-final context. The Linguistic Review 14: 4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á. 2013. Object shift in Romance. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 409451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T. 1993. Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Study. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, R. 2005. Scrambling, Remnant Movement, and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Homer, V., Ishizuka, T., and Sportiche, D.. 2009. The locality of clitic placement and the analysis of French causatives. Paper presented at the 7th GLOW in Asia Conference (GLOW Asia 7). The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
Hornstein, H. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 6996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, H. and Szabolsci, A.. 2000. Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motapanyane, V. 1995. Theoretical Implications of Complementation in Romanian. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Nicolis, M. 2001. L-Tous, restructuring, and quantifier climbing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 26: 6384.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. 1998. Post-verbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 313346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F. 2007. Cartography of postverbal subjects in Spanish and Catalan. In Baauw, S., Drijkoningen, F., and Pinto, M. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 259281.Google Scholar
Ortega-Santos, , I. 2016. Focus-Related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piera, Carlos. 1987. Sobre la estructura de las cláusulas de infinitivo. In Demonte, V. and Fernández, L. (eds.), Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas. Madrid: Arco Libros, 148166.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E.. 2002. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 245282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E. 2006. Expanding the scope of control and raising. Syntax 9: 171192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1976. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosselló, J. 2002. El SV i arguments verbals. In Solà, J. (ed.), Gramàtica del Català contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries, 18531949.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, C. 1993. Una anomalía del sistema pronominal español. Dicenda. Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica 11: 259284.Google Scholar
Solà, Jaume. 1992. Agreement and subjects. Doctoral dissertation. Bellaterra, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. http://filcat.uab.cat/clt/publicacions/tesis/pdf/Sola.pdf.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. 1996. On Quantifier Float in control clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 111126.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. 2002. L'oració com a Unitat Informativa. In Solà, J. (ed.), Gramàtica del Català Contemporari. Barcelona: Empúries, 12211279.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×