Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:37:19.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Large herbivores in heterogeneous grassland ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2009

By
Douglas Frank A.
Edited by
Kjell Danell ,
Roger Bergström ,
Patrick Duncan  and
John Pastor
Douglas Frank A.
Affiliation:
Biological Research Laboratories Syracuse University
Kjell Danell
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Roger Bergström
Affiliation:
The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden
Patrick Duncan
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
John Pastor
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Satisfying energetic and nutritional requirements is a difficult challenge for herbivores in grassland. Grass is a relatively abrasive, low‐quality forage (Van Soest 1982, Robbins 1983, McDowell 1985) whose nutritional content varies over complex spatial and temporal scales (Houston 1982, Hudson & White 1985, McNaughton 1985, Laca & Dement 1986, Senft et al. 1987, Demment & Greenwood 1988, Hobbs 1989, Singer et al. 1989). Ungulates, the principal large herbivores of grassland, are well suited for the dietary rigours of their habitat by possessing three important adaptations: (1) high‐crowned, hypsodontic dentition that resists wear and increases the capacity for long‐lived organisms to grind plant tissue; (2) a multichambered digestive tract that functions as a fermentation vat to efficiently extract energy from high cellulose ingesta; and (3) an elongation of limbs, reduction of digits and the development of a massive, hardened nail, the hoof, that provides for efficient and injury‐resistant travel over open terrain in search of food (Van Soest 1982, McNaughton 1989, 1991). This suite of adaptations facilitates energy and nutrient extraction from forage, and is testimony to the severe resource‐limiting conditions that ungulates face in a grassland habitat.

There has been considerable recent interest in factors controlling the development and maintenance of a spatial pattern in landscapes, and the flows of energy and material among landscape patches (Levin 1992, Pickett & Cadenasso 1995, Turner et al. 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation , pp. 326 - 347
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afzal, M. & Adams, W. A. (1992). Heterogeneity of soil mineral nitrogen in pasture grazed by cattle. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, 1160–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, D. J. & Frank, D. A. (2001). Effects of migratory grazers on spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen properties in a grassland ecosystem. Ecology, 82, 3149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, D. J., McNaughton, S. J. & Frank, D. A. (2003). Feedbacks between soil nutrients and large herbivores in a managed savanna ecosystem: bottom up is top down. Ecological Applications, 13, 1325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben‐Shahar, R. & Coe, M. J. (1992). The relationships between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behaviour of wildebeest and zebra. Oecologia, 90, 422–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bokhari, U. G. (1977). Regrowth of western wheatgrass utilizing14C‐labeled assimilates stored in belowground parts. Plant Soil, 48, 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhari, U. G. & Singh, J. S. (1974). Effects of temperature and clipping on growth, carbohydrate reserves, and root exudation of western wheatgrass in hydroponic culture. Crop Science, 14, 790–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C. (1989). Control of nitrogen mineralization in a sagebrush steppe landscape. Ecology, 70, 1115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughenour, M. B. (1991). Spatial components of plant‐herbivore interactions in pastoral, ranching, and native ungulate ecosystems. Journal of Range Management, 44, 530–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, T. A. & Detling, J. K. (1990). Grassland patch dynamics and herbivore grazing preference following urine deposition. Ecology, 71, 180–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demment, M. W. & Greenwood, G. B. (1988). Forage ingestion: effects of sward characteristics and body size. Journal of Animal Science, 66, 2380–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, D. A. (1998). Ungulate regulation of ecosystem processes in Yellowstone National Park: direct and feedback effects. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 410–18.Google Scholar
Frank, D. A. & Groffman, P. M. (1998). Ungulate vs landscape control of soil C and N processes in grasslands of Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 79, 2229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A. & McNaughton, S. J. (1992). The ecology of plants, large mammalian herbivores, and drought in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 73, 2043–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A. & McNaughton, S. J. (1993). Evidence for the promotion of aboveground grassland production by native large herbivores in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia, 96, 157–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, D. A., Inouye, R. S., Huntly, N., Minshall, G. W. & Anderson, J. E. (1994). The biogeochemistry of a north‐temperate grassland with native ungulates: nitrogen dynamics in Yellowstone National Park. Biogeochemistry, 26, 163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A., McNaughton, S. J. & Tracy, B. F. (1998). The ecology of the earth's grazing ecosystems. Bioscience, 48, 513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A., Kuns, M. M. & Guido, D. R. (2002). Consumer control of grassland plant production. Ecology, 83, 602–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, D. A., Evans, R. D. & Tracy, B. F. (2004). The role of ammonia volatilization in controlling the natural15N abundance of a grazed grassland. Biogeochemistry, 68, 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festa‐Bianchet, M. (1988). Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance. Oecologia, 75, 580–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryxell, J. M. & Sinclair, A. R. E. (1988). Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fryxell, J. M., Greever, J. & Sinclair, A. R. E. (1988). Why are migratory ungulates so abundant?American Naturalist, 131, 781–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, E. W. & Frank, D. A. (2001). Can plants stimulate soil microbes and their own nutrient supply? Evidence from a grazing tolerant grass. Ecology, 82, 2397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, N. T. (1989). Linking energy balance to survival in mule deer: development and test of a simulation model. Wildlife Monographs, No. 101, Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Hobbs, N. T. (1996). Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. N., Cheng, W. & Crossley, D. A. (1996). Herbivore‐induced changes in plant carbon allocation: assessment of below‐ground C fluxes using carbon‐14. Oecologia, 107, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston, D. B. (1982). The Northern Yellowstone Elk: Ecology and Management. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. J. & White, R. G. (eds.) (1985). Bioenergetics of Wild Herbivores. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W. & O'Connor, T. G. (2000). Resource heterogeneity and ungulate population dynamics. Oikos, 89, 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, V. J. & Detling, J. K. (1992). Small‐scale heterogeneity in a semi‐arid North American grassland. I. Tillering, N uptake and retranslocation in simulated urine patches. Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, H. (1980). The Soil Resource: Origin and Behavior. Ecological Studies, vol. 37. New York: Springer‐Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. C. & Machett, J. R. (2001). Fire and grazing regulate belowground processes in tallgrass prairie. Ecology, 82, 3377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. L. & Hanson, H. C. (1985). Mineral Licks, Geophagy, and Biogeochemistry of North American Ungulates. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, D. R. (1965). Ecology of deer range in Alaska. Ecological Monographs, 35, 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Blair, J. M. & Turner, C. L. (1998). Patterns and controls of aboveground net primary production in tallgrass prairie. In Grassland Dynamics: Long‐term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie, ed. Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C. & Collins, S. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–221.Google Scholar
Laca, E. A. & Demment, M. W. (1986). The feeding behavior of a grazing herbivore: harvesting limitations. Proceedings of the International Congress of Ecology, 4, 209.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1933). Game Management. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73, 1943–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, M. M., Stobbs, T. H., Davis, R. & Charles‐Edwards, D. A. (1982). Effect of sward structure of two tropical grasses with contrasting canopies on light distribution, net photosynthesis and size of bite harvested by grazing cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 33, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, L. R. (1985). Nutrition of Grazing Ruminants in Warm Climates. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1979). Grassland‐herbivore dynamics. In Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem, ed. Sinclair, A. R. E. & Norton‐Griffiths, M.. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 46–81.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1984). Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. American Naturalist, 124, 863–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1985). Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecological Monographs, 55, 259–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1989). Interactions of plants of the field layer with large herbivores. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 61, 15–29.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1990). Mineral nutrition and seasonal movements of African migratory ungulates. Nature, 345, 613–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1991). Evolutionary ecology of large tropical herbivores. In Plant‐Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions, ed. Price, P. W., Lewinsohn, T. M., Fernandes, G. W. & Benson, W. W.. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 509–22.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J., Ruess, R. W. & Seagle, S. W. (1988). Large mammals and process dynamics in African ecosystems. Bioscience, 38, 794–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, S. J., Banyikawa, F. F. & McNaughton, M. M. (1997). Promotion of the cycling of diet‐enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science, 278, 1798–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, M. M. (1973). The Bison of Yellowstone National Park. NPS Scientific Monograph Series Number 1. Washington, DC: United States Department of Interior.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B., McCowan, D. & Nicholson, I. A. (1976). Annual cycles of body weight and condition in Scottish red deer, Cervus elaphus. Journal of Zoology (London), 180, 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, R., Pastor, J. & Cohen, Y. (1997). A spatially explicit model of moose foraging and energetics. Ecology, 78, 505–21.Google Scholar
Morgantini, L. E. & Hudson, R. J. (1988). Migratory patterns of the wapati, Cervus elaphus, in Banff National Park, Alberta. Canadian Field Naturalist, 102, 12–19.Google Scholar
Pastor, J., Dewey, B., Naiman, R. J., McInnes, P. F. & Cohen, Y. (1993). Moose browsing and soil fertility in the boreal forests of Isle Royale National Park. Ecology, 74, 467–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J., Dewey, B., Moen, R.et al. (1998). Spatial patterns in the moose‐forest‐soil Ecosystem on Isle Royale, Michigan, USA. Ecological Applications, 8, 411–24.Google Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. & Cadenasso, M. L. (1995). Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science, 269, 331–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prins, H. H. T. (1996). Ecology and Behavior of the African Buffalo: Social Inequality and Decision Making. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, G. P. (1987). Geostatistics in ecology: interpolating with known variance. Ecology, 68, 744–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, C. T. (1983). Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schimel, D. S., Stillwell, M. A. & Woodmansee, R. G. (1985). Biogeochemistry of C, N, and P on a catena of the shortgrass steppe. Ecology, 66, 276–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, R. L., Coughenhour, M. B., Bailey, D. W.et al. (1987). Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience, 37M, 789–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. & Norton‐Griffiths, M. (1979). Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Singer, F. J., Schreier, W., Oppenheim, J. & Garton, E. O. (1989). Drought, fires, and large mammals. Bioscience, 39, 716–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, F. J. & Mack, J. A. (1993). Potential ungulate prey for gray wolves. In Ecological Issues on Reintroducing Wolves into Yellowstone National Park. ed. Cook, R. S.. United States Department of Interior. Scientific Monograph no. NPS/NRYELL/NRSM‐93/22, pp. 75–117.Google Scholar
Spalinger, D. E. & Hobbs, N. T. (1992). Mechanisms of foraging in mammalian herbivores: new models of functional response. American Naturalist, 140, 325–48.
Steinauer, E. M. & Collins, S. L. (2001). Spatial cascades in community structure following urine deposition in tallgrass prairie. Ecology, 82, 1319–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. J. (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stillwell, M. A. (1983). Effects of bovine urinary nitrogen on the nitrogen cycle of a shortgrass prairie. Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Swank, W. T. (1984). Atmospheric contributions to forest nutrient cycling. Water Resources Bulletin, 20, 313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. & Murray, J. I. (1987). Genetic aspects of mammalian survival and growth in relation to body size. In The Nutrition of Herbivores, ed. Hacker, J. B. & Ternouth, J. H.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 487–533.Google Scholar
Tracy, B. F. & McNaughton, S. J. (1995). Elemental analysis of mineral lick soils from Serengeti National Park, the Konza Prairie, and Yellowstone National Park. Ecography, 18, 91–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G., Wu, Y., Wallace, L. L., Romme, W. H. & Brenkert, A. (1994). Simulating winter interactions among ungulates, vegetation, and fire in northern Yellowstone Park. Ecological Applications, 4, 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H. & O'Neill, R. V. (2001). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. New York: Springer‐Verlag.Google Scholar
Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, OR: O & B Books.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. (1991). Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur?Biogeochemistry, 13, 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. L., Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., O'Neill, R. V. & Wu, Y. (1995). Scale of heterogeneity of forage production and winter foraging by elk and bison. Landscape Ecology, 10, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, D. A. & Tilman, D. (1990). Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia, 84, 433–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×