‘Amazon to Sue Over 1,000 Fake Reviews’ Digital Journal (18 October 2015). Available at www.digitaljournal.com/internet/amazon-to-sue-over-1-000-fake-reviewers/article/446891Google Scholar

Abel, R., ‘The Contradictions of Informal Justice’ in Abel, R. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, vol. 1 (Academic Press, 1892)Google Scholar

Abernethy, S., ‘Building Large-Scale Online Dispute Resolution and Trustmark Systems’ in Katsh, E. & Choi, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Technology as the ‘Fourth Party’ (International Conflict Resolution Centre, University of Melbourne, 2003)Google Scholar

ADICAE, Informe de ADICAE sobre el Anteproyecto de Ley de Resolución de Conflictos de Consumo (ADICAE, 2014)Google Scholar

ADICAE, Sistemas de Resolución Extrajudicial de Conflictos con los Consumidores (ADICAE, 2014)Google Scholar

Alberstein, M., ‘Judicial Conflict Resolution (JCR): A New Jurisprudence for an Emerging Judicial Practice’ (2015) 16 Cardozo Law J Confl Resol 886Google Scholar

Alleweldt, F. et al., ‘Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union’ IMCO (June 2011) IP/A/IMCO/ST/2010-15Google Scholar

Anagnostaras, G., ‘The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in Context: From Legal Disparity to Legal Complexity?’ (2010) 47 CMLR 147Google Scholar

Anonymous authors, ‘Mandatory Mediation and Summary Jury Trial: Guidelines for Ensuring Fair and Effective Processes’ (1990) 103 Harv Law Rev 1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, M., ‘Interactions between Competition and Consumer Policy’ (2008) 4(1) Competition Policy Int 97–147Google Scholar

Balboni, P., Trustmarks in E-Commerce (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balwin, J., ‘The Small Claims Procedure and the Consumer’ (London: Office of Fair Trading, 1995)Google Scholar

Banca d’Italia Eurosistema, ‘The Banking and Financial Ombudsman Annual Report’ (January 2016)Google Scholar

Barral-Viñals, I., ‘Consumer Complaints and Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods: Harmonisation of the European ADR System’ in Devenney, J. and Kenny, M. (eds.), The Transformation of European Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Barral Viñals, I., ‘Consumers, Online Dispute Resolution and Small Claims’ (2014) 10 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Electrônico 394Google Scholar

Barton, B. H., ‘The Lawyer’s Monopoly – What Goes and What Stays’ (2014) 82 Fordham Law Rev 3067Google Scholar

Better Business Bureau, ‘2014 Statistics: Sorted by Complaints’. Available at www.bbb.org/globalassets/local-bbbs/council-113/media/complaint-stats/2014/2014us-sorted-by-complaint.pdfGoogle Scholar

BIS, Guidance on Specific Points of Checklist for Attributes of ADR Entities (April 2014)Google Scholar

Blackwell, P., Satisfied Customers Tell Three Friends, Angry Customers Tell 3,000 (Tantor Media, 2008)Google Scholar

Black’s Law Dictionary (Thomson West, 2016)Google Scholar

Bordone, R., ‘Electronic Online Dispute Resolution: A System Approach – Potential, Problems, and a Proposal’ (1998) 3 Harv Negot Law Rev 175Google Scholar

Bradney, A. and Cownie, F., ‘Access to Justice?: The European Small Claims Procedure in the United Kingdom’ in Neuwahl, N. and Hammamoun, S. (eds.), The European Small Claims Procedure and the Philosophy of Small Change (Les Éditions Thémis, 2014) p. 118Google Scholar

Brand, R., ‘Analysis and Proposal for Incorporation of Substantive Principles for ODR Claims and Relief into Article 4 of the Draft Procedural Rules’ Note submitted by the Center for International Legal Education to UNCITRAL Working Group III Twenty-Fifth Session (New York, 21–25 May 2012)Google Scholar

British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association, Code of Conduct. Available at www.bvrla.co.uk/system/files/files/publication-order-forms/code_of_conduct_corporate_members.pdfGoogle Scholar

British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association, Response to the BIS Consultation Document on Implementing the ADR Directive and ODR Regulation (June 2014)Google Scholar

Bruni, A., ‘The Use and Practise of Mediation in Italy’ in Diedrich, F. (ed.), The Status Quo of Mediation in Europe and Overseas – Options for Countries in Transition (Verlag Dr Kovac, 2014)Google Scholar

Bucilla, J. II, ‘The Online Crossroads of Website Terms of Service Agreements and Consumer Protection: An Empirical Study of Arbitration Clauses in the Terms of Service Agreements for the Top 100 Websites Viewed in the United States’ (2014) 15 Wake Forest Law Rev 102Google Scholar

‘Buyers Beware as Fake Online Review Business Booms’ The Irish Times (25 June 2015)Google Scholar

Calliess, G-P., ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Consumer Redress in a Global Market Place’ (2006) 7(8) German Law J 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canto-Lopez, M., ‘Ofgem’s Recent Trends in Enforcement: Settlements, Redress and the Consumer’s Interest’ (2016) 21(2) Utilities Law Rev 65–70Google Scholar

Capobianco, E., ‘Arbitrato e conciliazione. La risoluzione stragiudiziale delle controversie tra mediazione e procedura dinanzi all’Arbitro Bancario Finanziario’ (2010) 8(9) Obbl contr 571Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes within the Framework of World-Wide Access-to-Justice Movement’ (1993) 56 Mod Law Rev 282Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M., ‘A World Survey’ in Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B. (eds.), Access to Justice vol. 1 (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1978)Google Scholar

Ceeney, N., ‘Modernising Courts and Tribunals’ HM Courts and Tribunals Service (23 September 2015). Available at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/modernising-the-courts-and-tribunalsGoogle Scholar

Centre for Consumer and Essential Services, University of Leicester ‘Complaint Handling by Airlines: Development of Best Practices’ Research Report for the Civil Aviation Authority (July 2014)Google Scholar

Centre for Retail Research, ‘Online Retailing: Britain, Europe and the US 2014’. Available at www.retailresearch.org/onlineretailing.phpGoogle Scholar

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Practice Guidelines 17: Guidelines for Arbitrators Dealing with Cases Involving Consumers and Parties with Significant Differences of Resources (2012)Google Scholar

Civic Consulting, European Parliament Study Cross-border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU (2011)Google Scholar

Civic Consulting Study for DG SANCO, ‘Study on the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU’ (2009)Google Scholar

Civil Aviation Authority, ‘Consumer Complaints Handling and ADR’ CAP 1286 (15 April 2015)Google Scholar

Civil Aviation Authority, Reforming Complaints Handling – Consultation on the CAA’s Draft Policy CAP 1257 (December 2014)Google Scholar

Civil Justice Council Advisory Group ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Low Value Civil Claims’ (February 2015)Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers, Response to the Consultation on Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and the Online Dispute Resolution Regulation’ (3 June 2014)Google Scholar

Competition and Markets Authority, UK Presidency of ICPEN Report (30 June 2016)Google Scholar

Conley Tyler, M., ‘115 and Counting: The State of ODR 2004’, in Conley Tyler, M., Katsh, E. and Choi, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP)Google Scholar

Conley Tyler, M. and Bornstein, J., ‘Accreditation of On-line Dispute Resolution Practitioners’ (2006) 23(3) Confl Resol Q 383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Consejo General de la Abogacía Española,‘Éxito Intermediación Hipotecaria en el CMICAV’ (13/08/2015)Google Scholar

Consumer Council of Northern Ireland, ‘Back to Business: Are Businesses Getting Consumers’ Rights Wrong?’ (December 2013)Google Scholar

Consumer Focus and DJS Research, ‘Dealing with Dissatisfaction: Complaint Handling in Energy, Water, Telecoms, Financial and Legal Services and Royal Mail’ (2012). Available at www.consumerfutures.org.uk/wpfb-file/dealing-with-dissatisfaction-pdfGoogle Scholar

Cooter, R. et al., ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior’ (1982) 11 Legal Stud 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘An Analysis of the UDRP Experience: Is It Time for Reform?’ (2008) 24(4) Comput Law Secur Rep 349Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘A Comparative Review of Offers to Settle – Would an Emerging Settlement Culture Pave the Way for Their Adoption in Continental Europe? (2013) 32(1) Civil Justice Q 42–67Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘The Digitalisation of the Judicial System: Online Tribunals and Courts’ (2016) 22(6) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 141Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Directive 2013/11/EU on Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers and Regulation (EC) 524/2013 on Online Dispute Resolution’ in Lodder, A., Murray, A. and Wisman, T. (eds.), Commentary on the EU Regulation of Electronic Commerce and Information, 2nd edn (Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Does the Proposed European Procedure Enhance the Resolution of Small Claims?’ (2008) 27(1) Civil Justice Q 83–97Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Enforcing EU Consumer Policy More Effectively: A Three-Pronged Approach’ in Drake, S. and Smith, M. (eds.), Effective Enforcement of EU Law and Policy (Edward Elgar, 2016)Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘A European Legal Perspective on Consumer ODR’ (2009) 15(4) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 92Google Scholar

Cortes, P., ‘European Small Claims Procedure and the Commission Proposal of 19 November 2013’ Report for the European Parliament (JURI, 2015) pp. 249–279. Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/510003/IPOL_STUper cent282015per cent29510003_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘The Impact of EU Law in the ADR Landscape in Italy, Spain and the UK: Time for Change or Missed Opportunity?’ (2015) 16(2) ERA Forum 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Improving the EU’s Proposals for Extra-Judicial Consumer Redress’ (2012) 23(2) Comput Law 27Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘The Need for Synergies in Judicial Cooperation and Dispute Resolution: Changes in the European Small Claims Procedure’ in Kramer, X. and Hess, B. (eds.), From Common Rules to Best Practices in European Civil Procedure (Hart, 2017) forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘A New Regulatory Framework for Extra-Judicial Consumer Redress: Where We Are and How to Move Forward’ (2015) 35(1) Legal Stud, 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Online Dispute Resolution for Businesses – Embedding Online Dispute Resolution in the Civil Justice System of the EU’ in Adamson, C. (ed.), Online Dispute Resolution: An International Business Approach to Solving Consumer Complaints (NetNeutrals, 2015) pp. 36–46Google Scholar

Cortés, P., Online Dispute Resolution for Consumers in the European Union (Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Online Dispute Resolution Services: A Selected Number of Case Studies’ (2014) 20(6) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 172–178Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘Small Claims in Ireland and the EU: The Need for Synergy between National Courts and Extrajudicial Redress’ in Neuwahl, N. and Hammamoun, S. (eds.), The European Small Claims Procedure and the Philosophy of Small Change (Les Éditions Thémis, 2014) pp. 125–146Google Scholar

Cortés, P., ‘The UDRP Reviewed: The Need for a “Uniform” Policy’ (2008) 14(6) Comput Telecommun Law Rev 133Google Scholar

Cortés, P. and Esteban de la Rosa, F., ‘Building a Global Redress System for Low-Value Cross-Border Disputes’ (2013) 62(2) Int Comp Law Q 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cortés, P. and Lodder, A., ‘Consumer Dispute Resolution Goes Online: Reflections on the Evolution of European Law for Out-of-Court Redress’ (2014) 21(1) Maastricht J 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Council of Europe Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination, ‘Equality and Non-Discrimination in the Access to Justice’ Report Doc 13740, Rapporteur: Mr V. Riceard Badea (31 March 2015)Google Scholar

Council of Europe Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, ‘Access to Justice through Online Instruments’ Draft Report, Rapporteur: Mr J. Xucla (2 November 2015)Google Scholar

Council of Europe Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, ‘Access to Justice through Online Instruments’ Introductory Memorandum, Rapporteur: Mr J. Xucla (23 September 2014)Google Scholar

Cownie, F. Bradney, A. and Burton, M., English Legal System in Context, 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Creutzfeldt, N., ‘Ombudsman Schemes – Energy Sector in Germany, France and the UK’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Creutzfeldt-Banda, N., ‘How Important Is Procedural Justice for Consumer Dispute Resolution? A Case Study of an Ombudsman Model for European Consumers’ (2014) 37(4) J Consumer Policy 527–546Google Scholar

Cuenca García, A., ‘Los Principios de Transparencia, Eficacia, Equidad, Libertad y Legalidad en la Directiva 2013/11/EU del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 21 de Mayo de 2013, relativa a la Resolución Alternativa de Litigios en Materia de Consumo, y su Incidencia en el Sistema de Arbitraje de Consumo Español’ in Moreno, G. Palao (ed.), Los Nuevos Instrumentos Europeos en Materia de Conciliación, Mediación y Arbitraje de Consumo (Tirant, 2016) pp. 37–80Google Scholar

Cunningham, A., ‘Caveat Consumer? Consumer Protection and Cloud Computing – Part I’ Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, n. 130, pp. 1–29 (January 2013)Google Scholar

Davies, J., ‘ADR/ODR: Too Much Optimism in the Promotion of Cross-Border Trade?’ in Hess, B., Bergstrom, M. and Storskrubb, E. (eds.), EU Civil Justice: Current Issues and Future Outlook (Hart, 2016) pp. 35–56Google Scholar

Dávila González, F.J., ‘La Tramitación de la Resolución de Conflictos Sometidos a las Juntas Arbitrales de Consumo Mediante Medios Electrónicos. Problemas Prácticos y Propuestas de Lege Ferenda’ in de Castro, E. Vázquez (ed.), Estudios sobre la Justicia Online (Comares, 2013) pp. 43–60Google Scholar

De Groote, B. and De Vulder, K., ‘European Framework for Unfair Commercial Practices: Analysis of Directive 2005/29’ (2007) JBL 16–42Google Scholar

Del Duca, L., Rule, C. and Loebl, Z., ‘Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce-Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System’ (2012) 1(1) Penn St J Law Int Aff 59Google Scholar

Del Duca, L., Rule, C. and Rimpfel, K., ‘eBay de Facto Low Value High Volume Resolution Process: Lessons and Best Practices for ODR Systems’ (2015) 4 Penn St J Law Int Aff 242Google Scholar

Del Duca, L., Rule, C. and Rogers, V., ‘Designing a Global Consumer Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) System for Cross-Border Small Value – High Volume Claims – OAS Developments’ (2010) 42(3) Uniform Commercial Code Law J 221Google Scholar

Deloitte, ‘An Assessment of the Socio-Economic Impacts of the Policy Options for the Future of the European Small Claims Regulation’ Final Report (19 July 2013)Google Scholar

Dennis, M., ‘Diseño de una Agencia Práctica para la Protección de los Consumidores en las Américas’ in Fernández Arroyo, D. and Rodríguez, J. Moreno (eds.) Trabajos de la CIDIP VII (Asunción, 2007) p. 219Google Scholar

Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers: Government Response to the Consultation on Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and the Online Dispute Resolution Regulation’ (November 2014)Google Scholar

Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers, Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and Online Dispute Resolution Regulation’ (March 2014)Google Scholar

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) ‘Checklist of Requirements for Providers of Alternative Dispute Resolution Services Who Wish to Become Certified “ADR Entities” for the Purposes of the ADR Directive’ (April 2014)Google Scholar

Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), ‘Civil Enforcement Remedies: Consultation on Extending the Range of Remedies Available to Public Enforcers of Consumer Law’ (November 2012)Google Scholar

Department for Business and Innovation Skills (BIS), Government Response to the Call for Evidence, EU Proposals on Alternative Dispute Resolution (May 2012)Google Scholar

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) ‘Guidance on Specific Points of Checklist for Attributes of ADR Entities’ (April 2014)Google Scholar

Department for Business and Innovation Skills (BIS) Report on ‘Consolidation and Simplification of UK Consumer Law’ (November 2010) and the Consumer Rights Bill 2013Google Scholar

Department for Transport – CAA, Changes to the CAA’s Policy on Consumer Complaint Handling and ADR (3 March 2016)Google Scholar

DG Justice and Consumers, European Commission, Consumer Conditions Scoreboard (2015)Google Scholar

DJS Report, ‘Understanding consumer experiences of complaints and redress’ Citizens Advice, (June 2016)Google Scholar

Doherty, M. and Leighton, P., ‘Research in Law: Who Funds It and What Is Funded? A Preliminary Investigation’ (2004) 38(2) Law Teach 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doktori, D. Karlik, E. and Perkins, L., ‘Stakeholder Analysis and Design Recommendations for an EU-Wide Online Dispute Resolution System’ Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program (2 May 2012)Google Scholar

Donahey, S., ‘The UDRP Model Applied to Online Consumer Transactions’ (2003) 20(5) J Int Arb 475Google Scholar

Doyle, M., ‘Gazing at the ADR landscape – Is the EU Directive just a Mirage?’ (9 October 2013). Available at http://domarmediation.co.uk/2013/10/09/gazing-at-the-adr-landscape-is-the-eu-directive-just-a-mirage/Google Scholar

Doyle, M., Bondy, V. and Hirst, C., ‘The Use of Informal Resolution Approaches by Ombudsmen in the UK and Ireland: A Mapping Study’ (October 2014). Available at www.ombudsresearch.org.ukGoogle Scholar

Drahozal, C., ‘New Experiences of International Arbitration in the United States’ (2006) 54 Am J Comp Law 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch-Brown, N. and Martens, B., ‘Barriers to Firms’ Cross-Border E-Commerce in the EU Digital Single Market’, JRC/IPTS Digital Economy Working Paper, 2015Google Scholar

eBay Business Equipment Protection. Available at http://pages.ebay.com/help/buy/business-protection.htmlGoogle Scholar

eBay Motors Vehicle Purchase Protection. Available at http://pages.motors.ebay.com/buy/purchase-protection/Google Scholar

Ebner, N. and Zeleznikow, J., ‘Fairness, Trust and Security in Online Dispute Resolution’ (2015) 36(2) Hamline Univ Sch Law J Pub Law Policy 143Google Scholar

Ebner, N. and Zeleznikow, J., ‘No Sheriff in Town: Governance for Online Dispute Resolution’ (2016) 32(4) Negot J 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ECC Ireland, The Development of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Ireland – An Analysis of Complaints, Best Practices and Future Recommendations, 2008Google Scholar

ECC-Net, ‘Chargeback in the EU/EEA’ (2014)Google Scholar

ECC-Net, ‘Cross-Border Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Europe-Practical Reflections on the Need and Availability’ (2009)Google Scholar

ECC-Net, European Small Claims Procedure Report (September 2012). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/ecc/docs/small_claims_210992012_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Economic Insight, ‘The Business Case for Good Complaints Handling in Legal Services’ Report for the Legal Ombudsman (November 2013).Google Scholar

Edwards, H., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?’ (1985) 99 Harv Law Rev 668Google Scholar

Edwards, L. and Theunissen, A., ‘Creating Trust and Satisfaction Online: How Important Is ADR? The eBay Experience’ (2007) 5 Web J Curr Legal IssuesGoogle Scholar

EESC, Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumer Disputes, Rapporteur: Pegado Liz (CESE 803/2012 – INT/609)Google Scholar

Eidenmiller, H. and Engle, M., ‘Against False Settlement: Designing Efficient Consumer Rights Enforcement System in Europe’ 29(2014) Ohio St J Disp Resol 261Google Scholar

Eidenmuller, H., Faust, F., Grigoleit, H.C., Jansen, N., Wagner, G. and Zimmerman, R., ‘Towards a Revision of the Consumer Acquis’ (2011) 48 Common Mark Law Rev 1077–1123Google Scholar

Eidenmullery, M. and Engel, H., ‘Against False Settlement: Designing Efficient Consumer Rights Enforcement Systems in Europe’ (2014) 29 Ohio St J Disp Resol 261Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M., ‘Private Ordering through Negotiation’ (1976) 89 Harv. Law Rev 637Google Scholar

El País, ‘Una Treintena de Empresas Pagarán por el Número de Quejas de Clientes’ (23 Febrero 2015)Google Scholar

Elliott, M. and Thomas, R., ‘Tribunal Justice and Proportionate Dispute Resolution’ (2012) 71(2) Camb Law J 279Google Scholar

Esteban de la Rosa, F., ‘Challenges for the Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Spain’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (OUP 2016) pp. 275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esteban de la Rosa, F., La protección del consumidor en dos espacios de integración: Europa y América (Tirant lo Blanch, 2015)Google Scholar

Esteban de la Rosa, F., ‘Principios De Protección Del Consumidor Para Una Iniciativa Europea En El Ámbito De La Resolución Electrónica De Diferencias (ODR) De Consumo Transfronterizas (2011) 25 Revista General de Derecho Europeo 1Google Scholar

EU Code of Conduct for Mediators 2014Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Consumer Attitudes towards Cross-Border Trade and Consumer Protection. An Analytical Report’ Flash Eurobarometer 299 (March 2011)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘The Consumer Conditions Scoreboard – Consumers at Home in the Single Market’ 9th edn (July 2013)Google Scholar

European Commission, EU Consumer Policy Strategy 2007–2013, COM(2007) 99 finalGoogle Scholar

European Commission, ‘The Online Dispute Resolution Platform’ Expert Group Meeting (Brussels, 12 December 2014)Google Scholar

European Consumer Centre – Ireland, Car Rental Contracts Business Practices, Contract Terms and Consumer Protection (2008). Available at www.eccireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/ECC_Car_Rental_Contracts_Report_2008.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Consumer Centres Network, ‘10 Years Serving Europe’s Consumers Anniversary Report 2005–2015’. Available at http://tinyurl.com/zuxz4chGoogle Scholar

European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) & Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) of Consumer Disputes’, BEUC Position Paper X/2012/010 (14 February 2012)Google Scholar

European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), ‘Improving Enforcement Cooperation – BEU Response to the Consultation on the Review of Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Regulation’ BEUC-X-2014-005 (3 February 2014)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Draft Report of 18 April 2012, 2011/0373(COD) Rapporteur L. GrechGoogle Scholar

European Parliament, Cross-Border ADR Final Report (2011) IP/A/IMCO/ST/2010-15Google Scholar

European Parliament Study Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the EU (2011)Google Scholar

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, ‘Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)/Gross Domestic Product (GDP)’ (2013). Available at https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=hh3Google Scholar

Fernández Arroyo, D., ‘Current Approaches Towards Harmonisation of Consumer Private International Law in the Americas’ (2009) 58(2) ICLQ 420Google Scholar

Financial Conduct Authority, Consultation Paper, Improving Complaints Handling (December 2014)Google Scholar

Financial Ombudsman Service Annual Review 2014/15. Available at www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ar15/index.html#a2Google Scholar

Fisher, W. and Ury, M., Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Penguin, 1981)Google Scholar

Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B., Getting to Yes, Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In, 2nd edn (Random House, 1999)Google Scholar

Fiss, O., ‘Against Settlement’ 93 (1984) Yale Law Rev 1073Google Scholar

Flash Eurobarometer Report Cross-Border and Consumer Protection (March 2011)Google Scholar

Fowlie, F., ‘Online Dispute Resolution and Ombudsmanship’ in Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012) pp. 313–328Google Scholar

Froomkin, A., ‘ICANN Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, Causes and (Practical) Cures’ (2002) 67 Brooklyn Law Rev 690Google Scholar

Fuller, L., ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harv Law Rev 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, L., ‘Mediation – Its Forms and Functions’ (1971) 44 Calif Law Rev 305Google Scholar

Gabuthy, Y., ‘Online Dispute Resolution and Bargaining’ (2004) 17(3) Eur J Law Econ 353Google Scholar

Gascón Inchausti, F., ‘Algunas Reflexiones Acerca de la Oralidad y la Prueba en el Proceso de Escasa Cuantía’ (2006) VI Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado 285–308Google Scholar

Geist, M., ‘Fair.com? An Examination of the Allegations of Systematic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP’ (2002) 27 Brooklyn J Int Law 903Google Scholar

Genn, H., ‘Civil Mediation: A Measured Approach?’ (2010) 32(2) J Soc Welf Fam Law 195Google Scholar

Genn, H., The Hamlyn Lectures 2008: Judging Civil Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Genn, H., ‘What Is Civil Justice for? Reform, ADR, and Access to Justice’ (2012) 24(1) Yale J Law Humanit 397–417Google Scholar

GFK, Complaints to Ombudsman Services: Energy, Report for Ofgem Exploring Why Few Consumers Refer Their Complaint to Ombudsman Services: Energy (2013)Google Scholar

Gill, C. Williams, J. Brennan, C. and Hirst, C., ‘Designing Consumer Redress: A Dispute System Design (DSD) Model for Consumer-to-Business Disputes’ (2016) 36(3) Legal Stud 438CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C. Williams, J. Brennan, C. and O’Brien, N., ‘The Future of Ombudsman Schemes: Drivers for Change and Strategic Responses’ (15 July 2013)Google Scholar

Glover, J. M., ‘Disappearing Claims and the Erosion of Substantive Law’ (2015) 125 Yale Law J 3Google Scholar

Goetzinger, L., Park, J.K. and Widdows, R., ‘E-Customers’ Third Party Complaining and Complementing Behavior (2006) 17(2) Int J Serv Ind Manag 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, J., Strategic Customer Service: Managing the Customer Experience to Increase Positive Word of Mouth, Build Loyalty, and Maximize Profits (Amacon, 2009)Google Scholar

Gott, S., ‘BBB Offers Tips on When and How to File a Complaint’ Better Business Bureau (24 April 2013). Available at www.bbb.org/blog/2013/04/bbb-offers-tips-on-when-and-how-to-file-a-complaint/Google Scholar

Graham, C., ‘Collective Consumer Redress’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (OUP, 2016)Google Scholar

Grundmann, S., ‘Targeted Consumer Protection’ in Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law (Hart, 2015) pp. 223–244Google Scholar

Halstead, D. and Page, T., ‘The Effects of Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior on Consumers Repurchase Behavior’ (1992) 5 J Satisf Dissatisf Complaining Behav 1Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. W., ‘Pre-Dispute Consumer Arbitration Clauses: Denying Access to Justice?’ (2006) 51 McGill Law J 693Google Scholar

Henry, R., ‘Med-Arb: An Alternative to Interest Arbitration in the Resolution of Contract Negotiation Disputes’ (1988) 3(2) Ohio St J Disp Resol 385Google Scholar

Hirschman, A., ‘Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States’ (Harvard University Press, 1970)Google Scholar

HMCTS, Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly, England and Wales (Incorporating Privacy Injunctions Statistics January to June 2015)Google Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘Collective Redress: A Breakthrough or a Damp Squib?’ (2014) 37 J Consum Policy 67Google Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘Collective Redress in Europe: The New Model’ (2010) 29(3) Civil Justice Q 373Google Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘Consumer Ombudsmen: Better Regulation and Dispute Resolution’ (2015) 16 ERA Forum 1Google Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘The Consumer as Regulator’ in Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law (Hart, 2015) pp. 245–256Google Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘Ethical Business Regulation: Understanding the Evidence’ Better Regulation Delivery Office, Department for Business Innovation & Skills (February 2016)Google Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘The Need for a Holistic Review of the Dispute Resolution Landscape in England and Wales’ (2017) forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Hodges, C., ‘The Way Forward: Policy Principles on the Role of Law and Interests in ADR’ at the Fourth Annual Oxford Consumer ADR Conference (18–20 April 2016)Google Scholar

Hodges, C., Benohr, I. and Creutzfeldt-Banda, N., ‘Consumer-to-Business Dispute Resolution: The Power of CADR’ (2012) 13 ERA Forum 199–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodges, C., Benohr, I., Creutzfeldt-Banda, N., Consumer ADR in Europe (Civil Justice Systems) (Beck/Hart, 2012)Google Scholar

Hodges, C. Creutzfeldt, N. and Macleod, S., ‘Reforming the EU Consumer ADR Landscape: Implementation and Its Issues’ Third Oxford Consumer Conference Report (30–31 October 2014)Google Scholar

Hodges, C. and Stadler, A., Resolving Mass Disputes – ADR and Settlement of Mass Claims (Edward Elgar, 2013)Google Scholar

Hoofnagle, C. and Whittington, J., ‘Free: Accounting for the Costs of the Internet’s Most Popular Price’ (2014) 61 UCLA Law Rev 606Google Scholar

Hopt, K. and Steffek, F., Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, N., ‘Arbitraje de Consumo en el Derecho Alemán y Europeo’, in de la Rosa, F. Esteban and Pardo, G. Orozco (eds.), Mediación y Arbitraje de Consumo, una Perspectiva Española, Europea y Comparada (Tirant lo Blanch, 2010) pp. 221–233Google Scholar

Hörnle, J., Cross-Border Internet Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Hörnle, J., ‘Dispute Resolution: Digital Alternative’ Law Gazette (14 June 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hörnle, J., ‘Encouraging Online Dispute Resolution in the EU and Beyond-Keeping Costs Low or Standards High?’ Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 122/2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hörnle, J. and Cortés, P., ‘Draft Report for the ODR Advisory Group, Working Paper on Legal Issues in Online Dispute Resolution’ (July 2014)Google Scholar

Howells, G. and Weatherill, S., Consumer Protection Law, 2nd edn (Ashgate, 2005)Google Scholar

Hyde, J., ‘Ratings Website Moves into Law’ Law Society Gazette (4 August 2014)Google Scholar

Irvine, C., ‘Mind the Gap: Mediation and Justice’ Kluwer Mediation Blog (12 May 2014)Google Scholar

Jacquemin, H., ‘Optimal Integration European Dispute Resolution Platform’ European Parliament (13 April 2012). Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201204/20120413ATT42990/20120413ATT42990EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

JUSTICE, ‘What Is a Court’ (May 2016). Available at https://2bquk8cdew6192tsu41lay8t-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JUSTICE-What-is-a-Court-Report-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Katsh, E. and Rabinovich-Einy, O., ‘Dispute Resolution in the Sharing Economy’ Internet Monitor 2014. Available at https://thenetmonitor.org/research/2014/Google Scholar

Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J., Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace (Jossey-Bass, 2001)Google Scholar

Katsh, E., Rifkin, J. and Gaitenby, A., ‘Ecommerce, E-disputes, and E-dispute Resolution: In the Shadow of “eBay Law”’ (2000) 15(3) Ohio St J Disp Resol 705Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Schultz, T., Online Dispute Resolution (Kluwer Law International, 2004)Google Scholar

Kirkham, R., ‘Analysis: Richard Kirkham on the Government’s plans for consumer ADR: Innovation or more of the same’ (26 November 2014). Available at http://ukaji.org/2014/11/26/analysis-kirkham-the-governments-plans-for-consumer-adr-innovation-or-more-of-the-same/Google Scholar

Kirkham, R., ‘Regulating ADR: Lessons from the UK’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Koulu, R., ‘Blockchains and Online Dispute Resolution: Smart Contracts as an Alternative to Enforcement’ (2016) 13(1) Scripted 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, D., ‘Technology Mediated Dispute Resolution (TMDR): A New Paradigm for ADR’ (2006) 21(3) Ohio St J Disp Resol 629Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A., ‘Designing Redress: Who Does It, How and Why? (2012) 20 Asia Pac Law Rev 17Google Scholar

Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S., ‘Images of the Consumer in EU Law’ in Leczykiewicz, D. and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Images of the Consumer in EU Law (Hart, 2015)Google Scholar

Legal Ombudsman, Annual Report 2013–14Google Scholar

Legal Ombudsman News, View from Operations – Assessor. Issue 8 (2014). Available at www.legalombudsman.org.uk/leo-news/issue-8/view-assessor.htmlGoogle Scholar

Sir Leggatt, Andrew, Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service, Report of the Review of Tribunals (2011)Google Scholar

Leveson, B., ‘Security and Justice’ 13th Annual Isaiah Berlin Lecture (12 November 2015) Available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/berlin-lecture-nov-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lincoln Law School, ‘Representative Actions and Restorative Justice’ (2008). Available at www.bis.gov.uk/files/file51559.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lodder, A. and Zeleznikow, J., Enhanced Dispute Resolution through the Use of Information Technology (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Loos, M., ‘Consumer ADR After the Implementation of the ADR Directive: Enforcing European Consumer Rights at the Detriment of European Consumer Law’ Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015–42Google Scholar

Loos, M., ‘Individual Private Enforcement of Consumer Rights in Civil Courts in Europe’ Centre for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series No. 2010/01Google Scholar

Lord Briggs, Justice, Civil Courts Structure Review Final Report (July 2016)Google Scholar

Lord Briggs, Justice, Civil Courts Structure Review, Interim Report (December 2015)Google Scholar

Lucerna Partners, Review of Ombudsman Services: Energy. A Report for Ofgem (London: Lucerna Partners, 2015)Google Scholar

Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., Reeves, D., ‘Pennies from eBay: the Determinants of Price in Online Auctions’ (2007) J Ind Econ 224Google Scholar

Luzak, J., ‘Online Consumer Contracts’ (2014) 15(3) ERA Forum 381Google Scholar

MacFarlane, J., ‘ADR and the Courts: Renewing our Commitment to Innovation’ (2012) 95(3) Marquette Law Rev 927Google Scholar

Madrid Parra, A., ‘El Uso de Medios Electrónicos en la Mediación Patrimonial’ (2013) 269 Derecho de los Negocios 2Google Scholar

Malbon, J., ‘Taking Fake Online Consumer Reviews Seriously’ (2013) 35 J Consum Policy 4Google Scholar

Manko, R., ‘European Small Claims Procedure: Commission Proposal to Remedy Weaknesses in the Current System’, EPRS In-depth analysis, PE 542.137 (November 2014)Google Scholar

Manko, R., ‘Europeanisation of Civil Procedure: Towards Common Minimum Standards?’ European Parlaimentary Research Service In-depth Analysis, PE 559.499 (June 2015)Google Scholar

Marchal Escalona, N., ‘La Protección del Consumidor en los Litigios Transfronterizos de Escasa Cuantía en la Unión Europea y en América Latina’ in de la Rosa, F. Esteban (ed.), La Resolución Alternativa de Litigios de Consumo en los Estados Miembros de la UE: Impacto del Nuevo Derecho Europeo (Tirant, 2015) pp. 1015–1054Google Scholar

Marques Cebola, C., ‘The Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Portugal: The Necessary Reform or Missed Opportunity?’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016) pp. 251–274Google Scholar

Martic, D., ‘Redress for Free Internet Services Under the Scope of the EU and UNCITRAL’s ODR Regulations’ (2014) 10 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Electrônico 360Google Scholar

Martín Díz, F., ‘Mediacion en Derecho Privado: Nuevas Perspectivas Prácticas’ 33 (2014) Revista General de Derecho Procesal 1–38Google Scholar

Matthews, J. M., ‘Consumer Arbitration: Is It Working Now and Will It Work in the Future?’ (2005) 79 Fl Bar J 1Google Scholar

Mayer-Schonberger, V. and Cukier, K., Big Data, a Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013)Google Scholar

McGill, S., ‘Consumer Arbitration after Seidel v TELUS’ (2011) 51 Can Bus Law J 187Google Scholar

McGregor, L., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and Human Rights: Developing a Rights-Based Approach through the ECHR’ (2015) 26(3) Eur J Int Law 607–634Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Are There Systematic Ethic Issues in Dispute System Design? And What We Should [Not] Do About It: Lessons from International and Domestic Fronts’ (Winter 2009) 14 Harv Negot Law Rev 202Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Do the “Haves” Come out Ahead in Alternative Judicial Systems? Repeat Players in ADR’ (1999) 15 Ohio St J Disp Resol 19Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C., Love, L., Schneider, A. and Sternlight, J., Dispute Resolution: Beyond the Adversarial Model , 2nd edn (Aspen, 2011)Google Scholar

Micklitz, H.W., The Future of Consumer Law – Plea for a Movable System (2013) 2(1) J Eur Consum Mark Law 5Google Scholar

Micklitz, H. and Reich, N., ‘Crónica de una Muerte Anunciada: The Commission Proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights’ (2009) 46(2) Common Mark Law Rev 471Google Scholar

Micklitz, H. and Sartor, G., ‘Assessing the Scope of the Online Dispute Resolution Platform’ European Parliament (March 2012). Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201204/20120417ATT43146/20120417ATT43146EN.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mimica, N., EU Commissioner for Consumer Policy, ‘EU Consumer Summit 2014: Ensuring that Consumers Reap the Benefits of the Digital Economy’ Press Release IP/14/353 (1 April 2014)Google Scholar

Ministero della Giustizia, Dipartimento della Organizzazione Giudiziaria, del Personale e dei Servizi, Direzione Generale di Statistica ‘Mediazione Civile Ex DL 28/2010 Statistiche Relative al Priodo Gennaio – Settembre 2014’Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice, ‘Caroline Dinenage responds to the launch of ‘Breaking up is Hard to Do’ report’ (17 December 2015). Available at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/caroline-dinenage-responds-to-the-launch-of-breaking-up-is-hard-to-do-reportGoogle Scholar

Miquel Sala, R., El Proceso Europeo de Escasa Cuantía (Aranzadi, 2009) pp. 81–85Google Scholar

Mnookin, R. and Korn Hauser, L., ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’ (1979) 88 Yale Law J 950CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moffitt, M., ‘Three Things to Be against (“Settlement Not Included”)’ (2009) 78 Ford Law Rev 1203Google Scholar

Morek, R., ‘The Regulatory Framework for Online Dispute Resolution: A Critical View’ (2006) 38 Univ Tol Law Rev 163Google Scholar

Mueller, M., ‘Rough Justice: An Analysis of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy’ (2000) Syracuse University Convergence Centre http://dcc.syr.edu/PDF/roughjustice.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mullenix, L., ‘Ending Class Actions As We Know Them: Rethinking the American Class Action’ (2014) 64 Emory Law J 399Google Scholar

Nielsen, P.A., ‘The New Brussels I Regulation’ (2013) 50 Common Mark Law Rev 503–528Google Scholar

Nordic Council of Ministers, ‘A Study on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Cross-border Complaints in Europe’ (TemaNord, 2002)Google Scholar

O’Brian, E., ‘The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: The Way Forward’ (2003) 66(4) Mod Law Rev 491Google Scholar

OECD, Conference on Empowering E-consumers Strengthening Consumer Protection in the Internet Economy, Background Report DSTI/CP(2009)20/FINAL, Washington DC, (8–10 December 2009)Google Scholar

OECD, Economics Department Policy Notes ‘What Makes Civil Justice Effective’ (18 June 2013)Google Scholar

Ofgem, ‘Enforcement Guidelines’ (2014). Available at www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgempublications/89753/enforcementguidelines12september2014publishedversion.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ombudsman Services, Response to the Competition Markets Authority Energy Market Investigation ‘Issues Statement’ (14 August 2014)Google Scholar

Online Retail Monitor, British Retail Consortium (2016). Available at www.brc.org.uk/bis/default.asp?main_id=7Google Scholar

Organisation of American States, Draft [Model Law/Cooperative Framework] for Electronic Resolution of Cross-Border E-Commerce Consumer Disputes (2010)Google Scholar

Ortiz, J.C., ‘La Aplicación en España de los Procesos Europeos Monitorio y de Escasa Cuantía: La Reforma de la Legislación Española en Virtud de la Ley 4/2011, de 24 d Marzo’ (2011) 24 Revista General de Derecho Procesal 2Google Scholar

Ortolani, P., ‘Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons from Bitcoin’ (2016) 36(3) Oxf J Legal Stud 595–629Google Scholar

OS Annual Report 2015. Available at www.ombudsman-services.org/downloads/Ombudsman-Services-annual-report-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

Peretz, N., ‘The Single Euro Payment Area: A New Opportunity for Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union’ (2008) 16 Mich St J Int Law 573Google Scholar

Pérez Luño, A.E., La Seguridad Juridical (Ariel, 1994)Google Scholar

Petrucci, C., ‘Collective Redress and Competition Law’ in Drake, S. and Smith, M. (eds.), Effective Enforcement of EU Law and Policy (Edward Elgar, 2016)Google Scholar

Pilia, C., Cortés, P. and Vargiu, P., ‘The Implementation of the Consumer ADR Directive in Italy’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2016) pp. 209–228Google Scholar

Ponte, L. and Cavenagh, T., Cyberjustice, Online Dispute Resolution for E-Commerce (Parson Prentice Hall, 2005)Google Scholar

Posner, R., ‘Conventionalism: The Key to Law as an Autonomous Discipline’ (1988) 38 Univ Tor Law J 333Google Scholar

Prince, S., ‘Mediating Small Claims: Are We on the Right Track?’ (2007) 26(2) Civil Justice Q 328–340Google Scholar

Prisco, G., ‘Bitrated Unveils Reputation System and Multisig Escrow’ (24 February 2015). Available at https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitrated-unveils-reputation-system-multisig-escrow-1424750534Google Scholar

Rabinovich-Einy, O., ‘Technology’s Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability in Mediation’ (2006) 11 Harv Negot Law Rev 253Google Scholar

Rabinovich-Einy, O. and Katsh, E., ‘Lessons from Online Dispute Resolution for Dispute System Design’ in Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012) pp. 39–60Google Scholar

Rabinovich-Einy, O. and Katsh, E., ‘Technology and the Future of Dispute System Design’ (2012) 17 Harv Negot Law Rev 175Google Scholar

Ramsay, I., Consumer Law and Policy, 3rd edn (Hart, 2012)Google Scholar

Reding, V., Vice-President of the European Commission and EU Commissioner for Justice ‘Towards a More Coherent Enforcement of EU Consumer Rules’ (19 March 2013). Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-237_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Reich, N., ‘Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict: A “Trojan Horse” in the Access to Justice in the EU ADR Directive 2013/11?’ (2015) 4(1) Penn St J Law Int Aff 290Google Scholar

Reich, N., ‘A “Trojan Horse” in Access to Justice – Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict in the ADR-Directive 2013/11/EU’ (2014) 10(2) Eur Rev Contract Law 258Google Scholar

Report of the Working Group on Consumer and Competition Policy for Scotland (October 2015)Google Scholar

Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J. and Lockwood, K., ‘The Value of Reputation on eBay: a Controlled Experiment’ (2006) 9 Exp Econ 79Google Scholar

Reyes López, M.J., ‘La Reforma del TRLGDCU en Materia de Arbitraje’ in Moreno, G. Palao (ed.), Los Nuevos Instrumentos Europeos en Materia de Conciliación, Mediación y Arbitraje de Consumo (Tirant, 2016) pp. 231–248Google Scholar

Riefa, C., Consumer Protection and Online Auction Platforms (Ashgate, 2015)Google Scholar

Roberts, S. and Palmer, M., Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making, 2nd ed (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Rogers, N. Bordone, R. Sander, F. and McEwen, C., Designing Systems and Processes for Managing Disputes (Kluwer, 2013)Google Scholar

Rogers, V., Institute of International Commercial Law (Pace Law School) Note on the Resolution Process Designated by the Draft ODR Rules Vienna, 14–18 November 2011Google Scholar

Rogers, V., ‘Managing Disputes in the Online Global Marketplace: Reviewing the Progress of UNCITRAL’s Working Group III on ODR’ (2013) 19 Disp Resol Mag 21Google Scholar

Ross, G., ‘The Possible Unintended Consequences of the European Directive on Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Regulation on Online Dispute Resolution’ (2014) 10 Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Electrônico 206–221Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘Alternative and Online Dispute Resolution for (Cross-Border) Consumer Contracts: A Critical Evaluation of the European Legislature’s Recent Efforts to Promote Competitiveness and Growth in the Internal Market’ (2015) 38 J Consum Policy 380Google Scholar

Rule, C., ‘AAA Chooses ODR for Its Largest Volume Case Load’ (2014) 1(1) Int J Online Disp Resol 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rule, C., ‘How the Internet Is Changing the Way Disputes Are Resolved’ Wire Innovation Insights (24 June 2014). Available at http://insights.wired.com/profiles/blogs/how-the-internet-is-changing-the-way-disputes-are-resolved#axzz39bcSIGVKGoogle Scholar

Rule, C., ‘Making Peace on eBay’, ACResolution (Fall 2008)Google Scholar

Rule, C., Online Dispute Resolution for Businesses. B2B, E-Commerce, Consumer, Employment, Insurance, and Other Commercial Conflicts (Jossey Bass, 2002)Google Scholar

Rule, C., ‘Quantifying the Economic Benefits of Effective Redress: Large E-Commerce Data Sets and the Cost-Benefit Case for Investing in Dispute Resolution’ (2012) 34 Univ of Ark Little Rock Law Rev 767Google Scholar

Rule, C. and Del Duca, L., ‘From Lex Mercatoria to Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons From History in Building Cross-Border Redress Systems’ (2011) 43(3) Uniform Commercial Code Law J 1–15Google Scholar

Rule, C. and Nagarajan, C., ‘Leveraging the Wisdom of Crowds: The eBay Community Court and the Future of Online Dispute Resolution’, AC Resolution (2010)Google Scholar

Rutherglen, G., ‘Wal-Mart, AT&T Mobility, and the Decline of the Deterrent Class Action’ (2012) 98 Virginia Law Rev 24Google Scholar

Samuel, A., ‘Consumer Financial Services in Britain: New Approaches to Dispute Resolution and Avoidance’ (2002) 3(3) Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 649–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sander, F., ‘Varieties of Dispute Resolution’ National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice 7–9 April 1976 Pound Conference (1976) 79 FRD 111Google Scholar

Sander, F. and Goldberg, S., ‘Fitting the Forum to the Fuss: A User-Friendly Guide to Selecting an ADR Procedure’ (1994) 10(1) Negot J 49–68Google Scholar

Sapp, W., ‘Creating an Online Property Guide and Resolution Center’ Fair and Equitable (April 2014)Google Scholar

Scannicchio, N., ‘L’Adeguamento dell’ Ordinamento Italiano alla Nuova Disciplina Europea sulla Risolutzione Alternativea Delle Controversie di Consumo’ in de la Rosa, F. Esteban (ed.), La Resolución Alternativa De Litigios De Consumo En Los Estados Miembros De La UE: Impacto Del Nuevo Derecho Europeo (Tirant, 2015)Google Scholar

Schmitz, A., ‘“Drive-Thru” Arbitration in the Digital Age: Empowering Consumers through Regulated ODR’ (2010) 62 Baylor Law Rev 178–244Google Scholar

Schmitz, A., ‘Introducing the “New Handshake” to Expand Remedies and Revive Responsibility in eCommerce’ (2014) 26 St. Thomas Law Rev 522Google Scholar

Schmitz, A., ‘Legislating in the Light: Considering Empirical Data in Crafting Arbitration Reforms’ (2010) 15 Harv Negot Law Rev 194Google Scholar

Schoenberger, C., ‘Computers’ Reasoning Skills to Equal Humans by 2029’ (26 June 2012). Available at www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303640804577490681107864926Google Scholar

Schulte-Nölke, H., ‘EC Law on the Formation of – From Common Frame of Reference to the ‘Blue Button’’’ (2007) 3 Eur Rev Contract Law 332Google Scholar

Schultz, T., ‘Does Online Dispute Resolution Need Governmental Intervention? The Case for Architectures of Control and Trust’ (2004) 6 N C J Law Technol 71Google Scholar

Schultz, T., ‘Internet Disputes, Fairness in Arbitration and Transnationalism: A Reply to Julia Hörnle’ (2011) 19(2) Int J Law Inf Technol 156Google Scholar

Schultz, T., ‘Private Legal Systems: What Cyberspace Might Teach Legal Theorists’ (2007) 10 Yale J Law Techol 159Google Scholar

Schultz, T., ‘The Roles of Dispute Settlement and ODR’ in Ingen-Housz, (ed.), ADR in Business: Practice and Issues Across Countries and Cultures (Kluwer, 2011) p. 135Google Scholar

Sela, A., ‘The Effect of Online Technologies on Online Dispute Resolution System Design: Antecedents, Current Trends and Future Directions’ (2017) 21(3) Lewis Clark Law Rev 1–48Google Scholar

Shackelford, S. and Raymond, A., ‘Building the Virtual Courthouse: Ethical Considerations for Design, Implementation, and Regulation in the World of ODR’ (2014) Wis Law Rev 616Google Scholar

Síndic de Greuges de Catalunya, ‘The Catalan Ombudsman and General Interest Companies’ (February 2014)Google Scholar

Smith, S. and Martinez, J., ‘An Analytical Framework for Dispute System Design’ (2009) 14(4) Harv Negot Law Rev 1401Google Scholar

Sorkin, D. E., ‘Payment Methods for Consumer-to-Consumer Online Transactions’ (2001) 35(1) Akron Law Rev 1Google Scholar

Special Eurobarometer 381, E-Communication Household Survey (June 2012)Google Scholar

Special Eurobarometer 395, European Small Claims Procedure (April 2013). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_395_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Speer, T. ‘They Complain Because They Care’ (1996) 18 Am Demogr 13Google Scholar

Sternlight, J. ‘In Defense of Mandatory Arbitration (If Imposed on the Company)’ (2007) 8 Nevada Law J 82Google Scholar

Sternlight, J. ‘Is Alternative Dispute Resolution Consistent With the Rule of Law’ (2006) 56 DePaul Law Rev 569Google Scholar

Sternlight, J. and Jensen, E., ‘Using Economic Arbitration to Eliminate Consumer Class Actions: Efficient Business Practice or Unconscionable Abuse?’ (2004) 67 Law Contemp Probl 75Google Scholar

Stewart, K. and Matthews, J., ‘Online Arbitration of Cross-Border, Business to Consumer Disputes’ (2002) 56 Univ Miami Law Rev 1119Google Scholar

Stipanowich, T., ‘The Arbitration Penumbra: Arbitration Law and the Rapidly Changing Landscape of Dispute Resolution’ (2007) 8 Nevada Law J 427Google Scholar

Stone, M., ‘A Paradox in the Theory of Commercial Arbitration’ (1966) 21(3) Arbitration J 156–163Google Scholar

Stuhmcke, A., ‘The Corporatisation and Privatisation of the Australian Telecommunications Industry: The Role of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman’ (1998) 21(3) Univ N S W Law J 807Google Scholar

Stürner, M., Gascón Inchausti, F. and Caponi, R., The Role of Consumer ADR in the Administration of Justice – New Trends in Access to Justice under EU Directive 2013/11 (Selp, 2015)Google Scholar

Stuyck, J., Terryn, E., Colaert, V., Van Dyck, T., Peretz, N., Hoekx, N. and Tereszkiewicz, P., Study on Alternative Means of Consumer Redress Other Than Redress through the Ordinary Judicial Proceedings (Catholic University of Lueven, 14 January 2007)Google Scholar

Susskind, R., The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Susskind, R., Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

The Economist, ‘The Truly Personal Computer’ (28 February 2015)Google Scholar

The Irish Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation ‘Consultation on the Implementation of the EU Directive on Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution and the EU Regulation on Consumer Online Dispute Resolution’ (June 2014)Google Scholar

Thompson, D., ‘Addressing Leveraging Technology in Civil Justice ODR’ Comput Law (6 October 2014)Google Scholar

Thompson, D., ‘Online Dispute Resolution Expansion in the EU’ (2012) Comput Law 31 (3 December 2011)Google Scholar

Tulibacka, M., ‘Europeanization of Civil Procedures: In Search of a Coherent Approach’ (2009) 46 Common Mark Law Rev 1527–1565Google Scholar

UK Office for National Statistics, ‘Statistical bulletin: Internet Access – Households and Individuals, 2013’. Available at www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access–households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia-2013.htmlGoogle Scholar

University of Lincoln, Lincoln Law School ‘Representative Actions and Restorative Justice’ (2008). Available at www.bis.gov.uk/files/file51559.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ury, W., Brett, J. and Goldberg, S., Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflicts (Jossey-Bass, 1988)Google Scholar

US Department of Health and Human Services, ‘Policy Issues Related to Patient Reported Data’ (8 June 2012) p. 8, available at http://tinyurl.com/jsc42ozGoogle Scholar

Van Boom, W. and Loos, M. (eds.), Collective Enforcement of Consumer Law: Securing Compliance in Europe through Private Group Action and Public Authority Intervention (Europa Law Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar

Vilalta, E., ‘ODR and E-Commerce’ in Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D. (eds.), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012) pp. 113–138Google Scholar

Vilalta Nicuesa, A. E., Mediación y Arbitraje Electrónicos (Aranzadi, 2013)Google Scholar

Vreeswijk, G.A.W. and Lodder, A.R., ‘Gearbi: Towards an Online Arbitration Environment Based On The Design Principles Simplicity, Awareness, Orientation, And Timeliness’ (2005) 13(2) Artif Intell Law 297Google Scholar

Wagner, G., ‘Private Law Enforcement Through ADR: Wonder Drug Or Snake Oil?’ (2014) 51(1) Common Mark Law Rev 165–194Google Scholar

Wahab, M., Katsh, E. and Rainey, D., Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (Eleven International Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Weatherill, S., ‘The Consumer Rights Directive: How and Why a Quest for “Coherence” Has (Largely) Failed’ (2012) 49 Common Mark Law Rev 1279Google Scholar

Weatherill, S. EU Consumer Law and Policy (Edward Elgar, 2014)Google Scholar

Weatherill, S. and Bernitz, U. (eds.), The Regulation of Unfair Commercial Practices under Directive 2005/29: New Rules and New Techniques (Hart, 2007)Google Scholar

Webb, L. ‘Brainstorming Meets Online Dispute Resolution’ (2004) 15 Am Rev Int Arb 337Google Scholar

Webb, L. ‘International BBB Ratings á la eBay: A Proposal for an Improved Online Better Business Bureau to Facilitate International Business Transactions’ (2004) 35 Calif West Int Law J 127Google Scholar

Which?, ‘Millions experience problems with online purchases’ (7 March 2014)Google Scholar

Williams, J. and Gill, C., ‘A Dispute System Design Perspective on the Future Development of Consumer Dispute Resolution’ in Cortés, P. (ed.), The European Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution (OUP, 2016) pp. 371–392Google Scholar

Winston, K., ‘Introduction to the Revised Edition’ in Winston, K. (ed.), The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller (Hart, 2001)Google Scholar

Yuthayotin, S., Access to Justice in Transnational B2C E-Commerce (Springer, 2015)Google Scholar

Zickuhr, K. ‘Who’s Not Online and Why’ Pew Research (25 September 2013)Google Scholar