ON THE INSIDE

Juridical discourse constructs a world of its own, a world of law. That legal world was, of course, embedded within the broader landscape of the polis: nomos means “norm” as well as “law” in Greek, and the courts were a central arena for the reproduction and negotiation of Athens' normative values and beliefs, as much recent scholarship has shown. But if the law was enmeshed in the fabric of Athenian society and ideology, it also had a discursive specificity of its own. In the dikastēria (courts), the Athenians developed a juridical way of looking at life, social relations, the past and the future; they also reflected self-consciously on the law itself, on its discursive boundaries, its institutional force, its internal rules and regularities. This juridical mode of thought was not, needless to say, isolated or idiosyncratic; if it were, it would have been incomprehensible. Rather the law, as Steven Johnstone has argued, was a “semiautonomous field.