Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2002
  • Online publication date: July 2009

3 - Insurgency, Radicalism, and Democracy

Summary

Five years into his presidency of the UAW, and four years after he launched his swift political “fumigation” of the UAW's Red “filth,” Walter Reuther still found himself encountering too much dissidence. “Everybody has a right to his own opinion …,” he pleaded at the UAW's 1951 convention. “You are going to have contests for offices. … But let's have democratic contests without factionalism. Let's have democracy but not factionalism.”

Real, contingent political struggles like the ones that had elevated Reuther to the UAW's presidency in 1946 and through which his faction had then defeated the “center-left” coalition in 1947 – and which, despite his steel grip on power, he was still being compelled to wage four years later to consolidate his new “one-party political machine” – have no place in the conventional organizational paradigm inspired by Robert Michels. Instead, an “inevitable current,” fed by hidden, and undemonstrable, organizational “needs” for stability, security, and continuity, carries labor unions toward their preordained destiny. The “spread of bureaucracy and the decay of democracy in trade unions” is an inherent “tragedy of organization.” The “quest for union democracy” is thus “futile.” In sum, oligarchy is an “immanent necessity,” dictated by an “iron law.”

What used to pass as “evidence” for this putative “iron law of oligarchy” was the “fact” that, in mid-twentieth-century America, “most unions” in the United States were ruled by an “entrenched oligarchy” facing no “internal opposition.”

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Left Out
  • Online ISBN: 9780511499395
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499395
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×