Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2019
Edited by
Summary
This chapter will consider a legal transplant that is potentially still occurring – the broad recognition of notions of ‘good faith’ in relation to contracts. Whilst notions of good faith surround early conceptions of contractual relations, as will be seen, the common law, whilst initially apparently accepting good faith as part of the law of contract, set its face against such a doctrine, except in relation to insurance contracts. That resistance had been stoic for many years, until finally in recent years, the United Kingdom Supreme Court accepted the doctrine as a principle applicable to contracts, at least to some extent. In so doing, it followed in the footsteps of the Canadian Supreme Court, which finally recognized a general doctrine of good faith earlier in the same year. The doctrine is broadly recognized in the United States.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania , pp. 109 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
VIII Bibliography
Allsop, J., ‘Good Faith and Australian Contract Law: A Practical Issue and a Question of Theory and Principle’, Australian Law Journal 85 (2011),341.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, A, Bachmann, R. and Deakin, S., ‘Contract Law, Social Norms and Inter-Firm Co-Operation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 (1997),171.Google Scholar
Beale, H. and Dugdale, T., ‘Contracts between Businessmen: Planning and the Use of Contractual Remedies’, British Journal of Law and Society 2 (1975), 45.Google Scholar
Bridge, M., ‘Does Anglo-Canadian Contract Law Need a Doctrine of Good Faith?’, Canadian Business Law Journal 9 (1984), 385.Google Scholar
Carter, J. and Peden, E., ‘Good Faith in Australian Contract Law’, Journal of Contract Law 19 (2003), 155.Google Scholar
Carter, J. and Stewart, A., ‘Interpretation, Good Faith and the True Meaning of Contracts: The Royal Botanic Decision’, Journal of Contract Law 18 (2002), 182.Google Scholar
Corcoran, S., ‘Good Faith as a Principle of Interpretation: What Is the Positive Content of Good Faith?’, Australian Bar Review 26 (2012), 3.Google Scholar
Courtney, W. and Carter, J., ‘Implied Terms: What Is the Role of Construction?’, Journal of Contract Law 31 (2014), 151.Google Scholar
Duke, A., ‘A Universal Duty of Good Faith: An Economic Perspective’, Monash University Law Review 33 (2007), 182.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, A., ‘Good Faith Performance and Commercial Reasonableness under the Uniform Commercial Code’, University of Chicago Law Review 30 (1963), 666.Google Scholar
Finn, P., ‘Commerce, the Common Law and Morality’, Melbourne University Law Review 17 (1989), 87.Google Scholar
Garvin, L., ‘Adequate Assurance of Forbearance of Risk, Duress and Cognition’, University of Colorado Law Review 69 (1998), 71.Google Scholar
Girard, P., ‘Good Faith in Contract Performance: Principle or Placebo?’, Supreme Court Law Review 5 (1983), 309.Google Scholar
Gleeson, M., ‘Individualised Justice: The Holy Grail’, Australian Law Journal 69 (1995), 421.Google Scholar
Hooley, R., ‘Controlling Contractual Discretion’, Cambridge Law Journal 72 (1) (2013), 65.Google Scholar
Hui, R., ‘The Doctrine of Good Faith in Contract: Greater Acknowledgement in Hong Kong? A Comparative Study’, City University of Hong Kong Law Review 5 (2015), 85.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., ‘Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases’, Virginia Law Review 74 (1988), 731.Google Scholar
Kuehne, G., ‘Implied Obligations of Good Faith and Reasonableness in the Performance of Contracts: Old Wine in New Bottles?’, University of Western Australia Law Review 33 (2006), 63.Google Scholar
Leonard, C., ‘A Legal Chameleon: An Examination of the Doctrine of Good Faith in Chines and American Contract Law, Connecticut Journal of International Law 25 (2010), 305.Google Scholar
Liew, C., ‘A Leap of Good Faith in Singapore Contract Law’, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2012], 416.Google Scholar
Macneil, I., ‘Contracts: Adjustments of Long-Term Economic Relations under a Classical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law’, Northwestern University Law Review 72 (1978), 854.Google Scholar
Macneil, I., ‘Relational Contract: What We Do and Do Not Know’, Wisconsin Law Review (1985), 483.Google Scholar
Mason, A., ‘Contract, Good Faith and Equitable Standards in Fair Dealing’, Law Quarterly Review 116 (2000), 66.Google Scholar
Peden, E., ‘The Meaning of Contractual Good Faith’, Australian Bar Review 22 (2002), 235.Google Scholar
Peden, E., ‘When Common Law Trumps Equity: The Rise of Good Faith and Reasonableness and the Demise of Unconscionability’, Journal of Contract Law 21 (2005), 226.Google Scholar
Pliener, D., ‘Are English Courts Still Hostile to a Doctrine of Good Faith?’, Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 1 (2017), 19.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. and Maitland, F., The History of English Law (Cambridge University Press, 1895).Google Scholar
Powers, P., ‘Defining the Undefinable: Good Faith and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’, Journal of Law and Commerce 18 (1999), 349.Google Scholar
Staughton, C., ‘Good Faith and Fairness in Commercial Contract Law’, Journal of Contract Law 7 (1994), 193.Google Scholar
Steyn, J., ‘Role of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contract Law: A Hair-Shirt Philosophy’, Denning Law Journal 6 (1991), 131.Google Scholar
Steyn, J., ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’, Law Quarterly Review 113 (1997), 433.Google Scholar
Summers, R., ‘Good Faith in General Contract Law and the Sales Provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code’, Virginia Law Review 54 (1968), 195.Google Scholar
Summers, R., ‘The General Duty of Good Faith – Its Recognition and Conceptualisation’, Cornell Law Review 67 (1982),810.Google Scholar
Tetley, W., ‘Good Faith in Contract, Particularly in the Contracts of Arbitration and Chartering’, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 36 (2004), 561.Google Scholar
Trakman, L., ‘The Binding Force of Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith’, Cambridge Law Journal 73 (2014), 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Alstine, M., ‘Of Textualism, Party Autonomy and Good Faith’, William and Mary Law Review 40 (1999), 1223.Google Scholar
Wang, L. and Xu, C., ‘Fundamental Principles of China’s Contract Law’, Columbian Journal of Asian Law 13 (1999), 1.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R., The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
IX Bibliography
Alshorbagy, A., ‘On the Failure of a Legal Transplant: The Case of Egyptian Takeover Law’, Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 22 (2) (2012), 237.Google Scholar
Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department, Improving Australia’s Law and Justice Framework a Discussion Paper to Explore the Scope for Reforming Australian Contract Law (2012).Google Scholar
Bant, E. and Harding, M. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 41.Google Scholar
Berman, P. S., ‘The Inevitable Legal Pluralism within Universal Harmonization Regimes: The Case of the CISG’, Uniform Law Review 21 (2016), 23.Google Scholar
Bonell, M. J., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Long-Term Contracts’ (position paper prepared for the Working Group on Long-Term Contracts, Principles of International Commercial Contracts, First session, Rome, 19–23 January 2015) www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2014/study50/s-50–126-e.pdf accessed 16 July 2018.Google Scholar
Bonell, M. J. ‘The CISG, European Contract Law and the Development of a World Contract Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 56 (2008),1.Google Scholar
Bridge, Michael G, ‘Good Faith, the Common Law, and the CISG’, Uniform Law Review 22 (1) (2017), 98.Google Scholar
Cairns, J. W., ‘Watson, Walton and the History of Legal Transplants’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 41 (3) (2013), 637.Google Scholar
Carter, John, ‘Good Faith in Contract: Why Australian Law Is Incoherent’ (Legal Studies Research Paper No 14/38, Sydney Law School, 2014) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2421117 accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Chen-Wishart, M., ‘Legal Transplant and Undue Influence: Lost in Translation or a Working Misunderstanding?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (1) (2013), 1.Google Scholar
Chianale, A., ‘The CISG as a Model Law: A Comparative Law Approach’, Singapore Journal of Law Studies [2016], 29.Google Scholar
Coyle, J. F., ‘The Role of the CISG in US Contract Practice: An Empirical Study’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 38 (2016), 195.Google Scholar
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, ‘New Colombo Plan’ http://dfat.gov.au/people-to-people/new-colombo-plan/pages/new-colombo-plan.aspx accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Dharmananda, K. and Firios, L. (eds.), Long Term Contracts (Federation Press, 2013), 136.Google Scholar
DiMatteo, L. (ed.), International Sales Law: A Global Challenge (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
DiMatteo, L.Dhooge, L., Greene, S., Maurer, V. and Pagnattaro, M. ‘The Interpretive Turn in International Sales Law: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of CISG Jurisprudence’, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 34 (2004), 299.Google Scholar
DiMatteo, L.‘Contract Talk: Reviewing the Historical and Practical Significance of the Principles of European Contract Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 43 (2002), 569.Google Scholar
Estrella Faria, J. A., ‘Future Directions of Legal Harmonisation and Law Reform: Stormy Seas or Prosperous Voyage?’, Uniform Law Review 14 (2009), 5.Google Scholar
Felemegas, J., ‘Comparative Editorial Remarks on the Concept of Good Faith in the CISG and the PECL’, Pace International Law Review 13 (2001), 399.Google Scholar
Finn, P., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles: An Australian Perspective’, Australian International Law Journal 17 (2010), 193.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, H. C., Comparative Law: An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research (Cambridge University Press, 1949), 25.Google Scholar
Hayward, B., ‘The CISG in Australia – The Jigsaw Puzzle Missing a Piece’, Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 14 (2) (2010), 193Google Scholar
Hofmann, N., ‘Interpretation Rules and Good Faith as Obstacles to the UK’s Ratification of the CISG and to the Harmonization of Contract Law in Europe’, Pace International Law Review 22 (2010), 145.Google Scholar
Honnold, J., Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention (Wolters Kluwer, 1982).Google Scholar
Dahan, H., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles and their Influence in the Modernisation of Contract Law in the People’s Republic of China’, Uniform Law Review 8 (2003), 107.Google Scholar
Kanda, H. and Milhaupt, C. J., ‘Re-Examining Legal Transplants: The Director’s Fiduciary Duty in Japanese Corporate Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (4) (2003), 887.Google Scholar
Keily, T., ‘Good Faith and the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)’, Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration 3 (1) (1999), 15.Google Scholar
Lando, O., ‘CISG and its Followers: A Proposal to Adopt Some International Principles of Contract Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53 (2005), 379.Google Scholar
Le, N., ‘Rules of Interpretation of Contracts under the UNIDROIT Principles and Their Possible Adoption in Vietnamese Law’, Uniform Law Review 4 (2002), 1017, 1028–9.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111.Google Scholar
MacNeil, I., ‘Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries’, Northwestern University Law Review 94 (3) (2000), 877.Google Scholar
Michaels, R., ‘The UNIDROIT Principles as Global Background Law’, Uniform Law Review 19 (4) (2014), 643.Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., ‘A Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant Process’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2003), 839.Google Scholar
Moss, S., ‘Why the United Kingdom Has Not Ratified the CISG’, Journal of Law and Commerce 25 (2005–2006), 483.Google Scholar
Nichols, P. M., ‘The Viability of Transplanted Law: Kazakhstani Reception of a Transplanted Foreign Investment Code’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 18 (4) (1997), 1235.Google Scholar
Nottage, L., ‘Who’s Afraid of the Vienna Sales Convention (CISG)? A New Zealander’s View from Australia and Japan’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 36 (2005), 815.Google Scholar
O’Hara O’Connor, E., ‘The Role of the CISG in Promoting Healthy Jurisdictional Competition for Contract Law’, Uniform Law Review 21 (2016), 41.Google Scholar
Oser, D., The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Governing Law? (Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Robertson, D., ‘Long-Term Relational Contracts and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts’, Australian International Law Journal 17 (2010), 185.Google Scholar
Schlechtriem, P.(ed.), Einheitliches Kaufrecht and Nationales Obligationenrecht: Referate and Diskussionen der Fachtagung Einheitliches Kaufrecht am 16–17 2 1987 (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1987).Google Scholar
Schwenzer, I., ‘Global Unification of Contract Law’, Uniform Law Review 21 (2016), 60.Google Scholar
Schwenzer, I.Schlechtriem & Schwenzer: Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Sheehy, B., ‘Good Faith in the CISG: The Interpretation Problems of Art 7’, Review of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (2007) 153.Google Scholar
Smythe, D. J., ‘Reasonable Standards for Contract Interpretation under the CISG’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 25 (2016), 1.Google Scholar
Sarcevic, P. and Volken, P. (eds.), International Sale of Goods: Dubrovnik Lectures (Oceana Publications, 1985), 1.Google Scholar
Spagnolo, L., ‘Law Wars: Australian Contract Law Reform v. CISG v. CESL’, Villanova Law Review 58 (4) (2013), 623.Google Scholar
Stewart, A., ‘What’s Wrong with the Australian Law of Contract?’, Journal of Contract Law 29 (2012), 74.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences’, Modern Law Review 61 (1998), 11.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT Secretariat, ‘Report to Working Group on Long-Term Contracts Second Session’ (Hamburg, 26–29 October 2015) see [43], [69], [19] respectively www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2016/study50/s-50-misc32-e.pdf accessed 16 July 2018.Google Scholar
UNIDROIT SecretariatItem No. 4 on the agenda: International Commercial Contracts – (b) Possible future work on long-term contracts’ UNIDROIT 2013 – C.D. (92) 4(b)) www.unidroit.org/english/governments/councildocuments/2013session/cd92-04b-e.pdf accessed 24 July 2018.Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Termination and Cure under the Common European Sales Law’, Common Market Law Review 50 (2013), 147.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Wesiack, M., ‘Is the CISG Too Much Influenced by Civil Law Principles of Contract Law Rather Than Common Law Principles of Contract Law? Should the CISG Contain a Rule on the Passing of Property?’ (2004) CISG Database www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/wesiack.html accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Zeller, B., The Unidroit Principles of Contract Law; Is There Room for Their Inclusion into Domestic Contracts?’, Journal of Law and Commerce 26 (2006–2007), 115.Google Scholar
Zeller, B.‘‘Four-Corners – The Methodology for Interpretation and Application of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (2003) CISC Database, Article 7 www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/4corners.html accessed 21 June 2018.Google Scholar
Zeller, B.‘Good Faith – Is It a Contractual Obligation?’, Bond Law Review 15 (2) (2003), 215.Google Scholar
XI Bibliography
Allan, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law 1st edn (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S.,Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Appleby, G., ’Proportionality and Federalism: Can Australia Learn from the European Community, the US and Canada?’ University of Tasmania Law Review 26, no. 1 (2007), 1–33.Google Scholar
Aronson, M., Groves, M. and Weeks, G., Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability 6th edn (Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited, 2017).Google Scholar
Aharon, B., Proportionality Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Boughey, J., ‘The Reasonableness of Proportionality in the Australian Administrative Law Context’ Federal Law Review 43, no. 1 (2015), 59.Google Scholar
Carter, A., ‘McCloy v. New South Wales: Political Donations, Political Communication and the Place of Proportionality Analysis’ Public Law Review 26, no. 4 (2015), 245–54.Google Scholar
Carter, A.,‘Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law: Towards Transnationalism?’, Heidelberg Journal of International Law 76 (2016), 951.Google Scholar
Carter, A.,‘Brown v Tasmania: Proportionality and the Reformulation of the Lange Test’, Public Law Review 29 (3) (2018), 14.Google Scholar
Chordia, S., ‘The Trajectory of Structured Proportionality in Implied Freedom of Political Communication cases: Brown v Tasmania’ (2017) AusPubLaw https://auspublaw.org/2017/11/the-trajectory-of-structured-proportionality/ accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Craig, P., ‘Proportionality, Rationality and Review’ New Zealand Law Review no. 2 (2010), 265–301.Google Scholar
Craig, P.,‘Unreasonableness and Proportionality in UK Law’ in The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe, edited by Ellis, E. (Hart Publishing, 1999), 85–102.Google Scholar
Daly, P., ‘Wednesbury’s Reason and Structure’, Public Law April issue (n.d.) 2011, 238–59.Google Scholar
Elliott, M. and Varuhas, J. N. E., Administrative Law: Text and Materials 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Ellis, Evelyn, ed. The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, B., ‘Proportionality and Australian Constitutionalism’ University of Tasmania Law Review 16, no. 3 (n.d.), 263.Google Scholar
Groves, M., and Weeks, G., ‘Substantive (Procedural) Review in Australia’ in The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow, edited by Wilberg, H. and Elliott, M. Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law, volume 8 (Hart Publishing, 2015), 154–70.Google Scholar
Henckels, C., ‘Proportionality and the Separation of Powers in Constitutional Review: Examining the Role of Judicial Deference’ Federal Law Review 45, no. 2 (2017), 181–97.Google Scholar
Hickman, T., ‘Problems for Proportionality’, New Zealand Law Review, no. 2 (2010), 303.Google Scholar
Jowell, J., and Lester, A., ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin 14, no. 2 (1988), 858–70 https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.1988.9985971.Google Scholar
Kiefel, S., ‘Proportionality: A Rule of Reason (Australia)’ Public Law Review 23, no. 2 (2012), 85–93.Google Scholar
Kiefel, S.,’Section 92: Markets, Protectionism and Proportionality – Australian and European Perspectives’, Monash University Law Review 36, no. 2 (2010), 1–15.Google Scholar
Kirk, J., ‘Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and the Concept of Proportionality’, Melbourne University Law Review 21, no. 1 (June 1997), 1.Google Scholar
Lee, H. P., ‘Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Adjudication’ in Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law edited by Lindell, G. (Federation Press, 1994) 126.Google Scholar
Lee, H. P.,‘The “Reasonably Appropriate and Adapted’ in Law and Government in Australia, edited by Groves, M. (Sydney: Federation Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Loftus, P., ‘Proportionality, Australian Constitutionalism and Governmental Theory: Changing the Grundnorm’ Southern Cross University Law Review, no. 3 (1999), 30–84.Google Scholar
Mason, A., ‘The Use of Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law’ Public Law Review 27, no. 2 (2016), 109–23.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, S., ‘Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power (Australia)’ Federal Law Review 35, no. 1 (2007), 25–79. https://doi.org/10.22145/flr.35.1.2.Google Scholar
Mason, A., ‘The Use of Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law’, Public Law Review 27 (2016), 109.Google Scholar
Meagher, D., ‘The Brennan Conception of the Implied Freedom: Theory, Proportionality and Deference’ University of Queensland Law Journal 30, no. 1 (2011), 119–33.Google Scholar
Quirk, P., ‘An Australian Looks at German “Proportionality”’ University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review 1 (1999), 39.Google Scholar
Stone, A., ‘The Limits of Constitutional Text and Structure Revisited (Freedom of Speech: Contemporary Issues)’, University of New South Wales Law Journal 28, no. 3 (2005), 842–51.Google Scholar
Stone, A.‘The Limits of Constitutional Text and Structure: Standards of Review and the Freedom of Political Communication (Australia)’, Melbourne University Law Review 23, no. 3 (1999), 668–708.Google Scholar
Stone, A.and Evans, S. ‘Australia: Freedom of Speech and Insult in the High Court of Australia’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 4, no. 4 (2006,), 677–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol030.Google Scholar
Villalta Puig, G., The High Court of Australia and Section 92 of the Australian Constitution: A Critique of the Cole v Whitfield Test (Thomson/Lawbook Co, 2008) https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/44567726.Google Scholar
Wilberg, H., and Elliott, M. (eds.). The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow. Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law, volume 8 (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Case Law
Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v. Commonwealth [1992] HCA 45; (1992) 177 CLR 1.
Brown v. Tasmania [2017] HCA 43.
Commonwealth v. Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1,
Davis v. Commonwealth (1988) 166 CLR 79.
Marcus Clark & Co Ltd v. Commonwealth (1952) 87 CLR 177.
McCulloch v. Maryland 7 US 316 (1819).
McCloy v. NSW [2015] HCA 34.
Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6.
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v. Peko-Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24.
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v. Li 362 (2013) 249 CLR 332, 362 [63].
Minister for Resources v. Dover Fisheries Pty Ltd (1993) 116 ALR 54,
Monis v. The Queen [2013] 249 CLR 92.
Mulholland v. Australian electoral Commission (2004) 220 CLR 181.
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v. Wills [1992] HCA 46; (1992) 177 CLR 1
Re Fares Rural Meat and Livestock Corporation Pty Ltd v. Australian Meat and Live-Stock Corporation (1990) 96 ALR 153.
R v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Everett [1989] 1 QB
Tajjour v. NSW [2014] HCA 35.
V Bibliography
Baker, J. H., The Oxford History of the Laws of England: 1483–1558 (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, S. and Halliday, T., ‘Incrementalisms in Global Lawmaking’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 32 (2007).Google Scholar
Brand, O., ‘Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 32 (2007) http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol32/iss2/3.Google Scholar
Cairns, J., ‘Watson, Walton, and the History of Legal Transplants’, Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 41 (2014), 637.Google Scholar
Clifford Chance and Cavenagh Law LLP, ‘The Singapore International Commercial Court – A Masterstroke’ (2013) Briefing Note www.cliffordchance.com/briefings/2013/12/the_singapore_internationalcommercialcourt.html accessed 29 March 2017.Google Scholar
Council of Ministers, ‘Instauration de la Brussels International Business Court [Establishment of the Brussels International Business Court]’ (2017) Press Release www.presscenter.org/fr/pressrelease/20171027/instauration-de-la-brussels-international-business-court accessed 7 December 2017.Google Scholar
de Jong, M., Lalenis, K. and Mamadouh, V. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation: Experiences with the Transfer of Policy Institutions (Springer, 2002).Google Scholar
de Jong, M. and Stoter, S., ‘Institutional Transplantation and the Rule of Law: How This Interdisciplinary Method Can Enhance the Legitimacy of International Organisations’, Erasmus Law Review 2 (2009),311.Google Scholar
de Rechtspraak [Judiciary of the Netherlands], ‘Plan tot oprichting van de Netherlands commercial court [Plan to establish the Netherlands commercial court]’ (2015).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G., Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G., ‘Critical Comparisons: Re-Thinking Comparative Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 26 (1985), 411.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G., ‘Constitutions as Commodities: Notes on a Theory of Transfer’ in Frankenberg, G. (ed.), Order from Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar
Frankfurt Regional Court [Landgericht Frankfurt am Main], ‘Gerichtsstandort Frankfurt wird gestärkt: Englischsprachige Kammer für Handelssachen ab Januar 2018 [Strengthening Frankfurt as a Venue: English-Speaking Chamber for Commercial Matters Starting January 2018]’ (2017) Press Release.Google Scholar
‘Full Steam Ahead: Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) Issues Judgment Clarifying the Position on What Constitutes an Offshore Case’ (Herbert Smith Freehills – Asia disputes notes, July 2016) http://hsfnotes.com/asiadisputes/2016/07/22/full-steam-ahead-singapore-international-commercial-court-sicc-issues-judgment-clarifying-the-position-on-what-constitutes-an-offshore-case/ accessed 12 June 2017.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., ‘From the Native’s Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding’ in Geertz, Clifford (ed.), Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Gillespie, J., ‘Towards a Discursive Analysis of Legal Transfers into Developing East Asia’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 40 (2007–2008), 657.Google Scholar
Graziadei, M., ‘Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions’ in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hill, J., ‘The Exercise of Judicial Discretion in Relation to Applications to Enforce Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention 1958’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2016),304.Google Scholar
Hwang, M., ‘Commercial Courts and International Arbitration–Competitors or Partners?’, Arbitration International 31 (2015), 193.Google Scholar
Justice Croft and Chief Justice Warren, ‘An International Commercial Court for Australia – Looking beyond the New York Convention’ (2016) Commercial CPD Seminar Series.Google Scholar
Koh, H., ‘Why Transnational Law Matters’, Penn State International Law Review 24 (2006), 745.Google Scholar
‘KWM : The Singapore International Commercial Court – Two Years On’ www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/singapore-international-commercial-court-two-years-on-20170529 accessed 12 June 2017.Google Scholar
Landbrecht, J., ‘The Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) – An Alternative to International Arbitration?’, ASA Bulletin 34 (2016), 112.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111.Google Scholar
Menon, S., ‘Transnational Commercial Law: Realities, Challenges and a Call for Meaningful Convergence’, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 2013 (2013), 231.Google Scholar
Menon, S., ‘Response by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon’ (2013) Speech delivered at the Singapore Opening of Legal Year 2013 www.sal.org.sg/lists/speeches/dispform.aspx?id=112 accessed 1 January 2017.Google Scholar
Menon, S., ‘The Somewhat Uncommon Law of Commerce’, Singapore Academy of Law Journal 26 (2014), 23.Google Scholar
Menon, S., ‘International Commercial Courts: Towards a Transnational System of Dispute Resolution’ (2015) Opening Lecture for the DIFC Courts Lecture Series 2015.Google Scholar
Menon, S., ‘The Transnational Protection of Private Rights: Issues, Challenges, and Possible Solutions’, Asian Journal of International Law 5 (2015), 219.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, ‘“One Size Can Fit All” – On the Mass Production of Legal Transplants’ in Frankenberg, G. (ed.), Order from Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar
Ministry of Law (Singapore), ‘Government Welcomes Recommendations to Establish Singapore International Commercial Court’ (2013) Press Release www.mlaw.gov.sg/news/press-releases/government-welcomes-recommendation-to-establish-sicc.html accessed 1 January 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Law (Singapore) ‘Public Consultation on the Report of the Singapore International Commercial Court Committee’ (2013) Public Consultation www.mlaw.gov.sg/news/press-releases/government-welcomes-recommendation-to-establish-sicc.html accessed 1 January 2017.Google Scholar
Seckelmann, M., ‘Clotted History and Chemical Reactions – On the Possibility of Constitutional Transfer’ in Frankenberg, G. (ed.), Order from Transfer: Comparative Constitutional Design and Legal Culture (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G., ‘The Dimensions and Determinants of State Change’ in Shaffer, G. (ed.), Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G., ‘Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change’ in Shaffer, G. (ed.), Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Sharar, Z. and Khulaifi, M. A. ‘The Courts in Qatar Financial Centre and Dubai International Financial Centre: A Comparative Analysis’, Hong Kong Law Journal 46 (2016), 529.Google Scholar
‘SICC – Hearings & Judgments’ www.sicc.gov.sg/hearingsjudgments.aspx?id=72 accessed 12 June 2017.Google Scholar
Silverstein, G., ‘Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter’ in Ginsburg, T. and Moustafa, T. (eds.), Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Singapore International Commercial Court, ‘Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions’ (2017).Google Scholar
Singapore International Commercial Court Committee, ‘Report of the Singapore International Court Committee’ (2013).Google Scholar
Smith, S. E., ‘The Way We Do Things Back Home: Do Expatriate Judges Preferentially Cite the Jurisprudence of Their Home Countries?’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 13 (2013), 331.Google Scholar
Supreme People’s Court Monitor, ‘SPC Reveals New Belt & Road-Related Initiatives’ (Supreme People’s Court Monitor, 7 October 2017) https://supremepeoplescourtmonitor.com/2017/10/07/spc-reveals-new-belt-road-related-initiatives/ accessed 18 December 2017.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences’, The Modern Law Review 61 (1998), 11.Google Scholar
Thio, L.-A., ‘Between Apology and Apogee, Autochthony: The “rule of Law” beyond the Rules of Law in Singapore’, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2012], 269.Google Scholar
Twining, W., ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 36 (2004), 1.Google Scholar
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, ‘UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules’ (2013).Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law 2nd edn (University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Whytock, C., ‘Litigation, Arbitration, and the Transnational Shadow of Law’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 18 (2008), 449.Google Scholar
Wong, D. H., ‘The Rise of the International Commercial Court: What Is It and Will It Work?’, Civil Justice Quarterly 33 (2014), 205.Google Scholar
Yip, M., ‘Singapore International Commercial Court: A New Model for Transnational Commercial Litigation’ in Ma, Y.-J. (ed.), Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, vol. 32 (Brill, 2016).Google Scholar
Yip, M., ‘The Resolution of Disputes before the Singapore International Commercial Court’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly [2016], 439.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 38.Google Scholar
IX Bibliography
Cairns, J., ‘Watson, Walton, and the History of Legal Transplants’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 41 (2013), 637–96.Google Scholar
Callahan, M., ‘The Opening in Burma: The Generals Loosen Their Grip’, The Journal of Democracy 23 (4) (2012), 120–31.Google Scholar
Cheesman, N. and San, K. M., ‘Not Just Defending; Advocating for Law in Myanmar’, Wisconsin International Law Journal 31 (2014), 718–19.Google Scholar
Chen, J., ‘Modernisation, Westernisation, and Globalisation: Legal Transplant in China’ in Oliveira, J. C. and Cardinal, P. (eds.), One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders – Perspectives of Evolution (Springer, 2009) 91.Google Scholar
Courts Manual of 1999 (1999) Myanmar Supreme Court. Available at: www.burmalibrary.org/docs14/Courts_Manual-ocr-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Crouch, M., ‘The Layers of Legal Development in Myanmar’, in Crouch, M. and Lindsey, T. (eds.), Law, Society and Transition in Myanmar (Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Crouch, M.,Asian Legal Transplants and Rule of Law Reform: National Human Rights Commission in Myanmar and Indonesia. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 5 (2013), 146–77.Google Scholar
Della, Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (eds.), Transnational Protest and Global Activism (Rowman and Littlefield, 2005).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. ‘The Import and Export of Law and Legal Institutions: International Strategies in National Palace Wars’, in Nelken, D. and Feest, J. (eds.), Adapting Legal Cultures (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry., ‘The Need for a Political Pact’, Journal of Democracy 23(4) (2012), 138–49.Google Scholar
Egreteau, R., ‘Legislators in Myanmar’s First “Post-Junta” National Parliament (2010–2015): A Sociological Analysis’, Journal of Southeast Asian Affairs 33 (2) (2014), 91–124.Google Scholar
Dolidze, A., ‘Bridging Comparative and International Law: Amicus Curiae Participation as a Vertical Legal Transplant’, European Journal of International Law 26 (4) (2016), 851–80.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J., ‘Towards a Discursive Analysis of Legal Transfers into Developing East Asia’, International Law and Politics 40 (2008), 657–721.Google Scholar
Hamson, C. J., ’The Istanbul Conference of 1955’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 5 (1956), 26.Google Scholar
Horsey, R., ‘Myanmar’s Political Landscape Following the 2010 Elections’, in Cheeseman, N., Skidmore, M. and Wilson, T. (eds.), Myanmar’s Transition: Openings, Obstacles, and Opportunities (Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2012).Google Scholar
Independent Lawyers’ Association of Myanmar (2018) Our Objectives. Independent Lawyers’ Association of Myanmar. Available at: www.ilam.org.mm/pages/2 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2016a) Myanmar Lawyers Attend Workshop Promoting Legal Ethics. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=14490A0D-F6C4-4E12-AE48-A4D730D0CDE4 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2016b) IBA President and Aung San Suu Kyi Open Inaugural Meeting of Myanmar’s First National Independent Lawyers’ Association. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=67923557-0f67-403c-ad67-ff04adc4ac52 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2015a) IBAHRI and Myanmar Lawyers Prepare for First Independent Lawyers’ Association Elections. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=96554c4d-8391-4f10-9955-d5c1ba10f019 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2015b) Myanmar, Capacity-Building 2014–2016. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=B0DFF549-F0F3-4A90-83D5-40B902FEDBF9 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2014a) Laws Regulating the Legal Profession: A Comparative Review from around the World. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=14490A0D-F6C4-4E12-AE48-A4D730D0CDE4 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2014b) Myanmar: IBAHRI Host Workshop on Laws Governing Legal Profession with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=5d4e7549-e00e-46ed-8c4c-2a0c421db55a accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2014c) Myanmar Lawyers Advance in Mission to Build a Representative National Bar Association. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=2efce9cc-5ef9-4dde-86e4-024648d54b93 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2014d) Myanmar’s Legal Profession Moves to Establish a National Bar Association. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=4670e898-428b-440d-b986-52b35593d40d accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2014e) Understanding Bar Associations and Their Roles and Responsibilities. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=6a0a6d72-09ef-4976-8cec-df30c9674f05 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2014 f) Myanmar: Major Legal Seminar on Bar Associations’ Best Practices to be Hosted by IBAHRI. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=ce33cd81-eb78-4209-9ca2-8a9338c17327 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2013a) Myanmar/Burma Country Visit 2013. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=7481efba-7855-4bd2-9af7-7cf71fe1ab43 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2013b) Panel Discussion—The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=c68828b3-9c10-48a7-a1c7-f5d394b63cc9 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2012a) The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=DE0EE11D-9878–4685-A20F-9A0AAF6C3F3E accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2012b) Myanmar/Burma Fact-finding Mission. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=DEBA1058-8D8D-47E3-B8DB-1BA2BA82E40E accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (2011) IBA International Principles on Conduct for the Legal Profession. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=1730FC33-6D70-4469-9B9D-8A12C319468C accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Bar Association (IBA) (1990) IBA Standards for the Independence of the Legal Profession. International Bar Association. Available at: www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=F68BBBA5-FD1F-426F-9AA5-48D26B5E72E7 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) (2013) Right to Counsel: Independence of Lawyers in Myanmar. International Commission of Jurists. Available at: www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/MYANMAR-Right-to-Counsel-electronic.pdf accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Independent Lawyers’ Association of Myanmar (ILAM) (2017) Available at: www.ilam.org.mm/en/pages/1.Google Scholar
Joseph, B., ‘Political Transition in Burma: Four Scenarios in the Run-up to the 2015 Elections’ SAIS Review of International Affairs 32 (2) (2012), 137–49.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, in Kahn-Freund, O. Selected Writings (Stevens, 1978).Google Scholar
Khagram, S., Riker, J. and Sikkink, Kathryn Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms (University of Minnesota Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Legal Practitioners Act of 1879 (1879) Myanmar Constitutional Tribunal. Available at: www.myanmarconstitutionaltribunal.org.mm/lawdatabase/sites/default/files/myanmar_code/2015/07/18–1879%20Legal%20Practitioners%20Act.pdf.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, The Maastricht Journal of Comparative Law 4 (2) (1997), 111–24.Google Scholar
Lwin, S., ‘Lawyers Vow Greater Independence for New Bar Association’, Myanmar Times 18 January, 2016. Available at: www.mmtimes.com/national-news/nay-pyi-taw/18513-lawyers-vow-greater-independence-for-new-bar-association.html accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Lwin, S. and Phyo, P. T. (2016) ‘Independent Bar Association Aims to Usher in New Era’ Myanmar Times 21 January, 2016. Available at: www.mmtimes.com/national-news/mandalay-upper-myanmar/18578-independent-bar-association-aims-to-usher-in-new-era.html accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Mandalay Bar Association (2018) Available at: www.mandalaydirectory.com/en/categories-index/mandalay-region/chan-aye-thar-zan/43-associations-clubs-societies/U00431677_000000000_mandalay-bar-association_40110 accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Miller, J., ‘A Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History, and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant Process’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2003), 839–86.Google Scholar
Min, A. K. (2018) ‘Move to Amend Bar Law Gains Steam’ Myanmar Times, 26 May, 2018. Available at: www.mmtimes.com/news/move-amend-bar-law-gains-steam.html accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Myanmar Legal Aid Network (2014) Available at: www.legalaidnetwork.org/ accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Myanmar Lawyers’ Network (2018) Available at: www.facebook.com/myanmarlawyernetwork/ accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Myanmar Media Lawyers’ Network (2018) Available at: www.myanmarmedialawyers.org/ accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. and Gillespie, J., ‘Interpreting Legal Transfers: The Implications for Law and Development’ in Nicholson, P. and Gillespie, J. (eds.), Law and Development and the Global Discourses of Legal Transfers (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Nelken, D., ‘Legal Transplants and Beyond: Of Disciplines and Metaphors’ in Harding, A. and Örücü, Esin (eds.), Comparative Law in the 21st Century (Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. and Low, S., ‘Local Accounts of Rule of Law Aid: Implications for Donors’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 5 (1) (2013), 1–43.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M., ‘Myanmar in 2014: ‘Tacking against the Wind’, Southeast Asian Affairs (2015) 223–45.Google Scholar
Soe, T. N. (2013) ‘Lawyers’ Network to Register in Mandalay’ Myanmar Times 28 January, 2013. Available at: www.mmtimes.com/national-news/mandalay-upper-myanmar/3919-lawyers-network-to-register-in-mandalay.html accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences’, The Modern Law Review 61 (1) (1998), 11–32.Google Scholar
Walton, F., ‘The Historical School of Jurisprudence and Transplantations of Law’, Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 9 (1927), 183.Google Scholar
Watley, B. A., ‘Report on the Rome Conference 1950’, Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 32 (1950), 91.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia, 1993).Google Scholar
Wise, E., ‘The Transplant of Legal Patterns’, American Journal of Comparative Law 38 (Supplement) (1990), 1–22.Google Scholar
Yangon Bar Association (2018) Available at: www.yangondirectory.com/en/categories-index/yangon-region/kyauktada/43-associations-clubs-societies/L52808_000000000_yangon-bar-association accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar