Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Danell, Kjell Bergström, Roger Edenius, Lars and Ericsson, Göran 2003. Ungulates as drivers of tree population dynamics at module and genet levels. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 181, Issue. 1-2, p. 67.

    SUMMERS, RON W. 2007. Stand selection by birds in Scots pinewoods in Scotland: the need for more old-growth pinewood. Ibis, Vol. 149, Issue. , p. 175.

    Rheault, Héloïse Bélanger, Louis Grondin, Pierre Ouimet, Rock Hébert, Christian and Dussault, Claude 2009. Stand composition and structure as indicators of epixylic diversity in old-growth boreal forests. Écoscience, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 183.

    2014. Ecology of Wildfire Residuals in Boreal Forests. p. 119.

    Monks, Adrian Burrows, Larry and Wan, Shiqiang 2014. Are threatened plant species specialists, or just more vulnerable to disturbance?. Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 51, Issue. 5, p. 1228.

    Sullivan, Thomas P Sullivan, Druscilla S Boonstra, Rudy Krebs, Charles J and Vyse, Alan 2017. Mechanisms of population limitation in the southern red-backed vole in conifer forests of western North America: insights from a long-term study. Journal of Mammalogy,

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1999
  • Online publication date: February 2010

13 - Special species

Summary

By now you have read a considerable amount in this book about the importance of a holistic, or integrative approach to the conservation of biodiversity in sustainable forest management. These approaches to forestry are advanced under the assumption that if a complete array of functioning ecosystems is maintained, then all species will be present on the landscape. However, forest and wildlife managers must frequently make decisions based on individual species. The two approaches, holistic and species-oriented, are not mutually exclusive and actually complement one another by focusing efforts at multiple scales. Regardless of how a ‘biodiversity management program’ is designed, the end result must be assessed primarily in terms of the conservation of species.

Within any political jurisdiction (at all scales, from country to local municipality) certain species will receive more attention from managers than others, for a variety of reasons. Some species may have attracted the interest of the public because they are rare, attractive, or culturally or economically important. Many species have value as indicators of a particular condition (such as old-growth forests) and are monitored by managers because they are good barometers of ecosystem health. Species selected for monitoring and study as indicator species are chosen with a view to indicating functioning of forest ecosystems, and because they themselves may play critical roles in forested systems (i.e., keystone species). As an example, a breeding population of a particular woodpecker species may indicate sufficient dead or dying trees in a forest type or age class to support many of the species that use these structures (Angelstam and Mikusinski 1994).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems
  • Online ISBN: 9780511613029
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613029
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×