Man on his Nature
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
There is however one peculiar inconsistency which we may note as marking this and many other psychological theories. They place the soul in the body and attach it to the body without trying in addition to determine the reason why or the condition of the body under which such attachment is produced. This would seem however to be a real question calling for solution.
Further I cannot admit that the connection of soul and body is really either intelligible or explicable.
The body is of cells and like the rest of the body the brain I is of cells. Have then the cells of the brain mind and JL the body's other cells not? Supposing a cell to be sentient, surely we have little chance of knowing whether it be so. A well-versed observer of the one-celled animal world has said that were an amoeba as big as a dog we should all acknowledge its mind. We could then put many more questions to it, but, with all deference, I am not clear that mind would be recognizable in the answers given. Aristotle knew the exposed human brain insentient when touched or manipulated. For him to remark the fact it must have seemed to him noteworthy. Today the surgeon reports that he removes large areas of the cortex of the brain—the cortex is the region where brain and mind meet- from conscious patients without their noticing difference or change.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.