Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Croce, Mariano 2015. From gay liberation to marriage equality: A political lesson to be learnt. European Journal of Political Theory, p. 147488511558142.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: November 2012

5 - The Curious Relationship of Marriage and Freedom

Summary

Marriage is surely at a crossroad, as the chapters in this volume so richly attest. In fact, marriage may be at more than one crossroad, some pointing toward new, uncharted terrain, others amounting to intersections we have visited before. My principal interest in exploring this dynamic moment in the evolution of the institution of marriage is to better understand why and how today's marriage equality movement for same-sex couples might benefit from lessons learned by African Americans when they too were allowed to marry for the first time in the immediate post–Civil War era. I find it curious that the right to marry rather than, say, employment rights, educational opportunity, or political participation has emerged as the preeminent vehicle by and through which the freedom, equality, and dignity of gay men and lesbians is being fought in the present moment. Why marriage? In what ways are the values, aspirations, and even identity of an oppressed community shaped when they are articulated in and through the institution of marriage? What kind of freedom and what kind of equality does the capacity to marry bring forth?

I write this chapter just as same-sex couples have won the right to legally marry in the state of New York. While there is much to celebrate in this victory, I am concerned that this new form of legal recognition for some members of the lesbian and gay community may come at a cost of rendering more marginalized and vulnerable other forms of family, kinship, and care (Franke 2011). Now that same-sex couples can marry, many employers have announced that they must do so in order to retain benefits to which they had previously been entitled without the legal sanction of the state (Bernard 2011:10–11). “We can now treat you just as we treat heterosexual couples,” they say. “Heterosexuals must marry to gain benefits for their spouses and children, you must now as well.”

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Marriage at the Crossroads
  • Online ISBN: 9781139087568
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087568
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
American Freedmen's Inquiry Commission 1863 Preliminary Report Touching the Condition and Management of Emancipated RefugeesS. Exec. Doc38
American Freedmen's Inquiry Commission 1864 Final Report of the American Freedmen's Inquiry Commission to the Secretary of WarS. Exec. Doc38
Authors unknown 1774 Petition to the Governor, the Council, and the House of Representatives of MassachusettsDavis, P.C.Neglected Stories: The Constitution and Family ValuesNew YorkHill and Wang
Baehr v. Miike 1996
Bernard, J. 1996 Marriage and Family among NegroesEnglewood Cliffs, NJPrentice-Hall
Bernard, , S. 2011 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/09/business/some-companies-want-gays-to-wed-to-get-health-benefits.html
Bibb, H. 1969 Narrative of the Life and Adventures of Henry Bibb, an American Slave, Written by HimselfNew YorkNegro Universities Press
Butler, J. 2009 Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?New YorkVerso
Carpenter, D. 2004 The Unknown Past of Michigan Law Review, 102 1464
Civil Rights Act of Nov. 25 1865
Davis, P.C. 1997 Neglected Stories: The Constitution and Family ValuesNew YorkHill and Wang
Devlin, P. 1965 The Enforcement of MoralsLondonOxford University Press
Eaton, J 1863 89
Edwards, L. 1996 The Marriage Covenant is at the Foundation of All Our Rights”: The Politics of Slave Marriages in North Carolina after EmancipationLaw & History Review, 14
Edwards, L. 1997 Gendered Strife and Confusion: The Political Culture of ReconstructionChampaignUniversity of Illinois Press
Foner, E. 1988 Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877New YorkHarper & Row
Franke, K. 1999 Becoming a Citizen: Construction Era Regulation of African American MarriagesYale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 14
Franke, K. 2011 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/24/opinion/24franke.html
Frankel, N. 1999 Freedom's Women: Black Women and Families in Civil War Era MississippiBloomingtonUniversity of Indiana Press
Grimké, A. 1837 Letter to Catharine E. BeecherHawkins, H.The Abolitionists: Means, Ends, and MotivationsBostonHoughton Mifflin
Grossberg, M. 1985 Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century AmericaChapel HillUniversity of North Carolina Press
Guild, J.P. 1996 Black Laws of Virginia: A Summary of the Legislative Acts of Virginia Concerning Negroes from Earliest Times to the PresentWestminster, MDWillow Bend Books
Gutman, H.G. 1979 The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750–1925New YorkRandom House
Hart, H.L.A. 1959 162
Hasty Marriages and Divorces 1871 1
Howard, O.O. 1866
Koppelman, A. 1998 Same-Sex Marriage, Choice of Law, and Public PolicyTexas Law Review, 76 921
Lawrence v. Texas 2003
Litwack, L. 1979 Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of SlaveryNew YorkKnopf
Lowe, R. 1993 The Freedmen's Bureau and Local Black LeadershipJournal of American History, 14
Malone, A.P. 1992 Sweet Chariot: Slave Family and Household Structure in Nineteenth- Century LouisianaChapel HillUniversity of North Carolina Press
Marrying in Haste 1876 4
McConico v. State 1873
Means v. State 1896
Olson, T. 2010 http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/01/08/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage.html
Oppenheimer, M. 2011 http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/magazine/infidelity-will-keep-us-together.html?pagewanted=all
1864 89
Protection of Civil Rights: Congressional Debate 1866
2009
Report by Chaplain Warren 1864 89
Richards, D.A.J. 1998 Women, Gays, and the Constitution: The Grounds for Feminism and Gay Rights in Culture and LawChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
Stampp, K.M. 1956 The Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Antebellum SouthNew YorkVintage
U. S. Department of Labor, Office of Planning and Research 1965 http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/history/webid-meynihan.htm
Williams v. Georgia 1881
1992