Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Pendakur, Krishna 2018. Welfare analysis when people are different. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 321.

    Chakravarty, Satya R. Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa Deutsch, Joseph Nissanov, Zoya and Silber, Jacques 2016. Inequality after the 20th Century: Papers from the Sixth ECINEQ Meeting. Vol. 24, Issue. , p. 1.

    Ebert, Udo and Moyes, Patrick 2009. Household decisions and equivalence scales. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 1039.

    Rojas, Mariano 2007. A Subjective Well-being Equivalence Scale for Mexico: Estimation and Poverty and Income-distribution Implications. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 273.

    Majumder, Amita and Chakrabarty, Manisha 2003. Relative cost of children: the case of rural Maharashtra, India. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 61.

    Ebert, Udo 2001. A general approach to the evaluation of nonmarket goods. Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 373.

    Bojer, Hilde 2000. Children and Theories of Social Justice. Feminist Economics, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 23.

    Bojer, Hilde and Nelson, Julie A. 1999. EQUIVALENCE SCALES AND THE WELFARE OF CHILDREN: A COMMENT ON "IS THERE BIAS IN THE ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON EQUIVALENCE SCALES?". by M. Luisa Ferriera, Reuben C. Buse, and Jan-Paul Chavas in Review of Income and Wealth, 44(2), 1998. Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 531.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1994
  • Online publication date: January 2010

2 - Measuring the cost of children: a theoretical framework

Summary

Introduction

Parenthood has costs as well as benefits. Children must be fed, clothed, housed, and educated, and the resulting expenditures leave parents with less to spend on themselves. In addition, because some governments attempt to compensate families for the costs of children, reasonable estimates of the costs of children are a prerequisite for sensible policies.

But how should the costs of children be measured? We might choose, for example, to assume that the costs of a first child are the same for all families, regardless of income, or we might choose to include or disregard the psychic benefits to parents. In addition, because parents cannot typically imagine the childless alternative, interpersonal comparisons of levels of well-being between individuals in different households are necessary for the construction of sensible indexes.

This chapter presents a theoretical framework for indexes of the costs of children using a methodology that is closely related to household equivalence scale techniques (see, as an example, Blackorby and Donaldson, 1988, 1991). Households' demand behaviour is assumed to be rationalised by standard preferences, individuals in each household are assumed to be equally well off, and comparisons of levels of utility between individuals in different households are assumed to be possible (see p. 52 below).

In this framework, we introduce general classes of cost-of-children indexes (p. 53). The first class – relative cost-of-children indexes – regards the cost as equal in percentage terms for all households, while the second class – absolute cost-of-children indexes – regards the cost as equal in absolute terms.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Measurement of Household Welfare
  • Online ISBN: 9780511598968
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598968
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×