Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fia, Magali and Sacconi, Lorenzo 2018. Justice and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Rawlsian Social Contract and Sen’s Capabilities Approach. Journal of Business Ethics,

    Curtis, Claire P. 2017. Standards of Justice for Human Being and Doing in Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2312 and C. S. Friedman’s This Alien Shore. Open Library of Humanities, Vol. 3, Issue. 2,

    Robeyns, Ingrid 2017. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined.

    Robeyns, Ingrid 2016. Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 397.

    Young, Robert 2016. International Encyclopedia of Ethics. p. 1.

    Young, Robert 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    Grasso, Marco 2012. Sharing the Emission Budget. Political Studies, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 668.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: June 2012

5 - Two cheers for capabilities

Summary

In this chapter, the author summons up qualified two cheers for the capability approach. According to the capability approach to the characterization of individual's condition for purposes of social justice theory, a person's wellbeing can be identified with the quality of her beings and doings, what Amartya Sen calls "functionings". Sen defends the capability approach against two rivals. One is welfare conceived in mental state terms, as desire satisfaction or as pleasure and the absence of pain. A second rival is the account of primary social goods developed by John Rawls. The author has urged that the principle of social justice that imposes on all of us a responsibility to ensure, to some degree, that no human life is avoidably blighted and wasted, is better regarded as responsive to people's overall condition rather than to the means or resources to which they have access.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Measuring Justice
  • Online ISBN: 9780511810916
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810916
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Anderson, E. 1999. “What is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109: 287–337.
Arneson, R. 1990. “Primary Goods Reconsidered,” Nous 24, 3: 429–54.
Arneson, R. 1998. “Real Freedom and Distributive Justice,” in Laslier, J.-F., Fleurbaey, M., Gravel, N., and Trannoy, A. (eds.), Freedom in Economics: New Perspectives in Normative Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 165–96.
Arneson, R. 2000. “Equal Opportunity for Welfare Defended and Recanted,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7: 488–97.
Arneson, R. 2003. “Equality, Coercion, Culture, and Social Norms,” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 2, 2: 139–63.
Arneson, R. 2006. “Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is Not Good Enough,” in Kaufman, A. (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 17–43.
Daniels, N. 2003. “Democratic Equality: Rawls's Complex Egalitarianism,” in Freeman, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–76.
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 1988. “Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Supplementary Volume), pp. 145–84.
Nussbaum, M. 1999. “Women and Cultural Universals,” in Nussbaum, M. (ed.), Sex and Social Justice. Oxford University Press, pp. 29–54.
Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (esp. chs. 1–3 and 5).
Parfit, D. 2000. “Equality or Priority?” in Clayton, M. and Williams, A. (eds.), The Ideal of Equality. New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press.
Pettit, P. 2001. “Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen,” Economics and Philosophy 17: 1–20.
Pogge, T. 2010. “A Critique of the Capability Approach,” in Brighouse, H. and Robegns, I. (eds.), Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. 1996 [1993]. Political Liberalism (Second Edition). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. 1999 [1971]. A Theory or Justice (Revised Edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scheffler, S. 2003. “What is Egalitarianism?Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 5–39.
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being,” in Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53.
Sen, A. 2002. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. and Nussbaum, M. C. 1990. “Aristotelian Social Democracy,” in Bruce Douglas, R., Mara, G. M., and Richardson, H. S. (eds.), Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–52.
Wolff, J. 1998. “Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27: 97–122.