Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Smith, Steven R. 2013. Citizenship and disability: incommensurable lives and well-being. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 403.

    Vorhaus, John Simon 2013. Capability, freedom and profound disability. Disability & Society, Vol. 28, Issue. 8, p. 1047.

    Talu, Valentina 2013. Qualità della vita urbana e approccio delle capacità. ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI, p. 52.

    Buzzelli, Cary A 2015. The capabilities approach: Rethinking agency, freedom, and capital in early education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 203.

    Hammell, Karen Whalley 2015. Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Vol. 62, Issue. 2, p. 78.

    Buzzelli, Cary A. 2015. Global Perspectives on Human Capital in Early Childhood Education. p. 215.

    Hoffmann, Anna Lauren 2016. Perspectives on Libraries as Institutions of Human Rights and Social Justice. Vol. 41, Issue. , p. 49.

    Robeyns, Ingrid 2016. Conceptualising well-being for autistic persons. Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 42, Issue. 6, p. 383.

    Smith, Andrew F. 2016. Food Deserts, Capabilities, and the Rectification of Democratic Failure. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 178.

    Hoffmann, Anna Lauren 2017. Beyond distributions and primary goods: Assessing applications of rawls in information science and technology literature since 1990. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 68, Issue. 7, p. 1601.

    Curtis, Claire P. 2017. Standards of Justice for Human Being and Doing in Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2312 and C. S. Friedman’s This Alien Shore. Open Library of Humanities, Vol. 3, Issue. 2,

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - What metric of justice for disabled people? Capability and disability

Summary

This chapter argues that a metric based on Sen's capability approach suggests a more promising, and to a certain extent, more just scheme, than one based on social primary goods. It is divided into two sections. In the first section, the chapter discusses the main elements of the primary goods metric in relation to disability. The second section outlines the capability metric and comparatively considers its merits over the "rival" approach. John Rawls broadly defines social primary goods as those "all-purpose means" and resources that free and equal moral persons need for "carrying out their plans in life". While disabilities caused by social factors receive attention under the social primary goods metric, those resulting from natural causes, such as "any combination of ordinary genetic variations, self-caused factors, and differential luck" are more problematic, and give rise to different and more controversial responses.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Measuring Justice
  • Online ISBN: 9780511810916
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810916
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, E. 1999. “What is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109: 287–337.
Berges, S. 2007. “Why the Capability Approach is Justified,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 24, 1: 16–25.
Brighouse, H. 2001. “Can Justice as Fairness Accommodate the Disabled?Social Theory and Practice 27, 4: 537–60.
Buchanan, A. 1990. “Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19, 3: 227–52.
Buchanan, A.et al. 2000. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N. 1985. Just Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N. 2003. “Democratic Equality: Rawls's Complex Egalitarianism,” in Freeman, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–76.
French, S. 1993. “Disability, Impairment or Something in Between?” in Swain, J., Finkelstein, V., French, S., and Oliver, M. (eds.), Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 17–25.
Jacobs, L. A. 2004. Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Kittay, E. F. 1999. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kittay, E. F. 2005. “At the Margins of Moral Personhood,” Ethics 116, 1: 100–31.
McMahan, J. 2005. “Causing Disabled People to Exist and Causing Disabled People to be Disabled,” Ethics 116, 1: 77–99.
Morris, J. 1991. Pride against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. London: The Women's Press.
Nagel, T. 2002, Concealment and Exposure and Other Essays. Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Pogge, T. 2010. “A Critique of the Capabilities Approach,” in Brighouse, H. and Robeyns, I. (eds.), Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge University Press.
Qizilbash, M. 2006. “Disability and Human Development.” Paper read at the 2006 International HDCA Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands, 29 August–1 September 2006, available at www.hdca.org. Consulted December 2007.
Rawls, J. 1982. “Social Unity and Primary Goods,” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–85.
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice (Revised Edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Richardson, H. S. 2006. “Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the Severely Disabled,” Journal of Ethics 10: 419–62.
Richardson, H. S. 2007. “The Social Background of Capabilities for freedoms,” Journal of Human Development 8: 389–414.
Sen, A. 1980. “Equality of What?” in McMurrin, S. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press and Cambridge University Press, pp. 196–220.
Sen, A. 1984. Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. 2002. “Response to Commentaries,” Studies in International Comparative Development 27, 2: 78–86.
Sen, A. 2004a. “Capabilities, Lists and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation,” Feminist Economics 10, 3: 77–80.
Sen, A. 2004b. “Disability and Justice.” Keynote speech, Second International Disability Conference, World Bank.
Shakespeare, T. 1997. “Cultural Representation of Disabled People: Dustbins of Disavowal?” in Barton, L. and Oliver, M. (eds.), Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future. Leeds: Disability Press.
Silvers, A., 1998. “Formal Justice,” in Silvers, A., Wasserman, D., and Mahowald, M. B. (eds.), Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Silvers, A. and Francis, L. 2005. “Justice through Trust: Disability and the ‘Outlier Problem’ in Social Contract Theory,” Ethics, 116, 1: 40–76.
Stark, C. 2007. “How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice,” Journal of Political Philosophy 15, 2: 127–45.
Terzi, L. 2004. “The Social Model of Disability: A Philosophical Critique,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21, 2: 141–57.
Terzi, L. 2005. “A Capability Perspective on Impairment, Disability and Special Educational Needs: Towards Social Justice in Education,” Theory and Research in Education 3, 2: 197–223.
Terzi, L. 2008. Justice and Equality in Education: A Capability Perspective on Disability and Special Educational Needs. London and New York: Continuum.
Terzi, L. 2009. “Vagaries of the Natural Lottery? Human Diversity, Disability and Justice: A Capability Perspective,” in Brownlee, K. and Cureton, A. (eds.), Disability and Disadvantage: Re-Examining Issues in Moral and Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Unterhalter, E. and Brighouse, H. 2007. “Distribution of What for Social Justice in Education? The Case of Education for All by 2015,” in Walker, M. and Unterhalter, E. (eds.), Amartya Sen's Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.