Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: December 2017

7 - New Insights into Food Safety Research Teams

Export citation
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Measuring the Economic Value of Research
  • Online ISBN: 9781316671788
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671788
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
[1]Owen-Smith, J., in Big Data and Social Science, Foster, I., Ghani, R., Jarmin, R., Kreuter, F., Lane, J., eds. (Taylor & Francis, 2016).
[2]Weinberg, B. A. et al., Science Funding and Short-Term Economic Activity. Science 344, 41–43 (2014).
[3]Buffington, C., Harris, B. C., Jones, C., Weinberg, B. A., STEM Training and Early Career Outcomes of Female and Male Graduate Students: Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census. Am. Eco. Rev. 106 (5), 333–338. (2016).
[4]Pezzoni, M., Mairesse, J., Stephan, P., Lane, J., Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study. PLoS One 11, e0145146 (2016).
[5]Lorsch, J. R., Maximizing the Return on Taxpayers’ Investments in Fundamental Biomedical Research. Mol. Biol. Cell. 26, 1578–1582 (2015).
[6]Berg, J., Estimated Publication Outputs as a Function of Number of R01 Grants per PI. Datahound Blog (2015), available at http://datahound.scientopia.
[7]Chang, W., Chen, W., Jones, C., Lane, J., Weinberg, B., “Federal Funding of Doctoral Recipients Results from New Linked Survey and Transaction Data.” No. w23019. National Bureau of Economic Research (2017).
[8]Saxenian, A., Regional Networks: Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994).
[9]Hwang, K., International Collaboration in Multilayered Center-Periphery in the Globalization of Science and Technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 33 (1), 101–133 (2008).
[10]Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., Siverstsen, G., Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values. 17, 101–126 (1992).
[11]Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., Uzzi, B., The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Plant Cell. 316, 2005–2008 (2007).
[12]O’Brien, T. L., Change in Academic Coauthorship, 1953–2003. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values. 37, 210–234 (2012).
[13]Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Stephan, P. E., Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy. 34, 259–285 (2005).
[14]Fernandez, J. A., The Transition from an Individual Science to a Collective One: The Case of Astronomy. Scientometrics. 42, 61–74 (1998).
[15]Lee, W. M., Publication Trends of Doctoral Students in Three Fields from 1965–1995. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 51, 139–144 (2000).
[16]Newman, M. E. J., Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 Suppl., 5200–5205 (2004).
[17]Freeman, R. B., Ganguli, I., Murciano-Goroff, R., Why and Wherefore of Increased Scientific Collaboration. The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy 17 (2015).
[18]Parker, J., Penders, B., Vermeulen, N., Collaboration in the New Life Sciences (Routledge, 2016).
[19]Hudson, J., Trends in Multi-authored Papers in Economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 10, 153–158 (1996).
[20]Milojević, S., Principles of Scientific Research Team Formation and Evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 3984–3989 (2014).
[21]Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., Holden, T., The How and Why of Academic Collaboration: Disciplinary Differences and Policy Implications. High. Educ. 64, 693–708 (2012).
[22]Leahey, E., From Sole Investigator to Team Scientist: Trends in the Practice and Study of Research Collaboration. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42, 81–100 (2016).
[23]Araujo, E. B., Moreira, A. A., Furtado, V., Pequeno, T. H. C., Andrade, J. S., Collaboration Networks from a Large CV Database: Dynamics, Topology and Bonus Impact. PLoS One 9, 1–7 (2014).
[24]Bozeman, B., Corley, E., Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Res. Policy. 33, 599–616 (2004).
[25]Boardmana, P. C., Corley, E. A., University Research Centers and the Composition of Research Collaborations. Res. Policy. 37, 900–913 (2008).
[26]Melin, G., Pragmatism and Self-Organization. Res. Policy. 29, 31–40 (2000).
[27]Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A., Ties That Last: Tie Formation and Persistence in Research Collaborations over Time. Adm. Sci. Q. 58, 69–110 (2013).
[28]Binz-Scharf, M., Kalish, Y., Paik, L., Making Science New Generations of Collaborative Knowledge Production. Am. Behav. Sci. 59 (5), 531–547. (2015).
[29]Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R., What Is Research Collaboration? Res. Policy. 26, 1–18 (1997).
[30]Bikard, M. A., Murray, F. E., Gans, J. S., Exploring Tradeoffs in the Organization of Scientific Work: Collaboration and Scientific Reward. Manage. Sci. 61, 1473–1495 (2015).
[31]Clark, B. Y., Llorens, J. J., Investments in Scientific Research: Examining the Funding Threshold Effects on Scientific Collaboration and Variation by Academic Discipline. Policy Stud. J. 40, 698–729 (2012).
[32]Cummings, J. N., Kiesler, S., Coordination Costs and Project Outcomes in Multi-University Collaborations. Res. Policy. 36, 1620–1634 (2007).
[33]Rawlings, C. M., McFarland, D. A., Dahlander, L., Wang, D., Streams of Thought: Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Cohesion in a Multidisciplinary Era. Soc. Forces. 93, 1687–1722 (2015).
[34]de Solla Price, D. J., Little Science, Big Science, and Beyond (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).
[35]Evans, J. A., Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. Science 321, 395–399 (2008).
[36]Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., Uzzi, B., Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science. Science. 322, 1259–1262 (2008).
[37]Boh, W. F., Ren, Y., Kiesler, S., Bussjaeger, R., Expertise and Collaboration in the Geographically Dispersed Organization. Organ. Sci. 18, 595–612 (2007).
[38]Wray, K. B., Rethinking Scientific Specialization. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35, 151–164 (2005).
[39]Bennett, M. L., Gadlin, H., Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice. J. Investig. Med. 60, 768–775 (2012).
[40]Hackman, J. R., Why Teams Don’t Work, in Theory and Research on Small Groups, Tindale, R. S. et al., eds., pp. 245–267 (New York: Plenum, 1998)
[41]Hackman, J. R., Collaborative Intelligence: Using Teams to Solve Hard Problems (Berrett-Koehler, 2011).
[42]Leahey, E., Moody, J., Sociological Innovation through Subfield Integration. Soc. Curr. 1, 228–256 (2014).
[43]Leahey, E., Beckman, C. M., Stanko, T. L., Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 62 (1), 105–139 (2017)..
[44]Larivière, V., Haustein, S., Börner, K., Long-Distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact. PLoS One 10, 1–15 (2015).
[45]Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., Jones, B., Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact. Science 342, 468–472 (2013).
[46]Walsh, J. P., Maloney, N. G., Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams. J. Comput. Commun. 12, 378–398 (2007).
[47]Cummings, J. N., Kiesler, S., Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35, 703–722 (2005).
[48]Rhoten, D., Parker, A., Education: Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path. Science (80-. ) 306, 2046 (2004).
[49]Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., The Ecology of Team Science: Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration. Am. J. Prev. Med. 305 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
[50]Stember, M., Advancing the Social Sciences through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise. Soc. Sci. J. 28, 1–14 (1991).
[51]Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., Moser, R. P., The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002.
[52]Weingart, P., Stehr, N., eds., Practising Interdisciplinarity (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000).
[53]Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. et al., Mapping a Research Agenda for the Science of Team Science. Res. Eval. 20, 145–158 (2011).
[54]Aboelela, S. W., Merrill, J., Carley, K. M., Larson, E., Social Network Analysis to Evaluate an Interdisciplinary Research Center. J. Res. Adm. 38, 61–79 (2007).
[55]Haines, V. A., Godley, J., Hawe, P., Understanding Interdisciplinary Collaborations as Social Networks. Am. J. Community Psychol. 47, 1–11 (2011).
[56]Fiore, S. M., Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork: How the Science of Teams Can Inform Team Science. Small Gr. Res. 39, 251–277 (2008).
[57]Keyton, J., Ford, D. J., Smith, F. L., A Mesolevel Communicative Model of Collaboration. Commun. Theory. 18, 376–406 (2008).
[58]Börner, K. et al., A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science. Sci. Transl. Med. 2 (2010), doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.A.
[59]Borrego, M., Newswander, L., Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes. Rev. High. Educ. 34, 61–84 (2010).
[60]Mitrany, M., Gauging the Transdisciplinary Qualities and Outcomes of Doctoral Training Programs. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 24, 437–449 (2005).
[61]Nash, J. M., Transdisciplinary Training: Key Components and Prerequisites for Success. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35 (2008), doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.004.
[62]Granovetter, M., Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 481–510 (1985).
[63]Uzzi, B., Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 35–67 (1997).
[64]Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W. W., Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organ. Sci. 15, 5–21 (2004).
[65]Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., Mallapragada, G., Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems. Manage. Sci. 52, 1043–1056 (2006).
[66]Singh, P. V., Tan, Y., Mookerjee, V., Network Effects: The Influence of Structural Capital on Open Source Project Success. MIS Q. 35, 813–829 (2011).
[67]Sabidussi, G., The Centrality of a Graph. Psychometrika. 31, 581–603 (1966).
[68]Burt, R. S., Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, 2009).
[69]Freeman, L. C., A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977).
[70]Anthonissen, J. M., The Rush in a Directed Graph (Amsterdam: SMC, 1971).
[71]Wasserman, S., Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. (Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
[72]Stvilia, B. et al., Composition of Scientific Teams and Publication Productivity at a National Science Lab. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62, 270–283 (2011).
Cancel
Confirm
×