Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: September 2009

14 - An educational/psychological perspective on the behaviors of three children with reading disabilities

Export citation
Summary

Overview: From an educational perspective, deriving meaning from text is paramount, and all other reading processes subserve this goal. Torgesen suggests that dyslexia be described at two levels that reflect this fact – the primary level of cognitive and neurophysiological deficits and the secondary level of behavioral and comprehension deficits that are associated with, but not necessarily caused by, neurological conditions. He shows how these two levels work with the four boys whom he was asked to analyze. In the end, while primary deficits will manifest in timed measures, phonological problems, and other reading-related subskills, secondary deficits seem to matter more in educational contexts. Children often build skills that work around their primary deficits so that they have virtually no secondary deficits. Analyzing brain–behavior correlations and their relations to educational functioning requires distinguishing these two levels of reading disorder.

The Editors

In this essay, I will discuss the behaviors of four children performing several reading and non-reading tasks from an educational/psychological perspective. I would like to begin with the simple observation that it is easy for researchers like myself to lose sight of the full individuality of children with reading disabilities when we spend most of our time thinking about the children only in terms of patterns of scores on a narrowly selected set of tests. Although William, Brian, and Andrew were all similar because they had experienced difficulties in learning to read to varying degrees, they each have complex personalities and response styles that are uniquely their own.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Mind, Brain, and Education in Reading Disorders
  • Online ISBN: 9780511489952
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489952
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
References
Adams, M. J. & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 113–39.
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In Metsala, J. & Ehri, L. (eds). Word recognition in beginning reading, 3–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E. & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low acheivement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.
Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 1–23.
Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Seteinbach, K. A. & DePalma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263–83.
Meyer, M. S. & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Share, D. L. & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: A model of acquisition and individual differences. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–57.
Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–79.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988) Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604.
Torgesen, J. K. (1993). Variations on theory in learning disabilities. In Lyon, R., Gray, D., Krasnegor, N., and Kavenagh, J. (eds), Better understanding learning disabilities: Perspectives on classification, identification, and assessment and their implications for education and policy. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
Torgesen, J. K. (1999). Phonologically based reading disabilities: Toward a coherent theory of one kind of learning disability. In Sternberg, R. J. & Spear-Swerling, L. (eds), Perspectives on learning disabilities, 231–62. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (eds), The science of reading: A handbook. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K., Conway, T. & Rose, E. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A. & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In Wolf, M. (ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Publishing, Inc.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Wenger, J. (1980). Behaviors involved in the performance of the coding subtest of the WISC-R. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Wise, B. W., Ring, J. & Olson, R. K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271–304.
Wolf, M. & Bowers, P. (1999). The “Double-Deficit Hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.
Wolf, M. & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–39.
Cancel
Confirm
×