Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Perry-Hazan, Lotem 2015. Curricular choices of ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities: translating international human rights law into education policy. Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 41, Issue. 5, p. 628.

    Weinstock, Daniel M. 2010. Can thinking about justice in health help us in thinking about justice in education?. School Field, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    Enslin, Penny and Tjiattas, Mary 2006. Educating for a just world without gender. School Field, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    Nichols, Robert Lee 2006. ‘Struggling with Language’. Ethnicities, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 27.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: September 2009

10 - Minors within minorities: a problem for liberal multiculturalists

Summary

Liberal multiculturalists seek to base the extension of group rights and accommodations to ethnocultural minorities on the claim that it is the interests of individuals and not groups themselves that warrant such rights and accommodations. Individual freedom and flourishing, liberal multiculturalists argue, is only possible within a cultural context. Traditional liberal policies of individual rights ought therefore to be supplemented with multicultural policies of group rights and accommodations that will promote individual freedom and flourishing. There is now a wide body of literature on the appropriate kind of group rights and accommodations for different circumstances and for different kinds of minority groups.

But the extension of group rights and accommodations to ethnocultural minorities within a liberal state leads to a clear tension. When the state seeks through collective rights to improve the status of minority groups and their members with respect to the larger society, it can also undermine the status of the weaker members within the group. Susan Moller Okin criticizes multiculturalism for this reason, arguing that group rights often reinforce the subordination of women within groups (Okin 1998; 1999a). And Ayelet Shachar, more sympathetic to the multicultural project, nevertheless finds that multicultural accommodations can reinforce power dynamics that render the most disadvantaged group members, especially women, even more vulnerable. She labels this the “paradox of multicultural vulnerability” (Shachar 2000a; 2001). Each is concerned to ensure that attempts to secure justice for minority groups do not undermine the already vulnerable position of women within such groups.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Minorities within Minorities
  • Online ISBN: 9780511490224
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490224
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×