Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:23:15.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

39 - DNA-damage-induced apoptosis

from Part 2.5 - Molecular pathways underlying carcinogenesis: cell cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Shun J. Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Benjamin F. O’Connor
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Scott A. Stuart
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Jean Y. J. Wang
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Overview

Regulation of DNA-damage-induced apoptosis is important to oncology in two ways. First, the majority of carcinogens are genotoxins that cause DNA damage and the apoptotic response to carcinogens is an important tumor-suppression mechanism. Second, a number of mainstay cancer therapeutic agents are genotoxins and their efficacies can be influenced by the robustness of DNA-damage-induced apoptosis in tumor cells. This chapter focuses on a network of nuclear factors involved in the transmission of DNA-damage signals to the intrinsic apoptotic machinery. These nuclear factors include DNA-damage sensors, the PIKK-family of protein kinases that these sensors activate, and three downstream nuclear effectors, p53, Abl, and caspase-2 (Figure 39.1). We have chosen to focus on this collection of nuclear factors, which represent only a subset of the DNA-damage signaling pathways, to illustrate two major points: (i) DNA-damage-induced apoptosis is regulated by nuclear proteins that also regulate DNA repair and (ii) DNA damage signals can be independently transmitted by several downstream effectors, i.e. p53, Abl, and caspase-2, to activate intrinsic apoptosis.

DNA damage does not always activate apoptosis

The concept of a linear, hard-wired signaling pathway that links lesions in genomic DNA to the apoptosis machinery would predict that DNA damage should always lead to cell killing, but this is not the case. In cells that undergo DNA-damage-induced apoptosis, death is invariably a delayed response requiring hours of deliberation. Generally speaking, delayed responses to biological perturbations are those that involve the reprogramming of gene expression, which, by nature of the transcription and translation processes, requires time. As the reprogramming of gene expression is under the hierarchical control of a multitude of genetic and epigenetic factors, activation of DNA-damage-induced apoptotic response is highly dependent on the lineage and the developmental stage of a cell. In addition to apoptosis, DNA-damaged cells can choose to undergo premature senescence or adaptation, where cells resume proliferation despite the persistence of DNA lesions. The choice a cell makes among these delayed responses to DNA damage is determined by how a cell reprograms its gene expression.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 465 - 472
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alano, CC, Ying, W, Swanson, RA. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-mediated cell death in astrocytes requires NAD+ depletion and mitochondrial permeability transition. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004;279: 18 895–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinovic-Terzic, I, Yoshioka-Yamashita, A, Shimodaira, H, et al. Apoptotic function of human PMS2 compromised by the nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphic variant R20Q. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2008;105:13 993–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, AG, Urbano, AG. Does apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) have both life and death functions in cells? Bioessays 2006;28:834–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, SJ, Dawson, TM, Dawson, VL. Nuclear and mitochondrial conversations in cell death: PARP-1 and AIF signaling. Trends in Pharmacological Science 2004;25:259–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, HE, Schultz, N, Thomas, HD, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 2005;434:913–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borges, HL, Hunton, IC, Wang, JY. Reduction of apoptosis in Rb-deficient embryos via Abl knockout. Oncogene 2007;26:3868–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stojic, L, Brun, R, Jiricny, J. Mismatch repair and DNA damage signalling. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 2004;3:1091–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haince, JF, Kozlov, S, Dawson, VL, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling network is modulated by a novel poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent pathway in the early response to DNA-damaging agents. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2007;282:16 441–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stracker, TH, Couto, SS, Cordon-Cardo, C, Matos, T, Petrini, JH. Chk2 suppresses the oncogenic potential of DNA replication-associated DNA damage. Molecular Cell 2008;31:21–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, RS, Williams, JS, Tainer, JA. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template. Biochemistry and Cell Biology 2007; 85:509–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morio, T, Kim, H. Ku, Artemis, and ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated: signalling networks in DNA damage. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 2008;40:598– 603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abe, T, Ishiai, M, Hosono, Y, et al. KU70/80, DNA-PKcs, and Artemis are essential for the rapid induction of apoptosis after massive DSB formation. Cell Signal 2008;20:1978–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiloh, Y.ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nature Reviews Cancer 2003;3:155– 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brumbaugh, KM, Otterness, DM, Geisen, C, et al. The mRNA surveillance protein hSMG-1 functions in genotoxic stress response pathways in mammalian cells. Molecular Cell 2004;14:585–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosma, GC, Custer, RP, Bosma, MJ. A severe combined immunodeficiency mutation in the mouse. Nature 1983; 301:527–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, C, Hirotsune, S, Paylor, R, et al. Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 1996;86:159–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, Y, Chaudhuri, J, Zhu, C, et al. A targeted DNA-PKcs-null mutation reveals DNA-PK-independent functions for KU in V(D)J recombination. Immunity 1998;9:367–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, EJ, Baltimore, D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes and Development 2000;14:397–402.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsuoka, S, Ballif, BA, Smogorzewska, A, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007;316:1160–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toledo, F, Wahl, GM. Regulating the p53 pathway: in vitro hypotheses, in vivo veritas. Nature Reviews Cancer 2006;6:909–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, T, Sontag, E, Chen, P, Levine, A. Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2008;9:402–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffers, JR, Parganas, E, Lee, Y, et al. Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways. Cancer Cell 2003;4:321–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villunger, A, Michalak, EM, Coultas, L, et al. p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins puma and noxa. Science 2003;302:1036–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youle, RJ, Strasser, A. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2008;9:47–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vousden, KH, Lane, DP. p53 in health and disease. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2007;8:275–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donehower, LA, Harvey, M, Slagle, BL, et al. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature 1992;356:215–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whibley, C, Pharoah, PD, Hollstein, M. p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications. Nature Reviews Cancer 2009;9:95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigneri, P, Wang, JY. Induction of apoptosis in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells through nuclear entrapment of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. Nature Medicine 2001;7:228–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshida, K, Yamaguchi, T, Natsume, T, Kufe, D, Miki, Y. JNK phosphorylation of 14-3-3 proteins regulates nuclear targeting of c-Abl in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. Nature Cell Biology 2005;7:278–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preyer, M, Shu, CW, Wang, JY. Delayed activation of Bax by DNA damage in embryonic stem cells with knock-in mutations of the Abl nuclear localization signals. Cell Death and Differentiation 2007;14:1139–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskaran, R, Wood, LD, Whitaker, LL, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutant protein activates c-Abl tyrosine kinase in response to ionizing radiation. Nature 1997;387:516–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafman, T, Khanna, KK, Kedar, P, et al. Interaction between ATM protein and c-Abl in response to DNA damage. Nature 1997;387:520–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sridevi, P, Nhiayi, MK, Wang, JY. Genetic disruption of Abl nuclear import reduces apoptosis in a mouse model of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Cell Death and Differentiation 20013;20:953–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, SS, Milne, DM, Meek, DW. c-Abl phosphorylates Hdm2 at tyrosine 276 in response to DNA damage and regulates interaction with ARF. Oncogene 2006;25:6666–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, V, Lenos, K, Popowicz, GM, et al. c-Abl phosphorylates Hdmx and regulates its interaction with p53. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2009;284:4031–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agami, R, Blandino, G, Oren, M, Shaul, Y. Interaction of c-Abl and p73alpha and their collaboration to induce apoptosis. Nature 1999;399:809–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gong, JG, Costanzo, A, Yang, HQ, et al. The tyrosine kinase c-Abl regulates p73 in apoptotic response to cisplatin-induced DNA damage. Nature 1999;399:806–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vella, V, Zhu, J, Frasca, F, et al. Exclusion of c-Abl from the nucleus restrains the p73 tumor suppression function. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003;278:25 151–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantovani, F, Piazza, S, Gostissa, M, et al. Pin1 links the activities of c-Abl and p300 in regulating p73 function. Molecular Cell 2004;14:625–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, D, Adamovich, Y, Reuven, N, Shaul, Y. Yap1 phosphorylation by c-Abl is a critical step in selective activation of proapoptotic genes in response to DNA damage. Molecular Cell 2008;29:350–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baskaran, R, Wood, LD, Whitaker, LL, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutant protein activates c-Abl tyrosine kinase in response to ionizing radiation. Nature 1997;387:516–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, ZG, Baskaran, R, Lea-Chou, ET, et al. Three distinct signalling responses by murine fibroblasts to genotoxic stress. Nature 1996;384:273–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egloff, S, Murphy, S. Cracking the RNA polymerase II CTD code. Trends in Genetics 2008;24:280–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L, Miura, M, Bergeron, L, Zhu, H, Yuan, J. Ich-1, an Ice/ced-3-related gene, encodes both positive and negative regulators of programmed cell death. Cell 1994;78:739–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergeron, L, Perez, GI, Macdonald, G, et al. Defects in regulation of apoptosis in caspase-2-deficient mice. Genes and Development 1998;12:1304–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nutt, LK, Margolis, SS, Jensen, M, et al. Metabolic regulation of oocyte cell death through the CaMKII-mediated phosphorylation of caspase-2. Cell 2005;123:89–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nutt, LK, Buchakjian, MR, Gan, E, et al. Metabolic control of oocyte apoptosis mediated by 14–3–3 zeta-regulated dephosphorylation of caspase-2. Developmental Cell 2009;16:856–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinel, A, Tschopp, J. The PIDDosome, a protein complex implicated in activation of caspase-2 in response to genotoxic stress. Science 2004;304:843–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassus, P, Opitz-Araya, X, Lazebnik, Y. Requirement for caspase-2 in stress-induced apoptosis before mitochondrial permeabilization. Science 2002;297:1352–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidi, S, Sanda, T, Kennedy, RD, et al. Chk1 suppresses a caspase-2 apoptotic response to DNA damage that bypasses p53, Bcl-2, and caspase-3. Cell 2008;133: 864–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, TG, Meylan, E, Chang, GP, et al. Caspase-2 mediated cleavage of Mdm2 creates a p53-induced positive feedback loop. Molecular Cell 2011;43:57–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, White, DL, Takai, S, et al. Apoptosis regulatory gene NEDD2 maps to human chromosome segment 7q34–35, a region frequently affected in haematological neoplasms. Human Genetics 1995;95: 641–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holleman, A, den Boer, ML, Kazemier, KM, et al. Decreased PARP and procaspase-2 protein levels are associated with cellular drug resistance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2005;106:1817–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • DNA-damage-induced apoptosis
    • By Shun J. Lee, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Benjamin F. O’Connor, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Scott A. Stuart, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Jean Y. J. Wang, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Edited by Edward P. Gelmann, Columbia University, New York, Charles L. Sawyers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, Frank J. Rauscher, III
  • Book: Molecular Oncology
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046947.040
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • DNA-damage-induced apoptosis
    • By Shun J. Lee, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Benjamin F. O’Connor, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Scott A. Stuart, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Jean Y. J. Wang, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Edited by Edward P. Gelmann, Columbia University, New York, Charles L. Sawyers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, Frank J. Rauscher, III
  • Book: Molecular Oncology
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046947.040
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • DNA-damage-induced apoptosis
    • By Shun J. Lee, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Benjamin F. O’Connor, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Scott A. Stuart, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, Jean Y. J. Wang, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Edited by Edward P. Gelmann, Columbia University, New York, Charles L. Sawyers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, Frank J. Rauscher, III
  • Book: Molecular Oncology
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046947.040
Available formats
×