Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Crump, Larry and Druckman, Daniel 2016. Turning Points and International Environments: Multilateral Negotiations in the GATT and the WTO. International Negotiation, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Crump, Larry and Druckman, Daniel 2012. Turning Points in Multilateral Trade Negotiations on Intellectual Property 1. International Negotiation, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 9.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: September 2009

2 - The evolution of national interests: new issues and North–South negotiations during the Uruguay Round

Summary

Are developing countries marginalized in the formation of global rules governing new issues such as services and intellectual property rights? This chapter shows that developing countries gave up fewer concessions in the 1994 services agreement than in the intellectual property agreement, both resulting from the Uruguay Round. The gains developing countries make in ‘high-tech’ issue-areas have been examined before. Other studies show developing country gains for a host of issue-areas, high-tech and otherwise. These studies stand in contrast to evidence documenting the inability of developing countries to understand or negotiate these new issues, or trading off their acquiescence in these issues in return for concessions in old issues.

A question then arises: Why do developing countries make fewer concessions or gain more in some new issue-areas than in others? This chapter provides a structured focused comparison to explain the difference in outcomes for two Uruguay Round (1986–94) agreements: the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Services (TRIPS). Developing countries made fewer concessions to the North in the former case than the latter.

The outcomes present contrasts with respect to each other as well as to the way the Round started. GATS allowed developing countries to walk with an agreement, allowing specific and tailored commitments across multiple issue-areas, that did not ask them to make concessions too far beyond their domestic liberalization schedules.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Negotiating Trade
  • Online ISBN: 9780511491610
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491610
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×