Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: December 2009

14 - Postmortem imaging

from Section III - Solving clinical problems and interpretation of test results
    • By Cornelia Hagmann, Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals London UK, Nicola J. Robertson, Senior Lecturer in Neonatology and Honorary Consultant Neonatologist, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK, Janet M. Rennie, Consultant and Senior Lecturer in Neonatal Medicine, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
  • Edited by Janet M. Rennie, University College London, Cornelia F. Hagmann, University College London, Nicola J. Robertson, University College London
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544750.016
  • pp 281-283

Summary

Introduction to the clinical problem

Establishing the cause of perinatal death has a particularly valuable role in the counseling of the parents after a loss of a baby. Assigning a cause of death can help parents in the grieving process, improve parental and professional understanding, and address any concerns they may have that prenatal events such as maternal illness or maternal use of medication might have contributed to the death of their baby [1,2,3,4]. After termination, confirmation of the prenatal diagnosis is vitally important information when counseling for future pregnancies.

Despite the recognized value of autopsy, perinatal autopsy rates have declined significantly in recent years [2,3,5]. Studies in both Europe and the United States indicate that as many as 40% of all perinatal deaths are not submitted for autopsy [6,7,8]. There is no obvious single explanation for the decline in autopsy rates but possible influences include a shift in attitude of clinicians towards autopsies and a change in the public's willingness to grant permission [3].

This decline in consent for autopsy leads to a reduction in the information available to parents about the risk for future pregnancies. The Chief Medical Officer of the United Kingdom issued two reports in 2000 and 2001 [9,10] recommending the assessment of less invasive forms of postmortem examination. After wide consultation with interested parties and faith groups, Alistair Parker produced a document (on behalf of the Department of Health) entitled Less Invasive Autopsy: The Place of MR Imaging in 2004 [11].

References
Wright, C, Lee, RE. Investigating perinatal death: a review of the options when autopsy consent is refused. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (4): F285–8.
Kumar, P, Angst, DB, Taxy, J, Mangurten, HH. Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154 (1): 38–42.
Brodlie, M, Laing, IA, Keeling, JW, McKenzie, KJ. Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. Br Med J 2002; 324 (7340): 761–3.
Laing, IA. Clinical aspects of neonatal death and autopsy. Semin Neonatol 2004; 9 (4): 247–54.
Okah, FA. The autopsy: experience of a regional neonatal intensive care unit. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002; 16 (4): 350–4.
Craven, CM, Dempsey, S, Carey, JC, Kochenour, NK. Evaluation of a perinatal autopsy protocol: influence of the Prenatal Diagnosis Conference Team. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76 (4): 684–8.
Cartlidge, PH, Dawson, AT, Stewart, JH, Vujanic, GM. Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. Br Med J 1995; 310 (6973): 155–8.
Saller, DN Jr, Lesser, KB, Harrel, U, Rogers, BB, Oyer, CE. The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273 (8): 663–5.
Chief Medical Officer. Report of a consensus of organs and tissues retained by pathology services in England. London, Stationery Office, 2000.
Chief Medical Officer. The removal, retention and use of human organs and tissues from post mortem examination. London, Stationery Office, 2001.
Parker. A. Less invasive autopsy: the place of magnetic resonance imaging. February, 2004. www.dh.gov.uk.
Roberts, IS, Benbow, EW, Bisset, Ret al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy. Histopathology 2003; 42 (5): 424–30.
Ros, PR, Li, KC, Vo, P, Baer, H, Staab, EV. Preautopsy magnetic resonance imaging: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8 (3): 303–8.
Brookes, JA, Hall-Craggs, MA, Sams, VR, Lees, WR. Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1996; 348 (9035): 1139–41.
Woodward, PJ, Sohaey, R, Harris, DPet al. Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168 (1): 41–6.
Huisman, TA, Wisser, J, Stallmach, T, Krestin, GP, Huch, R, Kubik-Huch, RA. MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002; 17 (1): 58–64.
Alderliesten, ME, Peringa, J, Hulst, VP, Blaauwgeers, HL, Lith, JM. Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110 (4): 378–82.
Griffiths, PD, Variend, D, Evans, Met al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24 (1): 22–7.
Brookes, JA, Deng, J, Wilkinson, ID, Lees, WR. Three-dimensional imaging of the postmortem fetus by MRI: early experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999; 14 (3): 166–71.
Razavi, RS, Hill, DL, Muthurangu, Vet al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of congenital cardiac anomalies. Cardiol Young 2003; 13 (5): 461–5.
Hagmann, CF, Robertson, NJ, Sams, VR, Brookes, JA. Postmortem MRI as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal tract abnormalities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92 (3): F215–18.