Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T05:31:25.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Short-term memory and language comprehension: a critical review of the neuropsychological literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Giuseppe Vallar
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Tim Shallice
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Research on memory has provided considerable evidence for a verbal short-term memory (STM) system that is involved in memory tasks, such as span, free recall, probe recognition, and the Brown–Peterson paradigm, in which subjects must retain small amounts of linguistic information over brief periods of time. There is evidence that the representations in STM include phonological forms (Conrad, 1964) and that these representations are maintained in STM in part through a process that involves articulatory rehearsal (Baddeley, Thomson, & Buchanan, 1975). The specific character of the STM system is the subject of investigation and debate. One view (see Shallice & Vallar, chapter 1, and Baddeley, chapter 2, this volume) maintains that auditorily presented items are entered into a phonological store (PS) directly (Salame & Baddeley, 1982; Baddeley, Lewis, & Vallar, 1984; Greene & Crowder, 1984), while printed items are entered, at least in part, through a controlled process of subvocal rehearsal (Murray, 1968; Levy, 1971; Peterson & Johnson, 1971; Estes, 1973; Baddeley et al., 1984). There appears to be a progressive diminishing of the strength of the phonological representations in the phonological store over a period that has been variously estimated to last between 2 and 20 sec (Crowder & Morton, 1969; Wickelgren, 1969; Darwin, Turvey, & Crowder, 1972). However, the strength of these representations can be increased through the controlled use of articulatory rehearsal processes (the articulatory loop [AL]: Baddeley et al., 1984; Baddeley and Lewis, 1984).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×