Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-fzltz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-12T08:09:41.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Gynecologic Malignancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2025

Camran R. Nezhat
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Farr R. Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Surgery for Gynecology/Oncology, New York
Ceana Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Nisha Lakhi
Affiliation:
Richmond University Medical Center, New York
Azadeh Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Institute and Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, California
Get access

Summary

Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the early 1900s, traditional surgeons have met it with skepticism. However, after decades of modern advances in technology, including improved lens systems, cold light, fiber optics, and especially the development of video endoscopy by Dr. Camran Nezhat, combined with the pioneering work of the early gynecologic surgeons, minimally invasive video laparoscopy and robotics have made inroads into the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic oncology.[1,2] The first video laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy, was performed by the Nezhats in 1989 and reported in subsequent years.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Nezhat's Textbook of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Including Hysteroscopy, Vaginoscopy and Robotic-Assisted Procedures
, pp. 529 - 688
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Kelly, WE Jr. The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 2008;12:351357.Google Scholar
Nezhat, C, Hood, J, Winer, W, et al. Videolaseroscopy and laser laparoscopy in gynaecology. Br J Hosp Med 1987;38:219224.Google ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F. Videolaseroscopy for the treatment of upper, mid, and lower peritoneal cavity pathology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AAGL, November 1990.Google Scholar
Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Silfen S. Videolaseroscopy: the CO2 laser for advanced operative laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991;18(3):585604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CR, Burrell, MO, Nezhat, FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dargent, D, Salvat, J. Lienvahissement Ganglionnaire Pelvien. Paris: MEDSI; 1989.Google Scholar
Querleu, D, Leblan, E, Catelain, B. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CR, Nezhat, FR, Ramirez, CE, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, JM, Hatch, KD, Surwit, EA. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:741747.Google ScholarPubMed
Acholonu, UC, Chang-Jackson, SCR, Radjabi, AR, Nezhat, F. Laparoscopy for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: from experimental to standard of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:434442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, JL, Piedmonte, MR, Spirtos, NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009 Nov 10;27(32):53315336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, JL, Peidmonte, MR, Spirtos, NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 2012 Mar 1;30(7):695700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W, Chu, HJ, Shang, CL, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer: A matched cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016 Sep;26(7):12641273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, T, Feng, Y, Huang, Q, Wan, T, Liu, J. Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendoscopc Adv Surg Tech 2015;25(12):990998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nam, JH, Park, JY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: long term survival outcomes in matched cohort study. Ann Oncol 2012;23(4):903911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W, Chu, HJ, Shang, CL, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016 Sep;26(7):12641273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018 Nov 15;379(20):18951904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Ananth, CV, Vintzileos, AM. The two Achilles heels of surgical randomized controlled trials: differences in surgical skills and reporting of average performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019 Sep;221(3):230232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fader, AN. Surgery in cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:19551957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naumann, RW. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has many benefits compared with open radical hysterectomy: will the LACC trial cause the premature demise of this procedure? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019 Mar–Apr;26(3):379380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, C, Hertel, H, Herrmann, J, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff – a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019 Jun;29(5):845850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, S, McCann, CK, Boruta, DM, Schorge, JO, Growdon, WB. Laparoscopic surgical staging of early ovarian cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2011;4(3–4):117122.Google ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Ezzati, M, Chuang, L, et al. Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009 Jan;200(1):83.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagotti, A, Ferrandina, G, Fanfani, F, et al. A laparoscopy-based score to predict surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a pilot study. Annual Surg Oncolol 2006;13:11561161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Lavie, O. The role of minimally invasive surgery in ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:782783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, AA, Bohlke, K, Armstrong, D, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Gynecol Oncol 2016 Oct;143(1):315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaru, DP, Nezhat, C, Teng, NN, et al. Operative laparoscopy in the management of ovarian cancer. Surg Laparos Endosc 1996;6(1):3845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, FR, DeNoble, SM, Liu, CS, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging and debulking of apparent advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. JSLS 2010;14:155168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, DeNoble, SM, Cho, JE, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical debulking or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;16:511518.Google ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Khalil, S, Finger, T, Vetere, P. Combined conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy for staging and debulking of early, advanced and recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer: a hybrid technique. Gynecol Surg 2014 Feb;11(1):2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, TN, Nezhat, FR. Robotic-assisted fertility-sparing surgery for early ovarian cancer. JSLS 2014; 18(2):308313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Finger, TN, Vetere, P, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014 Mar;24(3):600607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuer, GA, Lakhi, N, Barker, J, Salmieri, S, Burrell, M. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. Gynecol Oncol 2013 Dec;131(3):520524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanning, J, Yacoub, E, Hojat, R. Laparoscopic-assisted cytoreduction for primary ovarian cancer: success, morbidity and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:4749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Pejovic, T, Finger, TN, Khalil, SS. Role of minimally invasive surgery in ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:754765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J, Drury, L, Crane, EK, et al. When less is more: minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2019;26(5):902909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackroyd, SA, Thomas, S, Angel, C, et al. Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. J Robotic Surg 2018;12:245250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Creasman, W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105:109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prat, J, FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;124:15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatla, N, Aoki, D, Sharma, DN, Sankaranarayanan, R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143(Suppl 2):22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dargent, D, Salvat, J. L’envahissement ganglionnaire pelvien: Place de la pelviscopie retroperitoneale. Paris: McGraw-Hill, Medsi; 1989.Google Scholar
Nezhat, C, Burrell, MO, Nezhat, F, Benigno, BB, Welander, CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with para-aortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:864865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Feijoo, B, Gil-Ibáñez, B, Pérez-Benavente, A, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2014;132:98101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibula, D, Abu-Rustum, NR. Anatomy of pelvic lymphadenectomy. Video at European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, e-Academy. https://eacademy.esgo.orgGoogle Scholar
Gardner, GJ, Tzitzimikas, S, Nezhat, F. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy. In Wetter, PA, Kavic, MS, Levinson, CJ, et al., eds. Prevention and Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications, 2nd ed. Society of Laparoendscopic Surgeons; 2005.Google Scholar
Clark, LE, Menderes, G, Tower, AM, Silasi, DA, Azodi, M. A simple approach to specimen retrieval via posterior colpotomy incision. JSLS 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):pii:e2015.00222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhgar, J, Terai, H, Suhrab Rahmani, M, et al. Anatomical location of the common iliac veins at the level of the sacrum: relationship between perforation risk and the trajectory angle of the screw. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:1457219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaney, MW, Calton, WC, North, JH Jr. The effects of preperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation on cardiopulmonary function in pigs. JSLS 1999;3:4955.Google ScholarPubMed
Díaz-Feijoo, B, Correa-Paris, A, Pérez-Benavente, A, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial and ovarian cancer: the STELLA Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:29662974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, JM, Backes, FJ. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers. UpToDate, 2019.Google Scholar
Barlin, JN, Khoury-Collado, F, Kim, CH, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:531535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beavis, AL, Salazar-Marioni, S, Sinno, AK, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection rates using indocyanine green in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016;143:302306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinno, AK, Fader, AN, Roche, KL, Giuntoli, RL 2nd, Tanner, EJ. A comparison of colorimetric versus fluorometric sentinel lymph node mapping during robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014;134:281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levenback, CF, Ali, S, Coleman, RL, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:37863791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lécuru, F, Mathevet, P, Querleu, D, et al. Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:16861691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, EC, Kowalski, LD, Scalici, J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:384392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Uterine Neoplasms Version 2.2019. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kim, CH, Soslow, RA, Park, KJ, et al. Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer staging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:964970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinno, AK, Varma, S, Tanner, EJ. Updates in sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic cancer. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 2018;7:2838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, GF, Guiliano, AE, Veronesi, U ; Consensus Conference Committee. Proceeding of the consensus conference of the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma or the breast April 19–22, 2001, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Breast J 2002;8:124138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibula, D, Abu-Rustum, NR, Dusek, L, et al. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:496501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plante, M, Stanleigh, J, Renaud, MC, et al. Isolated tumor cells identified by sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: does adjuvant treatment matter? Gynecol Oncol 2017;146:240246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torné, A, Pahisa, J, Vidal-Sicart, S, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided myometrial injection of radiotracer (TUMIR): a new method for sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;128:8894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solima, E, Martinelli, F, Ditto, A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node in endometrial cancer by using hysteroscopic injection of radiolabeled tracer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;126:419423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoury-Collado, F, St Clair, C, Abu-Rustum, NR. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: an update. Oncologist 2016;21:461466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiavone, MB, Zivanovic, O, Zhou, Q, et al. Survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:196202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soliman, PT, Westin, SN, Dioun, S, et al. A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017;146:234239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, RW, Abu-Rustum, NR, Backes, FJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol Oncol 2017;146:405415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballester, M, Dubernard, G, Lécuru, F, et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol 2011;12:469476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M, Plante, M, Lee, PS, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical and uterine cancers (FILM): a randomised, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:13941403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanconi, JV. New technologies for human cancer imaging. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:40124021.Google Scholar
Zeybek, B, Borahay, M, Kilic, GS. Overcoming the obstacles of visualization in robotically assisted abdominal cerclage using indocyanine green. J Robot Surg 2016;10:361364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, EC, Ivanova, A, Boggess, JF. Robotically assisted fluorescence-guided lymph node mapping with ICG for gynecologic malignancies: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:7882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR, Khoury-Collado, F, Gemignani, ML. Techniques of sentinel lymph node identification for early-stage cervical and uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(2 Suppl):S4450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariani, A, Dowdy, SC, Cliby, WA, et al. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, DL, Thompson, JF, Essner, R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group. Ann Surg 1999;230:453463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, GF, Giuliano, AE, Veronesi, U ; Consensus Conference Committee. Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19–22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 2002;94:25422551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoury-Collado, F, Glaser, GE, Zivanovic, O, et al. Improving sentinel lymph node detection rates in endometrial cancer: how many cases are needed? Gynecol Oncol 2009;115:453455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019 – December 17, 2018. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vieira, MA, Rendón, GJ, Munsell, M, et al. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:585589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:18951904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, A, Margul, DJ, Chen, L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:19051914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, F, Pan, L, Li, L, Li, D, Mo, L. Effects of a simulated CO2 pneumoperitoneum environment on the proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis of cervical cancer cells in vitro. Med Sci Monit 2014;20:24972503.Google ScholarPubMed
Volz, J, Köster, S, Spacek, Z, Paweletz, N. The influence of pneumoperitoneum used in laparoscopic surgery on an intraabdominal tumor growth. Cancer 1999;86:770774.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, TW, Chang, SJ, Piao, X, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016;42:7786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyraz, G, Karalok, A, Basaran, D, Turan, T. Vaginal closure with EndoGIA to prevent tumor spillage in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018 Jul 29;pii: S1553-4650(18)30363–7.Google Scholar
Altgassen, C, Hertel, H, Brandstädt, A, et al.; AGO Study Group. Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:29432951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lécuru, F, Mathevet, P, Querleu, D, et al. Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:16861691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwendinger, V, Müller-Holzner, E, Zeimet, AG, Marth, C. Sentinel node detection with the blue dye technique in early cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27:359362.Google ScholarPubMed
Marchiolè, P, Buénerd, A, Scoazec, JY, Dargent, D, Mathevet, P. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not accurate in predicting lymph node status for patients with cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:21542159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Boyle, JD, Coleman, RL, Bernstein, SG, et al. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping in cervix cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:238243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rob, L, Strnad, P, Robova, H, et al. Study of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98:281288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slama, J, Dundr, P, Dusek, L, et al. Sentinel lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancers and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:303306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bats, AS, Mathevet, P, Buenerd, A, et al. The sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter prospective SENTICOL study. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:413422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eiriksson, LR, Covens, A. Sentinel lymph node mapping in cervical cancer: the future? BJOG 2012;119:129133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cormier, B, Diaz, JP, Shih, K, et al. Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:275280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibula, D, McCluggage, WG. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept in cervical cancer: current limitations and unanswered questions. Gynecol Oncol 2018 Oct 11. pii: S0090–8258(18)31286–1.Google Scholar
Bats, AS, Buénerd, A, Querleu, D, et al. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:230235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slama, J, Dundr, P, Dusek, L, Cibula, D. High false negative rate of frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:384388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar, PF, Fader, AN, Rasool, N, Espalliat, LR. Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20:1268–1273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagotti, A, Boruta, DM 2nd, Scambia, G, et al. First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:353.e1-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moukarzel, LA, Sinno, AK, Fader, AN, Tanner, EJ. Comparing single-site and multiport robotic hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24:977983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudry, D, Cannone, F, Houvenaeghel, G, et al. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc 2013;27:43194324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, JL, Piedmonte, MR, Spirtos, NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:53315336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childers, JM, Lang, J, Surwit, EA, Hatch, KD. Laparoscopic surgical staging of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C, Childers, J, Nezhat, F, Nezhat, CH, Seidman, DS. Major retroperitoneal vascular injury during laparoscopic surgery. Human Reprod 1997;7(1):5659.Google Scholar
Bristow, RE. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy. In Cundiff, GW, Azziz, R, Bristow, RE, eds. Te Linde’s Atlas of Gynecologic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014: Chapter 12.Google Scholar
Nezhat F, , Yadav, J, Rahaman, J, et al. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies using ultrasonically activated shears: analysis of first 100 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2005;97:813819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadis, AS, Velasquez, CD, Brauer, M, Hoak, B. Intraoperative management of a carbon dioxide embolus in the setting of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a patient with primary biliary cirrhosis: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014;5:833–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutt, CN, Oniu, T, Mehrabi, A, et al. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg 2004;21:95105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapron, C, Querleu, D, Bruhat, MA, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod 1998;13:867872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, G, O’Flynn, H, Duffy, JM, Phillips, K, Watson, A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(2):CD006583.Google Scholar
Llarena, NC, Shah, AB, Milad, MP. Bowel injury in gynecologic laparoscopy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:14071417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walden, PA, Zeybek, B, Phelps, JY. Understanding the legal essentials of a bowel injury lawsuit in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:3037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, GS. Surgical repair of an iatrogenic ureteral injury. UpToDate, 2019. www.uptodate.com/contents/surgical-repair-of-an-iatrogenic-ureteral-injury?topicRef=3276&source=see_link.Google Scholar
Thrasher, JB, Temple, DR, Spees, EK. Extravesical versus Leadbetter-Politano ureteroneocystostomy: a comparison of urological complications in 320 renal transplants. J Urol 1990;144:11051109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathews, R, Marshall, FF. Versatility of the adult psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation. J Urol 1997;158:20782082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, IB, Smith, JC. Trans-uretero-ureterostomy: British experience. Br J Urol 1975;47:519523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, MN, Gill, IS, Fergany, AF, Kaouk, JH, Desai, MM. Technical modifications to laparoscopic Boari flap. Urology 2007;69:175180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novick, AC, Straffon, RA, Stewart, BH. Experience with extracorporeal renal operations and autotransplantation in the management of complicated urologic disorders. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:1018.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolff, B, Chartier-Kastler, E, Mozer, P, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after ileal ureter substitution: a single-center experience. Urology 2011;78:692695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loeb, S, Partin, AW, Schaeffer, EM. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits? Rev Urol 2010 Winter;12:2024.Google Scholar
Menderes, G, Vilardo, N, Schwab, CL, Azodi, M. Incidental injury and repair of obturator nerve during laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142:208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Chang-Jackson, SC, Acholonu, UC Jr, Vetere, PF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transection and repair of an obturator nerve during pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:462464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todo, Y, Yamamoto, R, Minobe, S, et al. Risk factors for postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema in endometrial cancer survivors who had treatment including lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2010;119:6064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, JW, Kauderer, J, Hutson, A, et al. GOG 244, the lymphedema and gynecologic cancer (LEG) study: incidence and risk factors in newly diagnosed patients. Gynecol Oncol 2020;156(2):467474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conte, M, Panici, PB, Guariglia, L, et al. Pelvic lymphocele following radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: incidence rate and percutaneous management. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:268271.Google ScholarPubMed
Salani, R, Preston, MM, Hade, EM, et al. Swelling among women who need education about leg lymphedema: a descriptive study of lymphedema in women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24:15071512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuroda, K, Yamamoto, Y, Yanagisawa, M, et al. Risk factors and a prediction model for lower limb lymphedema following lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health 2017;17:50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, KJ, Cheville, AL, Al-Hilli, MM, et al. Lymphedema after surgery for endometrial cancer: prevalence, risk factors, and quality of life. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:307315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zikan, M, Fischerova, D, Pinkavova, I, et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphoceles following lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:291298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawhney, R, D’Agostino, HB, Zinck, S, et al. Treatment of postoperative lymphoceles with percutaneous drainage and alcohol sclerotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996;7:241245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, IS, Hodge, EE, Munch, LC, et al. Transperitoneal marsupialization of lymphoceles: a comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. J Urol 1995;153:706711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, TH, Gill, IS, Grune, MT, et al. Laparoscopic lymphocelectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 2000;163:10961098; discussion 1098–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahrer, A, Ramchandani, P, Trerotola, SO, Shlansky-Goldberg, RD, Itkin, M. Sclerotherapy in the management of postoperative lymphocele. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:10501053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Amant, F, Mirza, MR, Koskas, M, Creutzberg, CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;143:3750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, JM, Brzechffa, PR, Hatch, KD, Surwit, EA. Laparoscopically Assisted Surgical Staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, JM, Hatch, KD, Tran, AN, Surwit, EA. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:741747.Google ScholarPubMed
Hatch, KD, Hallum, AV, Surwit, EA, Childers, JM. The role of laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Cancer 1995;76:21132116.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergstrom, J, Aloisi, A, Armbruster, S, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers. Gynecol Oncol 2018;148:480484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malur, S, Possover, M, Michels, W, Schneider, A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer – a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2001;80:239244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fram, KM. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stage I endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:5761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zorlu, CG, Simsek, T, Ari, ES. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for the management of endometrial cancer. JSLS 2005;9:442446.Google ScholarPubMed
Malzoni, M, Tinelli, R, Cosentino, F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:126133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tozzi, R, Malur, S, Koehler, C, Schneider, A. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:130136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tozzi, R, Malur, S, Koehler, C, Schneider, A. Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2005;97:49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, JL, Piedmonte, MR, Spirtos, NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:53315336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obermair, A, Janda, M, Baker, J, et al. Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990 2012;48:11471153.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, JL, Piedmonte, MR, Spirtos, NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:695700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janda, M, Gebski, V, Davies, LC, et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:12241233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galaal, K, Donkers, H, Bryant, A, Lopes, AD. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018:CD006655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourits, MJ, Bijen, CB, Arts, HJ, et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:763771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Q, Liu, H, Liu, C, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma: a prospective randomized study with 11-year experience. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013;139:18531859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, JD, Neugut, AI, Wilde, ET, et al. Use and benefits of laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. J Oncol Pract 2012;8:e8999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalici, J, Laughlin, BB, Finan, MA, Wang, B, Rocconi, RP. The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136:512515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Advincula, AP, Song, A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:331336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boggess, JF, Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, L, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:360.e1-360.e9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeNardis, SA, Holloway, RW, Bigsby, GE, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:412417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, PC, Kang, E, Park, DH. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:739748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitao, MM, Briscoe, G, Santos, K, et al. Introduction of a computer-based surgical platform in the surgical care of patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer: outcomes and impact on approach. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:394399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitao, MM, Narain, WR, Boccamazzo, D, et al. Impact of robotic platforms on surgical approach and costs in the management of morbidly obese patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:21922198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitao, MM, Bartashnik, A, Wagner, I, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotically assisted laparoscopy for newly diagnosed uterine cancers. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:10311037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, S, Vaknin, Z, Ramana-Kumar, AV, et al. Outcomes and cost comparisons after introducing a robotics program for endometrial cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:717724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogani, G, Multinu, F, Dowdy, SC, et al. Incorporating robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer staging: analysis of morbidity and costs. Gynecol Oncol 2016;141:218224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, SL, Mogensen, O, Wu, C, et al. Nationwide introduction of minimally invasive robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and its association with severe complications. JAMA Surg 2019;154:530538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, LB, Ramirez, PT, Burke, W, et al. Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: an updated survey of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015;25:11211127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, LA, Shafer, A, et al. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamon, LG, Cohn, DE, Henretta, MS, et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:3641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprung, J, Whalley, DG, Falcone, T, et al. The impact of morbid obesity, pneumoperitoneum, and posture on respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation during laparoscopy. Anesth Analg 2002;94:13451350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, EA, Java, JJ, Moore, KN, et al. Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:109.e1–109.e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindfors, A, Åkesson, Å, Staf, C, et al. Robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly patients: surgical outcome, survival, and cost analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018;28:692699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backes, FJ, ElNaggar, AC, Farrell, MR, et al. Perioperative outcomes for laparotomy compared to robotic surgical staging of endometrial cancer in the elderly: a retrospective cohort. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26:17171721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Gynecologic Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 750: perioperative pathways: enhanced recovery after surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e120130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalogera, E, Dowdy, SC. Enhanced recovery pathway in gynecologic surgery: improving outcomes through evidence-based medicine. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016;43:551573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SJ, Calderon, B, Gardner, GJ, et al. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. Gynecol Oncol 2014;133:552555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner, KR, Fleming, ND, Barlavi, L, Axtell, AE, Lentz, SE. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:186.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Güenaga, KF, Matos, D, Wille-Jørgensen, P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;CD001544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, F, Li, J, Li, F. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:803810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Won, H, Maley, P, Salim, S, et al. Surgical and patient outcomes using mechanical bowel preparation before laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:538546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creasman, WT, Morrow, CP, Bundy, BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 1987;60:20352041.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR, Alektiar, K, Iasonos, A, et al. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:714718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yost, KJ, Cheville, AL, Al-Hilli, MM, et al. Lymphedema after surgery for endometrial cancer: prevalence, risk factors, and quality of life. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:307315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ASTEC Study Group, Kitchener, H, Swart, AMC, Qian, Q, Amos, C, Parmar, MKB. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet 2009;373:125136.Google Scholar
Frost, JA, Webster, KE, Bryant, A, Morrison, J. Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;CD007585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panici, PB, Basile, S, Maneschi, F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:17071716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, TW, Levenback, C, Tornos, C, et al. Intraabdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: results of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1996;62:169173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitao, MM. Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial carcinoma: less can be more. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 2016;5:279285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, W-J, Abu-Rustum, NR, Bean, S, et al. Uterine neoplasms, version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. JNCCN 2018;16:170199.Google ScholarPubMed
Ballester, M, Dubernard, G, Lécuru, F, et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol 2011;12:469476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, EC, Kowalski, LD, Scalici, J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:384392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodurtha Smith, AJ, Fader, AN, Tanner, EJ. Sentinel lymph node assessment in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:459476.e10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlin, JN, Khoury-Collado, F, Kim, CH, et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:531535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khoury-Collado, F, St Clair, C, Abu-Rustum, NR. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: an update. Oncologist 2016;21:461466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, CH, Khoury-Collado, F, Barber, EL, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping with pathologic ultrastaging: a valuable tool for assessing nodal metastasis in low-grade endometrial cancer with superficial myoinvasion. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:714719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitao, MM, Khoury-Collado, F, Gardner, G, et al. Impact of incorporating an algorithm that utilizes sentinel lymph node mapping during minimally invasive procedures on the detection of stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;129:3841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, AGZ, Ducie, J, Ali, N, et al. Comparison of a sentinel lymph node and a selective lymphadenectomy algorithm in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and limited myometrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol 2016;140:394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducie, JA, Eriksson, AGZ, Ali, N, et al. Comparison of a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm and comprehensive lymphadenectomy in the detection of stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma at higher risk for nodal disease. Gynecol Oncol 2017;147:541548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlappe, BA, Weaver, AL, Ducie, JA, et al. Multicenter study comparing oncologic outcomes between two nodal assessment methods in patients with deeply invasive endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a sentinel lymph node algorithm versus a comprehensive pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2018;151:235242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M, Plante, M, Lee, PS, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical and uterine cancers (FILM): a randomised, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:13941403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner, EJ, Sinno, AK, Stone, RL, et al. Factors associated with successful bilateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:542547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, AGZ, Montovano, M, Beavis, A, et al. Impact of obesity on sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with newly diagnosed uterine cancer undergoing robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:25222528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shveiky, D, Aseff, JN, Iglesia, CB. Brachial plexus injury after laparoscopic and robotic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:414420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gettman, MT. Robotic Instrumentation, Personnel and Operating Room Setup. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2011. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-026-7_2.Google Scholar
Abu-Rustum, NR, Khoury-Collado, F, Gemignani, ML. Techniques of sentinel lymph node identification for early-stage cervical and uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:S44S50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B, Backes, F. The role of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:753760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, S, Yoo, HJ, Hwang, JH, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: meta-analysis of 26 studies. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:522527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewell, EL, Huang, JJ, Abu-Rustum, NR, et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2014;133:274277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, M, Kim, YT, Kim, SW, et al. Effects of uterine manipulation on surgical outcomes in laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:372379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eltabbakh, GH, Mount, SL. Laparoscopic surgery does not increase the positive peritoneal cytology among women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:361364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granata, M, Tsimpanakos, I, Moeity, F, Magos, A. Are we underutilizing Palmer’s point entry in gynecologic laparoscopy? Fertil Steril 2010;94:27162719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, RW, Abu-Rustum, NR, Backes, FJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol Oncol 2017;146:405415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K, Caceres, A. Vaginal cuff closure in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a review of training, techniques, and materials. Cureus 2017;9:e1766.Google ScholarPubMed
Tandogdu, Z, Vale, L, Fraser, C, Ramsay, C. A systematic review of economic evaluations of the use of robotic assisted laparoscopy in surgery compared with open or laparoscopic surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2015;13:457467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korsholm, M, Sørensen, J, Mogensen, O, et al. A systematic review about costing methodology in robotic surgery: evidence for low quality in most of the studies. Health Econ Rev 2018;8:21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, MC, Torgerson, J, Seshadri-Kreaden, U, Suttle, AW, Hunt, S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:407411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, JC, Judd, JP, Wu, JM, et al. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:685693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, JD, Ananth, CV, Tergas, AI, et al. An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:10381048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, A, Katz Eriksen, JL, Hinchcliff, EM, et al. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:178185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K, Brewer, MA. Endometrial cancer: is this a new disease? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2017;37:435442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Novak, F. Gynäkologische Operationstechnik. Springer; 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauta, F. Die enveiterte vaginale Totalextirpation der Uterus beim Collumcarzinom. Wien Seipzig: J. Safar; 1908.Google Scholar
Wertheim, E. The extended abdominal operations for carcinoma uteri (based on 5000 operative cases). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1921;66:169.Google Scholar
Amreich, I. Zur Anatomie und Technik der erweiterten vaginalen Carcinoperation. Archiv für Gynäkologie 1924;122(3):497553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckel, W. Die vaginale Radikaloperation des Kollumcarzinom. Zentralbl Gynakol 1928;39.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. Mitra Operation for Cancer of the Cervix: Extraperitoneal Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy. Springfield, IL: Thomas1960]. American Lecture Series, no. 364: American Lectures in Gynecology and Obstetrics.Google Scholar
Dargent, D. A new future for Schauta’s operation through pre-surgical retroperitoneal pelviscopy. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 1987;8:292.Google Scholar
Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F. Videolaseroscopy for the treatment of upper, mid, and lower peritoneal cavity pathology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AAGL, November 1990.Google Scholar
Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Silfen, S. Videolaseroscopy: the CO2 laser for advanced operative laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991;18(3):585604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CR, Burrell, MO, Nezhat, FR, Benigno, BB, Welander, CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166(3):864865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sert, BM, Abeler, VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection – case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27(5):531533.Google Scholar
Possover, M, Krause, N, Schneider, A. Identification of the ureter and dissection of the bladder pillar in laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1998 Jan;91(1):139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertel, H, Kohler, C, Michels, W, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003 Sep;90(3):505511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallum, AV 3rd, Hatch, KD, Nour, M, Saucedo, M. Comparison of radical abdominal hysterectomy with laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Tech 2000;6(1):36.Google Scholar
Jackson, KS, Das, N, Naik, R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Dec;95(3):655–561. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nam, JH, Kim, JH, Kim, DY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Jan;92(1):277283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steed, H, Rosen, B, Murphy, J, et al. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Jun;93(3):588593. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Querleu, D, Narducci, F, Poulard, V, et al. Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol Oncol 2002 Apr;85(1):154158. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, CT, Lim, KT, Chung, HW, et al. Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002 Feb;9(1):4953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sardi, J, Vidaurreta, J, Bermudez, A, di Paola, G. Laparoscopically assisted Schauta operation: learning experience at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Buenos Aires University Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 1999 Dec;75(3):361365. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renaud, MC, Plante, M, Roy, M. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000 Oct;79(1):5963. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchiole, P, Benchaib, M, Buenerd, A, et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent’s operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol Oncol 2007 Jul;106(1):132141. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, R, Bailey, J, Anderson, R, Murdoch, J. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): a comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):19271932. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00661.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, DJ, Hunter, DC, McCracken, G, et al. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up. BJOG 2007 May;114(5):537–442. Erratum in: BJOG 2007 Jul;114(7):914. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01291.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahisa, J, Martínez-Román, S, Torné, A, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and open Wertheim-Meigs in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: eleven years of experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010 Jan;20(1):173178. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bf80ee.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, CH, Lee, JW, Lee, YY, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012 Nov;19(12):38393848. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2406-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018 Nov 15;379(20):18951904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, A, Margul, DJ, Chen, L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018 Nov 15; 379(20):19051914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiva, L, Zanagnolo, V, Querleu, D, et al.; SUCCOR Study Group. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020 Sep;30(9):1269–1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querleu D, Hudry D, Narducci F, et al. Radical hysterectomy after the LACC trial: back to radical vaginal surgery. Curr Treat Options in Oncol 2022 Feb;23(2):227–239. doi:10.1007/s11864-022-00937-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martino MA, Bixel K, Andrea M, et al. A novel technique to minimize contamination for cervical cancer surgery patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020 Nov-Dec;27(7):1624–1630. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesseliers T, Van Trappen P. Robotic vaginal cuff closure during radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: the Bruges method. Cureus 2023 Nov 20;15(11):e49149. doi:10.7759/cureus.49149. PMCID: PMC10734560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbachiya D, Kumari R. Vaginal closure before colpotomy with an endo-stapler to prevent tumor spillage in laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancy. JSLS 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2):e2020.00094. doi:10.4293/JSLS.2020.00094. PMCID: PMC8088333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, CR, Nezhat, FR, Burrell, MO, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg 1993 Summer;9(2):105120. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1993.9.105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlacek, TV, Campion, MJ, Hutchins, RA, Reich, H. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a preliminary report. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994 Aug;1(4, Part 2):S32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlacek, TV, Campion, M, Reich, H, Sedlacek, T. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 1995;56:126. Abstract.Google Scholar
Ting, HC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a preliminary experience. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994 Aug;1(4):S36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrzenski, A. A new laparoscopic abdominal radical hysterectomy: a pilot phase trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996 Dec;22(6):602606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, DH, Moon, JS. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early, invasive cervical carcinoma. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998 Nov;5(4):411417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, YY, Lin, WC, Chang, CC, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with low paraaortic, subaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results of short-term follow-up. J Reprod Med 1998 Jun;43(6):528534.Google ScholarPubMed
Spirtos, NM, Eisenkop, SM, Schlaerth, JB, Ballon, SC. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 Aug;187(2):340348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CL, Huang, KG. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using Lee-Huang portal and McCartney transvaginal tube. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002 Nov;9(4):536540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, YS. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003 Feb;10(1):8084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obermair, A, Ginbey, P, McCartney, AJ. Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003 Aug;10(3):345349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomel, C, Atallah, D, Le Bouedec, G, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2003 Dec;91(3):534539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR, Gemignani, ML, Moore, K, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003 Nov;91(2):402409. Erratum in: Gynecol Oncol 2004 Apr;93(1):275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil-Moreno, A, Puig, O, Perez-Benavente, MA, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):113120. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M, dos Reis, R, Sun, CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(1):96102. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798.75353.04.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puntambekar, SP, Palep, RJ, Puntambekar, SS, et al. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14(6):682689. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghezzi, F, Cromi, A, Ciravolo, G, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106(3):502506. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Datta, MS, Liu, C, Zakashansky, K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008;12:227237.Google ScholarPubMed
Magrina, JF, Kho, RM, Weaver, AL, Montero, RP, Magtibay, PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:8691. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrino, A, Vizza, E, Fruscio, R, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35(1):98103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estape, R, Lambrou, N, Diaz, R, et al. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(3):357361. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, X, Li, G, Shang, H, et al. Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy – experience of 117 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(5):963967. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a79430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobiczewski, P, Bidzinski, M, Derlatka, P, et al. Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(8):13901395. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ba5e88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chong, GO, Park, NY, Hong, DG, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(8):14591464. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181b76640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malzoni, M, Tinelli, R, Cosentino, F, Fusco, A, Malzoni, C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16(5):13161323. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0342-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CL, Wu, KY, Huang, KG, Lee, PS, Yen, CF. Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical hysterectomy in treating early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(2):165.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruijdenberg, CB, van den Einden, LC, Hendriks, JC, Zusterzeel, PL, Bekkers, RL. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120(3):334339. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nam, JH, Park, JY, Kim, DY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol 2012;23(4):903911. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L, Cai, J, Dong, W, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy can be routinely used for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a single-institute experience with 404 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015 Feb;22(2):199204. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sert, B, Abeler, V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007;3(3):224228. doi: 10.1002/rcs.152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boggess, JF, Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(4):357.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Datta, MS, Liu, C, Chuang, L, Zakashansky, K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):227237. PMCID: PMC3015864.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, YT, Kim, SW, Hyung, WJ, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108(2):312316. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanning, J, Fenton, B, Purohit, M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(6):649.e1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, EM, Muto, MG, Berkowitz, RS, Feltmate, CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(3):425430. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, MP, Chamberlain, DH, Kamelle, SA, Johnson, PR, Tillmanns, TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(2):191194. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maggioni, A, Minig, L, Zanagnolo, V, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115(1):6064. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persson, J, Reynisson, P, Borgfeldt, C, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(2):185190. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soliman, PT, Frumovitz, M, Sun, CC, et al. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123(2):333336. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.001. PMCID: PMC4264587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, TH, Choi, CH, Choi, JK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014 Oct;24(8):14661473. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanagnolo, V, Minig, L, Cárdenas-Rebollo, JM, et al. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single-institution experience of surgical and oncologic outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):909916. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.04.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sert, BM, Boggess, JF, Ahmad, S, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016 Apr;42(4):513522. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, CA, Beck, T, Liao, JB, et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2017 Nov;28(6):e82. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e82. PMCID: PMC5641532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Nezhat, CR, Burrell, MO, Nezhat, FR, Benigno, BB, Welander, CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992 Mar;166(3):864865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CR, Nezhat, FR, Burrell, MO, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9(2):105120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR. Laparoscopy 2003: oncologic perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003 Mar;46(1):6169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, SE, McBee, WC Jr, Richard, SD, Edwards, RP. Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. JSLS 2011;15(2):213217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchal, F, Rauch, P, Vandromme, J, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc 2005 Jun;19(6):826831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sert, BM, Abeler, VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection–case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27(5):531533.Google ScholarPubMed
Sert, B, Abeler, V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007 Sep;3(3):224228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salicru, S, Gil-Moreno, A, Montero, A, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18(5):555568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlacek, TV, Campion, MJ, Hutchins, RA, Reich, H. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a preliminary report. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994 Aug;1(4, Part 2):S32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedlacek, TV, Campion, MJ, Reich, H. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 1995;56:126. [abstract]Google Scholar
Lin, YS. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003 Feb;10(1):8084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR, Gemignani, ML, Moore, K, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003 Nov;91(2):402409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zakashansky, K, Chuang, L, Gretz, H, et al. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17(5):10751082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, G, Yan, X, Shang, H, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007 Apr;105(1):176180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M, dos Reis, R, Sun, CC, Milam, MR, Bevers, MW, Brown, J, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2007 Jul;110(1):96102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M, Ramirez, PT. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: surgical technique and instrumentation. Gynecol Oncol 2007 Feb;104(2 Suppl 1):13–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghezzi, F, Cromi, A, Ciravolo, G, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2007 Sep;106(3):502506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz-Feijoo, B, Gil-Moreno, A, Perez-Benavente, MA, et al. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(5):531537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malzoni, M, Tinelli, R, Cosentino, F, Fusco, A, Malzoni, C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2009 May;16(5):13161323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobiczewski, P, Bidzinski, M, Derlatka, P, et al. Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 Nov;19(8):13901395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soliman, PT, Frumovitz, M, Sun, CC, et al. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Nov;123(2):333336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malur, S, Possover, M, Schneider, A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 2001 Mar;15(3):289292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, JH, Kim, JH, Kim, DY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Jan;92(1):277283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steed, H, Rosen, B, Murphy, J, et al. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Jun;93(3):588593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, KS, Das, N, Naik, R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Dec;95(3):655661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, R, Bailey, J, Anderson, R, Murdoch, J. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): a comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(5):19271932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, DJ, Hunter, DC, McCracken, G, et al. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up. BJOG 2007 May;114(5):537542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornhofer, N, Hockel, M. New developments in the surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008 Sep;1138:233252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boggess, JF, Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 Oct;199(4):357.e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambaudie, E, Houvenaeghel, G, Walz, J, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2008 Dec;22(12):27432747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, EM, Muto, MG, Berkowitz, RS, Feltmate, CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Dec;111(3):425430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magrina, JF, Kho, RM, Weaver, AL, Montero, RP, Magtibay, PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Apr;109(1):8691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Datta, MS, Liu, C, Chuang, L, Zakashansky, K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008;12(3):227237.Google ScholarPubMed
Cho, JE, Nezhat, FR. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(6):669681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruijdenberg, CB, van den Einden, LC, Hendriks, JC, Zusterzeel, PL, Bekkers, RL. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Mar;120(3):334339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renato, S, Mohamed, M, Serena, S, et al. Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011:872434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estape, R, Lambrou, N, Diaz, R, et al. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009 Jun;113(3):357361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sert, MB, Eraker, R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2009;5(4):410414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shazly, SA, Murad, MH, Dowdy, SC, Gostout, BS, Famuyide, AO. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2015 August 1;138(2):457471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantrell, LA, Mendivil, A, Gehrig, PA, Boggess, JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2010 May;117(2):260265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, YT, Kim, SW, Hyung, WJ, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Feb;108(2):312316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanning, J, Fenton, B, Purohit, M. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 Jun;198(6):649.e4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persson, J, Reynisson, P, Borgfeldt, C, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol 2009 May;113(2):185190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, MP, Chamberlain, DH, Kamelle, SA, Johnson, PR, Tillmanns, TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009 May;113(2):191194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maggioni, A, Minig, L, Zanagnolo, V, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecol Oncol 2009 Oct;115(1):6064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W, Chu, HJ, Shang, CL, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016 09;26(7):12641273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallotta, V, Conte, C, Federico, A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: a case matched control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018;44(6):754759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018 Nov 15;379(20):18951904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, LC, Keating, NL, del Carmen, MG, Wright, JD, Rouh-Hain, JA. Comparative effectiveness of minimally-invasive staging surgery in women with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018;149(1):245–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, FR, Ananth, CV, Vintzileos, AM. The two Achilles of surgical randomized controlled trials: differences in surgical skills and reporting of average performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221(3):230232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persson, J, Kannisto, P, Bossmar, T. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Dec;111(3):564567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuang, LT, Lerner, DL, Liu, CS, Nezhat, FR. Fertility-sparing robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(6):767770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geisler, JP, Orr, CJ, Manahan, KJ. Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008 Oct;18(5):727729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molpus, KL, Wedergren, JS, Carlson, MA. Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition. JSLS 2003;7(1):5962.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Schmeler, KM, Wolf, JK, Brown, J, Soliman, PT. Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Oct;111(1):1821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fastrez, M, Vandromme, J, George, P, Rozenberg, S, Degueldre, M. Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009 Dec;147(2):226229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergote, I, Pouseele, B, Van Gorp, T, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87(7):783787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, PC. Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 2009 Nov;115(2):310311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambaudie, E, Narducci, F, Leblanc, E, Bannier, M, Houvenaeghel, G. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: report of three first cases. Gynecol Oncol 2010 Mar;116(3):582583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, MA, Adams, S, Eun, D, Lee, D, Randall, TC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer: Robotics improved the surgical experience for 2 women with recurrent cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 Jun;202(6):663.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambaudie, E, Narducci, F, Bannier, M, et al. Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010 Apr;36(4):409413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kietpeerakool, C, Aue-Aungkul, A, Galaal, K, Ngamjarus, C, Lumbiganon, P. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2:CD012828.Google ScholarPubMed
Roh, JW, Lee, DO, Suh, DH, et al. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Gynecol Oncol 2015 Apr;26(2):9099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, Y, Yao, D, Pan, X, Ou, T. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014;9(4):e94116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogani, G, Rossetti, DO, Ditto, A, et al. Nerve-sparing approach improves outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018 Mar–Apr;25(3):402410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basaran, D, Dusek, L, Majek, O, Cibula, D. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015 Sep;22(9):30333040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C, Saberi, N, Shahmohamady, B, Nezhat, F. Robotic assisted laparaoscopy in gynecolgical surgery. JSLS 2006;10:317320.Google Scholar
Nezhat, FR, Chang-Jackson, SC, Acholonu, UC Jr, Vetere, PF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transection and repair of an obturator nerve during pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 2):462464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, MC, Torgerson, J, Seshadri-Kreaden, U, Suttle, AW, Hunt, S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Dec;111(3):407411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, D, Lau, S, Vaknin, Z, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison of outcomes and cost. J Robot Surg 2010 Dec;4(4):211216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desille-Gbaguidi, H, Hebert, T, Paternotte-Villemagne, J, et al. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013 Dec;171(2):348352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, JD, Herzog, TJ, Neugut, AI, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012 Oct;127(1):1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espada, M, Munoz, R, Noble, BN, Magrina, JF. Insulation failure in robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Aug;205(2):121.e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mues, AC, Box, GN, Abaza, R. Robotic instrument insulation failure: initial report of a potential source of patient injury. Urology 2011 Jan;77(1):104107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cormier, B, Nezhat, F, Sternchos, J, Sonoda, Y, Leitao, MM Jr. Electrocautery-associated vascular injury during robotic-assisted surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012 Aug;120(2 Pt 2):491493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, AJ, Morris, SN, Millham, FH, Isaacson, KB. Women’s preferences for minimally invasive incisions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18(5):640643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenihan, JP Jr, Kovanda, C, Seshadri-Kreaden, U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(5):589594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sfakianos, GP, Frederick, PJ, Kendrick, JE, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors. Int J Med Robot 2010 Dec;6(4):405412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, F, Chang-Jackson, S, Achonlonu, U, Choe, J, Shamshirasaz, AA. Robotic surgery and gynecologic oncology: a review of the literature. Fem Pat 2011;36.Google Scholar
Marescaux, J, Leroy, J, Gagner, M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001 Sep 27;413(6854):379380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Adams, S, Boggess, JF, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol 2012 Feb;124(2):180184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures, 2919. Atlanta: ACS; 2019.Google Scholar
Moore, DH. Primary surgical management of early epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In Rubin, SC, Sutton, GP, eds. Ovarian Cancer, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001: 201218.Google Scholar
Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C, Welander, CE, et al. Four ovarian cancers diagnosed during laparoscopic management of 1011 women with adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:790796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, CS, Nagarsheth, NP, Nezhat, FR. Laparoscopy and ovarian cancer: A paradigm change in the management of ovarian cancer? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(3):250262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Querleu, D, Leblanc, E. Laparoscopic infrarenal para-aortic lymph node dissection for restaging of carcinoma of the ovary or fallopian tube. Cancer 1994;73:14671471.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, JM, Lang, J, Surwit, EA, et al. Laparoscopic surgical staging of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spirtos, NM, Eisekop, SM, Boike, G, et al. Laparoscopic staging in patients with incompletely staged cancers of the uterus, ovary, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneum: a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:16451649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tozzi, R, Kohler, C, Ferrara, A, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of early ovarian cancer: surgical and survival outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:199203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tozzi, R, Schneider, A. Laparoscopic treatment of early ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:354358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsen, NMS, Karlsen, MA, Hødall, E, et al. Relapse and disease specific survival in 1143 Danish women diagnosed with borderline ovarian tumours (BOT). Gynecol Oncol 2016 Jul;142(1):5053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romagnolo, C, Gadducci, A, Sartori, E, et al. Management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of an Italian multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 2006;101:255260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camatte, S, Morice, P, Pautier, P, et al. Fertility results after conservative treatment of advanced stage serous borderline tumors of the ovary. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:373380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C, Burrell, M. Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy for the management of a borderline ovarian tumor: a case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992;2:167169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darai, E, Teboul, J, Fauconnier, A, et al. Management and outcome of borderline ovarian tumors incidentally discovered at or after laparoscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:451457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seracchioli, S, Venturoli, FM, Colombo, F, et al. Fertility and tumor recurrence rate after conservative laparoscopic management of young women with early-stage borderline ovarian tumors. Fertil Steril 2001;76:9991004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauvet, J, Boccara, C, Dufournet, C, et al. Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2005;16:403410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Querleu, D, Papageorgiou, T, Lambaudie, E, et al. Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian tumors: results of 30 cases initially presumed as stage IA borderline ovarian tumors. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;110:201204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desfeux, P, Camatte, S, Chatellier, G, et al. Impact of surgical approach on the management of macroscopic early ovarian borderline tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98:390395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosi, N, Deckardt, R. Endoscopic surgery in patients with borderline tumor of the ovary: a follow-up study of thirty-five patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:606609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, X, Lili, C, Lupin, J, et al. Clinical comparative analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery for early stage ovarian epithelial cancer. Chinese J Obstet Gynecol 2017,52(2):103109.Google Scholar
Pomel, C, Provencher, D, Dauplat, J, et al. Laparoscopic staging of early ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995;58:301306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amara, DP, Nezhat, C, Teng, N, et al. Operative laparoscopy in the management of ovarian cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6(1):3845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeBlanc, E, Querleu, D, Narducci, F, et al. Laparoscopic restaging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94: 624629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Abu-Rustum, NR, Sonoda, Y, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging of apparent stage I ovarian and fallopian tube cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:16141619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, F, Cromi, A, Uccella, S, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105:409413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, JY, Bae, J, Lim, MC, et al. Laparoscopic and laparotomic staging in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison of feasibility and safety. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;15:20122019.Google Scholar
Park, JY, Kim, DY, Suh, DS, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of early-stage ovarian and fallopian tubal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(7):20122019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Ezzati, M, Rahaman, J, et al. Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;83:e1e6.Google Scholar
Colomer, AT, Jimenez, AM, Bover Barcelo, M. Laparoscopic treatment and staging of early ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:414419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Q, Qu, H, Liu, C, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of apparent early ovarian cancer: 13-year experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(20):e3655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallotta, V, Petrillo, M, Conte, C, et al. Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgical staging for early-stage ovarian cancer: a case-control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):769774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, US, Lee, JH, Kyung, MS, Choi, JS. Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:113118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreuder, HW, Pattij, TO, Zweemer, RP, van Baal, MW, Verheijen, RH. Increasing experience in laparoscopic staging of early ovarian cancer. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9:8996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockbank, EC, Harry, V, Kolomainen, D, et al. Laparoscopic staging for apparent early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer. First case series from a UK cancer centre and systematic literature review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:912917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CL, Kusunoki, S, Huang, CY, et al. Surgical and survival outcomes of laparoscopic staging surgery for patients with stage I ovarian cancer. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57:712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogani, G, Borhghi, C, Leone Roberti Maggiore, U, et al. Minimally invasive surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 May–Jun;24(4):552562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minig, L, Saadi, J, Patrono, MG, et al. Laparoscopic surgical staging in women with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer performed by recently certified gynecologic oncologists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016 Jun;201:94100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barakat, RR, Markman, M, Randall, ME. Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.Google Scholar
Katz, VL, Lentz, GM, Lobo, RA, et al. Comprehensive Gynecology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007.Google Scholar
Bristow, RE, Tomacruz, SR, Armstrong, DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:12481259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, WE III, Maxwell, GL, Tian, C, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:36213627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, WE III, Maxwell, GL, Tian, C, et al. Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:8389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du Bois, A, Reuss, A, Pujade-Lauraine, E, et al. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’ Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer 2009;115:12341244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, WJ, Bundy, BN, Thigpen, JT, et al. The influence of cytoreductive surgery on recurrence-free survival in small volume stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 1992;47:159166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raspagliesi, F, Bogani, G, Ditto, A, et al. Implementation of extensive cytoreduction resulted in improved survival outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2017 Oct;24(11):33963405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bristow, RE, Duska, LR, Lambrou, NC, et al. A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography. Cancer 2000;89:15321540.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergote, I, Trope, CG, Amant, F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the better treatment option in some patients with stage IIIc to IV ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(31):40764078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vrie, R, Rutten, MJ, Asseler, JD, et al. Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 23;3:CD009786.Google ScholarPubMed
Fagotti, A, Fanfani, F, Ludovisi, M, et al. Role of laparoscopy to assess the chance of optimal cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96:729735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergote, I, De Wever, I, Tjalma, W, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 285 patients. Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:431436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergote, I, Trope, CG, Amant, F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363(10): 943953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmermans, M, van der Hel, O, Sonke, GS, et al. The prognostic value of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2019 May;153(2):445451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bristow, RE, Montz, FJ, Lagasse, LD, et al. Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1999;72:278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angioli, R, Palaia, I, Zullo, MA, et al. Diagnostic open laparoscopy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100(3): 455461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahaman, J, Dottino, P, Jennings, TS, et al. The second-look operation improves survival in suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anaf, V, Gangji, D, Simon, P, et al. Laparoscopical insertion of intraperitoneal catheters for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:11401145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinh, H, Ott, C, Fanning, J. Feasibility of laparoscopic debulking with electrosurgical loop excision procedure and argon beam coagulator at recurrence in patients with previous laparotomy debulking. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:13941397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, DeNoble, S, Brown, D, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cytoreduction of recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting and Endo Expo of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, New York, NY, September 1–4, 2010.Google Scholar
Nezhat, F, Yadav, J, Rahaman, J, et al. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies using ultrasonically activated shears: analysis of first 100 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2005;97:813819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanning, J, Yacoub, E, Hojat, R. Laparoscopic-assisted cytoreduction for primary ovarian cancer: success, morbidity and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:4749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuer, GA, Lakhi, N, Woo, A, et al. Robotic surgery for staging of serous papillary and clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Med Robot 2014 8 April;10(3):306313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Pejovic, T, Finger, TN, Khalil, SS. Role of minimally invasive surgery in ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):754–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Ezzati, M, Chuang, L, et al. Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009 Jan;200(1):83.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, PC. Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115(2):310311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, SH, Li, ZA, Huang, R, Xue, HQ. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: a meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016;55(4):488494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, W, Cao, D, Yang, J, Shen, K, Zhao, L. Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016;142(10):2173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, MA, Adams, S, Eun, D, Lee, D, Randall, TC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer: robotics improved the surgical experience for 2 women with recurrent cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(6):663.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iavazzo, C, Gkegkes, ID. Robotic technology for pelvic exenteration in cases of cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;125(1):1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilescu, C, Tudor, S, Popa, M, Aldea, B, Gluck, G. Entirely robotic total pelvic exenteration. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011;21(4):e200202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farghaly, SA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Farghaly’s technique. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2010;31(4):361363.Google ScholarPubMed
Nanayakkara, PR, Ahmed, SA, Oudit, D, O’Dwyer, ST, Selvasekar, CR. Robotic assisted minimally invasive pelvic exenteration in advanced rectal cancer: review and case report. J Robot Surg 2014;8(2):173175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ercoli, A, Bassi, E, Ferrari, S, et al. Robotic-assisted conservative excision of retrocervical-rectal deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case series. Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24(5):863868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiomi, A, Kinugasa, Y, Yamaguchi, T, Kagawa, H, Yamakawa, Y. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31(10):17011710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Xu, H. Li, Z, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2016, 14, 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, H, Li, J, Sun, Y, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, G, Zhao, Z, Lin, S, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brotherton, J, McCarus, S, Redan, J, et al. Hand-assist laparoscopic surgery for the gynecologic surgeon. JSLS 2009;13:484488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krivak, TC, Elkas, JC, Rose, GS, et al. The utility of hand-assisted laparoscopy in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96:7276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spannuth, WA, Rocconi, RP, Huh, WK, et al. A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy for the surgical evaluation of pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:443446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingler, PJ, Smith, SL, Abendstein, BJ, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for isolated splenic metastasis from an ovarian carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;8:4954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelosi, MA, Pelsoi, MA 3rd, Eim, J. Hand assisted laparoscopy for pelvic malignancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2000;10:143150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornalik, H, Brooks, H, Moore, ES, et al. Hand-assisted robotic surgery for staging of ovarian cancer and uterine cancers with high risk of peritoneal spread: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):14881493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlaerth, AC, Abu-Rustum, NR. Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic cancers. Oncologist 2006;11:895901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Abu-Rustum, NR, Sonoda, Y, et al. Laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for recurrent and persistent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;101:224227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, JE, Shamshirsaz, AHA, Nezhat, C, et al. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Minerva Ginecol 2010;62:137167.Google ScholarPubMed
Magrina, JF, Zanagnolo, V, Noble, BN, et al. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:100105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, JM, Aqua, KA, Surwit, EA, et al. Abdominal-wall tumor implantation after laparoscopy for malignant conditions. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:765769.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Wolf, JK, Leveback, C. Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:179189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morice, P, Camatte, S, Larregain- Fournier, D, et al. Port-site implantation after laparoscopic treatment of borderline ovarian tumors. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:11671170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagarsheth, NP, Rahaman, J, Cohen, CJ, et al. The incidence of port-site metastases in gynecologic cancers. JSLS 2004;8:133139.Google ScholarPubMed
Vergote, I, Marquette, S, Arnant, F, et al. Port-site metastases after open laparoscopy: a study in 173 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15(5):776779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, KG, Wang, CJ, Chang, TC, et al. Management of port-site metastases after laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189(1):1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smidt, VJ, Singh, DM, Hurteau, JA, et al. Effect of carbon dioxide on human ovarian carcinoma cell growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001:185:13141317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorrance, HR, Oien, K, O’Dwyer, PJ. Effects of laparoscopy on intraperitoneal tumor growth and distant metastases in an animal model. Surgery 1990;125:3540.Google Scholar
Abu-Rustum, NR, Sonoda, Y, Chi, DS, et al. The effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the survival of women with persistent metastatic ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:431434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Curtin, JP. Gynecologic cancer and laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999;26:201215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaisbuch, E, Dgani, R, Ben-Arie, A, Hagay, Z. The role of laparoscopy in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential and early-stage ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005;60:326330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkins, AK, Jarobe, EA, Roh, MH, et al. Precursors to pelvic serous carcinoma and their clinical implications. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:391396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pejovic, T, Nezhat, F. Missing link: inflammation and ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol 2011;12(9):833834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roh, MH, Kindelberger, D, Crum, CP. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and the dominant ovarian mass. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33:376383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Datta, M, Hanson, V, et al. The relationship of endometriosis and ovarian malignancy: a review. Fertil Steril 2008;90(5):15591570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, PA, Rouzbahman, M, Pizer, ES, et al. Candidate serous cancer precursors in fallopian tube epithelium of BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers. Mod Pathol 2009;22(9):11331138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, CB, Kenley, E, Chen, LM, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: role of serial sectioning in the detection of occult malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:127132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch, A, Shaw, P, Rosen, B, et al. Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:5864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callahan, MJ, Crum, CP, Medeiros, F, et al. Primary fallopian tube malignancies in BRCA-positive women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer risk reduction. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:39853990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeper, K, Garcia, R, Swisher, E, et al. Pathologic findings in prophylactic oophorectomy specimens in high-risk women. Gynecol Oncol 2002;87:5256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kindelberger, DW, Lee, Y, Miron, A, et al. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:161169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, JW, Miron, A, Jarboe, EA, et al. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: its potential role in primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and serous cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:41604165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Nezhat, C, Garrison, CP. Surgical treatment of endometriosis via laser laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1986;45:778783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, B. Camran Nezhat and the advent of advanced operative video-laparoscopy. In Nezhat, C, ed. Nezhat’s History of Endoscopy. Tuttlingen: Endo Press; 2011: 159187.Google Scholar
Kelley, WE. The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery decade of the 1990s. JSLS 2008;12(4):351357.Google Scholar
Tinelli, R, Malzoni, M, Cosentino, F, et al. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18: 13161323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(5):661662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curcillo, PG II, Wu, AS, Podolsky, ER, et al. Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 2010;24(8):18541860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boike, GM, Miller, CE, Spirtos, NM, et al. Incisional bowel herniations after operative laparoscopy: a series of nineteen cases and review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(6):17261731; discussion 1731–1733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadar, N, Reich, H, Liu, CY, et al. Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(5):14931495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fader, AN, Escobar, PF. Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114(2):157161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, PF, Starks, DC, Fader, AN, et al. Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2010;119(1):4347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, TJ, Lee, YY, Cha, HH, et al. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2010;24(9):22482252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yim, GW, Jung, YW, Paek, J, et al. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(1):26 e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, YW, Lee, M, Yim, GW, et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc 2011;25(8):24622469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeless, CR. A rapid, inexpensive and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1969;3:6569.Google Scholar
Pelosi, MA, Pelosi, MA III. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med 1991;88(10):721726.Google ScholarPubMed
Podolsky, ER, Rottman, SJ, Poblete, H, et al. Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19(2):219222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canes, D, Desai, MM, Aron, M, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 2008;54(5):10201029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, MC, Kim, TJ, Kang, S, et al. Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for adnexal tumors. Surg Endosc 2009;23(11):24452449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, TJ, Lee, YY, Kim, MJ, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(5):612615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar, PF, Fader, AN, Rasool, N, et al. Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20(7):12681273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surico, D, Gentilli, S, Vigone, A, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for treatment of concomitant ovarian cystectomy and cholecystectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17(5):656659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, RJ, White, WM, Goel, RK, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol 2010;57(1):132136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, CR, Nezhat, FR, Silfen, SL. Videolaseroscopy. The CO2 laser for advanced operative laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991;18:585604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malzoni, M, Tinelli, R, Cosentino, F, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16(5):13161323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eltabbakh, GH, Shamonki, MI, Moody, JM, et al. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Gynecol Oncol 2000;78(3 Pt 1):329335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, YH, Kim, DY, Kim, JH, et al. Laparoscopic management of early uterine cancer: 10-year experience in Asan Medical Center. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106(3):585590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalogiannidis, I, Lambrechts, S, Amant, F, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196(3):248 e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childers, JM, Hatch, KD, Tran, AN, et al. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(5):741747.Google ScholarPubMed
Querleu, D, Leblanc, E, Castelain, B. Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the staging of early carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164(2):579581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowe, MP, Chamberlain, DH, Kamelle, SA, et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(2):191194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veljovich, DS, Paley, PJ, Drescher, CW, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(6):679 e19; discussion 679 e9–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanfani, F, Monterossi, G, Fagotti, A, Scambia, G. Laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: is it safe and feasible? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014;26:275280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagotti, DM, Boruta, G 2nd, Scambia, F, et al. First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:353.e1-353.e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cela, V, Freschi, L, Simi, G, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:26382643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mereu, L, Carri, G, Khalifa, H. Robotic single port total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2012 Dec;127(3):644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrado, G, Cutillo, G, Mancini, E. et al. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study. J Gynecol Oncol 2016;27:e39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogliolo, S, Ferrero, S, Cassani, C, et al. Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23:603609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moukarzel, LA, Fader, AN, Tanner, EJ. Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the gynecologic oncology setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24:258263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moukarzel, LA, Sinno, AK, Fader, AN, Tanner, EJ. Comparing single-site and multiport robotic hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: surgical outcomes and cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017 Sep–Oct;24(6):977983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrado, G, Mereu, L, Bogliolo, S, et al. Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: a multi-institution study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016 Oct;42(10):15061511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vizza, E, Chiofalo, B, Cutillo, G, et al. Robotic single site radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers. J Gynecol Oncol 2018 Jan;29(1):e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehrig, PA, Cantrell, LA, Shafer, A, et al. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(1):4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Pantaleoni, D. On endoscopic examination of the cavity of the womb. Med Press 1869;8(26).Google Scholar
Giusa-Chiferi, MG, Gonçalves, WJ, Baracat, EC, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound, uterine biopsy and hysteroscopy for postmenopausal bleeding. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996;55(1):3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danero, S, Ricci, MG, La Rosa, R, et al. Critical review of dilatation and curettage in the diagnosis of malignant pathology of the endometrium. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1986;7(3):162165.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, LP, Fries, MH, Zeringue, E, Brehm, W. Triage of abnormal postmenopausal bleeding: a comparison of endometrial biopsy and transvaginal sonohysterography versus fractional curettage with hysteroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178(5):956961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stock, RJ, Kanbour, A. Prehysterectomy curettage. Obstet Gynecol 1975;45(5):537541.Google ScholarPubMed
Loffer, FD. Hysteroscopy with selective endometrial sampling compared with D&C for abnormal uterine bleeding: the value of a negative hysteroscopic view. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73(1):1620.Google ScholarPubMed
Ben-Yehuda, OM, Kim, YB, Leuchter, RS. Does hysteroscopy improve upon the sensitivity of dilatation and curettage in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol. 1998;68(1):47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, E, Ramirez, A, Skoog, L, Valentin, L. Dilatation and curettage fails to detect most focal lesions in the uterine cavity in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80(12):11311136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, SR, Nachtigall, M, Snyder, JR, Nachtigall, L. Endometrial assessment by vaginal ultrasonography before endometrial sampling in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163(1):119123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stovall, TG, Photopulos, GJ, Poston, WM, Ling, FW, Sandles, LG. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:954956.Google ScholarPubMed
Dijkhuizen, FP, Mol, BW, Brǒlmann, HA, Heintz, AP. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer 2000;89(8):17651772.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triolo, O, Antico, F, Palmara, V, et al. Hysteroscopic findings of endometrial carcinoma. Evaluation of 104 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2005;26(4):434436.Google ScholarPubMed
Litta, P, Merlin, F, Saccardi, C, et al. Role of hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy to rule out endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Maturitas 2005;50(2):117123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchetti, M, Litta, P, Lanza, P, Lauri, F, Pozzan, C. The role of hysteroscopy in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002;23(2):151153.Google ScholarPubMed
Iossa, A, Cianferoni, L, Ciatto, S, et al. Hysteroscopy and endometrial cancer diagnosis: a review of 2007 consecutive examinations in self-referred patients. Tumori 1991;77(6):479483.Google ScholarPubMed
Birinyi, L, Daragó, P, Török, P, et al. Predictive value of hysteroscopic examination in intrauterine abnormalities. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;115(1):429483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garuti, G, Sambruni, I, Colonnelli, M, Luerti, M. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in predicting histopathology of endometrium in 1500 women. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8(2):207213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, TL, Voit, D, Gupta, K, et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review. JAMA 2002;288:16101621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagele, F, Wieser, F, Deery, A, Hart, R, Magos, A. Endometrial cell dissemination at diagnostic hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized cross-over comparison of normal saline and carbon dioxide uterine distension. Hum Reprod 1999;14(11):27392742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, KWK, Cheung, TH, Yim, SF, Chung, TKH. Hysteroscopic dissemination of endometrial carcinoma using carbon dioxide and normal saline: a retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2002;84(3):394398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, YN, Zhang, Y, Wang, YJ, Wang, LP, Duan, H. Effect of hysteroscopy on the peritoneal dissemination of endometrial cancer cells: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2011;96(4):957961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creasman, WT, Morrow, CP, Bundy, BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 1987;60(8 S):20352041.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, M, Shi, W, Barakat, RR, Thaler, HT, Saigo, PE. Peritoneal washings in endometrial carcinoma. Acta Cytol 2011;44(5):783789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, S, Shimoni, Y, Muralee, D, Shalev, E. Retrograde seeding of endometrial carcinoma during hysteroscopy. Gynecol Oncol 1992;44(1):116118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egarter, C, Krestan, C, Kurz, C. Abdominal dissemination of malignant cells with hysteroscopy. Gynecol Oncol 1996;63(1):143144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, PG, Mendelsohn, G, Kornbluth, I. Hysteroscopic dissemination of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1998 Oct;71(1):145146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcázar, JL, Errasti, T, Zornoza, A. Saline infusion sonohysterography in endometrial cancer: assessment of malignant cells dissemination risk. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79(4):321322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levêque, J, Goyat, F, Dugast, J, et al. Value of peritoneal cytology after hysteroscopy in surgical stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Oncol Rep 1998;5(3):712715.Google Scholar
Zerbe, MJ, Zhang, J, Bristow, RE, et al. Retrograde seeding of malignant cells during hysteroscopy in presumed early endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79(1):5558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obermair, A, Geramou, M, Gucer, F, et al. Does hysteroscopy facilitate tumor cell dissemination? Cancer 2000;88(1):139143.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, WH, Boente, MP, Brooker, D, et al. Hysteroscopy and cytology in endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(5):10301033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutman, G, Almog, B, Lessing, JB, Bar-Am, A, Grisaru, D. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer by hysteroscopy does not increase the risk for microscopic extrauterine spread in early-stage disease. Gynecol Surg 2005;2:2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvaggi, L, Cormio, G, Ceci, O, et al. Hysteroscopy does not increase the risk of microscopic extrauterine spread in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13(2):223227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, M, Shi, W, Huang, J, et al. Association between initial diagnostic procedure and hysteroscopy and abnormal peritoneal washings in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2000;90(3):143147.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biewenga, P, De Blok, S, Birnie, E. Does diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma cause positive peritoneal washings? Gynecol Oncol 2004;93(1):194198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudela, M, Pilka, R. Is there a real risk in patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy (HSC)? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2001;93:194198.Google Scholar
Kadar, N, Homesley, HD, Malfetano, JH. Positive peritoneal cytology is an adverse factor in endometrial carcinoma only if there is other evidence of extrauterine disease. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46(2):145149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milosevic, MF, Dembo, AJ, Thomas, GM. The clinical significance of malignant peritoneal cytology in stage I endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1992;2(5):225235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CM, Slomovitz, BM, Greer, M, et al. Practice patterns of SGO members for stage IIIA endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98(1):7783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devore, GR, Schwartz, PE, Morris, JM. Hysterography: a 5-year follow-up in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60(3):369372.Google ScholarPubMed
Arikan, G, Reich, O, Weiss, U, et al. Are endometrial carcinoma cells disseminated at hysteroscopy functionally viable? Gynecol Oncol 2001;83(2):221226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Uterine neoplasms (Version 3.2019). www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf.Google Scholar
Obermair, A, Geramou, M, Gücer, F, et al. Impact of hysteroscopy on disease-free survival in clinically stage I endometrial cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000;10(4):275279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gücer, F, Tamussino, K, Reich, O, et al. Two-year follow-up of patients with endometrial carcinoma after preoperative fluid hysteroscopy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998;8(6):476480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Arie, A, Tamir, S, Dubnik, S, et al. Does hysteroscopy affect prognosis in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;18(4):813819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicinelli, E, Tinelli, R, Colafiglio, G, et al. Risk of long-term pelvic recurrences after fluid minihysteroscopy in women with endometrial carcinoma: a controlled randomized study. Menopause 2010;17(3):511515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raspagliesi, F, Ditto, A, Kusamura, S, et al. Hysteroscopic injection of tracers in sentinel node detection of endometrial cancer: a feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(2):435439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niikura, H, Okamura, C, Utsunomiya, H, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92(2):669674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumovitz, M, Plante, M, Lee, PS, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical and uterine cancers (FILM): a randomised, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19(10):13941403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccauro, M, Lucignani, G, Aliberti, G, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection following the hysteroscopic peritumoural injection of 99mTc-labelled albumin nanocolloid in endometrial cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32(5):569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrone, AM, Casadio, P, Formelli, G, et al. Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(1):6267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robova, H, Charvat, M, Strnad, P, et al. Lymphatic mapping in endometrial cancer: Comparison of hysteroscopic and subserosal injection and the distribution of sentinel lymph nodes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(3):391394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delaloye, JF, Pampallona, S, Chardonnens, E, et al. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy using hysteroscopy in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106(1):8993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fersis, N, Gruber, I, Relakis, K, et al. Sentinel node identification and intraoperative lymphatic mapping. First results of a pilot study in patients with endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004;25(3):339342.Google ScholarPubMed
Montz, FJ, Bristow, RE, Bovicelli, A, Tomacruz, R, Kurman, RJ. Intrauterine progesterone treatment of early endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(4):651657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunderson, CC, Fader, AN, Carson, KA, Bristow, RE. Oncologic and reproductive outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125(2):477482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbs, JL, Saig, RM, Abaid, LN, Bae-Jump, VL, Gehrig, PA. Systemic and local hormone therapy for endometrial hyperplasia and early adenocarcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121(6):11721180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arendas, K, Aldossary, M, Cipolla, A, Leader, A, Leyland, NA. Hysteroscopic resection in the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22(1):3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurelli, G, Di Vagno, G, Scaffa, C, et al. Conservative treatment of early endometrial cancer: preliminary results of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120(1):4346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzon, I, Corrado, G, Masciullo, V, et al. Conservative surgical management of stage IA endometrial carcinoma for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2010;93(4):12861289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Marzi, P, Bergamini, A, Luchini, S, et al. Hysteroscopic resection in fertility-sparing surgery for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: safety and efficacy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22(7):11781182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falcone, F, Laurelli, G, Losito, S, et al. Fertility preserving treatment with hysteroscopic resection followed by progestin therapy in young women with early endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2017;28(1):e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, S, Castellanos, T, Lapuente, F, Chiva, L. Hysteroscopic surgery for conservative management in endometrial cancer: a review of the literature. Ecancermedicalscience 2015;9:505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasuda, M, Terai, Y, Sekijima, T, et al. Successful pregnancy after conservative surgery for stage IA endometrial cancer in a young woman. Fertil Steril 2009;91(3):936.e13–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, F, Yu, A, Xu, H, et al. Fertility preserved hysteroscopic approach for the treatment of stage Ia endometrioid carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017;27(9):19191925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, H, Toyofuku, K, Taniguchi, I, et al. A successful pregnancy and delivery after resectoscopic surgery for early invasive endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2009;30(6):689690.Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, B, Xu, Y, Zhu, Q, et al. Treatment efficiency of comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection combined with progestin therapy in young women with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019;153(1):5562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tock, S, Jadoul, P, Squifflet, JL, et al. Fertility sparing treatment in patients with early stage endometrial cancer, using a combination of surgery and GnRH agonist: a monocentric retrospective study and review of the literature. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, Z, Li, H, Hu, R, et al. Fertility-preserving treatment in young women with grade 1 presumed stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018;28(2):383393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, CJ, McVey, RM, Tone, AA, et al. The fallopian tube as the origin of high grade serous ovarian cancer: review of a paradigm shift. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2014;36(2):133140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, JW, Miron, A, Jarboe, EA, et al. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: its potential role in primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and serous cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(25):41604165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67(1):730.Google ScholarPubMed
Canadian Cancer Society Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2014. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2014.Google Scholar
Sholapurkar, SL. A plea for early diagnosis of fallopian tube carcinoma: can hysteroscopy be of use? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165(2):483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H, Klein, R, Arnold, S, et al. Tubal cytology of the fallopian tube as a promising tool for ovarian cancer early detection. J Vis Exp 2017;(125):55887.Google Scholar
Gizzo, S, Noventa, M, Quaranta, M, et al. A novel hysteroscopic approach for ovarian cancer screening/early diagnosis. Oncol Lett 2017;13(2):549553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lum, D, Guido, R, Rodriguez, E, et al. Brush cytology of the fallopian tube and implications in ovarian cancer screening. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21(5):851856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Wangensteen, OH, Lewis, FJ, Tongen, LA. The “second-look” in cancer surgery; a patient with colic cancer and involved lymph nodes negative on the “sixth-look.J Lancet 1951;71(8):303307.Google Scholar
Arhelger, SW, Jensen, CB, Wangensteen, OH. Experiences with the “second-look” procedure in the management of cancer of the colon and rectum: with special reference to site of residual cancer. Lancet 1957;77:412417.Google ScholarPubMed
Rutledge, F, Burns, BC. Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;96:761772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallach, RC, Blinick, G. The second look operation for carcinoma of the ovary. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:10851089.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, JP, Delgado, G, Rutledge, R. Second-look operation in ovarian carcinoma: postchemotherapy. Cancer 1976;38:14381442.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimer, RR, Hoover, R, Fraumeni, JF, et al. Acute leukemia after alkylating-agent therapy of ovarian cancer. New Engl J Med 1977;297:177181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, N. Acute leukemia after chemotherapy (melphalan). Cancer 1978;41:444447.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berek, JS, Hacker, NF, Lagasse, LD, et al. Second-look laparotomy in Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: clinical variables associated with disease status. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64(2):207212.Google ScholarPubMed
Luesley, DM, Cahn, KK, Fielding, JWL, et al. Second-look laparotomy in the management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: an evaluation of fifty cases. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64(3):421426.Google ScholarPubMed
Smirz, LR, Stehman, FB, Ulbright, TM, et al. Second-look laparotomy after chemotherapy in the management of ovarian malignancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152(6):661668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballon, SC, Portnuff, JC, Sikic, BI, et al. Second-look laparotomy in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: precise definition, sensitivity and specificity of the operative procedure. Gynecol Oncol 1984;17:154160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podratz, KC, Cliby, WA. Second-look surgery in the management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1994;55:S128133.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrow, CP. An opinion in support of second-look surgery in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:341343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greer, BE, Bundy, BN, Ozols, RF, et al. Implications of second-look laparotomy in the context of optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a nonrandomized comparison using an explanatory analysis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:7179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baram, A, Kovner, F, Lessing, JB. A second thought on second look laparotomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:386390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delbeke, D, Martin, WH. Positron emission tomography imaging in oncology. Radiol Clin North Am 2001;39:883917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S, Chung, JK, Kang, SM, et al. [18 F] FDG PET as a substitute for second-look laparotomy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31(2):196201.Google ScholarPubMed
Berek, JS, Knapp, RC, Malkasian, GD, et al. CA 125 serum levels correlated with second-look operations among ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67(5):685689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, SC, Hoskins, WJ, Hakes, TB, et al. Serum CA 125 levels and surgical findings in patients undergoing secondary operations for epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160(3):667671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podratz, KC, Malkasian, GD, Hilton, JF, et al. Second-look laparotomy in ovarian cancer: evaluation of pathologic variables. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152(2):230238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, SC, Hoskins, WJ, Saigo, PE, et al. Prognostic factors for recurrence following negative second-look laparotomy in ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 1991;42:137141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, SC, Jones, WB, Curtin, JP, et al. Second-look laparotomy in stage I ovarian cancer following comprehensive surgical staging. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(1):139142.Google Scholar
Rubin, SC, Lewis, JR. Second-look surgery in ovarian cancer. CRC Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1988;88(1):7591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozols, RF, Bundy, BN, Greer, BE, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(17):31943200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershenson, DM, Copeland, LJ, Wharton, JT, et al. Prognosis of surgically determined complete responders in advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer 1985;55:11291135.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berek, JS. Second-look versus second-nature. Gynecol Oncol 1992;44:12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahaman, J, Lottino, P, Jennings, TS, et al. The second-look operation improves survival in suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, CJ, Bruckner, HW, Goldberg, JD, et al. Improved therapy with cisplatin regimens for patients with ovarian carcinoma (FIGO III and IV) as measured by surgical end-staging (second-look surgery) – the Mount Sinai experience. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1983;10:307324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicoletto, MO, Tumolo, S, Talamini, R, et al. Surgical second look in ovarian cancer: a randomized study in patients with laparoscopic complete remission – a Northeastern Oncology Cooperative Group-Ovarian Cancer Cooperative Group study. J Clin Oncol 1997;15(3):994999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luesley, D, Lawton, F, Blackledge, G, et al. Failure of second-look laparotomy to influence survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet 1988;2(8611):599603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janisch, H, Schieder, K, Koelbl, H. Diagnostic versus therapeutic second-look surgery in patients with ovarian cancer. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1989;3:191200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozols, RF, Fisher, RI, Anderson, T, et al. Peritoneoscopy in the management of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;140:611619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piver, MS, Lele, SB, Barlow, JJ, et al. Second-look laparoscopy prior to proposed second-look laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55(5):571573.Google ScholarPubMed
Xygakis, AM, Politis, GS, Michalas, SP, et al. Second-look laparoscopy in ovarian cancer. J Reprod Med 1984;29(8):583585.Google ScholarPubMed
Berek, JS, Griffiths, CT, Leventhal, JM. Laparoscopy for second-look evaluation in ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58(2):193198.Google ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR, Barakat, RR, Diegel, PL, et al. Second-look operation for epithelial ovarian cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:549553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, AC, Farias-Eisner, R, Pisani, AL, et al. What is the role of reassessment laparoscopy in the management of gynecologic cancers in 1995? Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:454461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childers, JM, Lang, J, Surwit, EA, et al. Laparoscopic surgical staging of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husain, A, Chi, DS, Prasad, M, et al. The role of laparoscopy in second-look evaluations for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001;80:4447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clough, KB, Ladonne, JM, Nos, C, et al. Second look for ovarian cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? A prospective comparative study. Gynecol Oncol 1999;72:411417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, MA, Bishop, GJ, Campbell, JJ, et al. Laparoscopic follow-up of patients with ovarian carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87(12):11321139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, SD, Blessing, JA, DiSaia, PJ, et al. Second-look laparotomy in ovarian germ cell tumors: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience. Gynecol Oncol 1994;52:285289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershenson, DM, Copeland, LJ, del Junco, G, et al. Second-look laparotomy in the management of malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:789793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershenson, DM. The obsolescence of second-look laparotomy in the management of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol 1994;52:283285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathew, GK, Singh, SS, Swaminathan, RG, et al. Laparotomy for post-chemotherapy residue in ovarian germ cell tumours. J Postgrad Med 2006;52:262265.Google Scholar
Salani, R, Backes, FJ, Fung Kee Fung, M, et al. Posttreatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncologists recommendations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204(6):466478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2012. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer. Copyright © 2011 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc., All Rights Reserved.Google Scholar
Niloff, JM, Bast RCJr. Schaetzl, EM, et al. Predictive value of CA125 antigen levels in second-look procedures for ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;15:981986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M, Camacho-Vanegas, O, Wood, AM, et al. Applying precision medicine to ovarian cancer: proof-of-principle for a “molecular second look.Int J Gyn Cancer 2018;28(3):479485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knisely A, Lee S, Niteck Ri, et. al. Prognostic implications of minimal residual disease detection by second-look laparoscopy and circulating tumor DNA among patients with ovarian cancer after front-line therapy LBA7 SGO 2024. Gynecol Oncol 2024;190:S2–S67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Berends, FJ, Kazemier, G, Bonjer, HJ, et al. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 1994;344:58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundberg, O. Port site metastases after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg Suppl 2000;585:2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siriwardena, A, Samarji, WN. Cutaneous tumor seeding from a previously undiagnosed pancreatic carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75:199200.Google ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, JO, McCall, JL, Morris, DL. Port site seeding after laparoscopic ultrasonographic staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Surgery 1995;117:118119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, RK, Wait, MA. Port site metastasis after laparoscopic staging of esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:10321034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cava, A, Roman, J, Gonzalez Quintela, A, et al. Subcutaneous metastasis following laparoscopy in gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1990;16:6367.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, MP, von Gruenigen, V, Gaich, S. Laparoscopic port site implantation with ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:735736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:22242229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:20502059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, DB, Guo, LW, Reinhard, MK, et al. Impact of pneumoperitoneum on trocar site implantation of colon cancer in hamster model. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:11821188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, CA, Ordemann, J, Bohm, B, et al. The influence of laparotomy and laparoscopy on tumor growth in a rat model. Surg Endosc 1997;11:618621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Moine, MC, Navarro, F, Burgel, JS, et al. Experimental assessment of the risk of tumor recurrence after laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 1998;123:427431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouvy, ND, Marquet, RL, Jeekel, J, et al. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with less tumor growth stimulation than conventional surgery: an experimental study. Br J Surg 1997;84:358361.Google ScholarPubMed
Southall, JC, Lee, SW, Allendorf, JD, et al. Colon adenocarcinoma and B-16 melanoma grow larger following laparotomy vs. pneumoperitoneum in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:564569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutt, CN, Riemer, V, Kim, ZG, et al. Impact of laparoscopic colonic resection on tumor growth and spread in an experimental model. Br J Surg 1999;86:11801184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, B, Schwenk, W, Muller, JM. Long-term results after laparoscopic resection of colorectal carcinoma [in German]. Chirurg 1999;70:453455.Google ScholarPubMed
Poulin, EC, Mamazza, J, Schlachta, CM, et al. Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 1999;229:487492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearlstone, DB, Mansfield, PF, Curley, SA, et al. Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancy. Surgery 1999;125:6772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu-Rustum, NR, Rhee, EH, Chi, DS, et al. Subcutaneous tumor implantation after laparoscopic procedures in women with malignant disease. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:480487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Mulder, W, Gillardin, JP, Hofman, P, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis of the first 237 cases. Acta Chir Belg 2001;101:2530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, D, Tabet, J, Anvari, M. Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1018; discussion 18–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauter, DM, Froines, EJ. Initial experience with 150 cases of laparoscopic assisted colectomy. Am J Surg 2001;181:398403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobronte, Z, Wittmann, T, Karacsony, G. Rapid development of malignant metastases in the abdominal wall after laparoscopy. Endoscopy 1978;10:127130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umpleby, HC, Fermor, B, Symes, MO, et al. Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 1984;71:659663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, RJ, Jaques, BC, Mitchell, KG. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet 1993;341:249250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, ES, McDermott, FT, Polglase, AL, et al. Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:571572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilly, WT, Nelson, H, Schroeder, G, et al. Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:200207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wexner, SD, Cohen, SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 1995;82:295298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolucci, V, Schaeff, B, Schneider, M, et al. Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey. World J Surg 1999;23:989995; discussion 996–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagarsheth, NP, Rahaman, J, Cohen, CJ, et al. The incidence of port-site metastases in gynecologic cancers. JSLS 2004;8:133139.Google ScholarPubMed
Santoro, R, Barrat, C, Catheline, JM, et al. Port site metastasis. Prospective study of 131 cases [in Italian]. Chir Ital 1998;50:1522.Google ScholarPubMed
Pearlstone, DB, Feig, BW, Mansfield, PF. Port site recurrences after laparoscopy for malignant disease. Semin Surg Oncol 1999;16:307312.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoup, M, Brennan, MF, Karpeh, MS, et al. Port site metastasis after diagnostic laparoscopy for upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies: an uncommon entity. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:632636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rassweiler, J, Tsivian, A, Kumar, AV, et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1000 operations. J Urol 2003;169:20722075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, F, Yadav, J, Rahaman, J, et al. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies using ultrasonically activated shears: analysis of first 100 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2005;97:813819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, MP, Dulai, RM, Occhino, A, et al. The effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on seeding of tumor in port sites in a rat model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:13291333; discussion 1333–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dore, F, Melis, GC, Fumu, E, et al. Role of densitometry and scintigraphy in post-traumatic algodystrophy of the arms. Initial diagnosis and monitoring during treatment with carbocalcitonin [in Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1991;81:114117.Google ScholarPubMed
Are, C, Talamini, MA. Laparoscopy and malignancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2005;15:3847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Are, C, Talamini, MA. Current knowledge regarding the biology of pneumoperitoneum based surgery. Curr Probl Gen Surg 2001;18:5263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allardyce, R, Morreau, P, Bagshaw, P. Tumor cell distribution following laparoscopic colectomy in a porcine model. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(Suppl):S47–S52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathew, G, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, et al. The effect of laparoscopy on the movement of tumor cells and metastasis to surgical wounds. Surg Endosc 1997;11:11631166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knolmayer, TJ, Asbun, HJ, Shibata, G, et al. An experimental model of cellular aerosolization during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:399402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Champault, G, Taffinder, N, Ziol, M, et al. Cells are present in the smoke created during laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1997;84:993995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittich, P, Marquet, RL, Kazemier, G, et al. Port-site metastases after CO2 laparoscopy. Is aerosolization of tumor cells a pivotal factor? Surg Endosc 2000;14:189192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, RL, Sellers, GJ, Allendorf, JD, et al. Trocar site recurrence is unlikely to result from aerosolization of tumor cells. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(10 Suppl):S7–S13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikramuddin, S, Lucus, J, Ellison, EC, et al. Detection of aerosolized cells during carbon dioxide laparoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:580583; discussion 584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SH, Milsom, JW, Gramlich, TL, et al. Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:971978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nduka, CC, Poland, N, Kennedy, M, et al. Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells? Surg Endosc 1998;12:10311034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellers, GJ, Whelan, RL, Allendorf, JD, et al. An in vitro model fails to demonstrate aerosolization of tumor cells. Surg Endosc 1998;12:436439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvy, ND, Marquet, RL, Jeekel, H, et al. Impact of gas(less) laparoscopy and laparotomy on peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases. Ann Surg 1996;224:694700; discussion 700–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allardyce, RA, Morreau, P, Bagshaw, PF. Operative factors affecting tumor cell distribution following laparoscopic colectomy in a porcine model. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:939945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reymond, MA, Wittekind, C, Jung, A, et al. The incidence of port-site metastases might be reduced. Surg Endosc 1997;11:902906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, WM, Eaton, MC, Hewett, PJ. A proposed model for the movement of cells within the abdominal cavity during CO2 insufflation and laparoscopy. Aust NZ J Surg 1996;66:105106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewett, PJ, Thomas, WM, King, G, et al. Intraperitoneal cell movement during abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation and laparoscopy. An in vivo model. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(10 Suppl): S62S66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira, H Jr, Yamaguchi, T, Wexner, S, et al. Effect of pneumoperitoneal pressure on tumor dissemination and tumor recurrence at port-site and midline incisions. Am Surg 2001;67:369373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, CA, Wenger, FA, Ordemann, J, et al. Experimental study of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on tumor growth and port site metastasis. Br J Surg 1998;85:14191422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutt, CN, Kim, ZG, Hollander, D, et al. CO2 environment influences the growth of cultured human cancer cells dependent on insufflation pressure. Surg Endosc 2001;15:314318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseng, LN, Berends, FJ, Wittich, P, et al. Port-site metastases. Impact of local tissue trauma and gas leakage. Surg Endosc 1998;12:13771380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutter, D, Hajri, A, Tassetti, V, et al. Increased tumor growth and spread after laparoscopy vs laparotomy: influence of tumor manipulation in a rat model. Surg Endosc 1999;13:365370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SW, Southall, J, Allendorf, J, et al. Traumatic handling of the tumor independent of pneumoperitoneum increases port site implantation rate of colon cancer in a murine model. Surg Endosc 1998;12:828834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redmond, HP, Watson, RW, Houghton, T, et al. Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1994;129:12401246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trokel, MJ, Bessler, M, Treat, MR, et al. Preservation of immune response after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:13851387; discussion 1387–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, JM, LaPorta, AJ, Clark, JR, et al. Response of serum cytokines in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:13801383; discussion 1383–1384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, F, Sannwald, GA, Buhr, HJ, et al. General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1995;221:372380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maruszynski, M, Pojda, Z. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels in the monitoring of surgical trauma. A comparison of serum IL-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1995;9:882885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansbrough, JF, Bender, EM, Zapata-Sirvent, R, et al. Altered helper and suppressor lymphocyte populations in surgical patients. A measure of postoperative immunosuppression. Am J Surg 1984;148:303307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christou, NV, Ing, AF, Larson, DL, et al. A reliable rat model of the delayed hypersensitivity skin test response. J Surg Res 1984;37:264268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro-Dias, F, Russo, M, Nascimento, FR, et al. Thioglycollate-elicited murine macrophages are cytotoxic to Mycoplasma arginini-infected YAC-1 tumor cells. Braz J Med Biol Res 1998;31:14251428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, R, Yoneda, J, Fidler, IJ, et al. GM-CSF-transduced B16 melanoma cells are highly susceptible to lysis by normal murine macrophages and poorly tumorigenic in immune-compromised mice. J Leukoc Biol 1999;65:102108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennemann, B, Rehm, A, Kottke, A, et al. Adoptive immunotherapy with tumor-cytotoxic macrophages derived from recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood monocytes. J Immunother 1997;20:365371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pujade-Lauraine, E, Guastalla, JP, Colombo, N, et al. Intraperitoneal recombinant interferon gamma in ovarian cancer patients with residual disease at second-look laparotomy. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:343350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlan, RI, Burns, WH, White, DO. Two cytotoxic cells in peritoneal cavity of virus-infected mice: antibody-dependent macrophages and nonspecific killer cells. J Immunol 1977;119:15691574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, AH, Shen, L, Medley, G. Characteristics of the effector cells mediating cytotoxicity against antibody-coated target cells. I. Phagocytic and non-phagocytic effector cell activity against erythrocyte and tumor target cells in a 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay and [125I]IUdR growth inhibition assay. Immunology 1975;29:719729.Google Scholar
Bingle, L, Brown, NJ, Lewis, CE. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor progression: implications for new anti-cancer therapies. J Pathol 2002;196:254265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, JJ, Lin, YC, Yao, PL, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages: the double-edged sword in cancer progression. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:953964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, MA, Hackam, DJ, Baker, J, et al. Mechanism of decreased in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to carbon dioxide: relevance to laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 1997;226:179190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carozzi, S, Caviglia, PM, Nasini, MG, et al. Peritoneal dialysis solution pH and Ca2+ concentration regulate peritoneal macrophage and mesothelial cell activation. ASAIO J 1994;40:2023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopernik, G, Avinoach, E, Grossman, Y, et al. The effect of a high partial pressure of carbon dioxide environment on metabolism and immune functions of human peritoneal cells – relevance to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179(6 p. 1):1503–1510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutt, CN, Heinz, P, Kaps, W, et al. The phagocytosis activity during conventional and laparoscopic operations in the rat. A preliminary study. Surg Endosc 1997;11:899901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishida, H, Murata, N, Yamada, H, et al. Pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide enhances liver metastases of cancer cells implanted into the portal vein in rabbits. Surg Endosc 2000;14:239242 [erratum 14:411].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathew, G, Watson, DI, Rofe, AM, et al. Adverse impact of pneumoperitoneum on intraperitoneal implantation and growth of tumor cell suspension in an experimental model. Aust NZ J Surg 1997;67:289292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavina, E, Goletti, O, Molea, N, et al. Trocar site tumor recurrences. May pneumoperitoneum be responsible? Surg Endosc 1998;12:12941296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Targarona, EM, Martinez, J, Nadal, A, et al. Cancer dissemination during laparoscopic surgery: tubes, gas, and cells. World J Surg 1998;22:5560; discussion 60–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volz, J, Koster, S, Spacek, Z, et al. The influence of pneumoperitoneum used in laparoscopic surgery on an intraabdominal tumor growth. Cancer 1999;86:770774.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, S, Melchert, F, Volz, J. Effect of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on intraperitoneal tumor growth in the animal model [in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1996;56:458461.Google ScholarPubMed
Mathew, G, Watson, DI, Rofe, AM, et al. Wound metastases following laparoscopic and open surgery for abdominal cancer in a rat model. Br J Surg 1996;83:10871090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canis, M, Botchorishvili, R, Wattiez, A, et al. Tumor growth and dissemination after laparotomy and CO2 pneumoperitoneum: a rat ovarian cancer model. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:104108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridgway, PF, Smith, A, Ziprin, P, et al. Pneumoperitoneum augmented tumor invasiveness is abolished by matrix metalloproteinase blockade. Surg Endosc 2002;16:533536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuhaus, SJ, Ellis, T, Rofe, AM, et al. Tumor implantation following laparoscopy using different insufflation gases. Surg Endosc 1998;12:13001302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, A, Watson, DI, Ellis, T, et al. Tumor implantation following laparoscopy using different insufflation gases. A NZ J Surg 2002;72:254257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockdale, AD, Pocock, TJ. Abdominal wall metastasis following laparoscopy: a case report. Eur J Surg Oncol 1985;11:373375.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruitwagen, RF, Swinkels, BM, Keyser, KG, et al. Incidence and effect on survival of abdominal wall metastases at trocar or puncture sites following laparoscopy or paracentesis in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:233237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadar, N. Port-site recurrences following laparoscopic operations for gynaecological malignancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:13081313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dam PA, , DeCloedt, J, Tjalma, WA, et al. Trocar implantation metastasis after laparoscopy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: can the risk be reduced? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:536541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecuru, F, Darai, E, Robin, F, et al. Port site metastasis after laparoscopy for gynecological cancer: report of two cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:10211023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scribner, DR Jr, Walker, JL, Johnson, GA, et al. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible? Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:563568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Abu-Rustum, NR, Sonoda, Y, et al. Ten-year experience with laparoscopy on a gynecologic oncology service: analysis of risk factors for complications and conversion to laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:11381145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leblanc, E, Querleu, D, Narducci, F, et al. Laparoscopic restaging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:624629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tozzi, R, Kohler, C, Ferrara, A, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of early ovarian cancer: surgical and survival outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:199203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Abu-Rustum, NR, Sonoda, Y, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging of apparent stage I ovarian and fallopian tube cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:16141619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, AM, Delgado, S, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, et al. Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial. Surg Endosc 1998;12:10391042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milsom, JW, Bohm, B, Hammerhofer, KA, et al. Elson conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:4654; discussion 54–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morino, M, Parini, U, Giraudo, G, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 2003;237:335342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, IS, Sung, GT, Hobart, MG, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Urol 2000;164:15131522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicco, A, Salomon, L, Hoznek, H, et al. Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Eur Urol 2000;38:606612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillonneau, B, Vallancien, G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000;163:418422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingler, HC, Lodde, M, Pycha, A, et al. Modified laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for treatment of upper urinary tract transitional cell cancer is not associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence. Eur Urol 2003;44:442447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillonneau, B, el-Fettouh, H, Baumert, H, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 2003;169:12611266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhoul, B, De La Taille, A, Vordos, D, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer: the gold standard? A comparison of laparoscopic vs. open nephrectomy. BJU Int 2004;93:6770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wille, AH, Roigas, J, Deger, S, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2004;45:483488; discussion 488–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micali, S, Celia, A, Bove, P, et al. Tumor seeding in urological laparoscopy: an international survey. J Urol 2004; 171(6 p. 1):2151–2154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moinzadeh, A, Gill, IS. Laparoscopic radical adrenalectomy for malignancy in 31 patients. J Urol 2005;173:519525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rassweiler, J, Schulze, M, Teber, D, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients. J Urol 2005;173:761764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kindermann, G, Maassen, V, Kuhn, W. Laparoscopic preliminary surgery of ovarian malignancies. Experiences from 127 German gynecologic clinics [in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1995;55:687694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, CA, Peter, FJ, Wenger, FA, et al. New therapeutic strategies to avoid intra- and extraperitoneal metastases during laparoscopy: results of a tumor model in the rat. Dig Surg 1999;16:393399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hase, K, Ueno, H, Kuranaga, N, et al. Intraperitoneal exfoliated cancer cells in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:11341140 [erratum 41:1249].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, CA, Ordemann, J, Bohm, B, et al. Inhibition of peritoneal tumor cell growth and implantation in laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. Am J Surg 1997;174:359363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, RE. Opposition to NH1 urged [Letter]. J Oral Surg 1975;33:487.Google ScholarPubMed
Zivanovic, O, Sonoda, Y, Diaz, JP, et al. The rate of port-site metastases after 2251 laparoscopic procedures in women with underlying malignant disease. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111(3):431437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rindos, N, Curry, CL, Tabbarah, R, et al. Port-site metastases after robotic surgery for gynecologic malignancy. JSLS 2014;18:6670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraez, D, Godoy, H, McElrath, T, et al. Low-incidence of port-site metastases after robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer: a descriptive analysis. J Robotic Surg 2015;9:9195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezhat, FR, Finger, TN, Vetere, P, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Int J Gyn Cancer 2014:24(3);600607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, Ervik, M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136(5):E359386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torre, LA, Islami, F, Siegel, RL, et al. Global cancer in women: burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(4):444457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stordal, B, Davey, M. Understanding cisplatin resistance using cellular models. IUBMB Life 2007;59(11):696699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alberts, DS, Liu, P, Hannigan, EV, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1996;335(26):19501955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, DK, Bundy, B, Wenzel, L, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354(1):3443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markman, M, Bundy, BN, Alberts, DS, et al. Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2001;19(4):10011007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tewari, D, Java, JJ, Salani, R, et al. Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(13):14601466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elias, D, Antoun, S, Raynard, B, et al. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis using complete excision and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia. A phase I-II study defining the best technical procedures. [article in French] Chirurgie 1999;124(4):380389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega-Deballon, P, Facy, O, Jambet, S, et al. Which method to deliver hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin? An experimental comparison of open and closed techniques. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17(7):19571963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henle, KJ, Leeper, DB Effects of hyperthermia (45) on macromolecular synthesis in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cancer Res 1979;39(7 Part 1):26652674.Google ScholarPubMed
Kampinga, H, Jorritsma, J, Konings, AW. Heat-induced alterations in DNA polymerase activity of HeLa cells and of isolated nuclei. Relation to cell survival. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1985;47(1):2940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiro, IJ, Denman, D, Dewey, WC. Effect of hyperthermia on CHO DNA polymerases alpha and beta. Radiat Res 1982;89(1):134149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinga, JVE, Konings, AWT, Kampinga, HH. Reduction of cellular cisplatin resistance by hyperthermia – a review. Int J Hyperthermia 1997;13(5):439457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hettinga, J, Lemstra, W, Meijer, C, et al. Mechanism of hyperthermic potentiation of cisplatin action in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant tumour cells. Br J Cancer 1997;75(12):17351743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Los, G, van Vugt, M, Pinedo, HM. Response of peritoneal solid tumours after intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin. Br J Cancer 1994;69(2):235241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Los, G, van Vugt, MJ, den Engelse, L, Pinedo, HM. Effects of temperature on the interaction of cisplatin and carboplatin with cellular DNA. Biochem Pharmacol 1993;46(7):12291237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, E, Parker, RJ, Gill, I, et al. Platinum-DNA adduct in leukocyte DNA of a cohort of 49 patients with 24 different types of malignancies. Cancer Res 1993;53(16):36943699.Google ScholarPubMed
Hofstetter, G, Concin, N, Braicu, I, et al. The time interval from surgery to start of chemotherapy significantly impacts prognosis in patients with advanced serous ovarian carcinoma – analysis of patient data in the prospective OVCAD study. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131(1):1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seagle, B-LL, Butler, SK, Strohl, AE, et al. Chemotherapy delay after primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017;144(2):260265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hildebrand, B, Wust, P, Ahlers, O, et al. The cellular and molecular basis of hyperthermia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2002;43(1):3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Los, G, Sminia, P, Wondergem, J, et al. Optimisation of intraperitoneal cisplatin therapy with regional hyperthermia in rats. Eur J Cancer 1991;27(4):472477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zivanovic, O, Abramian, A, Kullmann, M, et al. HIPEC ROC I: a phase I study of cisplatin administered as hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemoperfusion followed by postoperative intravenous platinum‐based chemotherapy in patients with platinum‐sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 2015;136(3):699708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bree, E, Rosing, H, Filis, D, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(4):11831192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansaloni, L, Coccolini, F, Morosi, L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of concomitant cisplatin and paclitaxel administered by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2015;112(2):306312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakrin, N, Bereder, JM, Decullier, E, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a French multicentre retrospective cohort study of 566 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39(12):14351443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakrin, N, Cotte, E, Golfier, F, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for persistent and recurrent advanced ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter, prospective study of 246 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(13):40524058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cascales-Campos, PA, Gil, J, Gil, E, et al. Treatment of microscopic disease with hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy after complete cytoreduction improves disease-free survival in patients with stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2014);21(7):23832389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Giorgio, A, De Iaco, P, De Simone, M, et al. Cytoreduction (peritonectomy procedures) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in advanced ovarian cancer: retrospective Italian multicenter observational study of 511 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24(4):914922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz-Casares, FC, Medina-Fernandez, FJ, Arjona-Sanchez, A, et al. Peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: long-term outcomes and perspectives from a high-volume center. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42(2):224233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Classe, JM, Glehen, O, Decullier, E, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for first relapse of ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 2015;35(9):49975005.Google ScholarPubMed
Deraco, M, Virzi, S, Iusco, DR, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. BJOG 2012;119(7):800809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagotti, A, Costantini, B, Petrillo, M, et al. Cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients: a case-control study on survival in patients with two year follow-up. Gynecol Oncol 2012;127(3):502505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrillo, M, De Iaco, P, Cianci, S, et al. Long-term survival for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with secondary cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(5):16601665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Zivanovic, O, Levinson, KL, et al. The incidence of major complications after the performance of extensive upper abdominal surgical procedures during primary cytoreduction of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2010;8258(10)00423-3 [pii]Google Scholar
Kehoe, SM. Eisenhauer, EL, Abu-Rustum, NR, et al. Incidence and management of pancreatic leaks after splenectomy with distal pancreatectomy performed during primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian, peritoneal and fallopian tube cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112(3):496500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bristow, RE, Tomacruz, RS, Armstrong, DK, Trimble, EL, Montz, FJ. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(5):12481259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, Eisenhauer, EL, Lang, J, et al. What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)? Gynecol Oncol 2006;103(2):559564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, DS, Eisenhauer, EL, Zivanovic, O, et al. Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114(1):2631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, DS, McCaughty, K, Diaz, JP, et al. Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106(9):19331939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenhauer, EL, Abu-Rustum, NR, Sonoda, Y, et al. The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103(3):10831090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenkop, SM, Spirtos, NM, Friedman, RL, et al. Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90(2):390396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zivanovic, O, Sima, CS, Iasonos, A, et al. The effect of primary cytoreduction on outcomes of patients with FIGO stage IIIC ovarian cancer stratified by the initial tumor burden in the upper abdomen cephalad to the greater omentum. Gynecol Oncol 2010;116(3):351357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiliotis, J, Halkia, E, Lianos, E, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective randomized phase III study. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22(5):15701575. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4157-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harter, P, du Bois, A, Mahner, S, et al. Statement of the AGO Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria and AGO Switzerland regarding the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016;76(2):147149.Google Scholar
Harter, P, Reuss, A, Sehouli, J, Chiva, L, du Bois, A. Brief report about the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a prospective randomized phase 3 study in recurrent ovarian cancer from Spiliotis et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017;27(2):246247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Driel, WJ, Koole, SN, Sikorska, K, et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;378(3):230240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koole, SN, van Lieshout, C, van Driel, WJ, et al. Cost effectiveness of interval cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in stage iii ovarian cancer on the basis of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(23):20412050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Eskenazi, B, Warner, ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1997;24(2):235258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, MC, Chun, K-C, Shin, S-J, et al. Clinical presentation of endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer with concurrent endometriosis: a multicenter retrospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(2):398404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, JA Endometrial carcinoma of ovary arising in endometrial tissue in that organ. Arch Surg 1925;10:172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajiyama, H, Suzuki, S, Yoshihara, M, et al. Endometriosis and cancer. Free Radic Biol Med 2019;133:186192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinton, LA, Lamb, EJ, Moghissi, KS, et al. Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility. Fertil Steril 2004 Aug;82(2):405414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinton, LA, Westhoff, C, Soccia, B, et al. Causes of infertility as predictors of subsequent cancer risk. Epidemiology 2005;16(4):500507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melin, A, Sparén, P, Persson, I, Bergqvist, A. Endometriosis and the risk of cancer with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 2006;21(5) 12371242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melin, A, Sparén, P, Bergqvist, A. The risk of cancer and the role of parity among women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2007;22(11):3021–3026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, JE, Cerhan, JR, Janney, CA, et al. Postmenopausal cancer risk after self-reported endometriosis diagnosis in the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Cancer 2002;94(5):16121618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondi-Pafiti, A, Papakonstantinou, E, Iavazzo, C, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of ovarian carcinomas associated with endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285(2):479483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Gorp, T, Amant, F, Neven, P, et al. Endometriosis and the development of malignant tumours of the pelvis. A review of literature. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18(2):349371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnard, ME, Farland, LV, Yan, B, et al. Endometriosis typology and ovarian cancer risk. Am JAMA 2024;332(6):482489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenzuela, P, Ramos, P, Redondo, S, et al. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary and endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;134(1):8386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heaps, JM, Nieberg, RK, Berek, JS. Malignant neoplasms arising in endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75(6):10231028.Google ScholarPubMed
Benoit, L, Anould, L, Cheynel, N, et al. Malignant extraovarian endometriosis: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32(1):611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modesitt, SC, Tortolero-Luna, G, Robinson, JB, et al. Ovarian and extraovarian endometriosis-associated cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100(4):788795.Google ScholarPubMed
Ness, RB, Grisso, JA, Cottreau, C, et al. Factors related to inflammation of the ovarian epithelium and risk of ovarian cancer. Epidemiology 2000;11(2):111117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ness, RB, Cramer, DW, Goodman, MT, et al. Infertility, fertility drugs, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155(3):217224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinton, LA, Gridley, G, Persson, I, Baron, J, Bergqvist, A. Cancer risk after a hospital discharge diagnosis of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176(3):572579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgfeldt, C, Andolf, E. Cancer risk after hospital discharge diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts and endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83(4):395400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modugno, F, Ness, RB, Allen, GO, et al. Oral contraceptive use, reproductive history, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with and without endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(3):733740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H, Sumimoto, K, Moniwa, N, et al. Risk of developing ovarian cancer among women with ovarian endometrioma: a cohort study in Shizuoka, Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17(1):3743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, CL, Templeman, C, Rossing, MA, et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol 2012;13(4):385394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozerlat, I. Gynecological cancer: endometriosis link to invasive subtypes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9(4):189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, JJ, William, J, Bulun, S. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of clinical, pathologic, and molecular aspects. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2011;30(6):553568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deligdisch, L, Pénault-Llorca, F, Schlosshauer, P, et al. Stage I ovarian carcinoma: different clinical pathologic patterns. Fertil Steril 2007;88(4):906910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, Y, Zou, J-Y, Guo, J-B, et al. The presence of KRAS, PPP2R1A and ARID1A mutations in 101 Chinese samples with ovarian endometriosis. Mutat Res 2018;809:15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeda, T, Banno, K, Okawa, R, et al. ARID1A gene mutation in ovarian and endometrial cancers (Review). Oncol Rep 2016;35(2):607613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, M, Nakayama, K, Nakamura, K, et al. Affinity-purified DNA-based mutation profiles of endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms in Japanese patients. Oncotarget 2018;9(19):1475414763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Cohen, C, Rahaman, J, et al. Comparative immunohistochemical studies of BCL-2 and p53 proteins in benign and malignant ovarian endometriotic cysts. Cancer 2002;94(11):29352940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anglesio, MS, Papdopoulos, N, Ayhan, A, et al. Cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis without cancer. N Engl J Med 2017;376(19):18351848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munksgaard, PS, Blaakaer, J. The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of histological, genetic and molecular alterations. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124(1):164169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiegand, KC, Shah, SP, Al-Agha, OM, et al. ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. N Engl J Med 2010;363(16):15321543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H, Yamada, Y, Kawahara, N, et al. Integrating modern approaches to pathogenetic concepts of malignant transformation of endometriosis. Oncol Rep 2019;41(3):17291738.Google ScholarPubMed
Bukulmez, O, Hardy, DB, Carr, BR, Wood, RA Mendelson, CR. Inflammatory status influences aromatase and steroid receptor expression in endometriosis. Endocrinology 2008;149(3):11901204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rambau, P, Kelemen, LE, Steed, H, et al. Association of hormone receptor expression with survival in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: biological validation and clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18(3):515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguchi, K, Huang, Z, Matsumura, N, et al. Epigenetic determinants of ovarian clear cell carcinoma biology. Int J Cancer 2014;135(3):585597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H, Sugimoto, H, Onishi, S, Nakano, K. Novel biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2015;10(2):612618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jana, S. Chaterjee, K, Ray, AK, et al. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity by COX-2-PGE2-pAKT axis promotes angiogenesis in endometriosis. PLoS One 2016;11(10):e0163540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Carmen, MG, Smith Sehdev, AE, Nickles Fader, A, et al. Endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma: differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and estrogen/progesterone receptors. Cancer 2003;98(8):16581663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C, Allan, CJ, Metzger, DA, Sears, DL. Clinical and histologic classification of endometriomas. Implications for a mechanism of pathogenesis. J Reprod Med 1992;37(9):771776.Google ScholarPubMed
Melin, A-S, Lundholm, C, Malki, N, Swahn, M-L, Sparèn, P. Hormonal and surgical treatments for endometriosis and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92(5):546554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, FR, Apostol, R, Nezhat, C, Pejovic, T. New insights in the pathophysiology of ovarian cancer and implications for screening and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(3):262267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Shoma Datta, M, Hanson, V, et al. The relationship of endometriosis and ovarian malignancy: a review. Fertil Steril 2008;90(5):15591570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, CH, Malik, S, Osias, J, Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C. Laparoscopic management of 15 patients with infiltrating endometriosis of the bladder and a case of primary intravesical endometrioid adenosarcoma. Fertil Steril 2002;78(4):872875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matias-Guiu, X, Stewart, CJ. Endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasia. Pathology 2018,50(2):190204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, HC, Lin, C-Y, Chang, W-C, et al. Increased association between endometriosis and endometrial cancer. A nationwide population based retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015;25(3):447452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, EM, Lin, WT, Kvaskoff, M, et al. Endometriosis and risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers in a large prospective cohort of U.S. nurses. Cancer Causes Control 2017;28(5):437445.Google Scholar
Worley, MJ, Welch, WR, Berkowitz, RS, Ng, S-W. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: a review of pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14:53675379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreta, A, Sarian, L, Canato Ferracini, A, et al. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: population characteristics and prognosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018;28(7):12511257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noli, S, Ciprani, S, Scarfone, G, et al. Long term survival of ovarian endometriosis associated clear cell and endometrioid ovarian cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23(2):244248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagar, H, Yan, W, Parashar, B, et al. Adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy +/- vaginal brachytherapy in patients with high-risk stage I or stage II uterine papillary serous, clear cell, and high-grade endometrioid carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2016;39(4):335339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreta, A, Sarian, L, Canato Ferracin, A, et al. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. Population characteristics and prognosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018;28(7):12511257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M, Rauh-Hain, A, Andrade, C, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with clear cell and endometrioid ovarian cancer associated with endometriosis to papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2014;132(2):760766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paik, ES, Kim, TJ, Choi, CH, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with clear cell and endometrioid ovarian cancer arising from endometriosis. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29(2):e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahin, H, Sari, ME, Cuyian, ZF, et al. Is the presence of endometriosis associated with a survival benefit in pure ovarian clear cell carcinoma? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;297(4):10051013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J, Brady, MF, Young, RC, et al. Randomized phase III trial of three verses six cycles of adjuvant carboplatin and paciltaxel in early stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2006;102(3):432439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, JK, Tian, C, Fleming, GF, et al. The potential benefit of 6 vs. 3 cycles of chemotherapy in subsets of women with early-stage high-risk epithelial ovarian cancer: an exploratory analysis of a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2010;116(3):301306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takano, M, Kikuchi, Y, Yaegashi, N, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective multicentre experience of 254 patients with complete surgical staging. Brit J Cancer 2006;94(10):13691374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, CA, Zhou, Q, Jotwani, AR, et al. Ovarian clear cell carcinoma, outcomes by stage: the MSK experience. Gynecol Oncol 2015;139(2):236241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugiyama, T, Okamoto, A, Enomoto, T, et al. Randomized phase III trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first line chemotherapy for ovarian clear cell carcinoma: JGOG3017/GCIG trial. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(24):28812887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagai, Y, Iamine, M, Hirakawa, M, et al. Postoperative whole abdominal radiotherapy in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2007;107:469473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swenerton, KD, Santos, JL, Gilks, CB, et al. Histotype predicts the curative potential of radiotherapy: the example of ovarian cancers. Ann Onc 2010;22(2):341347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoskins, PJ, Le, N, Gilks, B, et al. Low-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: population-based outcomes in British Columbia, Canada, with evidence for a survival benefit as a result of irradiation. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(14):16561662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedernea, E, Gomora, M, Morales-Vasquez, F, Perez-Montiel, D, Mendez, C. Progesterone reduces cell survival in primary culture of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. J Ovarian Res 2019;12(1):1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A, Gabra, H, Langdon, SP, et al. CA 125 response is associated with estroven receptor expression in a phase II trial of letrozole in ovarian cancer: identification of an endocrine-sensitive subgroup. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:22332239.Google Scholar
Papadimitriou, CA, Markaki, S, Siapkara, J, et al. Hormonal therapy with letrozole for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Long-term results of a phase II study. Oncology 2004;66:112117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, JF, Gourley, C, Walker, G, et al. Antiestrogen therapy is active in selected ovarian cancer cases: the use of letrozole in estrogen receptor positive patients. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:36173622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Schmeler, KM, Milam, MR, et al. Efficacy of letrozole in the treatment of recurrent platinum- and taxane-resistant high-grade cancer of the ovary or peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110:5659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, D, Zhang, F, Zhang, W, et al. Prognostic role of hormone receptors in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23(1):2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modungo, F, Ness, RB, Allen, GO, et al. Contraceptive use, reproductive history, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with and without endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(3):733744.Google Scholar

References

Armstrong, K, Weiner, J, Weber, B, Asch, DA. Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why. Genet Med 2003 Mar;5(2):9298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miki, Y, Swensen, J, Shattuck-Eidens, D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):6671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooster, R, Bignell, G, Lancaster, J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995 Dec;378(6559):789792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behjati, S, Tarpey, PS. What is next generation sequencing? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2013 Dec;98(6):236238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dancey, JE, Bedard, PL, Onetto, N, Hudson, TJ. The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell 2012 Feb 3;148(3):409420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudson, AG. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1971 Apr;68(4):820823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, JM, Powell, CB, Chen, L, Richardson, DL, SGO Clinical Practice Committee. Society of Gynecologic Oncology statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions. Gynecol Oncol 2015 Jan;136(1):37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilarski, R, Berry, MP, Jude, S, et al. FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered. NCCN Guidelines Version 3.2019 Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. 2019. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdfGoogle Scholar
Practice Bulletin No 182: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2017 Sep;130(3):e110e126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, K, Miki, Y. Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 as regulators of DNA repair, transcription, and cell cycle in response to DNA damage. Cancer Sci 2004 Nov;95(11):866871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narod, SA, Feunteun, J, Lynch, HT, et al. Familial breast-ovarian cancer locus on chromosome 17q12-q23. Lancet 1991 Jul 13;338(8759):8283.Google ScholarPubMed
Walsh, T, Casadei, S, Coats, KH, et al. Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2006 Mar 22;295(12):1379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooster, R, Neuhausen, SL, Mangion, J, et al. Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. Science 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):20882090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PDQ Cancer Genetics Editorial Board. Genetics of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers (PDQ®): Health Professional Version PDQ Cancer Information Summaries. 2002. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389210Google Scholar
Kuchenbaecker, KB, Hopper, JL, Barnes, DR, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 2017 Jun 20;317(23):24022416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, A, Pharoah, PDP, Narod, S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003 May 1;72(5):11171130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsop, K, Fereday, S, Meldrum, C, et al. BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2012 Jul 20;30(21):26542663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, S, Royer, R, Li, S, et al. Frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among 1,342 unselected patients with invasive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011 May 1;121(2):353357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilarski, R, Axilbund, JE, Crawford, B, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2016 Panel Members Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. DVM & FORCE – Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered MPH Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center.Google Scholar
Roa, BB, Boyd, AA, Volcik, K, Richards, CS. Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nat Genet 1996 Oct;14(2):185187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClain, MR, Palomaki, GE, Nathanson, KL, Haddow, JE. Adjusting the estimated proportion of breast cancer cases associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: public health implications. Genet Med 2005 Jan;7(1):2833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauff, ND, Satagopan, JM, Robson, ME, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation. N Engl J Med 2002 May 23;346(21):16091615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buys, SS, Partridge, E, Black, A, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality. JAMA 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iodice, S, Barile, M, Rotmensz, N, et al. Oral contraceptive use and breast or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2010 Aug;46(12):22752284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, MB, Pilarski, R, Berry, M, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2017 Jan;15(1):920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domchek, SM, Friebel, TM, Singer, CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA 2010 Sep 1 9;304(9):967975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch, APM, Lubinski, J, Møller, P, et al. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014 May 20;32(15):15471553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebbeck, TR, Lynch, HT, Neuhausen, SL, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 2002 May 23;346(21):16161622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, B, Kwon, J, Fung, M, et al. Systematic review of management options for women with a hereditary predisposition to ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004 May 10;93(2):280296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandrasekaran, D, Menon, U, Evans, G, et al. Risk reducing salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy in high risk women: views of cancer geneticists, genetic counsellors and gynaecological oncologists in the UK. Fam Cancer 2015;14:521530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauff, ND, Barakat, RR. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 2007 Jul 10;25(20):29212927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, CB, Kenley, E, Chen, L-M, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: role of serial sectioning in the detection of occult malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2005 Jan 1;23(1):127–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finch, A, Shaw, P, Rosen, B, et al. Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol 2006 Jan;100(1):5864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yates, MS, Meyer, LA, Deavers, MT, et al. Microscopic and early-stage ovarian cancers in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: building a model for early BRCA-associated tumorigenesis. Cancer Prev Res 2011 Mar 1;4(3):463470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, F, Muto, MG, Lee, Y, et al. The tubal fimbria is a preferred site for early adenocarcinoma in women with familial ovarian cancer syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 2006 Feb;30(2):230236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koc, N, Ayas, S, Arinkan, SA. Comparison of the classical method and SEE-FIM protocol in detecting microscopic lesions in fallopian tubes with gynecological lesions. J Pathol Transl Med 2018 Jan;52(1):2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, PA, Rouzbahman, M, Pizer, ES, Pintilie, M, Begley, H. Candidate serous cancer precursors in fallopian tube epithelium of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Mod Pathol 2009 Sep 19;22(9):11331138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, CB, Chen, L, McLennan, J, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA mutation carriers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011 Jul;21(5):846851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, YC, Milne, RL, Lheureux, S, et al. Risk of uterine cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Eur J Cancer 2017 Oct;84:114120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavie, O, Ben-Arie, A, Segev, Y, et al. BRCA germline mutations in women with uterine serous carcinoma – still a debate. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010 Dec;20(9):15311534.Google ScholarPubMed
Pennington, KP, Walsh, T, Lee, M, et al. BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma. Cancer 2013 Jan 15;119(2):332338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, CA, Pike, MC, Jotwani, AR, et al. Uterine cancer after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy without hysterectomy in women with BRCA mutations. JAMA Oncol 2016 Nov 1;2(11):14341440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavie, O, Hornreich, G, Ben-Arie, A, et al. BRCA germline mutations in Jewish women with uterine serous papillary carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2004 Feb;92(2):521524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segev, Y, Iqbal, J, Lubinski, J, et al. The incidence of endometrial cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: an international prospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2013;130:127131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordhandas, S, Norquist, BM, Pennington, KP , et al. Hormone replacement therapy after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations; a systematic review of risks and benefits. Gynecol Oncol 2019 Apr;153(1):192200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nebgen, DR, Hurteau, J, Holman, LL, et al. Bilateral salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk reduction: a pilot study in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. 2018 Jul;150(1):7984.Google ScholarPubMed
Bryant, HE, Schultz, N, Thomas, HD, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):913917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, H, McCabe, N, Lord, CJ, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):917921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristeleit, R, Shapiro, GI, Burris, HA, et al. A phase I–II study of the oral PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2 -mutated ovarian carcinoma or other solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2017 Aug 1;23(15):40954106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domchek, SM, Aghajanian, C, Shapira-Frommer, R, et al. Efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with advanced ovarian cancer and three or more lines of prior therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2016 Feb;140(2):199203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swisher, EM, Lin, KK, Oza, AM, et al. Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(1):7587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, MR, Monk, BJ, Herrstedt, J, et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2016 Dec 1;375(22):21542164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pujade-Lauraine, E, Ledermann, JA, Selle, F, et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017 Sep;18(9):12741284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, J, Harter, P, Gourley, C, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1382–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K, Colombo, N, Scambia, G, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2018 Dec 27;379(26):24952505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RAD51D RAD51 paralog D [Homo sapiens (human)] – Gene ID: 5892. NCBI. Updated September 19, 2024. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?Db=gene&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=5892Google Scholar
Dosanjh, MK, Collins, DW, Fan, W, et al. Isolation and characterization of RAD51C, a new human member of the RAD51 family of related genes. Nucleic Acids Res 1998 Mar 1;26(5):11791184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, GJ, Sinclair, CS, Paape, J, et al. 17q23 amplifications in breast cancer involve the PAT1, RAD51C, PS6 K, and SIGma1B genes. Cancer Res 2000 Oct 1;60(19):53715375.Google Scholar
Tung, N, Domchek, SM, Stadler, Z, et al. Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13(9):581588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, H, Dicks, E, Ramus, SJ, et al. Contribution of germline mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes to ovarian cancer in the population. J Clin Oncol 2015 Sep 10;33(26):29012907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRIP1 BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 [Homo sapiens (human)] – Gene ID: 83990. NCBI. Updated September 19, 2024. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?Db=gene&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=83990Google Scholar
Lilyquist, J, LaDuca, H, Polley, E, et al. Frequency of mutations in a large series of clinically ascertained ovarian cancer cases tested on multi-gene panels compared to reference controls. Gynecol Oncol 2017;147(2):375380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, SJ, Song, H, Dicks, E, et al. Germline mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN genes in women with ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015 Nov;107(11).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, SB, Thompson, WD. A population-based study of endometrial cancer and familial risk in younger women. Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1996 Jun 1;5(6):411417.Google ScholarPubMed
Dunlop, MG, Farrington, SM, Nicholl, I, et al. Population carrier frequency of hMSH2 and hMLH1 mutations. Br J Cancer 2000 Dec 5;83(12):16431645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de la Chapelle, A. The incidence of Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 2005 Sep;4(3):233237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, KH, Schorge, JO, Rodabaugh, KJ, et al. Prospective determination of prevalence of Lynch syndrome in young women with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007 Nov 20;25(33):51585164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berends, MJW, Wu, Y, Sijmons, RH, et al. Toward new strategies to select young endometrial cancer patients for mismatch repair gene mutation analysis. J Clin Oncol 2003 Dec 1;21(23):43644370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, S, Ahnen, DJ, Blanco, AM, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2018 Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal NCCN Guidelines Panel Disclosures Continue. 2018.Google Scholar
Hsieh, P, Yamane, K. DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanism, cancer, and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2008 Jul;129(7–8):391407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira, L, Balaguer, F, Lindor, N, et al. Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 2012 Oct 17;308(15):1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niessen, RC, Hofstra, RMW, Westers, H, et al. Germline hypermethylation of MLH1 and EPCAM deletions are a frequent cause of Lynch syndrome. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2009 Aug;48(8):737744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aarnio, M, Sankila, R, Pukkala, E, et al. Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. Int J Cancer 1999 Apr 12;81(2):214218.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonadona, V, Bonaïti, B, Olschwang, S, et al. Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2011 Jun 8;305(22):23042310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, KH, Dinh, M, Kohlmann, W, et al. Gynecologic cancer as a “sentinel cancer” for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2005 Mar;105(3):569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broaddus, RR, Lynch, HT, Chen, L, et al. Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC. Cancer 2006 Jan 1;106(1):8794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westin, SN, Lacour, RA, Urbauer, DL, et al. Carcinoma of the lower uterine segment: a newly described association with Lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2008 Dec 20;26(36):59655971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ketabi, Z, Bartuma, K, Bernstein, I, et al. Ovarian cancer linked to Lynch syndrome typically presents as early-onset, non-serous epithelial tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Jun 1;121(3):462465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasen, HF, Mecklin, JP, Khan, PM, Lynch, HT. The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum 1991 May;34(5):424425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasen, HF, Watson, P, Mecklin, JP, Lynch, HT. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative Group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999 Jun;116(6):14531456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, H, Frankel, W, Panescu, J, et al. Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Res 2006 Aug 1;66(15):78107817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giardiello, FM, Allen, JI, Axilbund, JE, et al. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2014 Aug;57(8):10251048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umar, A, Boland, CR, Terdiman, JP, et al. Revised Bethesda guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 Feb 18;96(4):261268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Bigas, MA, Boland, CR, Hamilton, SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997 Dec 3;89(23):17581762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piñol, V, Castells, A, Andreu, M, et al. Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. JAMA 2005 Apr 27;293(16):19861994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 147: Lynch syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2014 Nov; 124(5):10421054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruegl, AS, Djordjevic, B, Urbauer, DL, et al. Utility of MLH1 methylation analysis in the clinical evaluation of Lynch syndrome in women with endometrial cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2014;20(11):16551663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, B, Ye, K, Zhang, Q, et al. MSIsensor: microsatellite instability detection using paired tumor-normal sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014 Apr 1;30(7):10151016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haraldsdottir, S, Hampel, H, Tomsic, J, et al. Colon and endometrial cancers with mismatch repair deficiency can arise from somatic, rather than germline, mutations. Gastroenterology 2014 Dec;147(6):13081316.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renkonen-Sinisalo, L, Bützow, R, Leminen, A, et al. Surveillance for endometrial cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Int J Cancer 2007 Feb 15;120(4):821824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerritzen, LHM, Hoogerbrugge, N, Oei, ALM, et al. Improvement of endometrial biopsy over transvaginal ultrasound alone for endometrial surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 2009 Dec 6;8(4):391397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeler, KM, Lynch, HT, Chen, L, et al. Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers in the Lynch syndrome. N Engl J Med 2006 Jan 19;354(3):261269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeler, KM, Daniels, MS, Soliman, PT, et al. Primary peritoneal cancer after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in two patients with Lynch syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 2):432434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pistorius, S, Kruger, S, Hohl, R, et al. Occult endometrial cancer and decision making for prophylactic hysterectomy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2006 Aug;102(2):189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, KY, Caughey, AB, Little, SE, Cheung, MK, Chen, L-M. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic surgery versus gynecologic surveillance for women from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families. Fam Cancer 2011 Sep 3;10(3):535543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, JS, Sun, CC, Peterson, SK, et al. Cost‐effectiveness analysis of prevention strategies for gynecologic cancers in Lynch syndrome. Cancer 2008 Jul 15;113(2):326335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemery, S, Keegan, P, Pazdur, R. First FDA approval agnostic of cancer site – when a biomarker defines the indication. N Engl J Med 2017 Oct 12;377(15):14091412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francisco, LM, Sage, PT, Sharpe, AH. The PD-1 pathway in tolerance and autoimmunity. Immunol Rev 2010 Jul 15;236(1):219242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudley, B, Brand, RE, Thull, D, et al. Germline MLH1 mutations are frequently identified in Lynch syndrome patients with colorectal and endometrial carcinoma demonstrating isolated loss of PMS2 immunohistochemical expression. Am J Surg Pathol 2015 Aug;39(8):11141120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelen, MR, Padberg, GW, Peeters, EAJ, et al. Localization of the gene for Cowden disease to chromosome 10q22–23. Nat Genet 1996 May;13(1):114116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stambolic, V, Suzuki, A, de la Pompa, JL, et al. Negative regulation of PKB/Akt-dependent cell survival by the tumor suppressor PTEN. Cell 1998 Oct 2;95(1):2939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, M-H, Mester, JL, Ngeow, J, et al. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2012 Jan 15;18(2):400407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bubien, V, Bonnet, F, Brouste, V, et al. High cumulative risks of cancer in patients with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome. J Med Genet 2013 Apr;50(4):255263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilarski, R, Burt, R, Kohlman, W, et al. Cowden syndrome and the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome: systematic review and revised diagnostic criteria. JNCI 2013 Nov 6; 105(21):16071616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Lier MGF, , Wagner, A, Mathus-Vliegen, EMH, et al. High cancer risk in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and surveillance recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 Jun 5;105(6):12581264; author reply 1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenne, DE, Reimann, H, Nezu, J, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel serine threonine kinase. Nat Genet 1998 Jan;18(1):3843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syngal, S, Brand, RE, Church, JM, et al. ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol 2015 Feb 3;110(2):223262; quiz 263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RH, Welch, WR, Dickersin, GR, Scully, RE. Ovarian sex cord tumor with annular tubules: review of 74 cases including 27 with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and four with adenoma malignum of the cervix. Cancer 1982 Oct 1;50(7):13841402.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivatsa, PJ, Keeney, GL, Podratz, KC. Disseminated cervical adenoma malignum and bilateral ovarian sex cord tumors with annular tubules associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gynecol Oncol 1994 May;53(2):256264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaminski, PF, Norris, HJ. Minimal deviation carcinoma (adenoma malignum) of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1983;2(2):141152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beggs, AD, Latchford, AR, Vasen, HFA, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and recommendations for management. Gut 2010 Jul 1;59(7):975986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noone, AM, Howlader, N, Krapcho, M, et al. Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015 – SEER Statistics based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. 2018. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/Google Scholar
Chen, S, Parmigiani, G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 2007 Apr;25(11):13291333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempers, MJE, Kuiper, RP, Ockeloen, CW, et al. Risk of colorectal and endometrial cancers in EPCAM deletion-positive Lynch syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2011 Jan;12(1):4955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Liebermann-Meffert, D. The greater omentum. Anatomy, embryology, and surgical applications. Surg Clin North Am 2000 Feb;80(1):275293, xii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, S, Lowery, E, Braun, RK, et al. Cellular basis of tissue regeneration by omentum. PLoS One 2012;7(6):e.38368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arie, AB, McNally, L, Kapp, DS, Teng, NN. The omentum and omentectomy in epithelial ovarian cancer: a reappraisal. Part I – omental function and history of omentectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2013 Dec;131(3):780783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsujimoto, J, Hagiwara, A, Shimotsuma, M, et al. Role of milky spots as selective implantation sites for malignant cells in peritoneal dissemination in mice. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1996;122(10):590595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arie, AB, McNally, L, Kapp, DS, Teng, NN. The omentum and omentectomy in epithelial ovarian cancer: a reappraisal: part II – the role of omentectomy in the staging and treatment of apparent early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013 Dec;131(3):784790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuer, GA, Lakhi, N, Barker, J, Salmieri, S, Burrell, M. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. Gynecol Oncol 2013 Dec;131(3):520524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuer, GA, Lakhi, N, Woo, A, et al. Robotic surgery for staging of serous papillary and clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Med Robot 2014 8 April;10(3):306313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Gynecologic Malignancy
  • Edited by Camran R. Nezhat, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, Farr R. Nezhat, Nezhat Surgery for Gynecology/Oncology, New York, Ceana Nezhat, Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta, Nisha Lakhi, Richmond University Medical Center, New York, Azadeh Nezhat, Nezhat Institute and Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, California
  • Book: Nezhat's Textbook of Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Online publication: 06 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561440.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Gynecologic Malignancy
  • Edited by Camran R. Nezhat, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, Farr R. Nezhat, Nezhat Surgery for Gynecology/Oncology, New York, Ceana Nezhat, Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta, Nisha Lakhi, Richmond University Medical Center, New York, Azadeh Nezhat, Nezhat Institute and Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, California
  • Book: Nezhat's Textbook of Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Online publication: 06 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561440.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Gynecologic Malignancy
  • Edited by Camran R. Nezhat, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, Farr R. Nezhat, Nezhat Surgery for Gynecology/Oncology, New York, Ceana Nezhat, Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta, Nisha Lakhi, Richmond University Medical Center, New York, Azadeh Nezhat, Nezhat Institute and Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, California
  • Book: Nezhat's Textbook of Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Online publication: 06 November 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108561440.020
Available formats
×