Skip to main content
×
Home
Opting Out of Congress
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Opting Out of Congress
    • Online ISBN: 9781316872055
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316872055
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This book provides a candidate entry explanation for partisan polarization in Congress. Danielle M. Thomsen draws on quantitative data to show that ideological moderates are less likely to run for and remain in Congress than those at the extremes. The book introduces a party fit argument for why moderates have opted out of congressional politics. It suggests that the personal and professional benefits of congressional service have diminished for liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats as the parties have drifted apart. Although the political center has long been deemed a coveted position in the legislature, it is now a lonely and lowly place to be. Opting Out of Congress argues that partisan polarization is unlikely to diminish if ideological moderates do not run for office, and reformers who seek to restore bipartisanship in Congress must consider how to encourage moderates to launch congressional candidacies.

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Alan I. Abramowitz and Kyle L. Saunders . 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.

Paul R. Abramson , John H. Aldrich , and David W. Rohde . 1987. “Progressive Ambition among United States Senators: 1972–1988.” Journal of Politics 49(1): 335.

Douglas J. Ahler , Jack Citrin , and Gabriel S. Lenz . 2016. “Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? An Experimental Test of California's 2012 Top-Two Primary.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(2): 237–68.

John H. Aldrich 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Strategies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

John H. Aldrich 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

John H. Aldrich 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

John R. Alford , Holly Teeters , Daniel S. Ward , and Rick K. Wilson . 1994. “Overdraft: The Political Cost of Congressional Malfeasance.” Journal of Politics 56(3): 788801.

Stephen Ansolabehere and Alan Gerber . 1997. “Incumbency Advantage and the Persistence of Legislative Majorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(2): 161–78.

Stephen Ansolabehere , James M Snyder , and Charles Stewart . 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 136159.

Joseph Bafumi and Michael C Herron . 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.” American Political Science Review 104(3): 519–42.

Jeffrey S. Banks and D. Roderick Kiewiet . 1989. “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 33(4): 9971015.

Michael J. Barber and Nolan McCarty . 2015. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Larry M. Bartels 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 3550.

Gordon S. Black 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 144–59.

178 Robert G. Boatright 2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Jon R. Bond , Cary Covington , and Richard Fleisher . 1985. “Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47(2): 510–29.

Adam Bonica . 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 294311.

Adam Bonica . 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 367–86.

Adam Bonica . 2015. “Data Science for the People.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Paul Brace . 1984. “Progressive Ambition in the House: A Probabilistic Approach.” Journal of Politics 46(2): 556–71.

Paul Brace . 1985. “A Probabilistic Approach to Member Retirement from the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10(1): 107–24.

David W. Brady , Hahrie Han , and Jeremy C. Pope . 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1): 79105.

David Broockman . 2014. “Mobilizing Candidates: Political Actors Strategically Shape the Candidate Pool with Personal Appeals.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1(2): 104–19.

Charles S. Bullock 1972. “House Careerists: Changing Patterns of Longevity and Attrition.” American Political Science Review 66(4): 1295–300.

Barry Burden . 2004. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34(2): 211–27.

Andrea Louise Campbell . 2002. “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens.” American Political Science Review 96(3): 565–74.

Brandice Canes-Wrone , David W Brady , and John F Cogan. 2002. “Out of Step, out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 127–40.

Edward G. Carmines 2011. “Review Symposium: Class Politics, American Style.” Perspectives on Politics 9(3): 645–7.

179 Nicholas Carnes . 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Susan J. Carroll and Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jamie L. Carson , Michael H. Crespin , Charles J. Finocchiaro , and David W. Rohde . 2007. “Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35(6): 878904.

Jamie L. Carson and Jason M. Roberts . 2013. Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform: The Politics of Congressional Elections Across Time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Marty Cohen , David Karol , Hans Noel , and John Zaller . 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gary W. Cox and Jonathan N. Katz . 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 478–97.

Gary W. Cox and Mathew D. McCubbins . 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Michael H. Crespin and Janna L. Deitz . 2010. “If You Can't Join ‘Em, Beat ‘Em: The Gender Gap in Individual Donations to Congressional Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 581–93.

Debra L. Dodson 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.

Casey Dominguez . 2011. “Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly 64(3): 534–44.

Laurel Elder . 2008. “Whither Republican Women: The Growing Partisan Gap among Women in Congress.” The Forum 6(1): Article 13.

Laurel Elder . 2012. “The Partisan Gap among Women State Legislators.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Public Policy 33(1): 6585.

Robert S. Erikson 1971. “The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3(3): 395403.

181 Hazel Erskine . 1971. “The Polls: Women's Role.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35(2): 275–90.

C. Lawrence Evans and Walter J. Oleszek . 1999. “The Strategic Context of Congressional Party Leadership.” Congress and the Presidency 26(1): 120.

Richard Fleisher and John R Bond . 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 34(3): 429–51.

Brian Frederick . 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress and the Presidency 36(2): 181202.

Jo Freeman . 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.

Sarah A. Fulton , Cherie D. Maestas , L. Sandy Maisel , and Walter J. Stone . 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Office.” Political Research Quarterly 59(2): 235–48.

John Geer . 1988. “Assessing the Representativeness of Electorates in Presidential Primaries.” American Journal of Political Science 32(4): 929–45.

Elisabeth R. Gerber and Rebecca B. Morton . 1998. “Primary Election Systems and Representation.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 14(2): 304–24.

Bernard Grofman , William Koetzle , and Anthony J. McGann . 2002. “Congressional Leadership 1965–96: A New Look at the Extremism versus Centrality Debate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 87105.

Tim Groseclose and Keith Krehbiel . 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirement from the 102nd House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 7599.

Matt Grossman and David A. Hopkins . 2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 13(1): 119–39.

Matt Grossman and David A Hopkins . 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jeffrey D. Grynaviski 2010. Partisan Bonds: Political Reputations and Legislative Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson . 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 643–62.

Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson . 2015. “Confronting Asymmetric Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richard L. Hall and Robert P. Van Houweling . 1995. “Avarice and Ambition in Congress: Representatives’ Decisions to Run or Retire from the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 89(1): 121–37.

Eric Heberlig , Marc Hetherington , and Bruce Larson . 2006. “The Price of Leadership: Campaign Money and the Polarization of Congressional Parties.” Journal of Politics 68(4): 9921005.

Paul S. Herrnson 1986. “Do Parties Make a Difference? The Role of Party Organizations in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 48(3): 589615.

Marc J. Hetherington 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–31.

Marc J. Hetherington 2009. “Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39(2): 413–48.

John R. Hibbing 1982. “Voluntary Retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives: Who Quits?” American Journal of Political Science 26(3): 467–84.

John R. Hibbing and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse . 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Attitudes toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shigeo Hirano , James M Snyder , Stephen Ansolabehere , and John Mark Hansen . 2010. “Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(2): 169–91.

Shigeo Hirano , Gabriel S. Lenz , Maksim Pinkovskiy , and James M Snyder 2015. “Voter Learning in State Primary Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 91108.

Gary C. Jacobson 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 773–93.

Gary C. Jacobson 2015. “It's Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77(3): 861–73.

Gary C. Jacobson and Michael A. Dimock . 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 601–24.

Stephen Jessee and Neil Malhotra . 2010. “Are Congressional Leaders Middlepersons or Extremists? Yes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 35(3): 361–92.

Kristin Kanthak and Jonathan Woon . 2015. “Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 595612.

D. Roderick Kiewiet and Langche Zeng . 1993. “An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions: 1947–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(4): 928–41.

Diane Kincaid . 1978. “Over His Dead Body: A Positive Perspective on Widows in the U.S. Congress.” Western Political Quarterly 31(1): 96104.

Keith Krehbiel . 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23(2): 235–66.

Jennifer L. Lawless and Richard L. Fox . 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jennifer L. Lawless and Richard L. Fox . 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jennifer L. Lawless and Kathryn Pearson . 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70(1): 6782.

Jennifer L. Lawless and Sean M. Theriault . 2005. “Will She Stay or Will She Go? Career Ceilings and Women's Retirement from the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(4): 581–96.

Geoffrey C. Layman and Thomas M. Carsey . 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 786802.

Geoffrey C. Layman , Thomas M. Carsey , John C. Green , Richard Herrera , and Rosalyn Cooperman . 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 324–46.

Frances E. Lee 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Matthew Levendusky . 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Steven D. Levitt and Catherine D. Wolfram . 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1): 4560.

186 Cherie D. Maestas , Sarah A. Fulton , L. Sandy Maisel , and Walter J. Stone . 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 195208.

Sandy Maisel and Walter J Stone . 2014. “Candidate Emergence Revisited: The Lingering Effects of Recruitment, Ambition, and Successful Prospects among House Candidates.” Political Science Quarterly 129(3): 429–47.

Seth E. Masket 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Seth E. Masket and Michael G. Miller . 2014. “Does Public Election Funding Create More Extreme Legislators? Evidence from Arizona and Maine.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 15(1): 2440.

Nolan McCarty . 2015. “Reducing Polarization by Making Parties Stronger.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nolan McCarty , Keith T Poole , and Howard Rosenthal . 2009. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?” American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 666–80.

Eric McGhee , Seth Masket , Boris Shor , Steve Rogers , and Nolan McCarty . 2014. “A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 337–51.

Suzanne Mettler . 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Michael K. Moore and John R. Hibbing . 1998. “Situational Dissatisfaction in Congress: Explaining Voluntary Departures.” Journal of Politics 60(4): 10881107.

David Niven . 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women and Politics 19(2): 5780.

Barbara Norrander . 1989. “Ideological Representativeness of Presidential Primary Voters.” American Journal of Political Science 33(3): 570–87.

Tracy L. Osborn 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Representation, and Gender in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.

Samuel C. Patterson 1963. “Legislative Leadership and Political Ideology.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27(3): 399410.

Kathryn Pearson . 2015. Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Nathan Persily . 2015a. Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

188 Nathan Persily . 2015b. “Stronger Parties as a Solution to Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richard H. Pildes 2015. “Focus on Political Fragmentation, Not Polarization: Re-empower Party Leadership.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Markus Prior and Natalie Jomini Stroud . 2015. “Using Mobilization, Media, and Motivation to Curb Political Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Nathan Persily . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mark D. Ramirez 2009. “The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 681–94.

Jason M. Roberts and Steven S. Smith . 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 305–17.

David W. Rohde 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 126.

189 David W. Rohde 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

David W. Rohde and Kenneth A. Shepsle . 1973. “Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process.” American Political Science Review 67(3): 889905.

Ruth Bloch Rubin . 2013. “Organizing for Insurgency: Intraparty Organization and the Development of the House Insurgency, 1908–1910.” Studies in American Political Development 27(2): 86110.

Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Ronnee Schreiber . 2012. “Mama Grizzlies Compete for Office.” New Political Science 34(4): 549–63.

Ronnee Schreiber . 2014. “Conservative Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office, 3rd ed., eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox . New York: Oxford University Press.

Boris Shor and Nolan McCarty . 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 530–51.

Steven S. Smith and Bruce A. Ray . 1983. “The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments.” Congress & The Presidency 10(2): 219–40.

James M. Snyder and Michael M. Ting . 2002. “An Informational Rationale for Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 90110.

Joe Soss . 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93(2): 363–80.

James A. Stimson , Michael B. MacKuen , and Robert S. Erikson . 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.

Walter J. Stone , and L. Sandy Maisel . 2003. “The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates’ Nomination and General Election Chances.” Journal of Politics 65(4): 951977.

Walter J. Stone , L. Sandy Maisel , and Cherie D. Maestas . 2004. “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 479495.

191 Michele L. Swers 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chris Tausanovitch and Christopher Warshaw . 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” Journal of Politics 75(2): 330–42.

Sean M. Theriault 2006. “Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress: Member Replacement and Member Adaptation.” Party Politics 12(4): 483503.

Sean M. Theriault 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sean M. Theriault 2013. The Gingrich Senators: The Roots of Partisan Warfare in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.

Danielle M. Thomsen 2014. “Ideological Moderates Won't Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress.” Journal of Politics 76(3): 786–87.

Danielle M. Thomsen 2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(2): 295323.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 384 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th May 2017 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.