Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2019
  • Online publication date: July 2019

8 - Queues: Tensions between Institution and Organization

from Part 2 - Organization in and around Markets


The formation of queues is an institution: it is created and managed largely by the emergent norms of those in the queue. Research on queues has demonstrated that it is more and more common for organizations to intervene in the ordering of queues. In this chapter we investigate why and how queues are organized and the tensions that arise when a strong institution becomes the subject of partial organization. As an institution, the idea of how to form a queue has strong legitimacy resting on commonly accepted values of equality and fairness. The fact that a queue is organized with one or several organizational elements does not necessarily mean that the queue as an institution is replaced by organization; on the contrary, organizational decisions may support the queue as an institution. In other cases, however, organization is a challenge to the legitimacy of the queue; instead it is the organization that uses its power to further its own interest in selecting the preferred customers from a larger number of people standing in a line. When an organization decides the order in which people are admitted, little remains of the institution of the queue.

Ahrne, G. (1990) Agency and Organization. Towards an Organizational Theory of Society. London: SAGE.
Alexander, M., MacLaren, A., O`Gorman, K., & White, C. (2012) Priority Queues: Where Social Justice and Equity Collide. Tourism Management 33: 875–84.
Allon, G. & Hanany, E. (2012) Cutting in Line: Social Norms in Queues. Management Science 58(3): 493506.
Brady, F. (2002) Lining up for Star-Wars Tickets: Some Ruminations on Ethics and Economics Based on an Internet Study of Behavior in Queues. Journal of Business Ethics 38(1): 157–65.
Ehn, B. & Löfgren, O. (2010) The Secret World of Doing Nothing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Elster, J. (2009) Norms. In Bearman, P. and Hedström, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press. 195217.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hraba, J. (1985) Consumer Shortages in Poland: Looking beyond the Queue into a World of Making Do. The Sociological Quarterly 26(3): 387404.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1986) Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. The Journal of Business 59(4): 285300.
Larson, R. C. (1987) Perspectives on Queues: Social Justice and Psychology of Queueing. Operations Research 35(6): 895905.
Liang, C-C. (2017) Enjoyable Queuing and Waiting Time. Time & Society.
Mann, L. (1969) Queue Culture: The Waiting Line as a Social System. The American Journal of Sociology 75(3): 340–54.
Rafaeli, A., Kedmi, E., Vashdi, D., & Barron, G. (2005) Queues and Fairness. A Multiple Study Experimental Investigation (manuscript). Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa: Israel.
Sandel, M. J. (2012) What Money Can´t Buy. The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Allen Lane.
Sartre, J.-P. (1976) Critique of Dialectical Reason. Volume 1. London: Verso.
Schwartz, B. (1974) Waiting, Exchange, and Power: The Distribution of Time in Social Systems. American Journal of Sociology 79(4): 841–69.
Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wexler, M. (2015) Re-thinking Queue Culture: The Commodification of Thick Time. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 35(3/4): 165–81.
Williams, D. (2009) Grounding the Regime of Precarious Employment: Homeless Day Laborers’ Negotiations of the Job Queue. Work and Occupations 36(3): 209–46.
Zohar, E., Mandelbaum, A., & Shimkin, N. (2002) Adaptive Behavior of Impatient Customers in Tele-Queues: Theory and Empirical Support. Management Science 48(4): 566–83.