Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:05:46.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Treatment for colorectal cancer: impact on health-related quality of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Carol M. Moinpour Ph.D.
Affiliation:
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
Dawn Provenzale M.D., M.S.
Affiliation:
Professor of Medicine and Director GI Outcomes Research Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Joseph Lipscomb
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Carolyn C. Gotay
Affiliation:
Cancer Research Center, Hawaii
Claire Snyder
Affiliation:
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the US each year. It is estimated that in 2002 there were 148 300 new cases and 56 600 deaths from CRC. Direct evidence from randomized trials and indirect evidence from case-control and cohort studies– suggest that screening affects 5-year survival. Specifically, screening can identify pre-cancerous lesions and prevent development of CRC or identify CRC in earlier stages (I and II) when it can be treated more effectively. The relative 5-year survival rates for early-stage disease (I and II) and advanced disease have been estimated at 65%–90% and 9%, respectively. Because most patients diagnosed with CRC have not undergone screening, most CRCs are diagnosed after local or regional spread, and nearly half of all patients so diagnosed will die from it.

Treatment for CRC is based on the stage and location of disease and includes surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. These modalities may be associated with substantial toxicity, including hair loss, profound nausea and vomiting, and fecal incontinence. Furthermore, therapy for CRC may result in the formation of a permanent or temporary stoma. All of these treatments may have side effects that have an important effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Treatment for colon cancer includes surgical resection for stage I and II disease, and surgery plus chemotherapy for stage III and selected patients with stage IV disease. Palliative care is provided to patients with unresectable disease.

Type
Chapter
Information
Outcomes Assessment in Cancer
Measures, Methods and Applications
, pp. 178 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

National Cancer Institute. Colorectal Screening. http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/pdq/screening/colorectal/healthprofessional. Last accessed September 11, 2004
Mandel, J. S., Bond, J. H., Church, T. R.et al. (1993). Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control StudyNew England Journal of Medicine 328:1365–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selby, J. V., Friedman, G. D., Quesenberry, C. P. Jr.et al. (1992). A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancerNew England Journal of Medicine 326:653–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomb, P. A., Norfleet, R. G., Storer, B. E.et al. (1992). Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortalityJournal of the National Cancer Institute 84:1572–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, A. D., Sonnenberg, A. (1995). Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancerArchives of Internal Medicine 155:1741–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Cancer Institute. Colon cancer treatment. http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/pdq/treatment/colon. Last accessed September 11, 2004
Ries, L. A. G., Eisner, M. P., Kosary, C. L. et al. (eds). (2002). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999. Accessed September 11, 2004
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B.et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncologyJournal of the National Cancer Institute 85:365–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaasa, S., Mastekaasa, A., Stokke, I.et al. (1988). Validation of a quality of life questionnaire for use in clinical trials for treatment of patients with inoperable lung cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 24:691–701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimelius, B., Hoffman, K., Olafsdottir, M.et al. (1989). Quality of life during cytostatic therapy for advanced symptomatic colorectal carcinoma: a randomized comparison of two regimensEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology 25:829–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adang, E. M., Engel, G. L., Konsten, J.et al. (1993). Quality of life after dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: first resultsThoracic Surgery 8:122–4Google Scholar
Renner, K., Rosen, H. R., Novi, G.et al. (1999). Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy?Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 42:1160–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björvell, H., Hylander, B. (1989). Functional status and personality in patients on chronic dialysisJournal of Internal Medicine 226:319–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsberg, C., Bjorvell, H., Cedermark, B. (1996). Well-being and its relation to coping ability in patients with colo-rectal and gastric cancer before and after surgeryScandinavian Journal of Caring Science 10:35–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schipper, H., Clinch, J., McMurray, A.et al. (1984). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index-Cancer: Development and validationJournal of Clinical Oncology 2:472–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, G. R., Lindke, J., Black, P. (1992). Measurement of quality of life in patients: psychometric analyses of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC)Quality of Life Research 1:287–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haes, J. C. J. M., Oostrom, M. A., Welvaart, K. (1986). The effect of radical and conserving surgery on the quality of life of early breast cancer patients.European Journal of Surgical Oncology 12:337–42Google ScholarPubMed
de Haes, J. C. J. M., Raatgever, J. W., van der Burg, M. E. L. et al. (1987). Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with combination chemotherapy. In The Quality of Life of Cancer Patients, ed. N. K. Aaronson, J. Beckman, pp. 215–26. New York: Raven Press
Haes, J. C. J. M., Knippenberg, F. C. E., Neijt, J. P. (1990). Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom ChecklistBritish Journal of Cancer 62:1034–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haes, J. C. J. M., Olschewski, M. (1998). Quality of life assessment in a cross-cultural context: use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist in a multinational randomised trial comparing CMF and Zoladex (Goserlin) treatment in early breast cancerAnnals of Oncology 9:745–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, W. O., Dobson, A. J., Hall, J.et al. (1983). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. A concise QL- Index for use by physiciansJournal of Chronic Disease 34:585–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EuroQoL Group (1990). EuroQoL — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
Kind, P. (1996). The EuroQoL instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd Edn), ed. B. Spilker, pp. 191–201. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven
Zigmund, A. S., Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67:361–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. M., McEwen, J., McKenna, S. P. (1986). Measuring Health Status. London: Croom Helm
Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P. (1991). The Nottingham Health Profile User's Manual. Manchester: Galen Research and Consultancy
McEwen, J., McKenna, S. P. (1996). Nottingham Health Profile. In Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd Edition), ed. B. Spilker, pp. 281–86. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven
Lorr, M., McNair, D. M. (1982). Profile of Mood States: Bi-polar Form. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service
Shacham, S. (1983). A shortened version of the Profile of Mood StatesJournal of Personality Assessment 47:305–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B.et al. (1981). The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measureMedical Care 19:787–805CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damiano, A. M. (1996). The Sickness Impact Profile. In Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd Edition), ed. B. Spilker, pp. 347–54. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven
Erickson, this volume, Chapter 3
Fayers, P., Aaronson, N., Bjordal, K. et al., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. (2001). EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition). Brussels: EORTC
Fayers, P., Weeden, S., Curran, D. (1998). EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. Brussels: EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life
Sprangers, M. A., Cull, A., Bjordal, K.et al., for the EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing modulesQuality of Life Research 2:287–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprangers, M. A. G. (1999). Quality-of-life assessment in colorectal cancer patients: evaluation of cancer therapiesSeminars in Oncology 26:691–6Google ScholarPubMed
Aaronson, N. K., Cull, A. M., Kaasa, S. et al. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Modular Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Oncology: An update. In Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd Edition), ed. B. Spilker, pp. 179–89. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven
Sprangers, M. A. G., te Velde, A.,Aaronson, N. K. on behalf of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life (1999). The construction of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38)European Journal of Cancer 35:238–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sailer, M., Debus, E. S., Fuchs, K.-H. (2000). How useful is the EORTC QLQ-CR38 in the pre- and post-operative evaluation of patients with rectal cancer?Quality of Life Research Newsletter 25:13–14Google Scholar
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G.et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measureJournal of Clinical Oncology 11:570–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cella, D. (1997). FACIT Manual. Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System. Version 4. Evanston, IL: Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE)
Ward, W. L., Hahn, E. A., Mo, F.et al. (1999). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrumentQuality of Life Research 8:181–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courneya, K. S., Friedenreich, C. M. (1997). Relationship between exercise pattern across the cancer experience and current quality of life in colorectal cancer survivorsJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 3:215–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allal, A. S., Bieri, S., Peloni, A.et al. (2002). Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomesBritish Journal of Cancer 82:1131–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika 16:297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borras, J. M., Sanchez-Hernandez, A., Navarro, M.et al. (2001). Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trialBritish Medical Journal 322:1–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhard, J., Hürny, C., Maibach, R., Herrmann, R.et al., for the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). (1999). Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapyAnnals of Oncology 10:775–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulander, K., Jeppsson, B., Grahn, G. (1997). Quality of life and independence in activities of daily living preoperatively and at follow-up in patients with colorectal cancerSupportive Care in Cancer 5:402–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whynes, D. K., Neilson, A. R. (1997). Symptoms before and after surgery for colorectal cancerQuality of Life Research 6:61–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsevick, A. M., Pasacreta, J., Orsi, A. (1995). Psychological distress and functional dependence in colorectal cancer patientsCancer Practice 3:105–10Google ScholarPubMed
Padilla, G. V., Grant, M. M., Lipsett, J.et al. (1992). Health quality of life and colorectal cancerCancer 70:1450–63.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scieszka, M., Zielinski, M., Machalski, M.et al. (2000). Quality of life in cancer patients treated by chemotherapyNeoplasma 47:396–9Google ScholarPubMed
Anthony, T., Jones, C., Antoine, J.et al. (2001). The effect of treatment for colorectal cancer on long-term health-related quality of lifeAnnals of Surgical Oncology 8:44–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructsMedical Care 31:247–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langius, A., Björvell, H., Antonovsky, A. (1992). The Sense of Coherence concept and its relation to personality traits in Swedish samplesScandinavian Journal of Caring Science 6:165–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers
Garufi, C., Brienza, S., Pugliese, P.et al. (2000). Overcoming resistance to chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid by the addition of chronomodulated oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer patientsAnticancer Drugs 11:495–501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garufi, C., Dogliotti, L., D'Attino, R. M.et al. (2001). Irinotecan and chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase I studyCancer 91:712–203.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauns, B., Häring, B., Köhler, S.et al. (2001). Phase II study of combined 5 fluorouracil/Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE 761 ONC) therapy in 5-fluorouracil pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancerPhytotherapy Research 15:34–83.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, B., Becouarn, Y., Aussage, P. (1999). Clinical benefits of stabilization with second line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancerOncology Hematology 32:145–54Google Scholar
Fordy, C., Glover, C., Davies, M. M.et al. (1998). Hepatic arterial floxuridine as second-line treatment for systemic fluorouracil-resistant colorectal liver metastasesBritish Journal of Cancer 78:1058–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, D., Zalcberg, J. R., Rath, U.et al. (1996). Final results of a randomised trial comparing ‘Tomudex’ (raltitrexed) with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. “Tomudex” Colorectal Cancer Study GroupAnnals of Oncology 7:961–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, D., Glimelius, B. on behalf of the V301 Study Group. (1999). A phase III study of irinotecan (CPT-11) versus best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed 5-fluorouracil therapy. V301 Study GroupSeminars in Oncology 26:6–12Google ScholarPubMed
Gramont, A., Figer, A., Seymour, M.et al. (2000). Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancerJournal of Clinical Oncology 18:2938–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douillard, J. Y., Cunningham, D., Roth, A. D.et al. (2000). Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trialLancet 355:1041–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, M., Norman, A., Cunningham, D.et al. (1995). Impact of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil with or without interferon alfa-2b on tumor response, survival, and quality of life in advanced colorectal cancerJournal of Clinical Oncology 13:2317–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, P., Norman, A., Cunningham, D.et al. (1997). A prospective randomised trial of protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil with or without mitomycin C in advanced colorectal cancerAnnals of Oncology 8:995–1001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rougier, P., Cutsem, E., Bajetta, E.et al. (1998). Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancerLancet 352:1407–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saltz, L. B., Cox, J. V., Blanke, C.et al. (2000). Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study GroupNew England Journal of Medicine 343:905–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutsem, E., Blijham, G. H. on behalf of the V302 Study Group. (1999). Irinotecan versus infusional 5-fluorouracil: a phase III study in metastatic colorectal cancer following failure on first-line 5-fluorouracilSeminars in Oncology 26:13–20Google ScholarPubMed
Norum, J., Vonen, B., Olsen, J. A.et al. (1997). Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and levamisole) in Dukes' B and C colorectal carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysisAnnals of Oncology 8:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen-Mersh, T. G., Earlam, S., Fordy, C.et al. (1994). Quality of life and survival with continuous hepatic-artery floxuridine infusion for colorectal liver metastasesLancet 344:1255–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen-Mersh, T. G., Glover, C., Fordy, C.et al. (2000). Randomized trial of regional plus systemic fluorinated pyrimidine compared with systemic fluorinated pyrimidine in treatment of colorectal liver metastasesEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology 26:468–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocconi, G., Cunningham, D., Cutsem, E.et al. (1998). Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology 16:2943–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earlam, S., Glover, C., Davies, M.et al. (1997). Effect of regional and systemic fluorinated pyrimidine chemotherapy on quality of life in colorectal liver metastasis patientsJournal of Clinical Oncology 15:2022–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seymour, M. T., Slevin, M. L., Kerr, D. J.et al. (1996). Randomized trial assessing the addition of interferon alpha-2a to fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Colorectal Cancer Working Party of the United Kingdom Medical Research CouncilJournal of Clinical Oncology 14:2280–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobrero, A., Zaniboni, A., Frassineti, G. L.et al. (2000). Schedule specific biochemical modulations of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized study. GISCAD, IOR and collaborating centersAnnals of Oncology 11:1413–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudry, M., Bonnel, C., Floquet, A.et al. (1995). A randomized study of bolus fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus 21-day fluorouracil infusion alone or in association with cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C in advanced colorectal carcinomaAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology 18:118–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loprinizi, C. L., Juross, S. A., O'Fallon, J. R.et al. (1994). Randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of hydrazine sulfate in patients with advanced colorectal cancerJournal of Clinical Oncology 12:1121–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. F., Hardcastle, J. D., Denton, G.et al. (1995). Two phase III trials of tauromustine (TCNU) in advanced colorectal cancerAnnals of Oncology 6:948–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufman, L. R., Bukowski, R. M., Collier, M. A.et al. (1993). A randomized, double-blind trial of fluorouracil plus placebo versus fluorouracil plus oral leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancerJournal of Clinical Oncology 11:1888–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheithauer, W., Rosen, H., Kornek, G.-V.et al. (1993). Randomized comparison of combination 4 chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancerBritish Medical Journal 306:752–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, B. A., McKinnis, R., Laufman, L. R. (1995). Quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy: a randomized, double-blind trial comparing 5-FU versus 5-FU with leucovorinPharmacotherapy 15:600–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimelius, B., Hoffman, K., Graf, W.et al. (1994). Quality of life during chemotherapy in patients with symptomatic advanced colorectal cancerCancer 73:556–623.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leichman, C. G., Fleming, T. R., Muggia, F. M.et al. (1995). Phase II study of fluorouracil and its modulation in advanced colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group studyJournal of Clinical Oncology 13:1303–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moinpour, C. M., Triplett, J. S., McKnight, B.et al. (2000). Challenges posed by non-random missing quality of life data in an advanced-stage colorectal cancer clinical trialPsycho-Oncology 9:340–543.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moinpour, C. M., Savage, M., Hayden, K. A. et al. (1995). Quality of Life Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials. In Quality of Life in Behavioral Medicine Research, ed. J. E. Dimsdale, A. Braun, pp. 79–95. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Boyle, M.et al. (1995). Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities IndexPharmacoeconomics 7:490–502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobin, E. (2001). Report on Focus Group Research. Conducted for NCI's COMWG with cancer patients and survivors by Cancer Care Strategies. September, 2001. Completed under contract to the National Cancer Institute by E. Tobin
Zebrack, Cella, this volume, Chapter 11
Bernhard, J., Cella, D. F., Coates, A. S.et al. (1998). Missing quality of life data in cancer clinical trials: serious problems and challengesStatistics in Medicine 17:517–323.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, J. W., Laird, N. M. (1997). Mixture models for the joint distribution of repeated measures and event timesStatistics in Medicine 16:239–573.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairclough, this volume, Chapter 17
Sprangers, M. A. G., Taal, B. G., Aaronson, N. K.et al. (1995). Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patientsDiseases of the Colon and Rectum 38:361–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camilleri-Brennan, J., Steele, R. J. C. (1998). Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery 85:1036–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wils, J., Sahmoud, T., Sobrero, A.et al. (1998). Evaluation of clinical efficacy of new medical treatments in advanced colorectal cancer. Results of a workshop organized by the EORTC GITCCGTumori 84:335–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobrero, A., Belvedere, O., Ramello, M.et al. (2001). Endpoints of medical treatment of colorectal cancerTumori 87(Suppl. 1):S63–4Google ScholarPubMed
Allen, M., Cunningham, D., Schmitt, C. (1998). The importance of stabilization as an endpoint in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma: recent quality of life studiesAnti-Cancer Drugs 9:783–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cull, A., Groenvold, M., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. (1998). EORTC Quality of Life Study Group Translation Procedure. ISBN: 2-930064-15–3. Brussels: EORTC
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Benoliel, J. Q., McCorkle, R., Young, K. (1983). The development of a social dependency scaleResearch in Nursing and Health 3:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorkle, R. M., Benoliel, J. Q., Donaldson, G.et al. (1989). A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patientsCancer 57:358–64Google Scholar
Priestman, T., Baum, M. (1976). Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancerLancet 24:899–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, A., Gebski, V., Bishop, J. F.et al. (1987). Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancerNew England Journal of Medicine 317:1633–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, J. E. Jr., Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selectionMedical Care 30:473–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., Lu, J. F. R., Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groupsMedical Care 32:40–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, Jr., J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M. et al. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×