Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: December 2009

4 - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for evaluating pancreatic neoplasms

Summary

Introduction

The imaging of pancreatic neoplasms often presents a diagnostic challenge to the interpreting radiologist. The radiological questions that need to be answered include the differentiation between benign and malignant entities and the determination of extent of disease and resectability. The latter includes evaluation of the lesion's relationship to the surrounding vasculature and assessment of the presence of local lymphadenopathy and metastatic disease to the liver and peritoneum. This thorough evaluation allows the referring clinician to determine the appropriateness of surgical resection of the lesion in question.

The superior soft tissue contrast provided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with other imaging tests has proven highly effective for imaging of the abdomen. Over the past decade, advancements in MRI techniques have resulted in a dramatic improvement in the ability of the radiologist to analyze pancreatic neoplasms. These advancements include the introduction of faster breath-hold sequences to limit motion artifact, the development of improved protocols for optimization of pancreatic contrast enhancement, the use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to evaluate the relationship of pancreatic lesions to the pancreaticobiliary system, and the use of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the relationship of pancreatic masses to the adjacent vasculature. Use of these techniques results in accurate diagnosis of malignant pancreatic lesions with 95% sensitivity and specificity. Of similar importance, positive and negative predictive values of cancer non-resectability as high as 90% and 83%, respectively, can be achieved [1].

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Pancreatic Cancer
  • Online ISBN: 9780511575440
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575440
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
REFERENCES
Hanninen, EL, Amthauer, H, Hosten, N, et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic tumors: accuracy of MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR angiography. Radiology 2002; 224: 34–41.
Heller, SL, Lee, VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 295–311.
Hiraishi, K, Narabayashi, I, Fujita, O, et al. Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194: 119–123.
Heller, SL, Lee, VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 295–311.
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.
Pamulkar, E, Semelka, R. MR imaging of the pancreas. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 313–330.
Miller, F, Rini, N, Keppke, A. MRI of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W365–W374.
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.
Rofsky, NM, Lee, VS, Laub, G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999; 212: 876–884.
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.
Birchard, KR, Semelka, RC, Hyslop, WB, et al. Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 700–703.
Foo, TK, Saranthan, M, Prince, MR, et al. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203: 275–280.
Kanematsu, M, Shiratori, Y, Hoshi, H, et al. Pancreas and peripancreatic vessels: effect of imaging delay on gadolinium enhancement at dynamic gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 215: 95–102.
Soto, JA, Barish, MA, Yucel, EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 459–464.
Reinhold, C, Bret, PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1285–1295.
Heller, SL, Lee, VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 295–311.
Zech, CJ, Herrmann, KA, Huber, A, et al. High-resolution MR-imaging of the liver with T2-weighted sequences using integrated parallel imaging: comparison of prospective motion correction and respiratory triggering. J Magn Res Imag 2004; 20: 443–450.
Reinhold, C, Bret, PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1285–1295.
Zhang, J, Israel, GM, Hecht, EM, et al. Isotropic #d T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 1564–1570.
Soto, JA, Barish, MA, Yucel, EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995; 196: 459–464.
Hoeffel, C, Azizi, L, Lewin, M, et al. Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 2006; 26: 1603–1620.
Nael, K, Laub, G, Finn, JP. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoraco-abdominal vessels. Magn Res Imag Clin N Am 2005; 13: 359–380.
Keogan, MT, Edelman, RR. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 310–320.
Ichikawa, T, Erturk, SM, Motosugi, U, et al. High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 409–414.
Yamashita, Y, Namimoto, T, Mitsuzaki, K, et al. Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging. Radiology 1998; 208: 605–609.
Cho, SG, Lee, DH, Lee, KY, et al. Differentiation of chronic focal pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 163–169.