Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:06:10.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Cultural Organization of Yucatec Mayan Children's Social Interactions

from Part IV - Peer Interactions and Social Behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

By
Suzanne Gaskins
Edited by
Xinyin Chen ,
Doran C. French  and
Barry H. Schneider
Suzanne Gaskins
Affiliation:
Northeastern Illinois University Chicago, Illinois, USA
Xinyin Chen
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Doran C. French
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University
Barry H. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

Most studies of social interactions with peers, including studies of friendship, assume that the basic rules and values about children's interaction in European American culture are universally shared by all cultures around the world – for example, parental goals for children's social interaction, concepts of friendship, and patterns of interacting with other children. Ethnographic studies of other cultures strongly suggest that this is not a reasonable assumption to make. Rules about social interaction in general and the nature of friendship in particular vary widely from one culture to the next. Thus, the culturally structured goals for the socialization of children and the daily activities of children also differ (e.g., Whiting & Edwards, 1988). Under these conditions, children's social behavior, including their interaction with other children, will differ widely by culture. This chapter illustrates such variation through a case study of Yucatec Mayan children growing up in their traditional village in Mexico. These children spend most of their time interacting with family members, including their siblings and other children who are their close relatives. Friendships and other significant peer relationships outside of this family circle are rare. This chapter examines how the literature on friendship and peer interactions is relevant for interpreting these children's experiences as well as how this case study is relevant for reevaluating current theories about children's social interactions.

Activity theory is the theoretical perspective that underlies this study.

Type
Chapter
Information
Peer Relationships in Cultural Context , pp. 283 - 309
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboud, F. E., & Mendelson, M. J. (1996). Determinants of friendship selection and quality: Developmental perspectives. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 87–114). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acadamia de la Lengua Maya deYucatán. (2003). Diccionario Maya popular. Merida, Mexico: Compañía Editorial de la Penísula.
Benedict, R. (1938). Continuities and discontinuities in cultural conditioning. Psychiatry, 1(2), 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, V., Po'ot Yah, E., & Dzul de Po'ot, O. (1998). A dictionary of the Maya language as spoken in Hocabá, Yucatán. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1972). The nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27, 688–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Rubin, K., , H., & Li, Z. (1995). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 31, 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Y. A. (1966). Patterns of friendship. In Cohen, Y. A. (Ed.), Social structure and personality (pp. 351–386). New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W. A. (1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
DeRosier, M. E., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1991). Costa Rican children's perceptions of their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 27, 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. (1999). Siblings, friends, and the development of social understanding. In Collins, W. A. & Lauresen, B. (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 263–279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2002). Sibling relationships. In Smith, P. K. & Hart, C. H. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 223–237). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foster, G. M. (1953). Confradía and compadrazgo in Spain and Spanish America. Southwest Journal of Anthropology, 9(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C. (1987). Children's social interaction with older, younger, and same-age peers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D. C., Rianasari, M., Pidada, S., Nelwan, P., & Buhrmester, D. (2001). Social support of Indonesian and U.S. children and adolescents by family members and friends. Merrill-Palmer Quarter, 47(3), 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furman, W., Rahe, D., & Hartup, W. W. (1979). Rehabilitation of socially-withdrawn preschool children through mixed-age and same-age socialization. Child Development, 50, 915–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gans, H. J. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gaskins, S. (1996). How Mayan parental theories come into play. In Harkness, S. & Super, C. M. (Eds.), Parents' cultural belief systems: Their origins, expressions, and consequences (pp. 345–363). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Gaskins, S. (1999). Children's daily lives in a Mayan village: A case study of culturally constructed roles and activities. In Göncü, A. (Ed.), Children's engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 25–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaskins, S. (2000). Children's daily activities in a Mayan village: A culturally grounded description. Journal of Cross Cultural Research, 34(4), 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskins, S. (2003). From corn to cash: Change and continuity within Mayan families. Ethos, 31(2), 248–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskins, S., & Lucy, J. A. (1986, December). Passing the buck: Responsibility and blame in the Yucatec Maya. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, Philadelphia.
Gauvain, M. (2000). The social context of cognitive development. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1969). Age-mate or peer affectional system. In Lehrman, D. S., Hinde, R. A., & Shaw, E. (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 333–383). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1992). Friendships and their developmental significance. In McGurk, H. (Ed.), Childhood social development (pp. 175–205). Gove, England: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartup, W. W. (1999). Peer experience and its developmental significance. In Bennett, M. (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 106–125). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Howes, C., & Wu, F. (1990). Peer interactions and friendships in an ethnically diverse school setting. Child Development, 61, 537–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konner, M. J. (1981). Evolution of human behavior development. In Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Whiting, B. B. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 3–51). New York: Garland STPM Press.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. M., Parker, J. G. & Hoffman, L. W. (1996). Behavioral, affective, and social correlates of involvement in cross-sex friendship in elementary school. Child Development, 67, 2269–2286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krappman, L. (1996). Amicitia, drujba, shin-yu, philia, Freundschaft, friendship: On the cultural diversity of a human relationship. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F. and Hartup, W. W. (eds.), The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence (pp. 19–40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kupersmidt, J. B., Griesler, P. C., DeRosier, M. E., Patterson, C. J., & Davis, P. W. (1995). Childhood aggression and peer relations in the context of family and neighborhood factors. Child Development, 66, 360–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leont'ev, A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharp.Google Scholar
Liebow, E. (1968). Tally's corner. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its social and cultural foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Redfield, R., & Villa Rojas, A. (1934). Chan Kom: A Maya village. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richman, A. L., LeVine, R. A., New, R. S., & Howrigan, G. A. (1988). Maternal behavior to infants in five cultures. New Directions for Child Development, 40, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison in research on the social and emotional adjustment of children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 793–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B. H., Fonzi, A., Tani, F., & Tomado, G. (1997). A cross-cultural exploration of the stability of children's friendship and the predictors of their continuation. Social Development, 6, 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietjen, A. M. (1989). The ecology of children's social support networks. In Belle, D. (Ed.), Children's social networks and social supports (pp. 37–69). Oxford, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tietjen, A. M. (1994). Supportive interactions in cultural context. In Nestmann, F. & Hurrelmann, K. (Eds.), Social networks and social support in childhood and adolescence (pp. 395–407). Oxford, England: Walter De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, B. B. (Ed.). (1963). Six cultures: Studies of child rearing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youniss, J. (1980). Parents and peers in social development: A Sullivan-Piaget perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zakriski, A. L., & Coie, J. D. (1996). A comparison of aggressive-rejected and nonaggressive-rejected children's interpretations of self-directed and other-directed rejection. Child Development, 67(3), 1048–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zukow-Goldring, P. (2002). Sibling caregiving. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 3, pp. 256–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×