Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 11
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2017
Print publication year:
2017
Online ISBN:
9781108231657

Book description

This book offers a new interpretation of the metaphysics of Charles Peirce (1839–1914), the founder of pragmatism and one of America's greatest philosophers. Robert Lane begins by examining Peirce's basic realism, his belief in a world that is independent of how anyone believes it to be. Lane argues that this realism is the basis for Peirce's account of truth, according to which a true belief is one that would be settled by investigation and that also represents the real world. He then explores Peirce's application of his Pragmatic Maxim to clarify the idea of reality, his two forms of idealism, and his realism about generality and vagueness. This rich study will provide readers with a clear understanding of Peirce's thoughts on reality and truth and how they intersect, and of his views on the relation between the mind and the external world.

Reviews

‘With impressive clarity and careful attention to the manuscripts, Robert Lane shows us how Peirce could consistently endorse both realism and idealism throughout his life. This book elucidates key conceptions and important distinctions at the heart of Peirce's metaphysics. It is essential reading for anyone trying to reconcile the comprehensibility of reality, on the one hand, with its mind-independence, on the other.'

Richard Kenneth Atkins - Boston College

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Almeder, R. (1980). The Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: A Critical Introduction. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
Almeder, R. (1985). Peirce’s Thirteen Theories of Truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 21(1), 7794.
Altshuler, B. (1980). Peirce’s Theory of Truth and His Early Idealism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 16(2), 118140.
Apel, K.-O. (2004). Peirce’s Theory of Reality and Truth. In de Groot, J., ed., Nature in American Philosophy. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 3752.
Aristotle, . (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2. Barnes, J., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Armstrong, D. (2004). How Do Particulars Stand to Universals? In Zimmerman, D., ed., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139154.
Atkin, A. (2016). Peirce. New York: Routledge.
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baldwin, J. M. and Ladd-Franklin, C. (1902). Truth and Falsity and Error. In Baldwin, J. M., ed., Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: The Macmillan Company, p. 720.
Bergman, M. (2011). Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication. New York: Continuum.
Berkeley, G. ([1710] 1874). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Krauth, C. P., ed. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippinoctt & Co.
Berkeley, G. ([1710] 1998). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dancy, J., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boler, J. (1963). Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism: A Study of Peirce’s Relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Boler, J. (2004). Peirce and Medieval Thought. In Misak, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5886.
Cooke, E. (2007). Peirce’s Pragmatic Theory of Inquiry: Fallibilism and Indeterminacy. New York: Bloomsbury.
David, M. (2016). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2013 edition, Zalta, E., ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/truth-correspondence/.
DeGrazia, D. (2005). Human Identity and Bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Devitt, M. (1997). Realism and Truth, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dummett, M. (1982). Realism. Synthese, 52(1), 55112.
Englebretsen, G. (2006). Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Fisch, M. (1986). Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. Ketner, K. and Kloesel, C., eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fisch, M. and Turquette, A.. (1966). Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 2(2), 7185; reprinted in Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. K. Ketner and C. Kloesel, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 171–183.
Flew, A. (1984). A Dictionary of Philosophy, rev. 2nd edn. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Forster, P. (2011). Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, L. (1997). Peirce’s Reality and Berkeley’s Blunders. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35(2), 253268.
Galluzzo, G. and Loux, M., eds. (2015). The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glanzberg, M. (2014). Truth. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2014 edition, E. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/truth/.
Guyer, P. and Horstmann, R.-P. (2015). Idealism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2015 edition, E. Zalta, ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/idealism/.
Haack, S. (1976). The Pragmatist Theory of Truth. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 231249.
Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Haack, S. (1992). Extreme Scholastic Realism: Its Relevance to Philosophy of Science Today. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 28(1), 1950.
Haack, S. (1994). How the Critical Common-sensist Sees Things. Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 16(1), 934.
Haack, S. (1997). The First Rule of Reason. In Brunning, J. and Forster, P., eds., The Rule of Reason. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 241261.
Haack, S. (2003). Defending Science – Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Haack, S., ed. (2006). Pragmatism, Old and New. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Haack, S. (2013). The Real, the Fictional and the Fake. Spazio Filosofico (8), 209217.
Haack, S. (2016). The World According to Innocent Realism. In Göhner, J. and Jung, E.-M., eds., Susan Haack: Reintegrating Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3355.
Hausman, C. R. (1993). Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Havenel, J. (2008). Peirce’s Clarifications of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 44(1), 86133.
Hirst, R. J. (1967). Realism. In Edwards, P., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. and the Free Press, pp. 7783.
Hookway, C. (1985). Peirce. New York: Routledge.
Hookway, C. (2000). Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hookway, C. (2012). The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jardine, N. (1986). The Fortunes of Inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kant, I. ([1783] 2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Zöller, G., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. ([1787] 1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Guyer, P. and Wood, A., eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Khlentzos, D. (2004). Naturalistic Realism and the Antirealist Challenge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Khlentzos, D. (2016). Challenges to Metaphysical Realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2016 edition, Zalta, E., ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/realism-sem-challenge/.
Lane, R. (1997). Peirce’s “Entanglement” with the Principles of Excluded Middle and Contradiction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33(3), 680703.
Lane, R. (1999). Peirce’s Triadic Logic Revisited. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35(2), 284311.
Lane, R. (2004). On Peirce’s Early Realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 40(4), 575605.
Lane, R. (2007a). Peirception: Haack’s Critical Common-sensism about Perception. In de Waal, C., ed., Susan Haack: A Lady of Distinctions – The Philosopher Responds to Her Critics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 109122.
Lane, R. (2007b). Peirce’s Modal Shift: From Set Theory to Pragmaticism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(4), 551576.
Lane, R. (2009). Persons, Signs, Animals: A Peircean Account of Personhood. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45(1), 126.
Lane, R. (2011a). The Final Incapacity: Peirce on Intuition and the Continuity of Mind and Matter, Part I. Cognitio, 12(1), 105119.
Lane, R. (2011b). The Final Incapacity: Peirce on Intuition and the Continuity of Mind and Matter, Part II. Cognitio, 12(2), 237256.
Legg, C. (2014). Charles Peirce’s Limit Concept of Truth. Philosophy Compass, 9(3), 204213.
Loux, M. (2001). Realism and Anti-Realism. In Loux, M., ed., Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge, pp. 449458.
Mayorga, R. M. (2007). From Realism to “Realicism”: The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Mayorga, R. M. (2012). Peirce’s Moral “Realicism.” In de Waal, C. and Skowronski, K., eds., The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 101124.
Meyers, R. (1985). Peirce’s Doubts about Idealism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 21(2), 223239.
Meyers, R. (2005). Peirce’s “Cheerful Hope” and the Varieties of Realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 41(2), 321341.
Michael, F. (1988). Two Forms of Scholastic Realism in Peirce’s Philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 24(3), 317348.
Migotti, M. (1998). Peirce’s Double Aspect Theory of Truth. In Misak, C., ed., Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 24: Pragmatism, pp. 75108.
Misak, C. (1991/2004). Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, expanded paperback edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Misak, C. (2013). The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, M. (2010). Peirce’s Cantor. In Moore, M., ed., New Essays on Peirce’s Mathematical Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 323362.
Morgan, C. (1979). Modality, Analogy, and Ideal Experiments According to C. S. Peirce. Synthese, 41(1), 6583.
Morgan, C. (1981). Peirce-Semantics for Modal Logics. In Ketner, K., Ransdell, J., Eisele, C., Fisch, M., and Hardwick, C., eds., Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. Lubbock: Texas Tech Press, pp. 207215.
Murphey, M. (1961). The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Murphey, M. (1968). Kant’s Children the Cambridge Pragmatists. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 4(1), 333.
Myrvold, W. (1995). Peirce on Cantor’s Paradox and the Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31(3), 508541.
Ney, A. (2014). Metaphysics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Noble, B. (1989). Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity and the Concept of Possibility. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 25(2), 149174.
Parks, R. Z. (1971). The Mystery of Phi and Psi. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7(3), 176177.
Parsons, T. (2000). Indeterminate Identity: Metaphysics and Semantics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peirce Edition Project (2001). “Scientific Fallibilism”: Peirce’s Forgotten Lecture of 1893. Peirce Project Newsletter, 4(1). www.iupui.edu/~peirce/news/4_1/4.1.htm.
Potter, V. (1996). Peirce on Continuity. In Potter, V. and Colapietro, V., eds., Peirce’s Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 117123.
Potter, V. and Shields, P. (1977). Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 13(1), 2034.
Price, H. (2003). Truth as Convenient Friction. Journal of Philosophy, 100(4), 167190.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1995). Peirce’s Continuum. In Ketner, K., ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 122.
Riley, G. (1974). Peirce’s Theory of Individuals. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 10(3), 135165.
Robin, R. (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Robin, R. (1971). The Peirce Papers: A Supplementary Catalogue. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7(1): 3757.
Rosenthal, S. (2004). Peirce’s Pragmatic Account of Perception: Issues and Implications. In Misak, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193213.
Savan, D. (1995). Peirce and Idealism. In Ketner, K., ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 315328.
Scheffler, I. ([1974] 2011). Four Pragmatists: A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and Dewey. New York: Routledge.
Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (1995). Reply to Savan. In Ketner, K., ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 329337.
Short, T. L. (1996). Review Essay. Synthese, 106(3), 409430.
Short, T. L. (2000). Peirce on the Aim of Inquiry: Another Reading of “Fixation.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31(1), 123.
Short, T. L. (2007a). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Short, T. L. (2007b). Response [part of a symposium on Short 2007a]. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(4), 663693.
Short, T. L. (2010). Did Peirce Have a Cosmology? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 46(4), 521543.
Short, T. L. (2015). Empiricism Expanded. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51(1), 133.
Skagestad, P. (1981). The Road of Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Skow, B. (2010). Deep Metaphysical Indeterminacy. Philosophical Quarterly, 60(240), 851858.
Smart, J. (1986). Realism v. Idealism. Philosophy, 61(237), 295312.
Thompson, M. (1953). The Pragmatic Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turquette, A. (1967). Peirce’s Phi and Psi Operators for Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 3(2), 6673.
Turquette, A. (1969). Peirce’s Complete Systems of Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 5(4), 199210.
Turquette, A. (1972). Dualism and Trimorphism in Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 8(3), 131140.
Turquette, A. (1976). Minimal Axioms for Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 22(1), 169176.
Turquette, A. (1978). Alternative Axioms for Peirce’s Triadic Logic. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 24(25–30), 443444.
Turquette, A. (1981/4). Quantification for Peirce’s Preferred System of Triadic Logic. Studia Logica, 40(4), 373382.
Turquette, A. (1983). Defining Peirce’s Verum. In Cauchy, V., ed., Philosophy and Culture: Actes du XVIIe Con’gres mondial de Philosophie, Vol. 2. Montreal: Editions Montmorency, pp. 842845.
Whately, R. (1848). Easy Lessons on Reasoning, 5th revised edn. London: John W. Parker.
Wiggins, D. (2004). Reflections on Inquiry and Truth Arising from Peirce’s Method for the Fixation of Belief. In Misak, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87126.
Wilkinson, P. R. (2013). Concise Thesaurus of Traditional English Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge.
Williams, B. (1990). Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry. New York: Penguin Books.
Wilson, A. (2012). The Perception of Generals. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 48(2), 169190.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.