Book contents
- Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery
- Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Historical Overview of Robot-Assisted Surgery
- 2 Credentialing for Robotic Surgery
- 3 Robotic Technology
- 4 Physiologic Effects of Pneumoperitoneum and Positioning
- 5 Considerations in Patients with Comorbidities, Pregnant and Pediatric Patients
- 6 Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic-Assisted Surgery
- 7 General and Colorectal Robotic Surgery of the Abdomen and Pelvis
- 8 Gynecology Robotic Surgery
- 9 Robotic Urological Surgery
- 10 Anesthetic Considerations in Robotic Cardiac Anesthesia
- 11 Robotics in Thoracic Surgery 1
- 12 Robotics in Thoracic Surgery 2
- 13 Transoral Robotic Surgery
- 14 Robotic Technology in Neurosurgery
- 15 Organ Transplant and Robotic Surgery
- 16 Surgical Considerations for Organ Transplantation and Robotic Surgery
- 17 Fetal Surgery and Robotic Surgery
- 18 Perioperative Complications of Robotic Surgery
- 19 Pain Management and Recovery after RAS
- 20 Technical Skills Training and Simulation
- 21 Understanding the Market Forces and Opportunity Costs of Robotic Surgery
- 22 The Past, Present, and Future of Robotics
- Index
- References
17 - Fetal Surgery and Robotic Surgery
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2017
Book contents
- Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery
- Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Historical Overview of Robot-Assisted Surgery
- 2 Credentialing for Robotic Surgery
- 3 Robotic Technology
- 4 Physiologic Effects of Pneumoperitoneum and Positioning
- 5 Considerations in Patients with Comorbidities, Pregnant and Pediatric Patients
- 6 Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic-Assisted Surgery
- 7 General and Colorectal Robotic Surgery of the Abdomen and Pelvis
- 8 Gynecology Robotic Surgery
- 9 Robotic Urological Surgery
- 10 Anesthetic Considerations in Robotic Cardiac Anesthesia
- 11 Robotics in Thoracic Surgery 1
- 12 Robotics in Thoracic Surgery 2
- 13 Transoral Robotic Surgery
- 14 Robotic Technology in Neurosurgery
- 15 Organ Transplant and Robotic Surgery
- 16 Surgical Considerations for Organ Transplantation and Robotic Surgery
- 17 Fetal Surgery and Robotic Surgery
- 18 Perioperative Complications of Robotic Surgery
- 19 Pain Management and Recovery after RAS
- 20 Technical Skills Training and Simulation
- 21 Understanding the Market Forces and Opportunity Costs of Robotic Surgery
- 22 The Past, Present, and Future of Robotics
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery , pp. 200 - 209Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Wójcicki, P. and Drozdowski, P., “In utero surgery – current state of the art: part I,” Med. Sci. Monit., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. RA237–44, 2010.Google ScholarPubMed
Berris, M. and Shoham, M., “Febotics – a marriage of fetal surgery and robotics,” Comput. Aided Surg., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 175–80, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, C. G., Lorincz, A., Johnson, A., Gidell, K., Rabah, R., Klein, M. D., and Langenburg, S. E., “Robot-enhanced fetoscopic surgery,” J. Pediatr. Surg., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1463–5, 2004.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrison, M., “Historical perspective.” In: Harrison, M., Enans, M., Adzick, N., and Holzgreve, W., eds. The Unborn Patients: The Art and Science of Fetal Therapy, 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Sainders Company; 2001:11–18.Google Scholar
Mayer, A., “U bcr die Moglichkeit operativer Eingriffe beim lebenden Saugetierfotus,” Zenh·alb Gynak, vol. 42, pp. 773–783, 1918.Google Scholar
Wolff, B., “Experimentelle Untersuchungen uber die Entstehung extrauteriner Schwangerschaflen und Uber die Moglichkeit operative Eingriffe bcim lebenden Saugetierfetus,” Beitr. Path. Anal., vol. 65, pp. 423–432, 1919.Google Scholar
Bors, E., “Die Methodik der intcruterinc Operation am uberlebenden Stiugetierfoetus,” Arch. Entwichl-Mech. Org., vol. 105, pp. 655–666, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, J. S., “Notes on the application of experimental methods upon mammalian embryos,” Anat. Rec., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 1925. doi:10.1002/ar.1090310404.Google Scholar
Hooker, D., “Spinal cord regeneration in the young rainbow fish, Lebistes reticulatus,” J. Comp. Neurol., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 277–297, 1930. doi:10.1002/cne.900560203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, A., “Sur la différenciation sexuelle de l’embryon de lapin I. Remarques au sujet de certaines operations chirurgicales sur l’ embryon II. Expériences de parabiose,” Soc. Biol. Compte. Rendus., vol. 140, pp. 461–464, 1946.Google Scholar
Foote, C. and Foote, F., “Changes in the thyroid gland of hamster embryos hypophysectomized by decapitation,” Anat Rec., 1949.Google Scholar
Domm, L. and Leroy, P., “A method for fotul hypophyscctomy by decupitation in the rat,” Anat. Rec., vol. 109, pp. 395–409, 1951.Google Scholar
Louw, J. and Barnard, C., “Congenital intestinal atresia observations on its origin,” Lancet, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, B., Piasecki, G., and Egdahl, R., “Experimental production of coarctation of the aorta in utero with prolonged postnatal survival,” Surg. Forum, vol. 14, pp. 290–291, 1963.Google ScholarPubMed
DeLorimier, A., Tierney, D., and Parker, H., “Hypoplastic lungs in fetal lambs with surgically produced congenital diaphragmatic hernia,” Surgery, vol. 62, pp. 12–21, 1967.Google Scholar
Kent, G., Olley, P., Creighton, R., and Dobbinson, T., “Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes following surgical creation of a diaphragmatic hernia in fetal lambs,” Surgery, vol. 72, pp. 427–433, 1972.Google ScholarPubMed
Burrington, J. and Olley, P., “Experimental diaphragmatic hernias in fetal lambs,” Clin. Res., vol. 18, p. 198, 1970.Google Scholar
Beck, A., “Intrauterine renal surgery: techniques for exposing the fetal kidney during the last to-thirds of gestation,” Invest. Urol., vol. 8, pp. 182–187, 1970.Google ScholarPubMed
Han, S. J. and Hwang, E. H., “The development of fetal surgery,” Yonsei Med. J., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 602–8, 2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jancelewicz, T. and Harrison, M. R., “A history of fetal surgery,” Clin. Perinatol., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 227–36, 2009.Google Scholar
Woo, R., Le, D., Krummel, T. M., and Albanese, C., “Robot-assisted pediatric surgery,” Am. J. Surg., vol. 188, no. 4A suppl, pp. 27S–37S, 2004.Google Scholar
Danzer, E., Schier, F., Paek, B., Harrison, M. R., and Albanese, C. T., “[Fetal surgery for severe congenital abnormalities],” Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatol., vol. 205, no. 5, pp. 174–88, 2001.Google ScholarPubMed
Wenstrom, K. D. and Carr, S. R., “Fetal surgery: principles, indications, and evidence,” Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 817–35, 2014.Google Scholar
Berris, M. and Shoham, M., “Febotics – a marriage of fetal surgery and robotics,” Comput. Aided Surg., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 175–80, 2006.Google ScholarPubMed
Knight, C. G., Lorincz, A., Johnson, A., Gidell, K., Rabah, R., Klein, M. D., and Langenburg, S. E., “Robot-enhanced fetoscopic surgery,” J. Pediatr. Surg., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1463–5, 2004.Google Scholar
Flake, A. W., “Surgery in the human fetus: the future,” J. Physiol., vol. 547, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2003.Google Scholar
Adzick, N. S., “Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies,” Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, L. N., “Fetal surgery for neural tube defects,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 175–88, 2008.Google Scholar
Tran, K. M., “Anesthesia for fetal surgery,” Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 40–5, 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J. P., Tulipan, N., Paschall, R. L., Boehm, F. H., Walsh, W. F., Silva, S. R., Hernanz-Schulman, M., Lowe, L. H., and Reed, G. W., “Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus,” JAMA, vol. 282, no. 19, pp. 1819–25, 1999.Google Scholar
Hüsler, M. R., Wilson, R. D., Horii, S. C., Bebbington, M. W., Adzick, N. S., and Johnson, M. P., “When is fetoscopic release of amniotic bands indicated? Review of outcome of cases treated in utero and selection criteria for fetal surgery,” Prenat. Diagn., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 457–63, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaiser, R. R. and Kurth, C. D., “Anesthetic considerations for fetal surgery,” Semin. Perinatol., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 507–14, 1999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombeck, K., Ball, R.H., Lee, H., Farrell, J., Farmer, D., Jacobs, V., Rosen, M., Filly, R., “Maternal morbidity after maternal-fetal surgery,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 834–9, 2006.Google ScholarPubMed
Ananth, C. V and Vintzileos, A. M., “Epidemiology of preterm birth and its clinical subtypes,” J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal Med., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 773–82, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., Sutton, L. N., Rintoul, N., Crombleholme, T. M., Flake, A. W., Howell, L. J., Hedrick, H. L., Wilson, R. D., and Adzick, N. S., “Fetal myelomeningocele repair: short-term clinical outcomes,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 482–7, 2003.Google Scholar
Flake, A. W., Crombleholme, T. M., Johnson, M. P., Howell, L. J., and Adzick, N. S., “Treatment of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia by fetal tracheal occlusion: clinical experience with fifteen cases,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 1059–66, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. D., Johnson, M. P., Flake, A. W., Crombleholme, T. M., Hedrick, H. L., Wilson, J., and Adzick, N. S., “Reproductive outcomes after pregnancy complicated by maternal-fetal surgery,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1430–6, 2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noah, M. M. S., Norton, M. E., Sandberg, P., Esakoff, T., Farrell, J., and Albanese, C. T., “Short-term maternal outcomes that are associated with the EXIT procedure, as compared with cesarean delivery,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 773–7, 2002.Google ScholarPubMed
Farrell, J. A., Albanese, C. T., Jennings, R. W., Kilpatrick, S. J., Bratton, B. J., and Harrison, M. R., “Maternal fertility is not affected by fetal surgery,” Fetal Diagn. Ther., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 190–2, 1999.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. D., Lemerand, K., Johnson, M. P., Flake, A. W., Bebbington, M., Hedrick, H. L., and Adzick, N. S., “Reproductive outcomes in subsequent pregnancies after a pregnancy complicated by open maternal-fetal surgery (1996–2007),” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 209.e1–6, 2010.Google Scholar
Smajdor, A., “Ethical challenges in fetal surgery,” J. Med. Ethics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 88–91, 2011.Google Scholar
Flake, A. W., “Prenatal intervention: ethical considerations for life-threatening and non-life-threatening anomalies,” Semin. Pediatr. Surg., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 212–21, 2001.Google Scholar
McNay, M. B. and Fleming, J. E., “Forty years of obstetric ultrasound 1957–1997: from A-scope to three dimensions,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–56, 1999.Google Scholar
Burgin, K., “The tentative pregnancy: prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood by Barbara Katz Rothman. New York: Viking Penguin Inc., 1986.” J. Nurse. Midwifery., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 114–15, 1987.Google Scholar
Kirklin, D., “The role of medical imaging in the abortion debate,” J. Med. Ethics, vol. 30, no. 5, p. 426, 2004.Google Scholar
Jackson, E., “Regulating reproduction: law, technology and autonomy,” Mod. Law Rev., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 478–81, 2003.Google Scholar
Zipfel, S., Löwe, B., Paschke, T., Immel, B., Lange, R., Zimmermann, R., Herzog, W., and Bergmann, G., “Psychological distress in patients awaiting heart transplantation,” J. Psychosom. Res., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 465–70, 1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osuna, E. E., “The psychological cost of waiting,” J. Math. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 82–105, 1985.Google Scholar
Doyal, L. and Ward, C., “Fetal surgery: ethical and legal issues,” Semin. Neonatol., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 255–65, 1998.Google Scholar
Lyerly, A. D., Gates, E. A., Cefalo, R. C., and Sugarman, J., “Toward the ethical evaluation and use of maternal-fetal surgery,” Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 689–97, 2001.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. R., Mychaliska, G. B., Albanese, C. T., Jennings, R. W., Farrell, J. A., Hawgood, S., Sandberg, P., Levine, A. H., Lobo, E., and Filly, R. A., “Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero IX: fetuses with poor prognosis (liver herniation and low lung-to-head ratio) can be saved by fetoscopic temporary tracheal occlusion,” J. Pediatr. Surg., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1017–22; discussion 1022–3, 1998.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. P., Richards, W. O., Tulipan, N. B., and Arney, T. L., “Endoscopic coverage of fetal myelomeningocele in utero,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 153–8, 1999.Google Scholar
Gratacós, E. and Deprest, J., “Current experience with fetoscopy and the Eurofoetus registry for fetoscopic procedures,” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 151–9, 2000.Google Scholar
De Lia, J. E., Kuhlmann, R. S., and Lopez, K. P., “Treating previable twin–twin transfusion syndrome with fetoscopic laser surgery: outcomes following the learning curve,” J. Perinat. Med., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 61–7, 1999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecher, K., Diehl, W., Zikulnig, L., Vetter, M., and Hackelöer, B. J., “Endoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses in 200 pregnancies with severe mid-trimester twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome,” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 135–9, 2000.Google Scholar
Howe, R. D. and Matsuoka, Y., “Robotics for surgery,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 1, pp. 211–40, 1999.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. and Falk, V., “Pearls and pitfalls: lessons learned in endoscopic robotic surgery – the da Vinci experience,” Heart Surg. Forum, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 307–10, 2001.Google Scholar
Roy, S., Ferrara, L. A., Fleischman, A. J., and Benzel, E. C., “Microelectromechanical systems and neurosurgery: a new era in a new millennium,” Neurosurgery, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 779–97; discussion 797–8, 2001.Google Scholar
Flake, A. W. and Harrison, M. R., “Fetal surgery,” Annu. Rev. Med., vol. 46, pp. 67–78, 1995.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by