Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:35:04.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Beavers and Biodiversity

The Ethics of Ecological Restoration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2009

Christian Gamborg
Affiliation:
Research scientist Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute and at the Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
Peter Sandøe
Affiliation:
Professor in Bioethics Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in Copenhagen; Director of the interdisciplinary Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
Markku Oksanen
Affiliation:
University of Kuopio, Finland
Juhani Pietarinen
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Finland
Get access

Summary

BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION

Ecological restoration has been portrayed recently as a process capable of reversing the loss of natural biodiversity now occurring in many densely populated areas and intensively managed landscapes in Europe (Throop 1997; Hobbs and Norton 1996). Species restoration schemes operate throughout Europe and in parts of North America as well. For example, they have involved the lynx in Poland, and the wolf and the moose in New York State. Human subsistence activities, such as hunting and agriculture, have resulted in losses of wildlife species. Natural environments have been intensively utilized for many centuries, especially in Western Europe and parts of North America; and a high level of productivity characterizes these domesticated environments (Nash 1989). As a result of these efforts to transform the natural environment into a highly efficient growth medium, variation is lacking and natural biodiversity has declined.

Species have died out regionally, and their opportunities to return to former haunts have been seriously limited by intensive management of the natural environment (Thomas 1992). Moreover, artifacts such as roads, towns, and bridges, as well as the straightening of rivers, block the paths of migrating wildlife. New policies on the conservation of wildlife, and on the general management and protection of the natural environment, are pursued in many affluent industrialized countries. These aim to recreate and maintain the dynamics and variation of natural ecosystems (Kane 1994; OECD 1999). This presents new opportunities for the conservation discipline (Pickett and Parker 1994).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaris-S⊘rensen, K. 1998. Danmarks forhistoriske dyreverden. 3. udgave. K⊘benhavn: Gyldendal
Agger, P. and P. Sand⊘e. 1998. Use of “Red Lists” as an Indicator of Biodiversity. In Cross-cultural Protection of Nature and the Environment, F. Arler, J. Jensen, and I. Svennevig, eds. Odense: Odense University Press
Andersen, I. F. 1999. Bæveren i Danmark. Naturens Verden 82(2):2–13Google Scholar
Andersen, I. F. 1999 2001. Bæveren. Natur og Museum 40(1):1–35Google Scholar
Aronson, J., Dhillon, S., and Floc'h, E.. 1995. On the Need to Select an Ecosystem of Reference, However Imperfect: A Reply to Pickett and Parker. Restoration Ecology 3(1):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J.,, C. Floret, , E. Le Floc'h, , C. Ovalle, and , R. Pontanier. 1993. Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Ecosystems in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands. I. A View from the South. Restoration Ecology 1: 8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbirk, S., ed. 1998. Management Plan for the European Beaver (Castor fiber) in Denmark. Copenhagen: The National Forest and Nature Agency
Attfield, R. 1994. Rehabilitating Nature and Making Nature Habitable. In Philosophy and the Natural Environment, R. Atffield and A. Belsey, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Reprinted in W. Throop, 2000.]
Cairns, J. 1995. Restoration Ecology: Protecting Our National and Global Life Support Systems. In Rehabilitating Damaged Ecosystems, 2d ed., J. Cairns, ed. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis
Cowell, C. M. 1993. Ecological Restoration and Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 15:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, R. 1982. Faking Nature. Inquiry 25:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, R. 1984. The Value of Wild Nature. Inquiry 27:359–61Google Scholar
Elliot, R. 1994. Extinction, Restoration, Naturalness. Environmental Ethics 16:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, R. 1997. Faking Nature. The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London and New York: Routledge
Fritzb⊘ger, B. 1998. Det åbne lands kulturhistorie ca. 1680–1980. Frederiksberg: DSR-forlag
Gilpin, A. 1996. Dictionary of Environment and Sustainable Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Gunn, A. 1991. The Restoration of Species and Natural Environments. Environmental Ethics 13:291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halley, D. 1995. The Proposed Reintroduction of the Beaver to Britain. Reintroduction News 10:17–18Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Norton, D. A. 1996. Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology. Restoration Ecology 4:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and D. A. Norton. IUCN (The World Conservation Union). 1994. http://www.wcmc.org.uk/species/animals/categories.html
Hobbs, R. J. and D. A. Norton. 1995. IUCN Guidelines for Re-introductions. Gland: IUCN
Jordan, W. R. Ⅲ. 1994. “Sunflower Forest”: Ecological Restoration as the Basis for a New Environmental Paradigm. In Beyond Preservation. Restoring and Inventing Landscapes, A. D. Baldwin, J. de Luce, and C. Pletsch, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Kane, G. S. 1994. Restoration or Preservation? Reflections on a Clash of Environmental Philosophies. In Beyond Preservation. Restoring and Inventing Landscapes, A. D. Baldwin, J. de Luce, and C. Pletsch, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Katz, E. 1991. The Ethical Significance of Human Intervention in Nature. Restoration & Management Notes 9:90–6Google Scholar
Katz, E. 1992. The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature. Research in Philosophy and Technology 12:231–41Google Scholar
Katz, E. 1996. The Problem of Ecological Restoration. Environmental Ethics 18:222–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E. 2000. Another Look at Restoration: Technology and Artificial Nature. In Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, P. H. Gobster and R. B. Hull, eds. Washington, DC: Island Press
Klein, T. 1999a. Hvad er det med den bæver?Weekendavisen 29. januar – 4. februar 1999: 6Google Scholar
Klein, T. 1999b. Bæveren gnaver sig ind på den danske natur. MegafonenMaj 1999:5Google Scholar
Light, A. 2000. Ecological Restoration and the Culture of Nature: A Pragmatic Perspective. In Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, P. H. Gobster and R. B. Hull, eds. Washington DC: Island Press
MacDonald, D. 1995. Beaver Come Home. BBC Wildlife Nov. 1995:72–6Google Scholar
MacDonald, D., Tattersall, F. H., Brown, E. D., and Balharry, D.. 1995. Reintroducing the European Beaver to Britain: Nostalgic Meddling or Restoring Biodiversity?Mammal Review 25:161–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammal Society 1999. Position Statement on the Re-introduction of the European Beaver, Castor fiber, into Scotland. Mammal Society: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/mammal/beavpos.htm
Mannison, D. 1984. Nature May Be of No Value: A Reply to Elliot. Inquiry 27:233–5Google Scholar
Nash, R. F. 1989. The Rights of Nature. A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
Naturrådet 1998. Naturrådets syn på genindf⊘relse af bæver i Danmark. SNS's debatm⊘de på Skovskolen, N⊘debo 12. juni 1998. Naturrådet. Unpublished
Nolet, B. A. and Baveco, J. M.. 1996. Development and Viability of a Translocated Beaver Castor fiber Population in the Netherlands. Biological Conservation 75:125–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolet, B. A. and , F. Rosell. 1998. Comeback of the Beaver Castor fiber: An Overview of Old and New Conservation Problems. Biological Conservation 5:165–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell
Nozick, R. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1999. Environmental Performance Reviews. Denmark. Paris: OCED
Pickett, S. T. A. and Parker, V. T.. 1994. Avoiding the Old Pitfalls: Opportunities in a New Discipline. Restoration Ecology 2:75–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolston, H. 1994. Conserving Natural Value. New York: Columbia University Press
Sheail, J., Treweek, J. R., and Mountford., J. O. 1997. The UK Transition from Nature Preservation to ‘Creative Conservation.’ Environmental Conservation 24:224–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinar, M. 1998. Bævere i Danmark?Jæger 7(2):6–8Google Scholar
Stensgaard, P. 1998a. Vi laver lige noget natur. Weekendavisen 24.–30. juli 1998: 3Google Scholar
Stensgaard, P. 1998b. En skov i forfald er en god skov. Weekendavisen 31. juli–6. august 1998:4Google Scholar
Taylor, P. W. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Thomas, J. M. 1992. Restoration and the Western Tradition. Restoration & Management Notes 10:169–76Google Scholar
Throop, W. 1997. The Rationale for Environmental Restoration. In The Ecological Community, R. Gottlieb, ed. New York and London: Routledge
Throop, W., ed. 2000. Environmental Restoration. Ethics, Theory, and Practice. New York: Humanity Books
Thygesen, J. K. 2003. Bæversagen skal afgøres i Vestre Landsret i 2003. Danmarks Sportsfiskerforbund. http://www.sportsfiskeren.dk/nyheder/2002/November/Baeversagen⍊skal⍊afgoeres⍊i⍊Vestre⍊Landsret⍊i⍊2003/
Tilman, D. 2000. Causes, Consequences and Ethics of Biodiversity. Nature 405:208–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolley, J. T. and McGinnis., M. V. 2000. The Conflicting Discourses of Restoration. Society & Natural Resources 13:339–57Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Beavers and Biodiversity
    • By Christian Gamborg, Research scientist Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute and at the Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Peter Sandøe, Professor in Bioethics Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in Copenhagen; Director of the interdisciplinary Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
  • Edited by Markku Oksanen, University of Kuopio, Finland, Juhani Pietarinen, University of Turku, Finland
  • Book: Philosophy and Biodiversity
  • Online publication: 26 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498527.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Beavers and Biodiversity
    • By Christian Gamborg, Research scientist Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute and at the Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Peter Sandøe, Professor in Bioethics Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in Copenhagen; Director of the interdisciplinary Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
  • Edited by Markku Oksanen, University of Kuopio, Finland, Juhani Pietarinen, University of Turku, Finland
  • Book: Philosophy and Biodiversity
  • Online publication: 26 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498527.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Beavers and Biodiversity
    • By Christian Gamborg, Research scientist Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute and at the Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment, Peter Sandøe, Professor in Bioethics Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in Copenhagen; Director of the interdisciplinary Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment
  • Edited by Markku Oksanen, University of Kuopio, Finland, Juhani Pietarinen, University of Turku, Finland
  • Book: Philosophy and Biodiversity
  • Online publication: 26 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498527.012
Available formats
×