Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:01:37.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Lawrence Sklar
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, D. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, H., ed. 1956. The Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Baird, D., ed. 1998. Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, J. 2001. The Discovery of Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barbour, J. and Bertotti, B. 1977. “Gravity and inertia in a Machian framework,” Il Nuovo Cimento B, 38, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, J. and Bertotti, B. 1982. “Mach's principle and the structure of dynamical theories,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 382, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, J. and Pfister, H., eds. 1995. Mach's Principle: From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Barrow-Green, J. 1997. Poincaré and the Three Body Problem. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, J., ed. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Life, Work and Influence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, J., ed. 1992. Ernst Mach – A Deeper Look. Dordrecht: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J. 1971. Mach's Philosophy of Science. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Clagett, M. 1959. Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1983. Principles of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Devaney, R. 1986. An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Diacu, F. and Holmes, P. 1996. Celestial Encounters: The Origins of Chaos and Stability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dugas, R. 1988. A History of Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 1970. “Who's afraid of absolute space,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 48(3), 287–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1998. The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galileo, . 1914. Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Galileo, . 1967. Dialogue Concerning the Chief World Systems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. 1950. Classical Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hanca, J., Tulejab, S., and Hancova, M. (2004). “Symmetries and conservation laws,” American Journal of Physics, 72(4), 428–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herival, J. 1965. The Background of Newton's Principia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. 1956. The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Lagrange, J. 1997. Analytical Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanczos, C. 1970. The Variational Principles of Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 2009. “Ramseyan humility,” in Braddon-Mitchell, D. and Nola, R. (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1957. The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mach, E. 1959. The Analysis of Sensations. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Mach, E. 1960. The Science of Mechanics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Moser, J. 1973. Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Systems. Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Noll, W. 1974. “The foundations of classical mechanics in the light of recent advances in continuum mechanics,” in W. Noll, Foundations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuenschwander, D. E. 2010. Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, I. 1947. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (The Principia). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pannekoek, A. 1961. A History of Astronomy. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1952. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Price, H. 1996. Time's Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1962. “What theories are not,” in Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A. (eds.), Logic, Method and the Philosophy of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Reprinted in H. Putnam, Mathematics, Matter and Method, vol. I, pp. 215–227, 1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. 1956. The Direction of Time. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Santilli, R. M. 1978. Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics, I: The Inverse Problem in Newtonian Mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Santilli, R. M. 1983. Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics, II: Birkhoffian Generalizations of Hamiltonian Mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. “Hertz's principles,” in D. Baird (ed.), Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 123–154.
Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, L. 1980. “Semantic analogy,” Philosophical Studies, 38, 217–234. Reprinted in L. Sklar, Philosophy and Spacetime Physics, 1985. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, L. 1993. Physics and Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneed, J. 1971. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. New York: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. 1998. Explaining Chaos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. 1967. “Newtonian space-time,” Texas Quarterly, 10(3), 174–200.Google Scholar
Sternberg, S. 1969. Celestial Mechanics. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Su, S.-C. and Chu, M.-C. 2009. “Is the Universe rotating?,” Astrophysical Journal, 703(1), 354–361.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, N. M. and Neugebauer, O. 1984. Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, I. 1977. Geschichte der mechanischen Prinzipien. Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, L. 1993. Ptolemy's Universe. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C. 1968. Essays in the History of Mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, R. 1971. Force in Newton's Physics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E. T. 1937. A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies, with an Introduction to the Problem of Three Bodies, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, A. 1947. The Analytical Foundations of Celestial Mechanics. Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell (especially items 244–309).Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2009. “Scientific explanation,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Lawrence Sklar, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034340.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Lawrence Sklar, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034340.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Lawrence Sklar, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034340.023
Available formats
×