Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T11:17:09.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Is Time's Arrow Perspectival?

from Part IV - Quantum Foundations and Quantum Gravity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2017

Carlo Rovelli
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
Khalil Chamcham
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Joseph Silk
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

We observe entropy decrease towards the past. Does this imply that in the past the world was in a non-generic microstate? I point out an alternative. The subsystem to which we belong interacts with the universe via a relatively small number of quantities, which define a coarse graining. Entropy happens to depend on coarse graining. Therefore, the entropy we ascribe to the universe depends on the peculiar coupling between us and the rest of the universe. Low past entropy may be due to the fact that this coupling (rather than microstate of the universe) is non-generic. I argue that for any generic microstate of a sufficiently rich system there are always special subsystems defining a coarse graining for which the entropy of the rest is low in one time direction (the “past”). These are the subsystems allowing creatures that “live in time” – such as those in the biosphere – to exist. I reply to some objections raised to an earlier presentation of this idea, in particular by Bob Wald, David Albert and Jim Hartle.

The Problem

An imposing aspect of the Cosmos is the mighty daily rotation of Sun, Moon, planets, stars and all galaxies around us. Why does the Cosmos so rotate? Well, it is not really the Cosmos that rotates, it is us. The rotation of the sky is a perspectival phenomenon: we understand it better as due to the peculiarity of our own moving point of view, rather than a global feature of all celestial objects.

A vivid feature of the world is its being in color: each dot of each object has one of the colors out of a three-dimensional (3D) color-space. Why? Well, it is us that have three kinds of receptors in our eyes, giving the 3D color space. The 3D space of the world's colors is perspectival: we understand it better as a consequence of the peculiarity of our own physiology, rather than the Maxwell equations.

The list of conspicuous phenomena that have turned out to be perspectival is long; recognizing them has been a persistent aspect of the progress of science.

A vivid aspect of reality is the flow of time; more precisely: the fact that the past is different from the future. Most observed phenomena violate time reversal invariance strongly. Could this be a perspectival phenomenon as well? Here I suggest that this is a likely possibility.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] J., Lebowitz, Boltzmann's entropy and time's arrow. Phys. Today. 46 (1993), 32.Google Scholar
[2] H., Price, Time's Arrow. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
[3] S. M., Carroll and H., Tam, Unitary Evolution and Cosmological Fine-Tuning, (2010) arXiv:1007.1417.
[4] R., Penrose, Singularities and Time-Asymmetry. In S. W., Hawking and W., Israel, eds. General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 581–638.
[5] H. M., Haggard and C., Rovelli, Death and resurrection of the zeroth principle of thermodynamics, Journal of Modern Physics D. 22 (2013), 1342007, arXiv:1302.0724.Google Scholar
[6] J. M., Deutsch, H., Li and A., Sharma, Microscopic origin of thermodynamic entropy in isolated systems, Physical Review E. 87 (2013), no. 4, 042135, arXiv:1202.2403.Google Scholar
[7] M., Tegmark, How unitary cosmology generalizes thermodynamics and solves the inflationary entropy problem, Physical Review D. 85 (June, 2012), 123517, arXiv:1108.3080.Google Scholar
[8] T., Josset, G., Chirco and C., Rovelli, Statistical mechanics of reparametrizationinvariant systems. It takes Three to Tango, (2016), arXiv:1503.08725.
[9] J., Ismael, The Situated Self. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
[10] H., Price, Naturalism without Mirrors. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×