Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: April 2017

14 - Is Time's Arrow Perspectival?

from Part IV - Quantum Foundations and Quantum Gravity

Summary

Introduction

We observe entropy decrease towards the past. Does this imply that in the past the world was in a non-generic microstate? I point out an alternative. The subsystem to which we belong interacts with the universe via a relatively small number of quantities, which define a coarse graining. Entropy happens to depend on coarse graining. Therefore, the entropy we ascribe to the universe depends on the peculiar coupling between us and the rest of the universe. Low past entropy may be due to the fact that this coupling (rather than microstate of the universe) is non-generic. I argue that for any generic microstate of a sufficiently rich system there are always special subsystems defining a coarse graining for which the entropy of the rest is low in one time direction (the “past”). These are the subsystems allowing creatures that “live in time” – such as those in the biosphere – to exist. I reply to some objections raised to an earlier presentation of this idea, in particular by Bob Wald, David Albert and Jim Hartle.

The Problem

An imposing aspect of the Cosmos is the mighty daily rotation of Sun, Moon, planets, stars and all galaxies around us. Why does the Cosmos so rotate? Well, it is not really the Cosmos that rotates, it is us. The rotation of the sky is a perspectival phenomenon: we understand it better as due to the peculiarity of our own moving point of view, rather than a global feature of all celestial objects.

A vivid feature of the world is its being in color: each dot of each object has one of the colors out of a three-dimensional (3D) color-space. Why? Well, it is us that have three kinds of receptors in our eyes, giving the 3D color space. The 3D space of the world's colors is perspectival: we understand it better as a consequence of the peculiarity of our own physiology, rather than the Maxwell equations.

The list of conspicuous phenomena that have turned out to be perspectival is long; recognizing them has been a persistent aspect of the progress of science.

A vivid aspect of reality is the flow of time; more precisely: the fact that the past is different from the future. Most observed phenomena violate time reversal invariance strongly. Could this be a perspectival phenomenon as well? Here I suggest that this is a likely possibility.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Philosophy of Cosmology
  • Online ISBN: 9781316535783
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535783
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
[1] J., Lebowitz, Boltzmann's entropy and time's arrow. Phys. Today. 46 (1993), 32.
[2] H., Price, Time's Arrow. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
[3] S. M., Carroll and H., Tam, Unitary Evolution and Cosmological Fine-Tuning, (2010) arXiv:1007.1417.
[4] R., Penrose, Singularities and Time-Asymmetry. In S. W., Hawking and W., Israel, eds. General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 581–638.
[5] H. M., Haggard and C., Rovelli, Death and resurrection of the zeroth principle of thermodynamics, Journal of Modern Physics D. 22 (2013), 1342007, arXiv:1302.0724.
[6] J. M., Deutsch, H., Li and A., Sharma, Microscopic origin of thermodynamic entropy in isolated systems, Physical Review E. 87 (2013), no. 4, 042135, arXiv:1202.2403.
[7] M., Tegmark, How unitary cosmology generalizes thermodynamics and solves the inflationary entropy problem, Physical Review D. 85 (June, 2012), 123517, arXiv:1108.3080.
[8] T., Josset, G., Chirco and C., Rovelli, Statistical mechanics of reparametrizationinvariant systems. It takes Three to Tango, (2016), arXiv:1503.08725.
[9] J., Ismael, The Situated Self. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
[10] H., Price, Naturalism without Mirrors. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).