Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:00:21.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2009

Chiara Bottici
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Florence
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbagnano, N., 1971, Dizionario di filosofia, Turin, Utet.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, E., 2003, “The US Media, Huntington and September 11”, in Third World Quarterly, 24, 2, pp. 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, F., 1961a, La filosofia antica. I. La formazione del pensiero filosofico dalle origini a Platone VI–VI secolo a.C., Milan, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Adorno, F., 1961b, La filosofia antica. II. Filosofia, cultura, scuole tra Aristotele e Augusto IV– II secolo a.C., Milan, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., and Horkheimer, M., 1997, Dialectic of Enlightenment, Eng. trans. by J. Cumming, London, Verso (1969, Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente, Frankfurt a. M., Fisher Verlag).Google Scholar
Aldrich, C. R., 1931, The Primitive Mind and Modern Civilisation, London, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Anderson, B., 1983, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Spread of Nationalism, London, Verso.Google Scholar
Angehrn, E., 1996, Die Überwindung des Chaos. Zur Philosophie des Mythos, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R., 2001, Historical Representation, Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T., 1975, Summa theologiae. English and Latin, ed. and trans. by Cunningham, J., London, Blackfriars.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1970a, The Physics, Eng. trans. by P. H. Wicksteed and F. M. Cornford, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vols IV and V.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1970b, Poetics, Eng. trans. by W. H. Fyfe, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vol. XXIII.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1974, Aristotle's Categories. De Interpretatione, Eng. trans. by J. L. Ackrill, Oxford, Clarendon.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1975, The “Art” of Rhetoric, Eng. trans. by J. H. Freese, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vol. XXII.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1977, The Metaphysics, Eng. trans. by M. A. Tredennick, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vols XVII–XVIII.Google Scholar
Arnason, J. P., 1989, “The Imaginary Constitution of Modernity”, in Busino, G.. (eds), Autonomie et autotransformation de la société. La philosophie militante de Cornelius Castoriadis, Geneva, Libraire Droz, pp. 323–39.Google Scholar
Arnason, J. P., 1994, “Reason, Imagination, Interpretation”, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 155–70.Google Scholar
Aron, R., 2001, The Opium of the Intellectuals, Eng. trans. by D. J. Mahoney and B. C. Anderson, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers (1955, L'opium des intellectuels, Paris, Hachette).Google Scholar
Aronsson, K., 2001, “Narrative, Sociology of”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier. vol. 15, pp. 10286–291.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 1997, Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen, Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 2000, Herrschaft und Heil: politische Theologie in Altägypten, Israel und Europa, Munich, Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Astius, F., 1836, Lexicon Platonicum sive Vocum Platonicorum Index, Leipzig, Weidmann.Google Scholar
Audi, R., (ed.), 1999, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E., 1944, “Figura”, in Neue Dantestudien, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E., 1953, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, Eng. trans. by W. R. Trask, Princeton, Princeton University Press (1946, Mimesis, Berne, Franke).Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint, 1970, Confessiones, Eng. trans. by W. Watts, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Bacon, F., 1963, Novum Organon, vol. IV in The Works of Francis Bacon, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Balibar, E., 1985, Spinoza et la politique, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R. C., 2000, “Introduction”, in P. Bayle, Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, Eng. trans. by R. C. Bartlett, New York, State University of New York, pp. xxiii–xlvii.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1972, Mythologies, Eng. trans. by A. Lavers, New York, Hill and Wang (1957, Mythologies, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1977, Image, Music, Text, Fontana, Collins.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1986, “The Discourse of History”, Eng. trans. by R. Howard, in The Rustle of Language, Oxford, Blackwell (1984, “Le discours de l'histoire”, in R. Barthes, Le Bruissement de la langue, Paris, Edition du Seuil).Google Scholar
Bayle, P., 2000, Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, Eng. trans. by R. C. Bartlett, New York, State University of New York (1994, Pensées diverses écrites à un Docteur de Sorbonne, à l'occasion de la comète qui parut au mois de décembre 1680, Paris, Société de Textes Français Modernes).Google Scholar
Bell, D., 1960, The End of Ideology: On Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, London, Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., 1980, “Myth, Ritual, and Political Control”, in Journal of Communication, 30, pp. 166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, A., 2001, “Identity and Identification: Philosophical Aspects”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7148–54.Google Scholar
Bloch, M., 1973, The Royal Touch: Sacred Monarchy and Scrofula in England and France, Eng. trans. by J. E. Anderson, London, Routledge (1924, Le rois thaumaturges: Etude sur le caractère surnaturel attribué à la puissance royale, particulièrement en France et en Angleterre, Strasbourg, Librairie Istra).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M., 1977, “The Past and the Present in the Present”, in Man, 12, 2, pp. 278–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenberg, H., 1971, “Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Wirkungspotential des Mythos”, in Fuhrmann, M. (ed), Terror und Spiel. Probleme der Mythenrezeption, Munich, Fink, pp. 11–66.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H., 1983, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, Eng. trans. by R. Wallace, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1966, Die Legitimität der Neuzeit, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H., 1985, Work on Myth, Eng. trans. by R. Wallace, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1979, Arbeit am Mythos, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Bohrer, K. H. (ed.), 1983, Mythos und Moderne. Begriff und Bild einer Rekonstruktion, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bonitz, H., 1955, Index Aristotelicus, Secunda Editio, Graz, Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Bottici, C., 2003, “The Domestic Analogy and the Kantian Project of Perpetual Peace”, in Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 4, pp. 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottici, C., 2004, Uomini e Stati. Percorsi di un'analogia, Pisa, ETS.Google Scholar
Bottici, C., and Challand, B., 2006, “Rethinking Political Myth: The Clash of Civilisations as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy”, in European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 3, pp. 315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R., 1999, “Local vs General Ideologies: A Normal Ingredient of Modern Political Life”, in Journal of Political Ideologies, 4, 2, pp. 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouveresse, J., 1982, “L'animal cérémoniel: Wittgenstein et l'anthropologie”, in Ludwig Wittgenstein. Remarques sur le Rameau d'Or de Frazer, Editions l'Age d'Homme, pp. 41–124.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L., 1976, A Word Index to Plato, Leeds, W. S. Maney and Son.Google Scholar
Braudel, F., 1980, On History, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bremner, C., 2004, “Stoned to Death … Why Europe is Starting to Lose Its Faith in Islam”, in www.timesonline.co.uk, 4 December.
Burnet, J., 1920, Early Greek Philosophy, London, A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., 1962, “Zum Problem der Entmythologisierung”, in Il problema della demitizzazione. Atti del convegno indetto dal Centro Internazionale di Studi Umanistici e dall'Istituto di Studi Filosofici, Rome, Archivio di Filosofia, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., 1984, New Testament and Mythology and Other Basic Writings, Eng. trans. by S. M. Ogden, Philadelphia, Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., and Jaspers, K., 1954, Die Frage der Entmythologisierung, Munich, Piper Verlag.Google Scholar
Callimachus, , 1958, Aetia, Iambi, Lyric Poems, Hecale, Minor Epic and Elegiac Poems, Fragments of Epigrams, Fragments of Uncertain Location, Eng. trans. by C. A. Trypanis, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Cantelli, G., 1986, Mente. Corpo. Linguaggio. Saggio sull'interpretazione vichiana del mito, Florence, Sansoni.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1951, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, Eng. trans by C. A. Koelln and J. P. Pettergrove, Princeton, Princeton University Press (1932, Die Philosophie der Aufklärung, Tübingen, Mohr).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1968, An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1973, The Myth of the State, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1977, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1981, Kant's Life and Thought, Eng. trans. by J. Haden, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1986, “Institution de la société et religion”, in C. Castoriadis, Domaines de l'homme. Le carrefour du labyrinthe, Paris, Seuil, pp. 455–81.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1987, The Imaginary Institution of Society, Eng. trans. by K. Blamey, Cambridge, Polity Press (1975, L'institution imaginaire de la société, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1991, “Power, Politics, Autonomy”, in C. Castoriadis, Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy – Essays in Political Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 143–75.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1997, “Radical Imagination and the Social Instituting Imaginary”, in C. Castoriadis, The Castoriadis Reader, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 319–38.Google Scholar
Cavell, S., 1979, The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Scepticism, Morality and Tragedy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cazes, B., 2001, “Utopias: Social”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 24, pp. 16123–7.Google Scholar
Cerutti, F., 1996, “Identità e politica”, in Cerutti, F. (ed.), Identità e politica, Bari, Laterza, pp. 5–43.Google Scholar
Cerutti, F., 2003, “A Political Identity of the Europeans?”, in Thesis Eleven, 72, London, Sage, pp. 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, P., 1984, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots, Paris, Edition Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Churchill, J., 1989, “If a Lion Could Talk …”, in Philosophical Investigations, 12, 4, pp. 308–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clack, B. R., 1999, Wittgenstein, Frazer and Religion, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohan, S., and Shires, L., 1988, Telling Stories: A Theoretical Analysis of Narrative Fiction, New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. P., 1985, The Symbolic Construction of Community, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, N., 1970, The Pursuit of the Millennium, London, Paladin.Google Scholar
Cole, T., 1983, “Archaic Truth”, in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, 13, pp. 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, G., 1975, La nascita della filosofia, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Colli, G., 1977, La sapienza greca I: Dioniso, Apollo Eleusi, Orfeo, Museo, Iperborei, Enigma, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Colli, G., 1978a, La sapienza greca II: Epimenide, Ferecide, Talete, Anassimandro, Anassimene, Onomacrito, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Colli, G., 1978b, La sapienza greca III: Eraclito, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M., 1952, Principium Sapientiae: The Origins of Greek Philosophical Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmas Indicopleustes, 1897, The Christian Topography of Cosmas, an Egyptian Monk, Eng. trans. by J. W. McCrindle, London, Hakluyt Society.
Coulter, J., 1999, “Discourse and Mind”, in Human Studies, 22, pp. 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtine, J.-F., 1992a, “Realitas”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 178–85.Google Scholar
Courtine, J.-F., 1992b, “Realität/Idealität”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 185–93.Google Scholar
Dante, A., 1984, The Divine Comedy, Eng. trans. by M. Musa, Harmondsworth, Penguin (1988–9, La Divina Commedia, ed. by U. Bosco and G. Reggio, Florence, Le Monnier).Google Scholar
Dante, A., 1995, Epistola a Cangrande, ed. by Cecchini, E., Florence, Giunti.Google Scholar
Das, V., 1998, “Wittgenstein and Anthropology”, in Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, pp. 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delatte, L., Rutter, C., Govaerts, S., and Denooz, J., 1984, Aristoteles Metaphisica. Index Verborum. Listes de Fréquence, Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., 2006, Nietzsche and Philosophy, Eng. trans. by H. Tomlinson, New York, Columbia University Press (1962, Nietzsche et la philosophie, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Denooz, J., 1988, Aristote 《Poetica》. Index Verborum. Liste de fréquence, Liege, Centre Informatique de Philosophie et Lettres.Google Scholar
Descartes, R., 1984, Meditations on First Philosophy, Eng. trans. by J. Cottingham, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–62 (1973, Meditationes de prima philosophia, Paris, Librairie Philosophique Vrin).Google Scholar
Descartes, R., 1985, Discourse on the Method, Eng. trans. by R. Stoothoff, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–51 (1973, Discours de la Méthode, Paris, Librairie Philosophique Vrin).Google Scholar
Detienne, M., 1967, Les Maîtres de la vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris, Maspéro.Google Scholar
Detienne, M., 1986, The Creation of Mythology, Eng. trans. by M. Cook, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diels, H., and Kranz, W., 1951, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Zurich, Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Dierse, U., 1976, “Ideologie” in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. IV, pp. 157–86.Google Scholar
Döner, A., 1996, Politischer Mythos und symbolische Politik, Reinbeck, Rowolt.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H., 1972, Der Mythos und sein Funktion in der antiken Philosophie, Innsbruck, Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Dubois, M., 2001, “Ideology, Sociology of”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7177–82.Google Scholar
Duhem, P., 1965, Le système du monde: histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, Paris, Herman.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T., 1991, Ideology: An Introduction, London, Verso.Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1967, “Myth, Metaphors and Political Conformity”, in Psychiatry, 30, 3, pp. 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M., 1976, The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1988, Constructing the Political Spectacle, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, M., 1954, The Myth of the Eternal Return, or Cosmos and History, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, M., 1957, Mythes, rêves et mystères, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E., 1948, The Divine Kingship of the Shilluk of Nilotic Sudan, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R., 1988, Literacy and Orality, Studies in the Technology of Communication, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fisch, J., 1992, “Zivilisation, Kultur”, in Brunner, O., Conze, W., and Koselleck, R. (eds), 1974–1997, Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politischensozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Stuttgart, Klett, vol. 7, pp. 679–774.Google Scholar
Flood, C. G., 1996, Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction, New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1988, “Technologies of the Self”, in Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., and Hutton, P. (eds), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Frandsen, S. B., 2000, “Italian Fascism and Roman Heritage: The Third Rome of Mussolini”, in Stråth, B., B. (ed.) Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 157–69.Google Scholar
Frank, M., 1982, Der kommende Gott. Vorlesungen über die Neue Mythologie, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G., 1922, The Golden Bough, a Study in Magic and Religion, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freeden, M., 2001, “Ideology: Political Aspects”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7175–7.Google Scholar
Freeman, K., 1966, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers: A Companion to Diels' Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1937, The Interpretations of Dreams, Eng. trans. by A. A. Brill, London, Allen & Unwin (1941–1968, “Die Traumdeutung”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vols II–III).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1941–1968, “Warum Krieg?”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vol. XVI, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1950, Totem and Taboo, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, “Totem und Tabu”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vol. IX).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1959, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, “Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vol. XV).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1966, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse – Neue Folge, vol. XI in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1989, Civilisation and Its Discontents, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, Das Unbehagen in der Kultur, vol. XIV in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer).Google Scholar
Friedman, J., 1992, “Myth, History, and Political Identity”, in Cultural Anthropology, 7, 2, pp. 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friese, H., 2001, “Imagination: History of the Concept”, in Smelser, N. J., and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7197–201.Google Scholar
Friese, H. (ed.), 2002, Identities: Time, Difference, and Boundaries, Oxford, Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Friese, H., and Wagner, P., 2002, “Survey Article: The Nascent Political Philosophy of the European Polity”, in Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 3, pp. 342–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (ed.), 1971, Terror und Spiel. Probleme der Mythenrezeption, Munich, Fink.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1988, Truth and Method, London, Sheed and Ward (1975, Wahrheit und Methode, vol. I in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr).Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1993a, “Der Mythos im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft”, in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr, vol. VIII, pp. 180–8.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1993b, “Mythologie und Offenbarungsreligion”, in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr, vol. VIII, pp. 174–80.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1993c, “Mythos und Logos”, in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr, vol. VIII, pp. 170–4.Google Scholar
Galilei, G., 2005, Opere, vol. I, Torino, Utet.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1964, “Ideology as a Cultural System” in Apter, D. E. (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, London, Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 47–76.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1973, Interpretation of Cultures, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1983, Local Knowledge, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1995, After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 2000, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gehlen, A., 1980, Man in the Age of Technology, Eng. trans. by P. Lipscomb, New York, Columbia University Press (1994, Urmensch und Spätkultur: philosophische Ergebnisse und Aussagen, Wiesbaden, Aula Verlag).Google Scholar
Gehlen, A., 1988, Man, His Nature and Place in the World, Eng. trans. by C. Mcmillan and K. Pillemer, New York, Columbia University Press (1997, Der Mensch: seine Natur und eine Stellung in der Welt, Wiesbaden, Quelle und Meyer).Google Scholar
Geiser, K., 1963, Platons ungeschriebene Lehre, Stuttgart, Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Geisser, V., 2003, La nouvelle islamophobie, Paris, Editions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Gliozzi, G., 1977, Adamo e il nuovo mondo. La nascita dell'antropologia come ideologia coloniale dalle genealogie bibliche alle teorie razziali (1500–1700), Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Gockel, H., 1981, Mythos und Poesie. Zum Mythosbegriff in Aufklärung und Frühromantik, Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1977, The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1986, The Logic of Writing and the Organisation of Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J., and I. Watt, 1968, “The Consequences of Literacy”, in Goody, J. (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A., 1975, Quaderni del carcere. Edizione critica dell'Istituto Gramsci, Turin, Einaudi.Google Scholar
Grünepütt, K., 1992, “Realität der Außenwelt”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds) 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 206–11.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, Eng. trans. by F. Lawrence, Cambridge, Polity Press (1985, Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwölf Vorlesungen, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1996, “Citizenship and National Identity”, in J. Habermas Between Facts and Norms, Eng. trans. by W. Rehg, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1992, Faktizität und Geltung, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp), pp. 491–515.Google Scholar
Halliday, F., 2003, Islam and the Myth of Confrontation, London, Tauris.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1963, Preface to Plato, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1983, “The Linguistic Task of Presocratics”, in Robb, K. (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, Hegeler Institute.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1986, The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1931, The Phenomenology of Mind, Eng. trans. by J. B. Baillie, London, Allen & Unwin (1971, Phänomenologie des Geistes, vol. III in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1956, The Philosophy of History, Eng. trans. by J. Sibree, New York, Dover Publications (1971, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, vol. XII in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1991, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1970, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, vol. VII in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1995, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Eng. trans. by E. S. Haldane, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press (1971, Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, vols XVIII–XX in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hölderlin, F., and Schelling, F. W. J., 1971, Das älteste Systemprogramm des deutschen Idealismus, in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, vol. I, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, pp. 234–7.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 2002a Being and Time, Eng. trans. by J. Stambaugh, Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1993, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag).Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 2002b, The Essence of Truth: On Plato's Cave Allegory and Theaetetus, Eng. trans. by T. Sadler, London, Continuum (1988, Vom Wesen der Wahrheit: zu Platons Höhlengleichnis und Theätet, in Gesamtausgabe, Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann, vol. 34).Google Scholar
Henry, B., 1986, Libertà e mito in Cassirer, Naples, ESI.Google Scholar
Henry, B., 2000, Mito e identità. Contesti di tolleranza, Pisa, ETS.Google Scholar
Henry, B., 2001, “The Role of Symbols for European Political Identity – Political Identity as a Myth?”, in Cerutti, F. and Rudolph, E. (eds), A Soul for Europe, Leuven, Peeters, vol. 2, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
Herodotus, , 1920–4, Historiae, Eng. trans. by A. D. Godley, London, Heinemann, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Hesiod, , 1977, The Homeric Hymns and Homerica, Eng. trans. by H. G. White, London, Heinemann, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Hick, J. (ed.), 1977, The Myth of God Incarnate, London, SCM Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J., 1982, God Has Many Names, Philadelphia, Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Hippler, T., 2000, “Spinoza on Historical Myth”, in Stråth, B. (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Hirsch, W., 1971, Platons Weg zum Mythos, Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., 1985, Leviathan, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., 1994, The Elements of Law, Natural and Political, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., 1963, Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Manchester, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., 1990, Nations and Nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., and Ranger, T., 1983, The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, F. 1966, Poems and Fragments, Eng. trans. by M. Hamburger, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul (1981, Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, Munich, Hanser).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F. et al., 1992, “Realismus”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 148–70.Google Scholar
Homer, , 1978, The Iliad, Eng. trans. by A. T. Murray, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Homer, , 1995, The Odyssey, Eng. trans. by A. T. Murray and G. E. Dimock, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 1995, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Eng. trans. by J. Anderson, Cambridge, Polity Press (1992, Kampf um Anerkennung, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hübner, K. 1985, Die Wahrheit des Mythos, Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Hübner, K., 1994, Die zweite Schöpfung. Das Wirkliche in Kunst und Musik, Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Hume, D., 1985, A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P., 1996, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 1954, The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Eng. trans. by D. Carr, Evanston, Northwestern University Press (1992, “Die Krisis der europäischer Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie”, in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier, vol. VIII).Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 1973, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, Eng. trans. by D. Cairns, The Hague, Nijhoff (1992, Cartesianische Meditationen, vol. VIII in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E., 1992, “Idee zu einer reinen Phänomenologie”, in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier, vol. V.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 2001, Logical Investigations, Eng. trans. by J. N. Findlay, London, Routledge (1992, Logische Untersuchungen, vols II–III–IV in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier).Google Scholar
Iser, W., 1976, Akt des Lesens, Munich, Fink.Google Scholar
Jamme, C., 1991, Einführung in die Philosophie des Mythos, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Jamme, C., 1999, “Gott an hat ein Gewand”. Grenzen und Perspektiven philosophischer Mythos-Theorien der Gegenwart, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Jenkins, K. (ed.), 1997, The Postmodern History Reader, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., 1996, Social Identity, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T. 1995, “Towards a Wittgensteinian Social Psychology of Human Development”, in Theory and Psychology, 5, 1, pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, J., 1957, Letters of James Joyce, ed. by Ellmann, R., London, Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G., 1981, Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious, Eng. trans. by G. Adler and R. F. C. Hull, in The collected Works of C. G. Jung, Princeton, Princeton University Press, vol. 9.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H., 1973, The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek, Dordrecht, Reidel.Google Scholar
Kaiser El-Safti, M., 1992, “Realität, formale/objektive” in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K. and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991a, “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, in Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–60 (1912–13, “Beant wortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. VIII, pp. 15–32).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991b, Metaphysics of Morals, Eng. trans. by M. Gregor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–175 (1912–13, Metaphysik der Sitten, erster teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, vol. VI in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 203–372).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991c, On the Common Saying: ‘This May Be True in Theory, But It Does Not Apply in Practice’, Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, in Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–93 (1912–13, Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. VIII, pp. 273–313).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991d, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, in Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–131 (1912–13, Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. VIII, pp. 341–86).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1993, Critique of Practical Reason, Eng. trans. by L. White Beck, New York, Macmillan (1912–13, Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. V, pp. 1–164).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1998, Critique of Pure Reason, Eng. trans. by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood, in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1912–13, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Kants Werke, vols III–IV in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vols III–IV).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., 2000, Critique of the Power of Judgment, Eng. trans. by P. Guyer and E. Matthews, in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel KantCambridge, Cambridge University Press (1912–13, Kritik der Urteilskraft, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. V, pp. 175–485).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, E., 1957, The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, G., 1986, Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kemper, P. (ed.), 1989, Macht des Mythos – Ohnmacht der Vernunft?, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. J. P., 1973, Wittgenstein, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Kerényi, K., 1963, Prolegomena, in K. Kerényi, and C. G. Jung, Essays on a Science of Mythology, Eng. trans. by R. F. C. Hull, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kersting, W., 1992, “Politics, Freedom and Order: Kant's Political Philosophy”, in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., 1970, Myth: Its Meaning and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., 1974, The Nature of Greek Myth, Hardmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schonfield, M., 1983, The Presocratic Philosophers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R., 2004, Futures Past, Eng. trans. by K. Tribe, New York, Columbia University Press (1979, Vergangene Zukunft, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Koyré, A., 1957, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J., 1982, Platone ed i fondamenti della metafisica, Milan, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J., 1995, Platons ungeschriebene Lehre, in Kobusch, T. and Mojsisch, B. (eds.), Platon. Seine Dialoge in der Sicht neuer Forschungen, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Krois, J. M., 1979, “Der Begriff des Mythos bei Ernst Cassirer”, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos: Ein Kolloquium, Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., 1972, Language in the Inner City, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Caze, M., 2002, The Analytic Imaginary, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Landucci, S., 1972, I Filosofi e i selvaggi, Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Lang, B., 1989, “The Politics of Interpretation: Spinoza's Modernist Turn”, in Review of Metaphysics, reprinted in G. Lloyd (ed.) 2001, Spinoza: Critical Assessments, London, Routledge, vol. III, pp. 293–318.
Larzilliére, P., 2003, “Le 《martyr》 palestinien, nouvelle figure d'un nationalisme en échec”, in Dieckhoff, A. and Leveau, R. (eds), Israéliens et Palestiniens: la guerre en partage, Paris, Editions Balland, pp. 89–119.Google Scholar
Leghissa, G., 2002, “Mito, dogma e genesi del moderno in Hans Blumenberg”, in H. Blumenberg, Il futuro del mito, Milan, Medusa, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
Le Goff, J., 2000, “The Medieval West and the Indian Ocean: An Oneiric Horizon”, in Pagden, A. (ed.), Facing Each other: The World's Perception of Europe and Europe's Perception of the World, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Lentin, A., 2004, Racism and Anti-Racism in Europe, London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1962, La pensée sauvage, Paris, Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1964, Mythologiques: Le cru et le cuit, Paris, Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1968, Structural Anthropology, Eng. trans. by C. Jacobson and B. Grundfest Schoepf, London, Allen Lane (1958, Anthropologie structurale, Paris, Plon).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1978, Myth and Meaning, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1987, Anthropology and Myth: Lectures, 1951–1982, Eng. trans. by R. Willis, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1990, The Naked Man, Eng. trans. by J. Weightman and D. Weightman, Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1965, Mythologiques: L'Homme nu, Paris, Plon).Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Stuart, J. H., 1968, A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B., 1989, Discourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual, and Classification, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J., 1997, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Lotito, L., 2002, “Introduzione”, in Schelling. Introduzione filosofica alla filosofia della mitologia, Milan, Bompiani, pp. v–xli.Google Scholar
Löwith, K., 1965, From Hegel to Nietzsche, London, Constable (1941, Von Hegel zu Nietzsche, Zürich, Europa Verlag).Google Scholar
Löwith, K., 1949, Meaning in History: The Theological Implication of the Philosophy of History, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B., 1964, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maffey, A., 1989, “Utopia”, in Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N., and Pasquino, G. (eds), Dizionario di Politica, Turin, Utet, pp. 1214–20.Google Scholar
Maltese, C., 1992, Storia dell'arte in Italia 1785–1943, Turin, Einaudi.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., 1992 Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays by Bronislaw Malinowski, Illinois, Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K., 1960, Ideology and Utopia, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Marconi, D., 1999, La filosofia del linguaggio. Da Frege ai giorni nostri, Turin, Utet.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H., 1980, Das Ende der Utopie, Berlin, Verlag Neue Kritik.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H., 1991, One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Society, Boston, Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marquard, O., 1979, “Lob des Polytheismus: Über Monomythie und Polymythie”, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos: Ein Kolloquium, Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. P., 1989, The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K., 1969, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Selected Works in Three Volumes, vol. I, Moscow, Progress, pp. 394–488 (1978, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte, in Marx Engels Werke, Berlin, Dietz Verlag, vol. VIII, pp. 11–194).Google Scholar
Marx, K., 1975, Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Law, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, vol. III, Moscow, Progress, pp. 3–129 (1982, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtphilosophie, in Karl Marx Friderich Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), vol. 1–2, Berlin, Dietz Verlag).Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F., 1976, The German Ideology, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, vol. V, Moscow, Progress, pp. 19–452 (1978, Die deutsche Ideologie, in Marx Engels Werke, Berlin, Dietz Verlag, vol. III).Google Scholar
McCormick, J. P., 1997, Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H., 1934, Mind, Self and Society, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, C., 1990, The Greek Discovery of Politics, Eng. trans. by D. McLintock, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press (1980, Die Entstehung des Politischen bei den Griechen, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Melucci, A., 2000, “Costruzione di sé, narrazione, riconoscimento” in Porta, D. Della, Greco, M., and Szakolczai, A. (eds), Identità, riconoscimento, scambio. Saggi in onore di Alessandro Pizzorno. Con una risposta e un saggio autobiografico di Alessandro Pizzorno, Bari, Laterza, pp. 30–45.Google Scholar
Messeri, M., 1997, Verità, Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Midgley, M., 2003, The Myths We Live By, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Moeller, J., 1988, “Nature, Human Nature, and Society in the American Western”, in Yanarella, E. J. and Siegelman, L. (eds), Political Mythology and Popular Fiction, New York, Greenwood Press, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
Moneti, M., 1992, Il pease che non c'è e i suoi abitanti, Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F., 1975, “Epilogue”, in Moore, S. F. and Meyerhoff, B. (eds), Symbol and Politics in Communal Ideology, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J., 1992, Plato and Platonism: Plato's Conception of Appearance and Reality in Ontology, Epistemology, and Ethics, and its Modern Echoes, London, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F., 1994, Spinoza: L'expérience et l'éternité, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Morgan, D., 2001, “A Fervour that America Should Easily Recognize”, Washington Post, 2 November.
Morgan, K., 2000, Myth and Philosophy from Presocratics to Plato, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosse, G. L., 1974, The Nationalization of Masses: Political Symbolism and the Mass Movements in Germany from Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich, New York, Howard Ferting.Google Scholar
Nestlé, W., 1942, Vom Mythos zum Logos: die Selbstentfaltung des griechischen Denkens von Homer bis auf die Sophistik und Sokrates, Stuttgart, Kröner.Google Scholar
Neumann, K., 1972, “Idee”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K. and Ritter, J. (eds.), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 55–134.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 1984, Nietzsche Briefwechsel. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by Colli, G. and Montinari, M., Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 1994, On the Genealogy of Morality, Eng. trans. by C. Diethe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1973, Zur Genealogie der Moral. Eine Streitschrift, in Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari, Berlin, De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 1999, The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, Eng. trans. by R. Geuss and R. Speirs, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1973, Die Geburt der Tragödie, oder: Griechentum und Pessimismus, in Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari, Berlin, De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 2002, Beyond Good and Evil, Eng. trans. by J. Norman, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1973, Jenseits von Gut und Böse, in Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari, Berlin, De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Norris, C., 1991, Spinoza and the Origins of Modern Critical Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., 1986, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., 2001, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R., and Torrance, N. (eds), 1991, Literacy and Orality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onions, C. T., 1966, The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pagden, A., 1982, The Fall of Natural Man, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagden, A. (ed.), 2000, Facing Each Other: The World's Perception of Europe and Europe's Perception of the World, Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Paggi, L. (ed.), 1999, Le memorie della Repubblica, Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Panikkar, R., 1962, “La demitologizzazione nell'incontro tra Cristianesimo e Induismo”, in Il Problema della demitizzazione. Atti del convegno indetto dal Centro Internazionale di Studi Umanistici e dall'Istituto di Studi Filosofici, Rome, Archivio di Filosofia, pp. 243–66.Google Scholar
Panikkar, R., 1964, The Unknown Christ of Hinduism, London, Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
Passerini, L. (ed.), 2003, Figures d'Europe: Images and Myths of Europe, Brussels, P. I. E.- Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pavone, C., 1991, Una Guerra civile. Saggio storico sulla moralità nella resistenza, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Pavone, C., 1995, Alle origini della repubblica: Scritti su fascismo, antifascismo e continuità dello stato, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P., 2001, Le Vocabulaire d'Aristote, Paris, Ellipses.Google Scholar
Pieper, J., 1965, Über die platonischen Mythen, Munich, Kösel Verlag.Google Scholar
Patai, R., 1973, The Arab Mind, New York, Scribner.Google Scholar
Pipes, D., 1983, In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A., 1993, Le radici della politica assoluta e altri saggi, Milan, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A., 2000, “Risposte e proposte”, in Porta, D. Della, Greco, M., and Szakolczai, A. (eds), Identità, riconoscimento, scambio. Saggi in onore di Alessandro Pizzorno. Con una riposta e un saggio autobiografico di Alessandro Pizzorno, Bari, Laterza, pp. 197–246.Google Scholar
Plato, 1989, The Collected Dialogues of Plato Including the Letters, ed. by Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H., New Haven, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poser, H. (ed.), 1979, Philosophie und Mythos: Ein Kolloquium, Berlin, De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preus, S., 1989, “Spinoza, Vico, and the Imagination of Religion”, in Journal of the Histories of Ideas, 50, pp. 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulcini, E., 2001, L'individuo senza passioni, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Rath, I. W., 1992, Die verkannte mythische Vernunft. Perspektiven einer vernünftigen Alternative, Wien, Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1973, A Theory of Justice, London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1993, Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reale, G., 1986, Per una nuova interpretazione di Platone. Rilettura dei grandi dialoghi alla luce delle dottrine non scritte, Milan, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Reale, G., 1991, Platone. Tutti gli scritti, Milan, Rusconi.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1970, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, Eng. trans. by D. Savage, New Haven, Yale University Press (1965, De l'interprétation: Essai sur Freud, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1986, Du texte à l'action, Paris, Editions du Seuil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1994, “Imagination in Discourse and in Action”, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 118–35.Google Scholar
Rorty, R., 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A., 1941, Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts – Eine Wertung der seelisch-geistigen Gestaltenkämpfe unserer Zeit, München, Hoheneichen-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M., 1997, “Why Spinoza Chose the Hebrews: The Exemplary Function of Prophecy in the Theological-Political Treatise”, in History of Political Thought, 18, reprinted in G. Lloyd (ed.), 2001, Spinoza: Critical Assessments, London, Routledge, vol. III, pp. 245–81.
Ross, W. D., 1951, Plato's Theory of Ideas, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., 1997a, “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men”, Eng. trans. by V. Gourevitch, in The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–230 (1996, Discours sur l'origine et les Fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes, Paris, Librairie Générale Française).Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., 1997b, “Of The Social Contract”, Eng. trans. by V. Gourevitch, in The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (2001, Du Contract Social, Paris, Flammarion).Google Scholar
Rundell, J., 1994a, “Creativity and Judgment: Kant on Reason and Imagination”, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 87–117.Google Scholar
Rundell, J., 1994b, “Introduction” in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Russell, B., 1922, “Introduction”, in L. Wittgenstein, 1961, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Eng. trans. by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London, Routledge, pp. ix–xxii.Google Scholar
Said, E., 1978, Orientalism, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Sabbatucci, D., 1978, Il mito, il rito e la storia, Rome, Bulzoni Editore.Google Scholar
Sadiki, L., 2004, The Search for Arab Democracy: Discourses and Counter-Discourses, London, Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J., 1856–1861, Philosophische Einleitung in die Philosophie der Mythologie oder Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie, vol. XI in F. W. J. Schellings Sämtliche Werke, Stuttgart, Cotta.Google Scholar
Scheman, N., 1996, “Forms of Life: Mapping the Rough Ground”, in Sluga, H. and Stern, D. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, F. S., and Schlegel, A. W., 1992, Athenäum. Eine Zeitschrift von A. W. Schlegel und F. S. Schlegel, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. J., 1999, “Creation and Recreation: The Interplay of Activity and Structure in Language”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 669–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C., 1985a, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, Eng. trans. by E. Kennedy, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1926, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus, Berlin, Dunker und Humblot).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., 1985b, Political Theology, Eng. trans. by G. Schwab, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1922, Politische Theologie, Berlin, Dunker und Humblot).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., 1988, “Die politische Theorie des Mythus”, in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, Berlin, Dunker und Humblot, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Seib, P., 2004, “The News Media and the Clash of Civilisations”, in Parameters, Winter 2004–5, pp. 71–85.
Shevory, T. C., 1988, “Winning Isn't Everything: Sport Fiction as a Genre of Political Criticism”, in Yanarella, E. J. and Siegelman, L. (eds), Political Mythology and Popular Fiction, New York, Greenwood Press, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Shils, E., 1958, “Ideology and Civility: On the Politics of the Intellectual”, in Sewanee Review, 66, pp. 450–80.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., and Weiner, E. S. C. (eds), 1989, The Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., 1986, The Ethnic Origins of Nations, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., 1991, National Identity, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., 1999, Myths and Memories of the Nation, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorel, G., 1975, Reflections on Violence, Eng. trans. by T. E. Hulme, New York, AMS Press (1990, Réflexions sur la violence, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Sparti, D., 2000, “Il riconoscimento dal volto umano”, in Porta, D. Della, Greco, M., and Szakolczai, A. (eds), Identità, riconoscimento, scambio. Saggi in onore di Alessandro Pizzorno. Con una risposta e un saggio autobiografico di Alessandro Pizzorno, Bari, Laterza, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 1951a, Political Treatise, Eng. trans. by R. H. M. Elwes, in A Theologico-Political Treatise and a Political Treatise, New York, Dover Publications, pp. 267–387 (1924, Tractatus Politicus, vol. III in Spinoza Opera, ed. by C. Gebhardt, Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 1951b, A Theologico-Political Treatise and a Political Treatise, Eng. trans. by R. H. M. Elwes, New York, Dover Publications, pp. 1–266 (1972, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, in Spinoza Opera, ed. by C. Gebhardt, vol. III, Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 1985, Ethics, Eng. trans. by E. Curley, in The Collected Works of Spinoza, Princeton, Princeton University Press, vol. I, pp. 401–617 (1924, Ethica, in Spinoza Opera, ed. by C. Gebhardt, vol. II, Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Stoppino, M., 1989, “Ideologia”, in Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N., and Pasquino, G. (eds), Dizionario di Politica, Turin, Utet, pp. 483–95.Google Scholar
Stråth, B. (ed.), 2000, Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A., 2001, “This Is a Religious War”, New York Times, 7 October.
Taylor, C., 1989, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1992, Multiculturalism and the “Politics of Recognition”, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1995, Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. T., 1986, “Do You understand? Criteria of Understanding in Verbal Interaction”, in Language and Communication, 6, 3, pp. 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebben, J. R., 1994, Concordantia Homerica. Pars I Odissea, Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Tebben, J. R., 1998, Concordantia Homerica. Pars II Ilias, Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Telhami, S., 2004, “Arabs Increasingly Define Themselves as Muslim First”, in Daily Star, 16 July 2004.
Thesaurus Linguae Graecae, 1992, CDROM, Irvine, University of California.
Thomas, R., 1992, Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. B., 2001, “Ideology: History of the Concept”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7170–4.Google Scholar
Thorsen, A., 2000, “Foundation Myth at Work: National Day Celebrations in France, Germany and Norway in a Comparative Perspective” in Stråth, B. (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 331–51.Google Scholar
Thucydides, , 1919, History of the Peloponnesian War, Eng. trans. by C. F. Smith, London, Heinemann, Loeb Classical Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomashevski, B., 1965, “Thematics”, in Lemon, L. and Reis, M. (eds), Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, pp. 61–95.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. J., 1988, Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tudor, H., 1972, Political Myth, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattimo, G., 1999a, “Estetica”, in Enciclopedia di filosofia, Milan, Garzanti, pp. 340–5.Google Scholar
Vattimo, G., 1999b, “Immaginazione”, in Enciclopedia di filosofia, Milan, Garzanti, pp. 528–30.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P., 2006, Myth and Thought Among the Greeks, Eng. trans. by J. Lloyd and J. Fort, New York, Zone Books (1990, Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs. Études de psychologie historique, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
Veyne, P., 1988, Did Greeks Believe in Their Myths?, Eng. trans. by P. Wissing, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vico, G., 1999, New Science, Eng. trans. by D. Marsh, London, Penguin Books (1992, Principi di scienza nuova, Milan, Mondadori).Google Scholar
Vlastos, G., 1965, “Degrees of Reality in Plato”, in Bambrough, R. (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Volkmann-Schluck, K.-H., 1969, Mythos und Logos. Interpretationen zu Schellings Philosophie der Mythologie, Berlin, De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Savigny, E., 1991, “Common Behavior of Many a Kind”, in Arrington, R. L. and Glock, H. J. (eds), Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: Text and Context, London, Routledge, pp. 105–119.Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 1994, A Sociology of Modernity, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 2002, “Identity and Selfhood as a Problematique”, in Friese, H. (ed.), Identities: Time, Difference, and Boundaries, Oxford, Berghahn Books, pp. 32–56.Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 2004, “Palomar's Question: The Axial Age Hypothesis: European Modernity and Historical Contingency”, in Arnason, J., Eisenstadt, S., and Wittrock, B. (eds), Axial Civilisations and World History, Leiden, Brill, pp. 87–121.Google Scholar
Wallace, R., 1984, “Introduction to Blumenberg”, in New German Critique, 32, pp. 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M., 1964, “On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought”, in Political Science Quarterly, 82, June, pp. 120–203.Google Scholar
Warrender, H., 1957, The Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford, Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wartelle, A., 1982, Lexique de la 《Rhétorique》 d'Aristote, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1969, On Charisma and Institution Building, ed. by Eisenstadt, S., Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1976, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Eng. trans. by T. Parsons, London, Allen & Unwin (1984, Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus, vol. 17 in Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, ed. by H. Baier et al. Tübingen Mohr).Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1978, Economy and Society, Eng. trans. by E. Fischoff et al. Berkeley, University of California Press (1984, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, vol. XXII 1–XXII 5 in Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, Abteilung I).Google Scholar
Weber, M., 2004, The Vocation Lectures: Science as Vocation, Politics as Vocation, Eng. trans. by R. Livingstone, Indianapolis Cambridge, Hackett.Google Scholar
White, H., 1973, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, H., 1987, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, H., 2000, “Catastrophe, Communal Memory and Mythic Discourse: The Uses of Myth in the Reconstruction of Society”, in Stråth, B. (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 49–75.Google Scholar
Whitebook, J., 1989, “Intersubjectivity and the Monadic Core of the Psyche: Habermas and Castoriadis on the Unconscious”, in Busino, G.. (eds), Autonomie et autotransformation de la société. La philosophie militante de Cornelius Castoriadis, Geneva, Libraire Droz, pp. 225–45.Google Scholar
Wingo, A. H., 2003, Veil Politics in Liberal Democratic States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1961, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Eng. trans. by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London, Routledge (1995, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, in Werkausgabe, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, vol. I, pp. 7–87).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1967, Zettel, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1969, On Certainty, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1974, Philosophical Grammar, Eng. trans. by A. Kenny, Oxford, Blackwell (1969, Philosophische Grammatik, ed. by R. Rhees, Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1976, Philosophical Investigations, Eng. trans, by G. E. M. Ascombe, Oxford, Blackwell (1995, Philosophische Untersuchungen, in Werkausgabe, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, vol. I, pp. 225–581).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1979, Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, Eng. trans. A. C. Miles, Retford, Brynmill.Google Scholar
Wolin, R., 1990, “Carl Schmitt, Political Existentialism and the Total State”, in Theory and Society, 19, pp. 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanarella, E. J., and Siegelman, L. (eds), 1988, Political Mythology and Popular Fiction, New York, Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Young, R., 1990, White Mythologies: Writing History and the West, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Abbagnano, N., 1971, Dizionario di filosofia, Turin, Utet.Google Scholar
Abrahamian, E., 2003, “The US Media, Huntington and September 11”, in Third World Quarterly, 24, 2, pp. 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, F., 1961a, La filosofia antica. I. La formazione del pensiero filosofico dalle origini a Platone VI–VI secolo a.C., Milan, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Adorno, F., 1961b, La filosofia antica. II. Filosofia, cultura, scuole tra Aristotele e Augusto IV– II secolo a.C., Milan, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W., and Horkheimer, M., 1997, Dialectic of Enlightenment, Eng. trans. by J. Cumming, London, Verso (1969, Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente, Frankfurt a. M., Fisher Verlag).Google Scholar
Aldrich, C. R., 1931, The Primitive Mind and Modern Civilisation, London, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Anderson, B., 1983, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Spread of Nationalism, London, Verso.Google Scholar
Angehrn, E., 1996, Die Überwindung des Chaos. Zur Philosophie des Mythos, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R., 2001, Historical Representation, Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T., 1975, Summa theologiae. English and Latin, ed. and trans. by Cunningham, J., London, Blackfriars.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1970a, The Physics, Eng. trans. by P. H. Wicksteed and F. M. Cornford, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vols IV and V.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1970b, Poetics, Eng. trans. by W. H. Fyfe, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vol. XXIII.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1974, Aristotle's Categories. De Interpretatione, Eng. trans. by J. L. Ackrill, Oxford, Clarendon.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1975, The “Art” of Rhetoric, Eng. trans. by J. H. Freese, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vol. XXII.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , 1977, The Metaphysics, Eng. trans. by M. A. Tredennick, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, vols XVII–XVIII.Google Scholar
Arnason, J. P., 1989, “The Imaginary Constitution of Modernity”, in Busino, G.. (eds), Autonomie et autotransformation de la société. La philosophie militante de Cornelius Castoriadis, Geneva, Libraire Droz, pp. 323–39.Google Scholar
Arnason, J. P., 1994, “Reason, Imagination, Interpretation”, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 155–70.Google Scholar
Aron, R., 2001, The Opium of the Intellectuals, Eng. trans. by D. J. Mahoney and B. C. Anderson, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers (1955, L'opium des intellectuels, Paris, Hachette).Google Scholar
Aronsson, K., 2001, “Narrative, Sociology of”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier. vol. 15, pp. 10286–291.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 1997, Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen, Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 2000, Herrschaft und Heil: politische Theologie in Altägypten, Israel und Europa, Munich, Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Astius, F., 1836, Lexicon Platonicum sive Vocum Platonicorum Index, Leipzig, Weidmann.Google Scholar
Audi, R., (ed.), 1999, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E., 1944, “Figura”, in Neue Dantestudien, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E., 1953, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, Eng. trans. by W. R. Trask, Princeton, Princeton University Press (1946, Mimesis, Berne, Franke).Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint, 1970, Confessiones, Eng. trans. by W. Watts, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Bacon, F., 1963, Novum Organon, vol. IV in The Works of Francis Bacon, London, Longman.Google Scholar
Balibar, E., 1985, Spinoza et la politique, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R. C., 2000, “Introduction”, in P. Bayle, Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, Eng. trans. by R. C. Bartlett, New York, State University of New York, pp. xxiii–xlvii.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1972, Mythologies, Eng. trans. by A. Lavers, New York, Hill and Wang (1957, Mythologies, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1977, Image, Music, Text, Fontana, Collins.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1986, “The Discourse of History”, Eng. trans. by R. Howard, in The Rustle of Language, Oxford, Blackwell (1984, “Le discours de l'histoire”, in R. Barthes, Le Bruissement de la langue, Paris, Edition du Seuil).Google Scholar
Bayle, P., 2000, Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet, Eng. trans. by R. C. Bartlett, New York, State University of New York (1994, Pensées diverses écrites à un Docteur de Sorbonne, à l'occasion de la comète qui parut au mois de décembre 1680, Paris, Société de Textes Français Modernes).Google Scholar
Bell, D., 1960, The End of Ideology: On Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, London, Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L., 1980, “Myth, Ritual, and Political Control”, in Journal of Communication, 30, pp. 166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, A., 2001, “Identity and Identification: Philosophical Aspects”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7148–54.Google Scholar
Bloch, M., 1973, The Royal Touch: Sacred Monarchy and Scrofula in England and France, Eng. trans. by J. E. Anderson, London, Routledge (1924, Le rois thaumaturges: Etude sur le caractère surnaturel attribué à la puissance royale, particulièrement en France et en Angleterre, Strasbourg, Librairie Istra).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M., 1977, “The Past and the Present in the Present”, in Man, 12, 2, pp. 278–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenberg, H., 1971, “Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Wirkungspotential des Mythos”, in Fuhrmann, M. (ed), Terror und Spiel. Probleme der Mythenrezeption, Munich, Fink, pp. 11–66.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H., 1983, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, Eng. trans. by R. Wallace, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1966, Die Legitimität der Neuzeit, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H., 1985, Work on Myth, Eng. trans. by R. Wallace, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1979, Arbeit am Mythos, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Bohrer, K. H. (ed.), 1983, Mythos und Moderne. Begriff und Bild einer Rekonstruktion, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bonitz, H., 1955, Index Aristotelicus, Secunda Editio, Graz, Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Bottici, C., 2003, “The Domestic Analogy and the Kantian Project of Perpetual Peace”, in Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 4, pp. 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottici, C., 2004, Uomini e Stati. Percorsi di un'analogia, Pisa, ETS.Google Scholar
Bottici, C., and Challand, B., 2006, “Rethinking Political Myth: The Clash of Civilisations as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy”, in European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 3, pp. 315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R., 1999, “Local vs General Ideologies: A Normal Ingredient of Modern Political Life”, in Journal of Political Ideologies, 4, 2, pp. 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouveresse, J., 1982, “L'animal cérémoniel: Wittgenstein et l'anthropologie”, in Ludwig Wittgenstein. Remarques sur le Rameau d'Or de Frazer, Editions l'Age d'Homme, pp. 41–124.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L., 1976, A Word Index to Plato, Leeds, W. S. Maney and Son.Google Scholar
Braudel, F., 1980, On History, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bremner, C., 2004, “Stoned to Death … Why Europe is Starting to Lose Its Faith in Islam”, in www.timesonline.co.uk, 4 December.
Burnet, J., 1920, Early Greek Philosophy, London, A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., 1962, “Zum Problem der Entmythologisierung”, in Il problema della demitizzazione. Atti del convegno indetto dal Centro Internazionale di Studi Umanistici e dall'Istituto di Studi Filosofici, Rome, Archivio di Filosofia, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., 1984, New Testament and Mythology and Other Basic Writings, Eng. trans. by S. M. Ogden, Philadelphia, Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R., and Jaspers, K., 1954, Die Frage der Entmythologisierung, Munich, Piper Verlag.Google Scholar
Callimachus, , 1958, Aetia, Iambi, Lyric Poems, Hecale, Minor Epic and Elegiac Poems, Fragments of Epigrams, Fragments of Uncertain Location, Eng. trans. by C. A. Trypanis, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Cantelli, G., 1986, Mente. Corpo. Linguaggio. Saggio sull'interpretazione vichiana del mito, Florence, Sansoni.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1951, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, Eng. trans by C. A. Koelln and J. P. Pettergrove, Princeton, Princeton University Press (1932, Die Philosophie der Aufklärung, Tübingen, Mohr).Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1968, An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1973, The Myth of the State, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1977, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E., 1981, Kant's Life and Thought, Eng. trans. by J. Haden, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1986, “Institution de la société et religion”, in C. Castoriadis, Domaines de l'homme. Le carrefour du labyrinthe, Paris, Seuil, pp. 455–81.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1987, The Imaginary Institution of Society, Eng. trans. by K. Blamey, Cambridge, Polity Press (1975, L'institution imaginaire de la société, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1991, “Power, Politics, Autonomy”, in C. Castoriadis, Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy – Essays in Political Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 143–75.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, C., 1997, “Radical Imagination and the Social Instituting Imaginary”, in C. Castoriadis, The Castoriadis Reader, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 319–38.Google Scholar
Cavell, S., 1979, The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Scepticism, Morality and Tragedy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cazes, B., 2001, “Utopias: Social”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 24, pp. 16123–7.Google Scholar
Cerutti, F., 1996, “Identità e politica”, in Cerutti, F. (ed.), Identità e politica, Bari, Laterza, pp. 5–43.Google Scholar
Cerutti, F., 2003, “A Political Identity of the Europeans?”, in Thesis Eleven, 72, London, Sage, pp. 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, P., 1984, Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots, Paris, Edition Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Churchill, J., 1989, “If a Lion Could Talk …”, in Philosophical Investigations, 12, 4, pp. 308–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clack, B. R., 1999, Wittgenstein, Frazer and Religion, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohan, S., and Shires, L., 1988, Telling Stories: A Theoretical Analysis of Narrative Fiction, New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. P., 1985, The Symbolic Construction of Community, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, N., 1970, The Pursuit of the Millennium, London, Paladin.Google Scholar
Cole, T., 1983, “Archaic Truth”, in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, 13, pp. 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, G., 1975, La nascita della filosofia, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Colli, G., 1977, La sapienza greca I: Dioniso, Apollo Eleusi, Orfeo, Museo, Iperborei, Enigma, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Colli, G., 1978a, La sapienza greca II: Epimenide, Ferecide, Talete, Anassimandro, Anassimene, Onomacrito, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Colli, G., 1978b, La sapienza greca III: Eraclito, Milan, Adelphi.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M., 1952, Principium Sapientiae: The Origins of Greek Philosophical Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmas Indicopleustes, 1897, The Christian Topography of Cosmas, an Egyptian Monk, Eng. trans. by J. W. McCrindle, London, Hakluyt Society.
Coulter, J., 1999, “Discourse and Mind”, in Human Studies, 22, pp. 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtine, J.-F., 1992a, “Realitas”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 178–85.Google Scholar
Courtine, J.-F., 1992b, “Realität/Idealität”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 185–93.Google Scholar
Dante, A., 1984, The Divine Comedy, Eng. trans. by M. Musa, Harmondsworth, Penguin (1988–9, La Divina Commedia, ed. by U. Bosco and G. Reggio, Florence, Le Monnier).Google Scholar
Dante, A., 1995, Epistola a Cangrande, ed. by Cecchini, E., Florence, Giunti.Google Scholar
Das, V., 1998, “Wittgenstein and Anthropology”, in Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, pp. 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delatte, L., Rutter, C., Govaerts, S., and Denooz, J., 1984, Aristoteles Metaphisica. Index Verborum. Listes de Fréquence, Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., 2006, Nietzsche and Philosophy, Eng. trans. by H. Tomlinson, New York, Columbia University Press (1962, Nietzsche et la philosophie, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Denooz, J., 1988, Aristote 《Poetica》. Index Verborum. Liste de fréquence, Liege, Centre Informatique de Philosophie et Lettres.Google Scholar
Descartes, R., 1984, Meditations on First Philosophy, Eng. trans. by J. Cottingham, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–62 (1973, Meditationes de prima philosophia, Paris, Librairie Philosophique Vrin).Google Scholar
Descartes, R., 1985, Discourse on the Method, Eng. trans. by R. Stoothoff, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–51 (1973, Discours de la Méthode, Paris, Librairie Philosophique Vrin).Google Scholar
Detienne, M., 1967, Les Maîtres de la vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris, Maspéro.Google Scholar
Detienne, M., 1986, The Creation of Mythology, Eng. trans. by M. Cook, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Diels, H., and Kranz, W., 1951, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Zurich, Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Dierse, U., 1976, “Ideologie” in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. IV, pp. 157–86.Google Scholar
Döner, A., 1996, Politischer Mythos und symbolische Politik, Reinbeck, Rowolt.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H., 1972, Der Mythos und sein Funktion in der antiken Philosophie, Innsbruck, Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Dubois, M., 2001, “Ideology, Sociology of”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7177–82.Google Scholar
Duhem, P., 1965, Le système du monde: histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic, Paris, Herman.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T., 1991, Ideology: An Introduction, London, Verso.Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1967, “Myth, Metaphors and Political Conformity”, in Psychiatry, 30, 3, pp. 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M., 1976, The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, M., 1988, Constructing the Political Spectacle, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, M., 1954, The Myth of the Eternal Return, or Cosmos and History, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eliade, M., 1957, Mythes, rêves et mystères, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E., 1948, The Divine Kingship of the Shilluk of Nilotic Sudan, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R., 1988, Literacy and Orality, Studies in the Technology of Communication, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fisch, J., 1992, “Zivilisation, Kultur”, in Brunner, O., Conze, W., and Koselleck, R. (eds), 1974–1997, Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politischensozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Stuttgart, Klett, vol. 7, pp. 679–774.Google Scholar
Flood, C. G., 1996, Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction, New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1988, “Technologies of the Self”, in Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., and Hutton, P. (eds), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Frandsen, S. B., 2000, “Italian Fascism and Roman Heritage: The Third Rome of Mussolini”, in Stråth, B., B. (ed.) Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 157–69.Google Scholar
Frank, M., 1982, Der kommende Gott. Vorlesungen über die Neue Mythologie, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G., 1922, The Golden Bough, a Study in Magic and Religion, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freeden, M., 2001, “Ideology: Political Aspects”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7175–7.Google Scholar
Freeman, K., 1966, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers: A Companion to Diels' Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1937, The Interpretations of Dreams, Eng. trans. by A. A. Brill, London, Allen & Unwin (1941–1968, “Die Traumdeutung”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vols II–III).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1941–1968, “Warum Krieg?”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vol. XVI, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1950, Totem and Taboo, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, “Totem und Tabu”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vol. IX).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1959, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, “Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse”, in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, vol. XV).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1966, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse – Neue Folge, vol. XI in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer).Google Scholar
Freud, S., 1989, Civilisation and Its Discontents, Eng. trans. by J. Strachey, New York, Norton (1941–1968, Das Unbehagen in der Kultur, vol. XIV in Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer).Google Scholar
Friedman, J., 1992, “Myth, History, and Political Identity”, in Cultural Anthropology, 7, 2, pp. 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friese, H., 2001, “Imagination: History of the Concept”, in Smelser, N. J., and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7197–201.Google Scholar
Friese, H. (ed.), 2002, Identities: Time, Difference, and Boundaries, Oxford, Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Friese, H., and Wagner, P., 2002, “Survey Article: The Nascent Political Philosophy of the European Polity”, in Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 3, pp. 342–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (ed.), 1971, Terror und Spiel. Probleme der Mythenrezeption, Munich, Fink.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1988, Truth and Method, London, Sheed and Ward (1975, Wahrheit und Methode, vol. I in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr).Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1993a, “Der Mythos im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft”, in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr, vol. VIII, pp. 180–8.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1993b, “Mythologie und Offenbarungsreligion”, in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr, vol. VIII, pp. 174–80.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G., 1993c, “Mythos und Logos”, in Gesammelte Werke, Tübingen, Mohr, vol. VIII, pp. 170–4.Google Scholar
Galilei, G., 2005, Opere, vol. I, Torino, Utet.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1964, “Ideology as a Cultural System” in Apter, D. E. (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, London, Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 47–76.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1973, Interpretation of Cultures, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1983, Local Knowledge, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 1995, After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C., 2000, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gehlen, A., 1980, Man in the Age of Technology, Eng. trans. by P. Lipscomb, New York, Columbia University Press (1994, Urmensch und Spätkultur: philosophische Ergebnisse und Aussagen, Wiesbaden, Aula Verlag).Google Scholar
Gehlen, A., 1988, Man, His Nature and Place in the World, Eng. trans. by C. Mcmillan and K. Pillemer, New York, Columbia University Press (1997, Der Mensch: seine Natur und eine Stellung in der Welt, Wiesbaden, Quelle und Meyer).Google Scholar
Geiser, K., 1963, Platons ungeschriebene Lehre, Stuttgart, Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Geisser, V., 2003, La nouvelle islamophobie, Paris, Editions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Gliozzi, G., 1977, Adamo e il nuovo mondo. La nascita dell'antropologia come ideologia coloniale dalle genealogie bibliche alle teorie razziali (1500–1700), Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Gockel, H., 1981, Mythos und Poesie. Zum Mythosbegriff in Aufklärung und Frühromantik, Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1977, The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1986, The Logic of Writing and the Organisation of Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J., and I. Watt, 1968, “The Consequences of Literacy”, in Goody, J. (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A., 1975, Quaderni del carcere. Edizione critica dell'Istituto Gramsci, Turin, Einaudi.Google Scholar
Grünepütt, K., 1992, “Realität der Außenwelt”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds) 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 206–11.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, Eng. trans. by F. Lawrence, Cambridge, Polity Press (1985, Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwölf Vorlesungen, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1996, “Citizenship and National Identity”, in J. Habermas Between Facts and Norms, Eng. trans. by W. Rehg, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1992, Faktizität und Geltung, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp), pp. 491–515.Google Scholar
Halliday, F., 2003, Islam and the Myth of Confrontation, London, Tauris.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1963, Preface to Plato, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1983, “The Linguistic Task of Presocratics”, in Robb, K. (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, Hegeler Institute.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A., 1986, The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1931, The Phenomenology of Mind, Eng. trans. by J. B. Baillie, London, Allen & Unwin (1971, Phänomenologie des Geistes, vol. III in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1956, The Philosophy of History, Eng. trans. by J. Sibree, New York, Dover Publications (1971, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, vol. XII in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1991, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1970, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, vol. VII in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1995, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Eng. trans. by E. S. Haldane, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press (1971, Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, vols XVIII–XX in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hölderlin, F., and Schelling, F. W. J., 1971, Das älteste Systemprogramm des deutschen Idealismus, in G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in Zwanzig Bänden, vol. I, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, pp. 234–7.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 2002a Being and Time, Eng. trans. by J. Stambaugh, Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1993, Sein und Zeit, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag).Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 2002b, The Essence of Truth: On Plato's Cave Allegory and Theaetetus, Eng. trans. by T. Sadler, London, Continuum (1988, Vom Wesen der Wahrheit: zu Platons Höhlengleichnis und Theätet, in Gesamtausgabe, Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann, vol. 34).Google Scholar
Henry, B., 1986, Libertà e mito in Cassirer, Naples, ESI.Google Scholar
Henry, B., 2000, Mito e identità. Contesti di tolleranza, Pisa, ETS.Google Scholar
Henry, B., 2001, “The Role of Symbols for European Political Identity – Political Identity as a Myth?”, in Cerutti, F. and Rudolph, E. (eds), A Soul for Europe, Leuven, Peeters, vol. 2, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
Herodotus, , 1920–4, Historiae, Eng. trans. by A. D. Godley, London, Heinemann, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Hesiod, , 1977, The Homeric Hymns and Homerica, Eng. trans. by H. G. White, London, Heinemann, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Hick, J. (ed.), 1977, The Myth of God Incarnate, London, SCM Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J., 1982, God Has Many Names, Philadelphia, Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Hippler, T., 2000, “Spinoza on Historical Myth”, in Stråth, B. (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Hirsch, W., 1971, Platons Weg zum Mythos, Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., 1985, Leviathan, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T., 1994, The Elements of Law, Natural and Political, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., 1963, Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Manchester, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., 1990, Nations and Nationalism since 1780, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J., and Ranger, T., 1983, The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, F. 1966, Poems and Fragments, Eng. trans. by M. Hamburger, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul (1981, Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, Munich, Hanser).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F. et al., 1992, “Realismus”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K., and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 148–70.Google Scholar
Homer, , 1978, The Iliad, Eng. trans. by A. T. Murray, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Homer, , 1995, The Odyssey, Eng. trans. by A. T. Murray and G. E. Dimock, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 1995, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Eng. trans. by J. Anderson, Cambridge, Polity Press (1992, Kampf um Anerkennung, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hübner, K. 1985, Die Wahrheit des Mythos, Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Hübner, K., 1994, Die zweite Schöpfung. Das Wirkliche in Kunst und Musik, Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Hume, D., 1985, A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P., 1996, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 1954, The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Eng. trans. by D. Carr, Evanston, Northwestern University Press (1992, “Die Krisis der europäischer Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie”, in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier, vol. VIII).Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 1973, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, Eng. trans. by D. Cairns, The Hague, Nijhoff (1992, Cartesianische Meditationen, vol. VIII in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E., 1992, “Idee zu einer reinen Phänomenologie”, in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier, vol. V.Google Scholar
Husserl, E., 2001, Logical Investigations, Eng. trans. by J. N. Findlay, London, Routledge (1992, Logische Untersuchungen, vols II–III–IV in Gesammelte Schriften, Hamburg, Meier).Google Scholar
Iser, W., 1976, Akt des Lesens, Munich, Fink.Google Scholar
Jamme, C., 1991, Einführung in die Philosophie des Mythos, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Jamme, C., 1999, “Gott an hat ein Gewand”. Grenzen und Perspektiven philosophischer Mythos-Theorien der Gegenwart, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Jenkins, K. (ed.), 1997, The Postmodern History Reader, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., 1996, Social Identity, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T. 1995, “Towards a Wittgensteinian Social Psychology of Human Development”, in Theory and Psychology, 5, 1, pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, J., 1957, Letters of James Joyce, ed. by Ellmann, R., London, Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G., 1981, Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious, Eng. trans. by G. Adler and R. F. C. Hull, in The collected Works of C. G. Jung, Princeton, Princeton University Press, vol. 9.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H., 1973, The Verb “Be” in Ancient Greek, Dordrecht, Reidel.Google Scholar
Kaiser El-Safti, M., 1992, “Realität, formale/objektive” in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K. and Ritter, J. (eds), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991a, “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, in Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–60 (1912–13, “Beant wortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. VIII, pp. 15–32).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991b, Metaphysics of Morals, Eng. trans. by M. Gregor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–175 (1912–13, Metaphysik der Sitten, erster teil: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, vol. VI in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 203–372).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991c, On the Common Saying: ‘This May Be True in Theory, But It Does Not Apply in Practice’, Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, in Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–93 (1912–13, Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. VIII, pp. 273–313).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1991d, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, Eng. trans. by H. B. Nisbet, in Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–131 (1912–13, Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. VIII, pp. 341–86).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1993, Critique of Practical Reason, Eng. trans. by L. White Beck, New York, Macmillan (1912–13, Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. V, pp. 1–164).Google Scholar
Kant, I., 1998, Critique of Pure Reason, Eng. trans. by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood, in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1912–13, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Kants Werke, vols III–IV in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vols III–IV).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., 2000, Critique of the Power of Judgment, Eng. trans. by P. Guyer and E. Matthews, in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel KantCambridge, Cambridge University Press (1912–13, Kritik der Urteilskraft, in Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft (=Akademie-Ausgabe), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, vol. V, pp. 175–485).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, E., 1957, The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, G., 1986, Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kemper, P. (ed.), 1989, Macht des Mythos – Ohnmacht der Vernunft?, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. J. P., 1973, Wittgenstein, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Kerényi, K., 1963, Prolegomena, in K. Kerényi, and C. G. Jung, Essays on a Science of Mythology, Eng. trans. by R. F. C. Hull, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kersting, W., 1992, “Politics, Freedom and Order: Kant's Political Philosophy”, in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, G. S., 1970, Myth: Its Meaning and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., 1974, The Nature of Greek Myth, Hardmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schonfield, M., 1983, The Presocratic Philosophers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R., 2004, Futures Past, Eng. trans. by K. Tribe, New York, Columbia University Press (1979, Vergangene Zukunft, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Koyré, A., 1957, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J., 1982, Platone ed i fondamenti della metafisica, Milan, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J., 1995, Platons ungeschriebene Lehre, in Kobusch, T. and Mojsisch, B. (eds.), Platon. Seine Dialoge in der Sicht neuer Forschungen, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Krois, J. M., 1979, “Der Begriff des Mythos bei Ernst Cassirer”, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos: Ein Kolloquium, Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., 1972, Language in the Inner City, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Caze, M., 2002, The Analytic Imaginary, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Landucci, S., 1972, I Filosofi e i selvaggi, Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Lang, B., 1989, “The Politics of Interpretation: Spinoza's Modernist Turn”, in Review of Metaphysics, reprinted in G. Lloyd (ed.) 2001, Spinoza: Critical Assessments, London, Routledge, vol. III, pp. 293–318.
Larzilliére, P., 2003, “Le 《martyr》 palestinien, nouvelle figure d'un nationalisme en échec”, in Dieckhoff, A. and Leveau, R. (eds), Israéliens et Palestiniens: la guerre en partage, Paris, Editions Balland, pp. 89–119.Google Scholar
Leghissa, G., 2002, “Mito, dogma e genesi del moderno in Hans Blumenberg”, in H. Blumenberg, Il futuro del mito, Milan, Medusa, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
Le Goff, J., 2000, “The Medieval West and the Indian Ocean: An Oneiric Horizon”, in Pagden, A. (ed.), Facing Each other: The World's Perception of Europe and Europe's Perception of the World, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Lentin, A., 2004, Racism and Anti-Racism in Europe, London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1962, La pensée sauvage, Paris, Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1964, Mythologiques: Le cru et le cuit, Paris, Plon.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1968, Structural Anthropology, Eng. trans. by C. Jacobson and B. Grundfest Schoepf, London, Allen Lane (1958, Anthropologie structurale, Paris, Plon).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1978, Myth and Meaning, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1987, Anthropology and Myth: Lectures, 1951–1982, Eng. trans. by R. Willis, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1990, The Naked Man, Eng. trans. by J. Weightman and D. Weightman, Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1965, Mythologiques: L'Homme nu, Paris, Plon).Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Stuart, J. H., 1968, A Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B., 1989, Discourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual, and Classification, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J., 1997, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Lotito, L., 2002, “Introduzione”, in Schelling. Introduzione filosofica alla filosofia della mitologia, Milan, Bompiani, pp. v–xli.Google Scholar
Löwith, K., 1965, From Hegel to Nietzsche, London, Constable (1941, Von Hegel zu Nietzsche, Zürich, Europa Verlag).Google Scholar
Löwith, K., 1949, Meaning in History: The Theological Implication of the Philosophy of History, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B., 1964, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maffey, A., 1989, “Utopia”, in Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N., and Pasquino, G. (eds), Dizionario di Politica, Turin, Utet, pp. 1214–20.Google Scholar
Maltese, C., 1992, Storia dell'arte in Italia 1785–1943, Turin, Einaudi.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., 1992 Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays by Bronislaw Malinowski, Illinois, Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K., 1960, Ideology and Utopia, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Marconi, D., 1999, La filosofia del linguaggio. Da Frege ai giorni nostri, Turin, Utet.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H., 1980, Das Ende der Utopie, Berlin, Verlag Neue Kritik.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H., 1991, One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Society, Boston, Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marquard, O., 1979, “Lob des Polytheismus: Über Monomythie und Polymythie”, in Poser, H. (ed.), Philosophie und Mythos: Ein Kolloquium, Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. P., 1989, The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K., 1969, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Selected Works in Three Volumes, vol. I, Moscow, Progress, pp. 394–488 (1978, Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte, in Marx Engels Werke, Berlin, Dietz Verlag, vol. VIII, pp. 11–194).Google Scholar
Marx, K., 1975, Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Law, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, vol. III, Moscow, Progress, pp. 3–129 (1982, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtphilosophie, in Karl Marx Friderich Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), vol. 1–2, Berlin, Dietz Verlag).Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F., 1976, The German Ideology, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, vol. V, Moscow, Progress, pp. 19–452 (1978, Die deutsche Ideologie, in Marx Engels Werke, Berlin, Dietz Verlag, vol. III).Google Scholar
McCormick, J. P., 1997, Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H., 1934, Mind, Self and Society, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, C., 1990, The Greek Discovery of Politics, Eng. trans. by D. McLintock, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press (1980, Die Entstehung des Politischen bei den Griechen, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Melucci, A., 2000, “Costruzione di sé, narrazione, riconoscimento” in Porta, D. Della, Greco, M., and Szakolczai, A. (eds), Identità, riconoscimento, scambio. Saggi in onore di Alessandro Pizzorno. Con una risposta e un saggio autobiografico di Alessandro Pizzorno, Bari, Laterza, pp. 30–45.Google Scholar
Messeri, M., 1997, Verità, Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Midgley, M., 2003, The Myths We Live By, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Moeller, J., 1988, “Nature, Human Nature, and Society in the American Western”, in Yanarella, E. J. and Siegelman, L. (eds), Political Mythology and Popular Fiction, New York, Greenwood Press, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
Moneti, M., 1992, Il pease che non c'è e i suoi abitanti, Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F., 1975, “Epilogue”, in Moore, S. F. and Meyerhoff, B. (eds), Symbol and Politics in Communal Ideology, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J., 1992, Plato and Platonism: Plato's Conception of Appearance and Reality in Ontology, Epistemology, and Ethics, and its Modern Echoes, London, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moreau, P.-F., 1994, Spinoza: L'expérience et l'éternité, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Morgan, D., 2001, “A Fervour that America Should Easily Recognize”, Washington Post, 2 November.
Morgan, K., 2000, Myth and Philosophy from Presocratics to Plato, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosse, G. L., 1974, The Nationalization of Masses: Political Symbolism and the Mass Movements in Germany from Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich, New York, Howard Ferting.Google Scholar
Nestlé, W., 1942, Vom Mythos zum Logos: die Selbstentfaltung des griechischen Denkens von Homer bis auf die Sophistik und Sokrates, Stuttgart, Kröner.Google Scholar
Neumann, K., 1972, “Idee”, in Gabriel, G., Gründer, K. and Ritter, J. (eds.), 1971–, Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, vol. VII, pp. 55–134.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 1984, Nietzsche Briefwechsel. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by Colli, G. and Montinari, M., Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 1994, On the Genealogy of Morality, Eng. trans. by C. Diethe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1973, Zur Genealogie der Moral. Eine Streitschrift, in Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari, Berlin, De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 1999, The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, Eng. trans. by R. Geuss and R. Speirs, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1973, Die Geburt der Tragödie, oder: Griechentum und Pessimismus, in Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari, Berlin, De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., 2002, Beyond Good and Evil, Eng. trans. by J. Norman, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1973, Jenseits von Gut und Böse, in Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. by G. Colli and M. Montinari, Berlin, De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Norris, C., 1991, Spinoza and the Origins of Modern Critical Theory, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., 1986, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., 2001, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R., and Torrance, N. (eds), 1991, Literacy and Orality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onions, C. T., 1966, The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pagden, A., 1982, The Fall of Natural Man, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagden, A. (ed.), 2000, Facing Each Other: The World's Perception of Europe and Europe's Perception of the World, Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Paggi, L. (ed.), 1999, Le memorie della Repubblica, Florence, La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Panikkar, R., 1962, “La demitologizzazione nell'incontro tra Cristianesimo e Induismo”, in Il Problema della demitizzazione. Atti del convegno indetto dal Centro Internazionale di Studi Umanistici e dall'Istituto di Studi Filosofici, Rome, Archivio di Filosofia, pp. 243–66.Google Scholar
Panikkar, R., 1964, The Unknown Christ of Hinduism, London, Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
Passerini, L. (ed.), 2003, Figures d'Europe: Images and Myths of Europe, Brussels, P. I. E.- Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pavone, C., 1991, Una Guerra civile. Saggio storico sulla moralità nella resistenza, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Pavone, C., 1995, Alle origini della repubblica: Scritti su fascismo, antifascismo e continuità dello stato, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P., 2001, Le Vocabulaire d'Aristote, Paris, Ellipses.Google Scholar
Pieper, J., 1965, Über die platonischen Mythen, Munich, Kösel Verlag.Google Scholar
Patai, R., 1973, The Arab Mind, New York, Scribner.Google Scholar
Pipes, D., 1983, In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A., 1993, Le radici della politica assoluta e altri saggi, Milan, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A., 2000, “Risposte e proposte”, in Porta, D. Della, Greco, M., and Szakolczai, A. (eds), Identità, riconoscimento, scambio. Saggi in onore di Alessandro Pizzorno. Con una riposta e un saggio autobiografico di Alessandro Pizzorno, Bari, Laterza, pp. 197–246.Google Scholar
Plato, 1989, The Collected Dialogues of Plato Including the Letters, ed. by Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H., New Haven, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poser, H. (ed.), 1979, Philosophie und Mythos: Ein Kolloquium, Berlin, De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preus, S., 1989, “Spinoza, Vico, and the Imagination of Religion”, in Journal of the Histories of Ideas, 50, pp. 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulcini, E., 2001, L'individuo senza passioni, Turin, Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Rath, I. W., 1992, Die verkannte mythische Vernunft. Perspektiven einer vernünftigen Alternative, Wien, Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1973, A Theory of Justice, London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1993, Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reale, G., 1986, Per una nuova interpretazione di Platone. Rilettura dei grandi dialoghi alla luce delle dottrine non scritte, Milan, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Reale, G., 1991, Platone. Tutti gli scritti, Milan, Rusconi.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1970, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, Eng. trans. by D. Savage, New Haven, Yale University Press (1965, De l'interprétation: Essai sur Freud, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1986, Du texte à l'action, Paris, Editions du Seuil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1994, “Imagination in Discourse and in Action”, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 118–35.Google Scholar
Rorty, R., 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A., 1941, Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts – Eine Wertung der seelisch-geistigen Gestaltenkämpfe unserer Zeit, München, Hoheneichen-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, M., 1997, “Why Spinoza Chose the Hebrews: The Exemplary Function of Prophecy in the Theological-Political Treatise”, in History of Political Thought, 18, reprinted in G. Lloyd (ed.), 2001, Spinoza: Critical Assessments, London, Routledge, vol. III, pp. 245–81.
Ross, W. D., 1951, Plato's Theory of Ideas, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., 1997a, “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men”, Eng. trans. by V. Gourevitch, in The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–230 (1996, Discours sur l'origine et les Fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes, Paris, Librairie Générale Française).Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., 1997b, “Of The Social Contract”, Eng. trans. by V. Gourevitch, in The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (2001, Du Contract Social, Paris, Flammarion).Google Scholar
Rundell, J., 1994a, “Creativity and Judgment: Kant on Reason and Imagination”, in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 87–117.Google Scholar
Rundell, J., 1994b, “Introduction” in Robinson, G. and Rundell, J. (eds), Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity, London, Routledge, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Russell, B., 1922, “Introduction”, in L. Wittgenstein, 1961, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Eng. trans. by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London, Routledge, pp. ix–xxii.Google Scholar
Said, E., 1978, Orientalism, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Sabbatucci, D., 1978, Il mito, il rito e la storia, Rome, Bulzoni Editore.Google Scholar
Sadiki, L., 2004, The Search for Arab Democracy: Discourses and Counter-Discourses, London, Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J., 1856–1861, Philosophische Einleitung in die Philosophie der Mythologie oder Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie, vol. XI in F. W. J. Schellings Sämtliche Werke, Stuttgart, Cotta.Google Scholar
Scheman, N., 1996, “Forms of Life: Mapping the Rough Ground”, in Sluga, H. and Stern, D. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, F. S., and Schlegel, A. W., 1992, Athenäum. Eine Zeitschrift von A. W. Schlegel und F. S. Schlegel, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. J., 1999, “Creation and Recreation: The Interplay of Activity and Structure in Language”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 669–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C., 1985a, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, Eng. trans. by E. Kennedy, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1926, Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus, Berlin, Dunker und Humblot).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., 1985b, Political Theology, Eng. trans. by G. Schwab, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press (1922, Politische Theologie, Berlin, Dunker und Humblot).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., 1988, “Die politische Theorie des Mythus”, in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, Berlin, Dunker und Humblot, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Seib, P., 2004, “The News Media and the Clash of Civilisations”, in Parameters, Winter 2004–5, pp. 71–85.
Shevory, T. C., 1988, “Winning Isn't Everything: Sport Fiction as a Genre of Political Criticism”, in Yanarella, E. J. and Siegelman, L. (eds), Political Mythology and Popular Fiction, New York, Greenwood Press, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Shils, E., 1958, “Ideology and Civility: On the Politics of the Intellectual”, in Sewanee Review, 66, pp. 450–80.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., and Weiner, E. S. C. (eds), 1989, The Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., 1986, The Ethnic Origins of Nations, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., 1991, National Identity, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., 1999, Myths and Memories of the Nation, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorel, G., 1975, Reflections on Violence, Eng. trans. by T. E. Hulme, New York, AMS Press (1990, Réflexions sur la violence, Paris, Seuil).Google Scholar
Sparti, D., 2000, “Il riconoscimento dal volto umano”, in Porta, D. Della, Greco, M., and Szakolczai, A. (eds), Identità, riconoscimento, scambio. Saggi in onore di Alessandro Pizzorno. Con una risposta e un saggio autobiografico di Alessandro Pizzorno, Bari, Laterza, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 1951a, Political Treatise, Eng. trans. by R. H. M. Elwes, in A Theologico-Political Treatise and a Political Treatise, New York, Dover Publications, pp. 267–387 (1924, Tractatus Politicus, vol. III in Spinoza Opera, ed. by C. Gebhardt, Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 1951b, A Theologico-Political Treatise and a Political Treatise, Eng. trans. by R. H. M. Elwes, New York, Dover Publications, pp. 1–266 (1972, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, in Spinoza Opera, ed. by C. Gebhardt, vol. III, Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 1985, Ethics, Eng. trans. by E. Curley, in The Collected Works of Spinoza, Princeton, Princeton University Press, vol. I, pp. 401–617 (1924, Ethica, in Spinoza Opera, ed. by C. Gebhardt, vol. II, Heidelberg, Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Stoppino, M., 1989, “Ideologia”, in Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N., and Pasquino, G. (eds), Dizionario di Politica, Turin, Utet, pp. 483–95.Google Scholar
Stråth, B. (ed.), 2000, Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A., 2001, “This Is a Religious War”, New York Times, 7 October.
Taylor, C., 1989, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1992, Multiculturalism and the “Politics of Recognition”, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1995, Philosophical Arguments, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. T., 1986, “Do You understand? Criteria of Understanding in Verbal Interaction”, in Language and Communication, 6, 3, pp. 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebben, J. R., 1994, Concordantia Homerica. Pars I Odissea, Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Tebben, J. R., 1998, Concordantia Homerica. Pars II Ilias, Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Telhami, S., 2004, “Arabs Increasingly Define Themselves as Muslim First”, in Daily Star, 16 July 2004.
Thesaurus Linguae Graecae, 1992, CDROM, Irvine, University of California.
Thomas, R., 1992, Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. B., 2001, “Ideology: History of the Concept”, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Amsterdam, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 7170–4.Google Scholar
Thorsen, A., 2000, “Foundation Myth at Work: National Day Celebrations in France, Germany and Norway in a Comparative Perspective” in Stråth, B. (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 331–51.Google Scholar
Thucydides, , 1919, History of the Peloponnesian War, Eng. trans. by C. F. Smith, London, Heinemann, Loeb Classical Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomashevski, B., 1965, “Thematics”, in Lemon, L. and Reis, M. (eds), Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, pp. 61–95.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. J., 1988, Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Tudor, H., 1972, Political Myth, London, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattimo, G., 1999a, “Estetica”, in Enciclopedia di filosofia, Milan, Garzanti, pp. 340–5.Google Scholar
Vattimo, G., 1999b, “Immaginazione”, in Enciclopedia di filosofia, Milan, Garzanti, pp. 528–30.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P., 2006, Myth and Thought Among the Greeks, Eng. trans. by J. Lloyd and J. Fort, New York, Zone Books (1990, Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs. Études de psychologie historique, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
Veyne, P., 1988, Did Greeks Believe in Their Myths?, Eng. trans. by P. Wissing, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vico, G., 1999, New Science, Eng. trans. by D. Marsh, London, Penguin Books (1992, Principi di scienza nuova, Milan, Mondadori).Google Scholar
Vlastos, G., 1965, “Degrees of Reality in Plato”, in Bambrough, R. (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Volkmann-Schluck, K.-H., 1969, Mythos und Logos. Interpretationen zu Schellings Philosophie der Mythologie, Berlin, De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Savigny, E., 1991, “Common Behavior of Many a Kind”, in Arrington, R. L. and Glock, H. J. (eds), Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: Text and Context, London, Routledge, pp. 105–119.Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 1994, A Sociology of Modernity, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 2002, “Identity and Selfhood as a Problematique”, in Friese, H. (ed.), Identities: Time, Difference, and Boundaries, Oxford, Berghahn Books, pp. 32–56.Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 2004, “Palomar's Question: The Axial Age Hypothesis: European Modernity and Historical Contingency”, in Arnason, J., Eisenstadt, S., and Wittrock, B. (eds), Axial Civilisations and World History, Leiden, Brill, pp. 87–121.Google Scholar
Wallace, R., 1984, “Introduction to Blumenberg”, in New German Critique, 32, pp. 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M., 1964, “On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought”, in Political Science Quarterly, 82, June, pp. 120–203.Google Scholar
Warrender, H., 1957, The Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford, Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wartelle, A., 1982, Lexique de la 《Rhétorique》 d'Aristote, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1969, On Charisma and Institution Building, ed. by Eisenstadt, S., Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1976, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Eng. trans. by T. Parsons, London, Allen & Unwin (1984, Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus, vol. 17 in Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, ed. by H. Baier et al. Tübingen Mohr).Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1978, Economy and Society, Eng. trans. by E. Fischoff et al. Berkeley, University of California Press (1984, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, vol. XXII 1–XXII 5 in Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, Abteilung I).Google Scholar
Weber, M., 2004, The Vocation Lectures: Science as Vocation, Politics as Vocation, Eng. trans. by R. Livingstone, Indianapolis Cambridge, Hackett.Google Scholar
White, H., 1973, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, H., 1987, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, H., 2000, “Catastrophe, Communal Memory and Mythic Discourse: The Uses of Myth in the Reconstruction of Society”, in Stråth, B. (ed.), Myth and Memory in the Construction of the Community, Brussels, Peter Lang, pp. 49–75.Google Scholar
Whitebook, J., 1989, “Intersubjectivity and the Monadic Core of the Psyche: Habermas and Castoriadis on the Unconscious”, in Busino, G.. (eds), Autonomie et autotransformation de la société. La philosophie militante de Cornelius Castoriadis, Geneva, Libraire Droz, pp. 225–45.Google Scholar
Wingo, A. H., 2003, Veil Politics in Liberal Democratic States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1961, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Eng. trans. by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, London, Routledge (1995, Tractatus logico-philosophicus, in Werkausgabe, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, vol. I, pp. 7–87).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1967, Zettel, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1969, On Certainty, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1974, Philosophical Grammar, Eng. trans. by A. Kenny, Oxford, Blackwell (1969, Philosophische Grammatik, ed. by R. Rhees, Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1976, Philosophical Investigations, Eng. trans, by G. E. M. Ascombe, Oxford, Blackwell (1995, Philosophische Untersuchungen, in Werkausgabe, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, vol. I, pp. 225–581).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1979, Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, Eng. trans. A. C. Miles, Retford, Brynmill.Google Scholar
Wolin, R., 1990, “Carl Schmitt, Political Existentialism and the Total State”, in Theory and Society, 19, pp. 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanarella, E. J., and Siegelman, L. (eds), 1988, Political Mythology and Popular Fiction, New York, Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Young, R., 1990, White Mythologies: Writing History and the West, London, Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Chiara Bottici, Università degli Studi, Florence
  • Book: A Philosophy of Political Myth
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498626.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Chiara Bottici, Università degli Studi, Florence
  • Book: A Philosophy of Political Myth
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498626.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Chiara Bottici, Università degli Studi, Florence
  • Book: A Philosophy of Political Myth
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498626.018
Available formats
×