Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 37
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Stanton, Juliet and Zukoff, Sam 2018. Prosodic identity in copy epenthesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 637.

    Al-Tamimi, Jalal 2017. Revisiting acoustic correlates of pharyngealization in Jordanian and Moroccan Arabic: Implications for formal representations. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 28.

    Mudzingwa, Calisto 2017. Spreading as a hiatus resolution strategy in Shona. Language Matters, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 147.

    BENNETT, RYAN 2017. Output optimization in the Irish plural system. Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 53, Issue. 02, p. 229.

    Mirshahidi, Shahriar 2017. I find you attractive but I don’t trust you: the case of language attitudes in Iran. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 146.

    Freeman, Aaron 2016. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVII. Vol. 3, Issue. , p. 171.

    Hayes-Harb, Rachel and Durham, Kristie 2016. Native English Speakers’ Perception of Arabic Emphatic Consonants and the Influence of Vowel Context. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 557.

    Anderson, Stephen R. 2016. Synchronic Versus Diachronic Explanation and the Nature of the Language Faculty. Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 11.

    Ragheb, Marwa and Davis, Stuart 2014. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVI. Vol. 2, Issue. , p. 263.

    Al-Solami, Majed 2013. Arabic Emphatics: Phonetic and Phonological Remarks. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, Vol. 03, Issue. 04, p. 314.

    de Lacy, Paul and Kingston, John 2013. Synchronic explanation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 287.

    Berent, Iris Wilson, Colin Marcus, Gary F. and Bemis, Douglas K. 2012. On the Role of Variables in Phonology: Remarks on Hayes and Wilson 2008. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Rice, Keren 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Mielke, Jeff 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    2011. The Handbook of Phonological Theory. p. 779.

    Miller, Amanda 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Uffmann, Christian 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Yu, Alan C. L. 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Kadenge, Maxwell and Mudzingwa, Calisto 2011. Diphthong simplification through spreading: An Optimality Theory account. Language Matters, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 142.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1994
  • Online publication date: February 2010

12 - The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals

Summary

Introduction

An adequate theory of phonological distinctive features must meet four criteria: (i) it must have a relatively consistent and direct relation to the phonetic properties of speech sounds; (ii) it must be able to describe all and only the distinctions made by the sound systems of any of the world's languages; (iii) it must be able to characterize all and only the natural classes of sounds that recur in the phonological phenomena of different languages; and (iv) it must correctly characterize the subgrouping of features by recurrent phonological phenomena. The third criterion is the most important one and probably the hardest to achieve. The fourth has assumed greater importance in the last five years or so in the context of work on feature geometry (Clements 1985; Sagey 1986; and others).

The Semitic languages have many consonants produced with a primary constriction in the posterior regions of the vocal tract. Traditional grammars refer to these consonants as “gutturals.” Standard Arabic and most modern Arabic dialects have retained the full set of gutturals usually reconstructed for Proto-Semitic: laryngeals ʔ and h; pharyngeals ħ and ʕ; and uvulars χ and ʁ. Other Semitic languages, as well as several other branches of the larger Afro-Asiatic family, have similar or smaller inventories of gutturals.

The phonology of the various Semitic languages provides a remarkable range of evidence that the gutturals are treated as a natural class by phonological rules. This can be shown through independent developments in the various languages at different historical periods and in different areas of the phonology.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form
  • Online ISBN: 9780511659461
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659461
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×