Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Myers, Scott Selkirk, Elisabeth and Fainleib, Yelena 2018. Phonetic implementation of high-tone spans in Luganda. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 19.

    Türk, Helen Lippus, Pärtel and Šimko, Juraj 2017. Context-dependent articulation of consonant gemination in Estonian. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 26.

    Shaw, Jason A. and Kawahara, Shigeto 2017. Effects of Surprisal and Entropy on Vowel Duration in Japanese. Language and Speech, p. 002383091773733.

    Šimko, Juraj O'Dell, Michael and Vainio, Martti 2014. Emergent consonantal quantity contrast and context-dependence of gestural phasing. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 44, Issue. , p. 130.

    GROSVALD, MICHAEL and CORINA, DAVID 2012. Perception of long-distance coarticulation: An event-related potential and behavioral study. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 33, Issue. 01, p. 55.

    Beňuš, Štefan 2011. Control of phonemic length contrast and speech rate in vocalic and consonantal syllable nuclei. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 130, Issue. 4, p. 2116.

    2010. From Speech Physiology to Linguistic Phonetics. p. 179.

    Pycha, Anne 2010. A test case for the phonetics–phonology interface: gemination restrictions in Hungarian. Phonology, Vol. 27, Issue. 01, p. 119.

    Grosvald, Michael 2010. Long-Distance Coarticulation in Spoken and Signed Language: An Overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 4, Issue. 6, p. 348.

    Shaw, Jason Gafos, Adamantios I. Hoole, Philip and Zeroual, Chakir 2009. Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: evidence from patterns of temporal stability in articulation*. Phonology, Vol. 26, Issue. 01, p. 187.

    Löfqvist, Anders 2006. Interarticulator programming: Effects of closure duration on lip and tongue coordination in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 120, Issue. 5, p. 2872.

    Kingston, John 1999. Extrapolating from Spoken to Signed Prosody via Laboratory Phonology. Language and Speech, Vol. 42, Issue. 2-3, p. 251.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1995
  • Online publication date: May 2011

15 - Prosodic patterns in the coordination of vowel and consonant gestures

Summary

Both autosegmental representations (e.g. McCarthy, 1981, 1982, 1989; Prince, 1987; Archangeli, 1985; Steriade, 1986) and analyses of articulatory and acoustic data (e.g. Joos, 1948; Öhman, 1966, 1967; Fowler, 1980, 1981, 1983) suggest that vowels and consonants can appear independent of one another. In phenomena such as vowel harmony, phonological processes involving vowels sometimes operate as if an intervocalic consonant were absent; likewise, consonantal harmony processes or co-occurrence restrictions may ignore intervening vowels. In speech production, it has been suggested that there are distinct, identifiable vowels and consonants, but that the two classes of sounds may be produced at least partially simultaneously. It is hypothesized that these periods of simultaneous production (“coproduction”, as discussed in Fowler, 1980) are responsible for the context-dependent influences of vowels on consonants, and vice versa.

This study focuses on the organization of the temporal relations between vowels and consonants. It is proposed that languages may choose among alternative ways of coordinating vowels and consonants, and that these alternatives underlie differing prosodic properties that languages exhibit, such as the timing patterns traditionally described as stress-, syllable- or mora-timing. The approach taken here involves defining consonants and vowels in terms of articulatory gestures, following Browman and Goldstein's Articulatory Phonology (e.g. Browman & Goldstein, 1986, 1992). This framework provides a phonological description that explicitly specifies how consonants and vowels are produced, making it possible to predict how differences in articulatory coordination could result in different prosodic characteristics.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Phonology and Phonetic Evidence
  • Online ISBN: 9780511554315
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554315
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×