Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:09:19.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Advocate Evidence-based policing for crime prevention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Brandon C. Welsh
Edited by
David Weisburd  and
Anthony A. Braga
Brandon C. Welsh
Affiliation:
Associate Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice University of Massachusetts Lowell
David Weisburd
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In recent weeks Big City has experienced an increase in young people selling drugs on the street. The police chief directs one of his managers to organize a small group of officers to look into the matter and report back with a plan of action. One of these officers is tasked with researching what works to address the problem of street-level drug sales. The officer carries out literature searches, contacts other police departments and police research organizations such as the Police Foundation, and follows up with some of the researchers involved in evaluation studies. The most rigorous evaluations are coded according to the outcomes of interest, results are analyzed, and a report is prepared that shows what type of intervention works best. Detailed observational and other information on the problem gathered by the other officers is used to assess the applicability of the “best practice” to the local context and conditions. On the basis of this information, the chief authorizes the needed resources for a program to be implemented to address street-level drug sales, and introduces a monitoring and evaluation scheme to aid in-house policy and for dissemination purposes.

This fictitious scenario, while brief on details, is an example of evidence-based policing in action. Evidence-based policing involves the police using the highest quality available research evidence on what works best to reduce a specific crime problem and tailoring the intervention to the local context and conditions. This approach likely holds wide appeal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
 , pp. 305 - 321
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayley, D. H. (1998). Introduction: Effective law enforcement. In Bayley, D. H. (ed.), What works in policing (pp. 174–177). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blumstein, A. and Wallman, J. (eds.). (2000). The crime drop in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A. A. (2003). Personal communication, November 19, 2003.
Braga, A. A. (2005). Policing crime hot spots. In Welsh, B. C. and Farrington, D. P. (eds.), Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims, and places. New York: Springer, in press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, I. (2003). Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: The role of rigorous, transparent, up-to-date evaluations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V. (ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies, 2nd ed. Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.Google Scholar
Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2002). Preventing crime at places. In Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., and MacKenzie, D. L. (eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 241–294). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, J. E. and Maguire, E. R. (2000). Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In Blumstein, A. and Wallman, J. (eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 207–265). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ekblom, P. (2002). From the source to the mainstream is uphill: The challenge of transferring knowledge of crime prevention through replication, innovation and anticipation. In Tilley, N. (ed.), Analysis for crime prevention: Crime prevention studies, 13 (pp. 131–203). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1983). Randomized experiments on crime and justice. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and justice: Annual review of research, 4 (pp. 257–308). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Gottfredson, D. C., Sherman, L. W., and Welsh, B. C. (2002). The Maryland scientific methods scale. In Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., and MacKenzie, D. L. (eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 13–21). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, M. and Tilley, N. (1998). Getting the grease to the squeak: Research lessons for crime prevention. Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 85. London: Home Office Police Research Group.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. R., Li, S., Larson, D. B., and McCullough, M. (2000). A systematic review of the religiosity and delinquency literature: A research note. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16, 32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. M. (1997). Pulling levers: Chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 449–484.Google Scholar
Lab, S. P. (2003). Let's put it in context. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddle, H. A., Rowe, C. L., Quille, T. J., Dakof, G. A., Mills, D. S., Sakran, E., and Biaggi, H. (2002). Transporting a research-based adolescent drug treatment into practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. and Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. L. (1998). Using the US land-grant university system as a model to attack this nation's crime problem. The Criminologist, 23 (2), 1, 3–4.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., Rogan, D., Frank, J., Famega, C., and Eck, J. E. (2002). Managing citizen calls to the police: The impact of Baltimore's 3-1-1 call system. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millenson, M. L. (1997). Demanding medical excellence: Doctors and accountability in the information age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mosteller, F. and Boruch, R. (eds.). (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1992). Attacking crime: Policing and crime control. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.), Modern policing. Crime and justice: A review of research, 15 (pp. 159–230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1997). Policing for crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J. E., Reuter, P., and Bushway, S. D., Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising (ch. 8). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Ideas in American policing series. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2003). Misleading evidence and evidence-led policy: Making social science more experimental. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W. and Eck, J. E. (2002). Policing for crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., and MacKenzie, D. L. (eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 295–329). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., and MacKenzie, D. L. (eds.). (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J. E., Reuter, P., and Bushway, S. D. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Tita, G., Riley, K. J., and Greenwood, P. W. (2003). From Boston to Boyle Heights: The process and prospects of a “pulling levers” strategy in a Los Angeles bario. In Decker, S. H. (ed.), Policing gangs and youth violence (pp. 102–130). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. and Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Lum, C. M., and Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 50–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S. D., McNally, A. M., Greenspan, R., and Willis, J. J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. (2002). Technological innovations for policing: Crime prevention as the bottom line. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C. (2003). Community-based approaches to preventing delinquency and crime: Promising results and future directions. Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, 28, 7–24.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. and Farrington, D. P. (2000). Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programs. In Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, 27 (pp. 305–361). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. and Farrington, D. P. (2001). Toward an evidence-based approach to preventing crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P., Sherman, L. W., and MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). What do we know about crime prevention?International Annals of Criminology, 40 (1 and 2), 11–31.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. B. (2001). Meta-analytic methods for criminology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×