Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:35:18.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Making interest: on representation and democratic legitimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Clarissa Rile Hayward
Affiliation:
Washington University
Ian Shapiro
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Susan C. Stokes
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elisabeth Jean Wood
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Alexander S. Kirshner
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Political representation has no necessary link to democratic legitimacy. As Hanna Pitkin (among others) has argued, there are ways of “making present” in a political sense people who are not literally present that stand at odds with basic democratic principles, such as political equality and inclusiveness in collective norm-making (Pitkin 1967: ch. 2). Representation is often considered a means to promoting legitimacy, however, when those who are subject to the norms representatives make first authorize those who represent them, and then hold them accountable for their choices and their actions. Such specifically democratic forms of representation often are understood to promote legitimacy in government under conditions in which all cannot participate directly in norm-making, if and to the extent that they enable and motivate representatives to track the interests of the represented (Przeworski, Stokes, and Manin 1999: 2).

Call this understanding of the democratic value of representation “the conventional view.” Although the conventional view does not provide the only way to understand the link between representation and democratic legitimacy, it provides one important way. In this chapter, I make trouble for the conventional view. In so doing, I join other theorists who have begun the project of rethinking this orthodox understanding of the nature and the value of political representation. David Plotke, for instance, has argued it is not the case that representation is a second-best alternative to direct, participatory democracy: an unfortunate necessity that follows from the complexities of modern political life (Plotke 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Babcock, Frederick Morrison. 1932. The Valuation of Real Estate. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Baxandall, Rosalyn and Ewen, Elizabeth. 2000. Picture Windows: How the Suburbs Happened. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy,” in Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 67–94.Google Scholar
Briffault, Richard. 1990. “Our Localism, Part II – Localism and Legal Theory.” Columbia Law Review 90 (March): 346–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briffault, Richard. 1996. “The Local Government Boundary Problem in Metropolitan Areas.” Stanford Law Review 48 (May): 1115–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1854–6. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol,” in The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, 6 vols., ed. Burke, Edmund. London: Henry G. Bohn, vol. IV.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. 1991. Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael. 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deveaux, Monique. 1999. “Agonism and Pluralism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreier, Peter, Mollenkopf, John, and Swanstrom, Todd. 2004. Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1997. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,” in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–34.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. (ed.). 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
,Federal Housing Agency (FHA). 1938. Underwriting Manual, Underwriting and Valuation Procedure under Title II of the National Housing Act. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, para. 937.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard Thompson. 1994. “The Boundaries of Race: Political Geography in Legal Analysis.” Harvard Law Review 107 (June): 1843–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Richard Thompson. 1999. “Law's Territory (A History of Jurisdiction).” Michigan Law Review 97 (4): 843–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Bernard and Sagalyn, Lynne. 1990. Downtown, Inc.: How America Rebuilds Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fullilove, Mindy Thompson. 2004. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Gelfand, Mark. 1975. A Nation of Cities: The Federal Government and Urban America, 1933–1965. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification,” in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Lenhardt, Christian and Nicholsen, Hierry Weber. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 116–94.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. “Three Normative Models of Democracy,” in Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 21–30.Google Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa. 2000. De-facing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa. 2003. “The Difference States Make: Democracy, Identity, and the American City.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 501–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helper, Rose. 1969. Racial Policies and Practices of Real Estate Brokers. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Arnold. 1998. Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago, 1940–1960, second edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1995. “Toward an Agonistic Feminism: Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Identity,” in Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt, ed. Honig, Bonnie. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 135–66.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth. 1985. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen (ed.). 1999. Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press.
Madison, James. 1969. “Federalist 10,” in The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American Library of World Literature, 77–89.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15 (3): 338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1996. “Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity,” in Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 46–66.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2006. “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Archē, and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas and Denton, Nancy. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1825. Essays on Government, Jurisprudence, Liberty of the Press, and Law of Nations. New York: Kelley.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1975. Considerations on Representative Government, in John Stuart Mill: Three Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1981. “Justice: On Relating Private and Public.” Political Theory 9 (3): 340–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotke, David. 1997. “Representation is Democracy.” Constellations 4 (1): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Carol, and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rehfield, Andrew. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” Journal of Politics, 68 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Gregory. 1994. “Community Reinvestment: The Privatization of Fair Lending Law Enforcement,” in Residential Apartheid: The American Legacy, ed. Bullard, Robert, Grigsby, III J. Eugene, and Lee, Charles. Los Angeles, CA: CAAS, 257–86.Google Scholar
Sugrue, Thomas. 1996. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teaford, Jon. 1990. The Rough Road to Renaissance: Urban Revitalization in America, 1940–1985. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Teaford, Jon. 2000. “Urban Renewal and Its Aftermath.” Housing Policy Debate 11 (2): 443–65.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 1999. “The Agonic Freedom of Citizens.” Economy and Society 28 (2): 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 2000. “Struggles over Recognition and Distribution.” Constellations 7 (4): 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 2002. “The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy.” Modern Law Review 65 (March): 204–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,US Bureau of the Census. 2002. “Preliminary Report No. 1: The 2002 Census of Governments.” Available at: http://ftp2.census.gov/govs/cog/2002COGprelim_report.pdf (accessed June 8, 2009).
Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1996. “Fugitive Democracy,” in Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 31–455.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×